Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: PSYCHOTHERAPY FOR CLIENTS WITH ADDICTIVE DISORDERS NRNP 6645<\/strong><\/a><\/em><\/span><\/h3>\nSUBMISSION INFORMATION<\/h3>\n
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the\u00a0Turnitin Drafts<\/strong>\u00a0from the\u00a0Start Here<\/strong>\u00a0area.<\/p>\n\n- To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as\u00a0WK8Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial<\/strong><\/li>\n
- Then, click on\u00a0Start Assignment <\/strong>near the top of the page.<\/li>\n
- Next, click on\u00a0Upload File <\/strong>and select\u00a0Submit Assignment<\/strong>\u00a0for review.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
PSYCHOTHERAPY FOR CLIENTS WITH ADDICTIVE DISORDERS NRNP 6645 Rubric<\/h3>\n
NRNP_6645_Week8_Assignment_Rubric<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n| NRNP_6645_Week8_Assignment_Rubric<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n |
\nCriteria<\/strong><\/td>\nRatings<\/strong><\/td>\nPts<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n\n\n| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelop a 5- to 10-slide PowerPoint presentation on your selected research article discussing a therapeutic approach for treating clients, families, or groups with addictive disorders.\u2022Provide an overview of the article you selected, including:What population (individual, group, or family) is under consideration?What was the specific intervention that was used? Is this a new intervention or one that was already used?What were the author’s claims?<\/td>\n | \n\n\n\n| 20\u00a0to >17.0\u00a0pts<\/strong><\/p>\n Excellent 90%\u2013100%<\/strong><\/p>\nThe presentation thoroughly and accurately defines the considered population…. The specific intervention used is fully and accurately described. The description clearly indicates whether the intervention is new or whether it was already studied…. The response includes a thorough and accurate description of the author’s claims.<\/td>\n 17\u00a0to >15.0\u00a0pts<\/strong><\/p>\n Good 80%\u201389%<\/strong><\/p>\nThe presentation defines the considered population…. The specific intervention used is described. The description indicates whether the intervention is new or whether it was already studied…. The response includes a description of the author’s claims.<\/td>\n 15\u00a0to >13.0\u00a0pts<\/strong><\/p>\n Fair 70%\u201379%<\/strong><\/p>\nThere is an incomplete definition of the considered population…. The specific intervention used is partially or inaccurately described…. The response includes a partial or inaccurate description of the author’s claims.<\/td>\n 13\u00a0to >0\u00a0pts<\/strong><\/p>\n Poor 0%\u201369%<\/strong><\/p>\nThere is an incomplete definition of the considered population, or it is missing…. The specific intervention used is partially or inaccurately described, or is missing…. The response includes a partial or inaccurate description of the author’s claims, or is missing.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n 20\u00a0pts<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcomeo Explain the findings\/outcomes of the study in the article. Include whether this will translate into practice with your clients. If so, how? If not, why?<\/td>\n | \n\n\n\n| 25\u00a0to >22.0\u00a0pts<\/strong><\/p>\n Excellent 90%\u2013100%<\/strong><\/p>\nThe presentation includes a thorough and accurate review of the findings of the selected article…. The response fully addresses whether or not the outcomes will translate into practice with clients.<\/td>\n 22\u00a0to >19.0\u00a0pts<\/strong><\/p>\n Good 80%\u201389%<\/strong><\/p>\nThe presentation includes a review of the findings of the selected article…. The response addresses whether or not the outcomes will translate into practice with clients.<\/td>\n 19\u00a0to >17.0\u00a0pts<\/strong><\/p>\n Fair 70%\u201379%<\/strong><\/p>\nThe presentation includes a somewhat inaccurate or incomplete review of the findings of the selected article…. The response partially or inaccurately addresses whether or not the outcomes will translate into practice with clients.<\/td>\n 17\u00a0to >0\u00a0pts<\/strong><\/p>\n Poor 0%\u201369%<\/strong><\/p>\nThe presentation includes an inaccurate and incomplete review of the findings of the selected article, or is missing…. The response partially or inaccurately addresses whether or not the outcomes will translate into practice with clients, or is missing.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n 25\u00a0pts<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome\u2022 Explain whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings\/outcomes presented in the article.<\/td>\n | \n\n\n\n| 25\u00a0to >22.0\u00a0pts<\/strong><\/p>\n Excellent 90%\u2013100%<\/strong><\/p>\nThe presentation includes a thorough and accurate explanation of the whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings presented in the article.<\/td>\n 22\u00a0to >19.0\u00a0pts<\/strong><\/p>\n Good 80%\u201389%<\/strong><\/p>\nThe presentation includes an explanation of the whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings presented in the article.<\/td>\n 19\u00a0to >17.0\u00a0pts<\/strong><\/p>\n Fair 70%\u201379%<\/strong><\/p>\nThe presentation includes a somewhat inaccurate or incomplete explanation of the whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings presented in the article.<\/td>\n 17\u00a0to >0\u00a0pts<\/strong><\/p>\n Poor 0%\u201369%<\/strong><\/p>\nThe presentation includes an inaccurate or incomplete explanation of the whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings presented in the article, or is missing.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n 25\u00a0pts<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome\u2022Use the Notes function of PowerPoint to craft presenter notes to expand upon the content of your slides.<\/td>\n | \n\n\n\n| 10\u00a0to >8.0\u00a0pts<\/strong><\/p>\n Excellent 90%\u2013100%<\/strong><\/p>\nThe Notes function of the presentation is appropriately used to comprehensively expand upon the presentation slides.<\/td>\n 8\u00a0to >7.0\u00a0pts<\/strong><\/p>\n Good 80%\u201389%<\/strong><\/p>\nThe Notes function of the presentation is adequately used to expand upon the presentation slides.<\/td>\n 7\u00a0to >6.0\u00a0pts<\/strong><\/p>\n Fair 70%\u201379%<\/strong><\/p>\nThe Notes function of the presentation is utilized but notes are vague or contain small inaccuracies.<\/td>\n 6\u00a0to >0\u00a0pts<\/strong><\/p>\n Poor 0%\u201369%<\/strong><\/p>\nThe Notes function of the presentation partially or inaccurately expands upon the presentation slides, or is not included.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n 10\u00a0pts<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome\u2022 Support your response with at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources. Explain why each of your supporting sources is scholarly. References are included on your last slide.<\/td>\n | \n\n\n\n| 10\u00a0to >8.0\u00a0pts<\/strong><\/p>\n Excellent 90%\u2013100%<\/strong><\/p>\nThe presentation is strongly supported with at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based, scholarly sources. References are included on the last slide.<\/td>\n 8\u00a0to >7.0\u00a0pts<\/strong><\/p>\n Good 80%\u201389%<\/strong><\/p>\nThe presentation is supported with at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based, scholarly sources. References are included on the last slide.<\/td>\n 7\u00a0to >6.0\u00a0pts<\/strong><\/p>\n Fair 70%\u201379%<\/strong><\/p>\nThe presentation is supported with two or three peer-reviewed, evidence-based, scholarly sources. Accurate references may not be included on the last slide.<\/td>\n 6\u00a0to >0\u00a0pts<\/strong><\/p>\n Poor 0%\u201369%<\/strong><\/p>\nThe presentation is not supported with resources peer-reviewed, evidence-based, scholarly sources, and\/or the reference list is missing.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n 10\u00a0pts<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Style and Organization: Slides are clear and not overly crowded. Sentences in presenter notes are carefully focused\u2014neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.<\/td>\n | \n\n\n\n| 5\u00a0to >4.0\u00a0pts<\/strong><\/p>\n Excellent 90%\u2013100%<\/strong><\/p>\nSlides are clear, concise, and visually appealing. Sentences in presenter notes follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.<\/td>\n 4\u00a0to >3.5\u00a0pts<\/strong><\/p>\n Good 80%\u201389%<\/strong><\/p>\nSlides are clear and concise. Sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.<\/td>\n 3.5\u00a0to >3.0\u00a0pts<\/strong><\/p>\n Fair 70%\u201379%<\/strong><\/p>\nSlides may be somewhat unorganized or crowded. Sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%\u201379% of the time.<\/td>\n 3\u00a0to >0\u00a0pts<\/strong><\/p>\n Poor 0%\u201369%<\/strong><\/p>\nSlides are unorganized and\/or crowded. Sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n 5\u00a0pts<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation<\/td>\n | \n\n\n\n| 5\u00a0to >4.0\u00a0pts<\/strong><\/p>\n Excellent 90%\u2013100%<\/strong><\/p>\nUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.<\/td>\n 4\u00a0to >3.5\u00a0pts<\/strong><\/p>\n Good 80%\u201389%<\/strong><\/p>\nContains 1 or 2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<\/td>\n 3.5\u00a0to >3.0\u00a0pts<\/strong><\/p>\n Fair 70%\u201379%<\/strong><\/p>\nContains 3 or 4 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.<\/td>\n 3\u00a0to >0\u00a0pts<\/strong><\/p>\n Poor 0%\u201369%<\/strong><\/p>\nContains many (\u2265 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader\u2019s understanding.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/td>\n 5\u00a0pts<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | \n| Total Points:\u00a0100<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n As we begin this session, I would like to take this opportunity to clarify my expectations for this course:<\/p>\n Please note that GCU Online weeks run from Thursday (Day 1) through Wednesday (Day 7).<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Course Room Etiquette<\/strong>:<\/p>\n\n- It is my expectation that all learners will respect the thoughts and ideas presented in the discussions.<\/li>\n
- All postings should be presented in a respectful, professional manner.\u00a0Remember \u2013 different points of view add richness and depth to the course!<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
<\/p>\n Office Hours:<\/em><\/p>\n\n- My office hours vary so feel free to shoot me an email at\u00a0<\/u>Dellorusso1@my.gcu.edu or my office phone is 602.639.6517\u00a0and I will get back to you within one business day or as soon as possible.<\/li>\n
- Phone appointments can be scheduled as well. Send me an email and the best time to call you, along with your phone number to make an appointment.<\/li>\n
- I welcome all inquiries and questions as we spend this term together. My preference is that everyone utilizes the\u00a0Questions to Instructor forum<\/em>. In the event your question is of a personal nature, please feel free to post in the\u00a0Individual Questions for Instructor forum<\/em>I will respond to all posts or emails within 24 or sooner.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
<\/p>\n Late Policy and Grading Policy<\/em><\/p>\nDiscussion questions:<\/p>\n \n- I do not mark off for late DQ\u2019s.<\/li>\n
- I would rather you take the time to read the materials and respond to the DQ\u2019s in a scholarly way, demonstrating your understanding of the materials.<\/li>\n
- I will not accept any DQ submissions after day 7, 11:59 PM (AZ Time) of the week.<\/li>\n
- Individual written assignments – due by 11:59 PM AZ Time Zone on the due dates indicated for each class deliverable.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Assignments:<\/em><\/p>\n\n- Assignments turned in after their specified due dates are subject to a late penalty of -10%, each day late, of the available credit.\u00a0Please refer to the student academic handbook and GCU policy.<\/strong><\/li>\n
- Any activity or assignment submitted after the due date will be subject to GCU\u2019s late policy<\/li>\n
- Extenuating circumstances may justify exceptions, which are at my sole discretion. If an extenuating circumstance should arise, please contact me privately as soon as possible.<\/li>\n
- No assignments can be accepted for grading after midnight on the final day of class.<\/li>\n
- All assignments will be graded in accordance with the Assignment Grading Rubrics<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Participation<\/em><\/p>\n\n- Participation in each week\u2019s Discussion Board forum accounts for a large percentage of your final grade in this course.<\/li>\n
- Please review the Course Syllabus for a comprehensive overview of course deliverables and the value associated with each.<\/li>\n
- It is my expectation that each of you will substantially contribute to the course discussion forums and respond to the posts of at least three other learners.<\/li>\n
- A\u00a0substantive post should be at least 200 words<\/strong>. Responses such as \u201cgreat posts\u201d or \u201cI agree\u201d\u00a0do not<\/u>meet the active engagement expectation.<\/li>\n
- Please feel free to draw on personal examples as you develop your responses to the Discussion Questions but you do need to demonstrate your understanding of the materials.<\/li>\n
- I do expect outside sources as well as class materials to formulate your post.<\/li>\n
- APA format is not necessary for DQ responses, but I do expect a proper citation for references.<\/li>\n
- Please use peer-related journals found through the GCU library and\/or class materials to formulate your answers. Do not try to “Google” DQ’s as I am looking for class materials and examples from the weekly materials.<\/li>\n
- I\u00a0<\/strong>will not accept responses that are from Wikipedia, Business\u00a0com<\/a>, or other popular business websites. You will not receive credit for generic web searches \u2013 this does not demonstrate graduate-level research.<\/li>\n
- Stay away from the use of personal pronouns when writing.<\/u>As a graduate student, you are expected to write based on research and gathering of facts. Demonstrating your understanding of the materials is what you will be graded on. You will be marked down for lack of evidence to support your ideas.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Plagiarism<\/em><\/p>\n\n- Plagiarism is the act of claiming credit for another’s work, accomplishments, or ideas without appropriate acknowledgment of the source of the information by including in-text citations and references.<\/li>\n
- This course requires the utilization of APA format for all course deliverables as noted in the course syllabus.<\/strong><\/li>\n
- Whether this happens deliberately or inadvertently, whenever plagiarism has occurred, you have committed a Code of Conduct violation.<\/li>\n
- Please review your LopesWrite report prior to final submission.<\/li>\n
- Every act of plagiarism, no matter the severity, must be reported to the GCU administration (this includes your DQ\u2019s, posts to your peers, and your papers).<\/em><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Plagiarism includes<\/em>:<\/p>\n\n- Representing the ideas, expressions, or materials of another without due credit.<\/li>\n
- Paraphrasing or condensing ideas from another person\u2019s work without proper citation and referencing.<\/li>\n
- Failing to document direct quotations without proper citation and referencing.<\/li>\n
- Depending upon the amount, severity, and frequency of the plagiarism that is committed, students may receive in-class penalties that range from coaching (for a minor omission), -20% grade penalties for resubmission, or zero credit for a specific assignment. University-level penalties may also occur, including suspension or even expulsion from the University.<\/li>\n
- If you are at all uncertain about what constitutes plagiarism, you should review the resources available in the Student Success Center. Also, please review the University\u2019s policies about plagiarism which are covered in more detail in the GCU Catalog and the Student Handbook.<\/li>\n
- We will be utilizing the GCU APA Style Guide 7th edition located in the Student Success Center > The Writing Center for all course deliverables.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
LopesWrite<\/em><\/p>\n\n- All course assignments must be uploaded to the specific Module Assignment Drop Box, and also submitted to LopesWrite\u00a0every week.<\/li>\n
- Please ensure that your assignment is uploaded to both locations under the Assignments DropBox. Detailed instructions for using LopesWrite\u00a0are located in the Student Success Center.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Assignment Submissions<\/em><\/p>\n\n- Please note that Microsoft Office is the software requirement at GCU.<\/li>\n
- I can open Word files or any file that is saved with a .rtf (Rich Text Format) extension. I am unable to open .wps files.<\/li>\n
- If you are using a \u201c.wps\u201d word processor, please save your files using the .rtf extension that is available from the drop-down box before uploading your files to the Assignment Drop Box.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
![\"PSYCHOTHERAPY](\"https:\/\/nursingassignmentcrackers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/PSYCHOTHERAPY-FOR-CLIENTS-WITH-ADDICTIVE-DISORDERS-NRNP-6645-300x112.png\")