Sample Answer for LOCATING AND CRITICALLY ANALYZING PRIMARY RESEARCH ARTICLES NURS 8002 Included After Question<\/strong><\/h2>\nWhat steps do you take to locate primary and peer-reviewed research articles when performing a literature search?<\/p>\n
What resources are available to you to engage in a meaningful and successful literature search?<\/p>\n
As you have explored throughout this course, Walden University provides vast resources for student support to ensure success in their academic program of study. When it comes to research and using Library resources, several support mechanisms are available to you as well.<\/p>\n
Taking the first step to think about a research topic or area of interest and filtering that topic using a series of keywords and operations will be a fundamental component for performing a literature search in Walden Library\u2019s databases. While the ultimate goal is to produce a set or results that match your search criteria, you must keep in mind that that the quality of the research articles obtained will likely vary. Thus, you must critically examine and analyze the aims of the research produced and how it aligns, confirms, or negates your topic or area of research. As you develop proficiency in this area, you will discover that you can extract content themes and frameworks to enhance future research and the need to identify additional research support.<\/p>\n
For this Assignment, consult the Walden Library webinars and resources provided. These resources serve as a general good first step for performing literature searches and engaging with the databases of research available to you. Think about a research topic or area of interest to focus on for this Assignment. Then, search the Walden Library to locate and retrieve peer-reviewed research articles that pertain to your topic or area of interest.<\/p>\n
RESOURCES<\/h2>\n
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
\nClick the weekly resources link to access the resources.<\/p>\n
WEEKLY RESOURCES<\/strong><\/a><\/h2>\nTO PREPARE:<\/h3>\n\n- Review the Walden Library webinars presented in the media Learning Resources for this week.<\/li>\n
- Then, search the Walden Library and locate three peer-reviewed primary research articles that pertain to your practice area and are of particular interest to you.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
THE ASSIGNMENT: (6 PARAGRAPHS)<\/h2>\n
Write a 6-paragraph APA-formatted paper in which you do the following:<\/p>\n
\n- Write a 1-pararaph introduction of how you conducted your literature search and the databases consulted in your search in relation to your practice area or area of interest. Be specific and provide examples.<\/li>\n
- Write a 1-paragraph summary of each of the articles you have selected (a total of 3 paragraphs).<\/li>\n
- Write 1 paragraph that\u00a0synthesizes<\/em>the three articles using a scholarly voice.<\/li>\n
- Write a final paragraph in which you discuss the differences between summarizing and synthesizing research. Be specific and provide examples.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Reminder:<\/strong>\u00a0The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at\u00a0https:\/\/academicguides.waldenu.edu\/writingcenter\/templates\/general#s-lg-box-20293632<\/a>). All papers submitted must use this formatting.<\/p>\nBY DAY 7 OF WEEK 9<\/h2>\n
Submit<\/strong>\u00a0your Assignment by\u00a0Day 7 of Week 9<\/strong>.<\/p>\nSUBMISSION INFORMATION<\/h2>\n
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the\u00a0Turnitin Drafts<\/strong>\u00a0from the\u00a0Start Here<\/strong>\u00a0area.<\/p>\n\n- To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as\u00a0M4Assgn+last name+first initial.<\/strong><\/li>\n
- Then, click on\u00a0Start Assignment<\/strong>\u00a0near the top of the page.<\/li>\n
- Next, click on\u00a0Upload File<\/strong>\u00a0and select\u00a0Submit Assignment<\/strong>\u00a0for review.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: LOCATING AND CRITICALLY ANALYZING PRIMARY RESEARCH ARTICLES NURS 8002<\/strong><\/h2>\nTitle: <\/strong> LOCATING AND CRITICALLY ANALYZING PRIMARY RESEARCH ARTICLES NURS 8002<\/strong><\/h2>\nOne of the major activities that a DNP nurse participates in is research, usually evidence-based research. As indicated earlier, my interest is in researching reducing catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI). This condition is a clinical issue that needs to be mitigated to ensure that the patients have better health outcomes. This write-entails a summary and synthesis of two peer-reviewed articles obtained through the Walden Library search pertaining to reducing catheter-associated urinary tract infections.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nSummary of The Articles<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h2>\nOne of the articles with the title \u201c<\/span>Chlorhexidine for meatal cleaning in reducing catheter-associated urinary tract infections: a multicentre stepped-wedge randomized controlled trial\u201d reported by Fasugba et al<\/span>. (2019) entails reducing CAUTI. The report compares the efficacy of the use of normal saline and 0.1% chlorhexidine solution in cleaning the meatal area prior to inserting urinary catheters in lowering the incidences of CAUTI. The study used a cross-sectional randomized control trial in the hospitals for a period of three weeks, with a total of 1642 research subjects recruited in three hospitals (<\/span>Fasugba et al., 2019)<\/span>. While 58% of them were in the intervention period, the remaining 42% were in the control phase. Among the findings is that among the control group, 13 cases of CAUTI were recorded as compared to only 4 cases among the intervention group; hence the intervention was connected to a 94% reduction of the rates of catheter-associated urinary tract infections.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nMore recently, a study has been reported by <\/span>Nassikas et al<\/span>. (2020) with the title “<\/span>Intensive care unit rounding checklists to reduce catheter-associated urinary tract infections\u201d This study purposed to determine whether the use of rounding checklist in an intensive care unit lowers the incidences of catheter-associated urinary tract infections. These researchers used a retrospective before-and-after study design. Done in an academic community hospital with a 16 bed ICU unit, the intervention used was an ICU rounding checklist which ensured that the caregivers addressed the use of the indwelling catheters. Analysis was then done to compare the pre-intervention duration with the post-intervention after implementing the checklist. Pre and post-intervention strategy is one of the best ways of determining the efficacy of an intervention in the management of a condition or disease (Spurlock, 2018).\u00a0 Among the findings obtained from the research is that before the intervention, the unit recorded nineteen CAUTI cases per one thousand catheter days. The rate was found to reduce to 2.12 after the intervention from 4.62 before the implementation of the checklist.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nSynthesis of The Sources<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h2>\nThe findings of Fasugba et al. (2019) implies that by taking care of the meatal area through thorough cleaning, the rates of CAUTI incidences can greatly be reduced. By employing the normal intervention of using the 0.9% saline solution, whose efficacy has also been shown in previous studies (Khahakaew et al., 2019), this current research was able to demonstrate that the use of <\/span>0.1% chlorhexidine solution is more efficacious hence introducing better evidence to practice. Indeed, the findings are in agreement with other studies (<\/span>Mitchell et al., 2019). However, the findings also differ from other reports where the use of chlorhexidine did not lead to lower incidences of CAUTI, even though that study was a single-site randomized control site.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nSeveral interventions exist for controlling CAUTI. Patients at the ICU particularly need to be free from the infections to give them a better chance of healing; therefore, the study by Nassikas et al. (2020) is significant. They were able to demonstrate that using the checklist in the ICU setting can be vital. These findings can be generalizable in an ICU setting in other locations since the intervention focuses on just using a checklist. It is important to note that this intervention is relatively cost effective, even though at first it may lead to increased use of indwelling catheters, eventually it allows for lower usage rates. The findings are also supported by other studies. For instance, a study done to combine checklist and education intervention effectively reduced the rates of CAUTI (Menegueti et al., 2019).<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n![\"LOCATING](\"http:\/\/nursingassignmentcrackers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/Capture-3-1-300x90.png\")
LOCATING AND CRITICALLY ANALYZING PRIMARY RESEARCH ARTICLES NURS 8002<\/figcaption><\/figure>\nReferences<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h2>\nFasugba, O., Cheng, A. C., Gregory, V., Graves, N., Koerner, J., Collignon, P., … & Mitchell, B. G. (2019). Chlorhexidine for meatal cleaning in reducing catheter-associated urinary tract infections: a multicentre stepped-wedge randomised controlled trial.\u202f<\/span>The Lancet Infectious Diseases<\/span><\/i>,\u202f<\/span>19<\/span><\/i>(6), 611-619. Doi:<\/span> 10.1016\/S1473-3099(18)30736-9<\/span><\/a>.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nKhahakaew, S., Suwanpimolkul, G., Wongkeskij, T., Punakabutra, N., & Suankratay, C. (2019, October). 1151. A Comparison of Periurethral Cleaning Between Normal Saline and Savlon Solutions Before Indwelling Urinary Catheterization in Reducing Catheter-Associated Bacteriuria: A Randomized Controlled Study. In\u202f<\/span>Open Forum Infectious Diseases<\/span><\/i>\u202f(Vol. 6, No. Supplement_2, pp. S411-S411). US: Oxford University Press. <\/span>https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/ofid\/ofz360.1015<\/span><\/a>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nMenegueti, M. G., Ciol, M. A., Bellissimo-Rodrigues, F., Auxiliadora-Martins, M., Gaspar, G. G., da Silva Canini, S. R. M., … & Laus, A. M. (2019). Long-term prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections among critically ill patients through the implementation of an educational program and a daily checklist for maintenance of indwelling urinary catheters: a quasi-experimental study.\u202f<\/span>Medicine<\/span><\/i>,\u202f<\/span>98<\/span><\/i>(8). Doi <\/span>10.1097\/MD.0000000000014417<\/span><\/a>.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nMitchell, B. G., Fasugba, O., Cheng, A. C., Gregory, V., Koerner, J., Collignon, P., … & Graves, N. (2019). Chlorhexidine versus saline in reducing the risk of catheter associated urinary tract infection: a cost-effectiveness analysis.\u202f<\/span>International journal of nursing studies<\/span><\/i>,\u202f<\/span>97<\/span><\/i>, 1-6. <\/span>https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijnurstu.2019.04.003<\/span><\/a>.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nNassikas, N. J., Monteiro, J. F. G., Pashnik, B., Lynch, J., Carino, G., & Levinson, A. T. (2020). Intensive Care Unit Rounding Checklists to Reduce Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections.\u202f<\/span>Infection control and hospital epidemiology<\/span><\/i>,\u202f<\/span>41<\/span><\/i>(6), 680-683.\u00a0 Doi:<\/span> 10.1017\/ice.2020.43<\/span><\/a>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nSpurlock Jr, D. R. (2018). The single-group, pre-and posttest design in nursing education research: It’s time to move on.\u202f<\/span>Journal of Nursing Education<\/span><\/i>,\u202f<\/span>57<\/span><\/i>(2), 69-71. Doi: <\/span>https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3928\/01484834-20180123-02<\/span><\/a>.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nA Sample Answer 2 For the Assignment: LOCATING AND CRITICALLY ANALYZING PRIMARY RESEARCH ARTICLES NURS 8002<\/strong><\/h2>\nTitle: <\/strong> LOCATING AND CRITICALLY ANALYZING PRIMARY RESEARCH ARTICLES NURS 8002<\/strong><\/h2>\nStudents pursuing advanced nursing education require and should develop research skills so that they can locate and critically analyze articles to attain evidence for implementation in their practice settings. Through this approach, they attain not just success in nursing research but also advance in their careers as well-informed practitioners who leverage evidence-based practice (EBP) interventions to offer patient-centered care and reduce hospital readmission (Charosaei et al., 2021). The Walden University library offers resources and databases for advanced nursing students to conduct research and locate scholarly articles. Imperatively, through these databases which include PubMed Central, Medline, and CINAHL as well as BMC Central, one can locate articles on the topic of interest using keywords or terms. The purpose of this paper is to locate and analyze three articles from online resources provided by the identified databases or journals, summarize, and synthesize them from a scholarly perspective. In its final part, the paper explores the differences between summarizing and synthesizing research articles.<\/p>\n
Article 1<\/strong><\/h2>\nThe first article is by Bokhour et al. (2018) and focuses on strategies that healthcare organizations can implement to offer patient-centered care. According to the authors, a core part of implementing patient-centered care (PCC) is transforming the organization’s culture of care. Using the Department of Veterans Affairs, the authors conducted qualitative semi-structured interviews with employees to identify various factors that help entities to offer patient-centered care like effective leadership, patient and family engagement, engaging the staff, and focusing on innovation among other aspects. In their conclusion, the authors are categorical that an effective organizational culture is key to offering patient-centered care.<\/p>\n
Article 2<\/strong><\/h2>\nThe article by Hower et al. (2019) explores the organizational determinants from decision makers\u2019 point-of-view on implementing patient-centered care. Using a qualitative approach across different health and social care organizations (HSCOs), the authors found that various aspects were important and determined the level of patient-centered care (PCC) that each facility can offer. Among these include effective communication among staff, addressing staff welfare to motivate them, and overcoming resource constraints, especially financial and human resource issues. The authors conclude by imploring HSCOs to tailor their interventions based on their situations to meet these needs.<\/p>\n
Article 3<\/strong><\/h2>\nThe third article by Rammohan et al. (2023) discusses the implementation of care transition teams to reduce hospital readmission and enhance patient outcomes. Using a two-phase study approach to investigate readmission rates and associated risk factors in a community hospital for about five years, and a care transition team after discharge and patient support to evaluate the social determinants of health (SDOHs). As such, the authors emphasize the critical role that care transition teams play in lowering the rates of hospital readmissions rates and mitigating the financial strain on healthcare organizations. The researchers assert that hospitals through care transition teams can lower the overall readmission rates by identifying and addressing individual risk factors that include evaluation of social determinants of health (SDOHs).<\/p>\n
Synthesis of the Articles<\/strong><\/h2>\nThe three articles emphasize the need for healthcare organizations to develop and implement effective strategies aimed at providing patient-centered care that can reduce hospital readmissions. According to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) (2020), patient-tailored interventions lead to increased participation of patients in their care plans and management of their condition. Tailoring these interventions ensures that patients get quality care based on care transition teams to reduce possible readmissions. Through these articles, one can identify the relationship between patient-centered care and reduced rates of readmissions, especially within the first thirty days after discharge. The articles are categorical that providing patient-centered care leads to improved care quality and reduces the possibility of readmissions.<\/p>\n
Differences Between Summary and Synthesis of Articles<\/strong><\/h2>\nArticle summary and synthesis are different based on the goals and focus. At the core of the article’s summary is detailing the topic of the study, methods, and approaches used, the results of the research, and the conclusion. The summary also outlines the main themes of the article. Conversely, synthesizing an article means identifying and critically analyzing the themes and areas of study covered by the authors. Article synthesis entails giving a more in-depth interpretation of the sources and their relevance to the practice issue being researched.<\/p>\n
Conclusion<\/strong><\/h2>\nLocating and critically analyzing research articles is a core part of nurturing advanced nursing students’ research skills and attributes. Through this approach, nursing students enhance their ability to attain research evidence and implement it in practice settings to solve patient issues. The implication is that critical analysis entails synthesizing the articles to determine the common themes and their connection to the research goals and interests of the research.\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\nReferences<\/strong><\/h2>\nAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) (2020). Rethinking the Role of Primary <\/em><\/p>\nCare in Reducing Hospital Readmissions. <\/em>https:\/\/www.ahrq.gov\/news\/blog\/ahrqviews\/rethinking-role-of-primary-care.html<\/a><\/p>\nBokhour, B. G., Fix, G. M., Mueller, N. M., Barker, A. M., Lavela, S. L., Hill, J. N., … & Lukas,<\/p>\n
\n- V. (2018). How can healthcare organizations implement patient-centered care? Examining a large-scale cultural transformation. BMC health services research,<\/em> 18(1), 1-11. DOI: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12913-018-2949-5<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
Charosaei, F., Rostami, S., Esmaeili, M., Molavynejad, S., & Vanaki, Z. (2021). Effective<\/p>\n
strategies for implementing patient-centered care in cardiac care unit: An opportunity for change. Journal of education and health promotion,<\/em> 10. DOI: 10.1007\/s11606-019-05428-2<\/p>\nHower, K. I., Vennedey, V., Hillen, H. A., Kuntz, L., Stock, S., Pfaff, H., & Ansmann, L. (2019).<\/p>\n
Implementation of patient-centered care: which organizational determinants matter from the decision maker’s perspective? Results from a qualitative interview study across various health and social care organizations. BMJ open,<\/em> 9(4), e027591. DOI: 10.1136\/bmjopen-2018-027591<\/p>\nRammohan R, Joy M, Magam S, et al. (May 15, 2023) The Path to Sustainable Healthcare:<\/p>\n
Implementing Care Transition Teams to Mitigate Hospital Readmissions and Improve Patient Outcomes. Cureus,<\/em> 15(5): e39022. DOI:10.7759\/cureus.39022<\/p>\n <\/p>\n
What steps do you take to locate primary and peer-reviewed research articles when performing a literature search<\/a>?<\/p>\nWhat resources are available to you to engage in a meaningful and successful literature search?<\/p>\n
Photo Credit: [erhui1979]\/[Digital Vision Vectors]\/Getty Images<\/em><\/p>\nAs you have explored throughout this course, Walden University provides vast resources for student support to ensure success in their academic program of study. When it comes to research and using Library resources, several support mechanisms are available to you as well.<\/p>\n
Taking the first step to think about a research topic<\/a> or area of interest and filtering that topic using a series of keywords and operations will be a fundamental component for performing a literature search in Walden Library\u2019s databases. While the ultimate goal is to produce a set or results that match your search criteria, you must keep in mind that that the quality of the research articles obtained will likely vary. Thus, you must critically examine and analyze the aims of the research produced and how it aligns, confirms, or negates your topic or area of research. As you develop proficiency in this area, you will discover that you can extract content themes and frameworks to enhance future research and the need to identify additional research support.<\/p>\nFor this Assignment, consult the Walden Library webinars and resources provided. These resources serve as a general good first step for performing literature searches and engaging with the databases of research available to you. Think about a research topic or area of interest to focus on for this Assignment. Then, search the Walden Library to locate and retrieve peer-reviewed research articles that pertain to your topic or area of interest.<\/p>\n
To prepare:<\/h2>\n\n- Review the Walden Library webinars presented in the media Learning Resources for this week.<\/li>\n
- Then, search the Walden Library and locate three peer-reviewed primary research articles that pertain to your practice area and are of particular interest to you.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
The Assignment: (6 paragraphs)<\/p>\n
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: LOCATING AND CRITICALLY ANALYZING PRIMARY RESEARCH ARTICLES NURS 8002<\/em> <\/strong><\/a><\/span><\/h3>\nWrite a 6-paragraph APA-formatted paper in which you do the following:<\/p>\n
\n- Write a 1-pararaph introduction of how you conducted your literature search and the databases consulted in your search in relation to your practice area or area of interest. Be specific and provide examples.<\/li>\n
- Write a 1-paragraph summary of each of the articles you have selected (a total of 3 paragraphs).<\/li>\n
- Write 1 paragraph that\u00a0synthesizes<\/em>\u00a0the three articles using a scholarly voice.<\/li>\n
- Write a final paragraph in which you discuss the differences between summarizing and synthesizing research. Be specific and provide examples.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Reminder:<\/strong>\u00a0The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at\u00a0https:\/\/academicguides.waldenu.edu\/writingcenter\/templates\/general#s-lg-box-20293632<\/a>). All papers submitted must use this formatting.<\/p>\nBy Day 7 of Week 9<\/h2>\n
Submit<\/strong>\u00a0your Assignment by\u00a0Day 7 of Week 9<\/strong>.<\/p>\nSubmission and Grading Information<\/p>\n
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n- Please save your Assignment using the naming convention \u201cM4Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)\u201d as the name.<\/li>\n
- Click the\u00a0Module 4 Assignment Rubric\u00a0<\/strong>to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.<\/li>\n
- Click the\u00a0Module 4\u00a0Assignment\u00a0<\/strong>link. You will also be able to \u201cView Rubric\u201d for grading criteria from this area.<\/li>\n
- Next, from the Attach File area, click on the\u00a0Browse My Computer<\/strong>\u00a0button. Find the document you saved as \u201cM4Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)\u201d and click\u00a0Open<\/strong>.<\/li>\n
- If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for\u00a0I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database<\/strong>.<\/li>\n
- Click on the\u00a0Submit<\/strong>\u00a0button to complete your submission.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Grading Criteria<\/p>\n
To access your rubric:<\/p>\n
Module 4 Assignment Rubric<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity<\/p>\n
To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:<\/p>\n
Submit your Module 4 Assignment draft and review the originality report.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 9<\/p>\n
To participate in this Assignment:<\/p>\n
Module 4 Assignment<\/p>\n
LOCATING AND CRITICALLY ANALYZING PRIMARY RESEARCH ARTICLES NURS 8002<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n
\nClick the weekly resources link to access the resources.<\/p>\n
TO PREPARE:<\/h3>\n\n- Review the Walden Library webinars presented in the media Learning Resources for this week.<\/li>\n
- Then, search the Walden Library and locate three peer-reviewed primary research articles that pertain to your practice area and are of particular interest to you.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
THE ASSIGNMENT: (6 PARAGRAPHS)<\/h2>\n
Write a 6-paragraph APA-formatted paper in which you do the following:<\/p>\n
\n- Write a 1-pararaph introduction of how you conducted your literature search and the databases consulted in your search in relation to your practice area or area of interest. Be specific and provide examples.<\/li>\n
- Write a 1-paragraph summary of each of the articles you have selected (a total of 3 paragraphs).<\/li>\n
- Write 1 paragraph that\u00a0synthesizes<\/em>the three articles using a scholarly voice.<\/li>\n
- Write a final paragraph in which you discuss the differences between summarizing and synthesizing research. Be specific and provide examples.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Reminder:<\/strong>\u00a0The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at\u00a0https:\/\/academicguides.waldenu.edu\/writingcenter\/templates\/general#s-lg-box-20293632<\/a>). All papers submitted must use this formatting.<\/p>\nBY DAY 7 OF WEEK 9<\/h2>\n
Submit<\/strong>\u00a0your Assignment by\u00a0Day 7 of Week 9<\/strong>.<\/p>\nSUBMISSION INFORMATION<\/h2>\n
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the\u00a0Turnitin Drafts<\/strong>\u00a0from the\u00a0Start Here<\/strong>\u00a0area.<\/p>\n\n- To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as\u00a0M4Assgn+last name+first initial.<\/strong><\/li>\n
- Then, click on\u00a0Start Assignment<\/strong>\u00a0near the top of the page.<\/li>\n
- Next, click on\u00a0Upload File<\/strong>\u00a0and select\u00a0Submit Assignment<\/strong>\u00a0for review.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: LOCATING AND CRITICALLY ANALYZING PRIMARY RESEARCH ARTICLES NURS 8002<\/strong><\/h2>\nTitle: <\/strong> LOCATING AND CRITICALLY ANALYZING PRIMARY RESEARCH ARTICLES NURS 8002<\/strong><\/h2>\nOne of the major activities that a DNP nurse participates in is research, usually evidence-based research. As indicated earlier, my interest is in researching reducing catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI). This condition is a clinical issue that needs to be mitigated to ensure that the patients have better health outcomes. This write-entails a summary and synthesis of two peer-reviewed articles obtained through the Walden Library search pertaining to reducing catheter-associated urinary tract infections.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nSummary of The Articles<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h2>\nOne of the articles with the title \u201c<\/span>Chlorhexidine for meatal cleaning in reducing catheter-associated urinary tract infections: a multicentre stepped-wedge randomized controlled trial\u201d reported by Fasugba et al<\/span>. (2019) entails reducing CAUTI. The report compares the efficacy of the use of normal saline and 0.1% chlorhexidine solution in cleaning the meatal area prior to inserting urinary catheters in lowering the incidences of CAUTI. The study used a cross-sectional randomized control trial in the hospitals for a period of three weeks, with a total of 1642 research subjects recruited in three hospitals (<\/span>Fasugba et al., 2019)<\/span>. While 58% of them were in the intervention period, the remaining 42% were in the control phase. Among the findings is that among the control group, 13 cases of CAUTI were recorded as compared to only 4 cases among the intervention group; hence the intervention was connected to a 94% reduction of the rates of catheter-associated urinary tract infections.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nMore recently, a study has been reported by <\/span>Nassikas et al<\/span>. (2020) with the title “<\/span>Intensive care unit rounding checklists to reduce catheter-associated urinary tract infections\u201d This study purposed to determine whether the use of rounding checklist in an intensive care unit lowers the incidences of catheter-associated urinary tract infections. These researchers used a retrospective before-and-after study design. Done in an academic community hospital with a 16 bed ICU unit, the intervention used was an ICU rounding checklist which ensured that the caregivers addressed the use of the indwelling catheters. Analysis was then done to compare the pre-intervention duration with the post-intervention after implementing the checklist. Pre and post-intervention strategy is one of the best ways of determining the efficacy of an intervention in the management of a condition or disease (Spurlock, 2018).\u00a0 Among the findings obtained from the research is that before the intervention, the unit recorded nineteen CAUTI cases per one thousand catheter days. The rate was found to reduce to 2.12 after the intervention from 4.62 before the implementation of the checklist.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nSynthesis of The Sources<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h2>\nThe findings of Fasugba et al. (2019) implies that by taking care of the meatal area through thorough cleaning, the rates of CAUTI incidences can greatly be reduced. By employing the normal intervention of using the 0.9% saline solution, whose efficacy has also been shown in previous studies (Khahakaew et al., 2019), this current research was able to demonstrate that the use of <\/span>0.1% chlorhexidine solution is more efficacious hence introducing better evidence to practice. Indeed, the findings are in agreement with other studies (<\/span>Mitchell et al., 2019). However, the findings also differ from other reports where the use of chlorhexidine did not lead to lower incidences of CAUTI, even though that study was a single-site randomized control site.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nSeveral interventions exist for controlling CAUTI. Patients at the ICU particularly need to be free from the infections to give them a better chance of healing; therefore, the study by Nassikas et al. (2020) is significant. They were able to demonstrate that using the checklist in the ICU setting can be vital. These findings can be generalizable in an ICU setting in other locations since the intervention focuses on just using a checklist. It is important to note that this intervention is relatively cost effective, even though at first it may lead to increased use of indwelling catheters, eventually it allows for lower usage rates. The findings are also supported by other studies. For instance, a study done to combine checklist and education intervention effectively reduced the rates of CAUTI (Menegueti et al., 2019).<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nLOCATING AND CRITICALLY ANALYZING PRIMARY RESEARCH ARTICLES NURS 8002<\/figcaption><\/figure>\nReferences<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h2>\nFasugba, O., Cheng, A. C., Gregory, V., Graves, N., Koerner, J., Collignon, P., … & Mitchell, B. G. (2019). Chlorhexidine for meatal cleaning in reducing catheter-associated urinary tract infections: a multicentre stepped-wedge randomised controlled trial.\u202f<\/span>The Lancet Infectious Diseases<\/span><\/i>,\u202f<\/span>19<\/span><\/i>(6), 611-619. Doi:<\/span> 10.1016\/S1473-3099(18)30736-9<\/span><\/a>.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nKhahakaew, S., Suwanpimolkul, G., Wongkeskij, T., Punakabutra, N., & Suankratay, C. (2019, October). 1151. A Comparison of Periurethral Cleaning Between Normal Saline and Savlon Solutions Before Indwelling Urinary Catheterization in Reducing Catheter-Associated Bacteriuria: A Randomized Controlled Study. In\u202f<\/span>Open Forum Infectious Diseases<\/span><\/i>\u202f(Vol. 6, No. Supplement_2, pp. S411-S411). US: Oxford University Press. <\/span>https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/ofid\/ofz360.1015<\/span><\/a>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nMenegueti, M. G., Ciol, M. A., Bellissimo-Rodrigues, F., Auxiliadora-Martins, M., Gaspar, G. G., da Silva Canini, S. R. M., … & Laus, A. M. (2019). Long-term prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections among critically ill patients through the implementation of an educational program and a daily checklist for maintenance of indwelling urinary catheters: a quasi-experimental study.\u202f<\/span>Medicine<\/span><\/i>,\u202f<\/span>98<\/span><\/i>(8). Doi <\/span>10.1097\/MD.0000000000014417<\/span><\/a>.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nMitchell, B. G., Fasugba, O., Cheng, A. C., Gregory, V., Koerner, J., Collignon, P., … & Graves, N. (2019). Chlorhexidine versus saline in reducing the risk of catheter associated urinary tract infection: a cost-effectiveness analysis.\u202f<\/span>International journal of nursing studies<\/span><\/i>,\u202f<\/span>97<\/span><\/i>, 1-6. <\/span>https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijnurstu.2019.04.003<\/span><\/a>.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nNassikas, N. J., Monteiro, J. F. G., Pashnik, B., Lynch, J., Carino, G., & Levinson, A. T. (2020). Intensive Care Unit Rounding Checklists to Reduce Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections.\u202f<\/span>Infection control and hospital epidemiology<\/span><\/i>,\u202f<\/span>41<\/span><\/i>(6), 680-683.\u00a0 Doi:<\/span> 10.1017\/ice.2020.43<\/span><\/a>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nSpurlock Jr, D. R. (2018). The single-group, pre-and posttest design in nursing education research: It’s time to move on.\u202f<\/span>Journal of Nursing Education<\/span><\/i>,\u202f<\/span>57<\/span><\/i>(2), 69-71. Doi: <\/span>https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3928\/01484834-20180123-02<\/span><\/a>.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nA Sample Answer 2 For the Assignment: LOCATING AND CRITICALLY ANALYZING PRIMARY RESEARCH ARTICLES NURS 8002<\/strong><\/h2>\nTitle: <\/strong> LOCATING AND CRITICALLY ANALYZING PRIMARY RESEARCH ARTICLES NURS 8002<\/strong><\/h2>\nStudents pursuing advanced nursing education require and should develop research skills so that they can locate and critically analyze articles to attain evidence for implementation in their practice settings. Through this approach, they attain not just success in nursing research but also advance in their careers as well-informed practitioners who leverage evidence-based practice (EBP) interventions to offer patient-centered care and reduce hospital readmission (Charosaei et al., 2021). The Walden University library offers resources and databases for advanced nursing students to conduct research and locate scholarly articles. Imperatively, through these databases which include PubMed Central, Medline, and CINAHL as well as BMC Central, one can locate articles on the topic of interest using keywords or terms. The purpose of this paper is to locate and analyze three articles from online resources provided by the identified databases or journals, summarize, and synthesize them from a scholarly perspective. In its final part, the paper explores the differences between summarizing and synthesizing research articles.<\/p>\n
Article 1<\/strong><\/h2>\nThe first article is by Bokhour et al. (2018) and focuses on strategies that healthcare organizations can implement to offer patient-centered care. According to the authors, a core part of implementing patient-centered care (PCC) is transforming the organization’s culture of care. Using the Department of Veterans Affairs, the authors conducted qualitative semi-structured interviews with employees to identify various factors that help entities to offer patient-centered care like effective leadership, patient and family engagement, engaging the staff, and focusing on innovation among other aspects. In their conclusion, the authors are categorical that an effective organizational culture is key to offering patient-centered care.<\/p>\n
Article 2<\/strong><\/h2>\nThe article by Hower et al. (2019) explores the organizational determinants from decision makers\u2019 point-of-view on implementing patient-centered care. Using a qualitative approach across different health and social care organizations (HSCOs), the authors found that various aspects were important and determined the level of patient-centered care (PCC) that each facility can offer. Among these include effective communication among staff, addressing staff welfare to motivate them, and overcoming resource constraints, especially financial and human resource issues. The authors conclude by imploring HSCOs to tailor their interventions based on their situations to meet these needs.<\/p>\n
Article 3<\/strong><\/h2>\nThe third article by Rammohan et al. (2023) discusses the implementation of care transition teams to reduce hospital readmission and enhance patient outcomes. Using a two-phase study approach to investigate readmission rates and associated risk factors in a community hospital for about five years, and a care transition team after discharge and patient support to evaluate the social determinants of health (SDOHs). As such, the authors emphasize the critical role that care transition teams play in lowering the rates of hospital readmissions rates and mitigating the financial strain on healthcare organizations. The researchers assert that hospitals through care transition teams can lower the overall readmission rates by identifying and addressing individual risk factors that include evaluation of social determinants of health (SDOHs).<\/p>\n
Synthesis of the Articles<\/strong><\/h2>\nThe three articles emphasize the need for healthcare organizations to develop and implement effective strategies aimed at providing patient-centered care that can reduce hospital readmissions. According to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) (2020), patient-tailored interventions lead to increased participation of patients in their care plans and management of their condition. Tailoring these interventions ensures that patients get quality care based on care transition teams to reduce possible readmissions. Through these articles, one can identify the relationship between patient-centered care and reduced rates of readmissions, especially within the first thirty days after discharge. The articles are categorical that providing patient-centered care leads to improved care quality and reduces the possibility of readmissions.<\/p>\n
Differences Between Summary and Synthesis of Articles<\/strong><\/h2>\nArticle summary and synthesis are different based on the goals and focus. At the core of the article’s summary is detailing the topic of the study, methods, and approaches used, the results of the research, and the conclusion. The summary also outlines the main themes of the article. Conversely, synthesizing an article means identifying and critically analyzing the themes and areas of study covered by the authors. Article synthesis entails giving a more in-depth interpretation of the sources and their relevance to the practice issue being researched.<\/p>\n
Conclusion<\/strong><\/h2>\nLocating and critically analyzing research articles is a core part of nurturing advanced nursing students’ research skills and attributes. Through this approach, nursing students enhance their ability to attain research evidence and implement it in practice settings to solve patient issues. The implication is that critical analysis entails synthesizing the articles to determine the common themes and their connection to the research goals and interests of the research.\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\nReferences<\/strong><\/h2>\nAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) (2020). Rethinking the Role of Primary <\/em><\/p>\nCare in Reducing Hospital Readmissions. <\/em>https:\/\/www.ahrq.gov\/news\/blog\/ahrqviews\/rethinking-role-of-primary-care.html<\/a><\/p>\nBokhour, B. G., Fix, G. M., Mueller, N. M., Barker, A. M., Lavela, S. L., Hill, J. N., … & Lukas,<\/p>\n
\n- V. (2018). How can healthcare organizations implement patient-centered care? Examining a large-scale cultural transformation. BMC health services research,<\/em> 18(1), 1-11. DOI: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12913-018-2949-5<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
Charosaei, F., Rostami, S., Esmaeili, M., Molavynejad, S., & Vanaki, Z. (2021). Effective<\/p>\n
strategies for implementing patient-centered care in cardiac care unit: An opportunity for change. Journal of education and health promotion,<\/em> 10. DOI: 10.1007\/s11606-019-05428-2<\/p>\nHower, K. I., Vennedey, V., Hillen, H. A., Kuntz, L., Stock, S., Pfaff, H., & Ansmann, L. (2019).<\/p>\n
Implementation of patient-centered care: which organizational determinants matter from the decision maker’s perspective? Results from a qualitative interview study across various health and social care organizations. BMJ open,<\/em> 9(4), e027591. DOI: 10.1136\/bmjopen-2018-027591<\/p>\nRammohan R, Joy M, Magam S, et al. (May 15, 2023) The Path to Sustainable Healthcare:<\/p>\n
Implementing Care Transition Teams to Mitigate Hospital Readmissions and Improve Patient Outcomes. Cureus,<\/em> 15(5): e39022. DOI:10.7759\/cureus.39022<\/p>\n <\/p>\n
What steps do you take to locate primary and peer-reviewed research articles when performing a literature search<\/a>?<\/p>\nWhat resources are available to you to engage in a meaningful and successful literature search?<\/p>\n
Photo Credit: [erhui1979]\/[Digital Vision Vectors]\/Getty Images<\/em><\/p>\nAs you have explored throughout this course, Walden University provides vast resources for student support to ensure success in their academic program of study. When it comes to research and using Library resources, several support mechanisms are available to you as well.<\/p>\n
Taking the first step to think about a research topic<\/a> or area of interest and filtering that topic using a series of keywords and operations will be a fundamental component for performing a literature search in Walden Library\u2019s databases. While the ultimate goal is to produce a set or results that match your search criteria, you must keep in mind that that the quality of the research articles obtained will likely vary. Thus, you must critically examine and analyze the aims of the research produced and how it aligns, confirms, or negates your topic or area of research. As you develop proficiency in this area, you will discover that you can extract content themes and frameworks to enhance future research and the need to identify additional research support.<\/p>\nFor this Assignment, consult the Walden Library webinars and resources provided. These resources serve as a general good first step for performing literature searches and engaging with the databases of research available to you. Think about a research topic or area of interest to focus on for this Assignment. Then, search the Walden Library to locate and retrieve peer-reviewed research articles that pertain to your topic or area of interest.<\/p>\n
To prepare:<\/h2>\n\n- Review the Walden Library webinars presented in the media Learning Resources for this week.<\/li>\n
- Then, search the Walden Library and locate three peer-reviewed primary research articles that pertain to your practice area and are of particular interest to you.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
The Assignment: (6 paragraphs)<\/p>\n
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: LOCATING AND CRITICALLY ANALYZING PRIMARY RESEARCH ARTICLES NURS 8002<\/em> <\/strong><\/a><\/span><\/h3>\nWrite a 6-paragraph APA-formatted paper in which you do the following:<\/p>\n
\n- Write a 1-pararaph introduction of how you conducted your literature search and the databases consulted in your search in relation to your practice area or area of interest. Be specific and provide examples.<\/li>\n
- Write a 1-paragraph summary of each of the articles you have selected (a total of 3 paragraphs).<\/li>\n
- Write 1 paragraph that\u00a0synthesizes<\/em>\u00a0the three articles using a scholarly voice.<\/li>\n
- Write a final paragraph in which you discuss the differences between summarizing and synthesizing research. Be specific and provide examples.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Reminder:<\/strong>\u00a0The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at\u00a0https:\/\/academicguides.waldenu.edu\/writingcenter\/templates\/general#s-lg-box-20293632<\/a>). All papers submitted must use this formatting.<\/p>\nBy Day 7 of Week 9<\/h2>\n
Submit<\/strong>\u00a0your Assignment by\u00a0Day 7 of Week 9<\/strong>.<\/p>\nSubmission and Grading Information<\/p>\n
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n- Please save your Assignment using the naming convention \u201cM4Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)\u201d as the name.<\/li>\n
- Click the\u00a0Module 4 Assignment Rubric\u00a0<\/strong>to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.<\/li>\n
- Click the\u00a0Module 4\u00a0Assignment\u00a0<\/strong>link. You will also be able to \u201cView Rubric\u201d for grading criteria from this area.<\/li>\n
- Next, from the Attach File area, click on the\u00a0Browse My Computer<\/strong>\u00a0button. Find the document you saved as \u201cM4Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)\u201d and click\u00a0Open<\/strong>.<\/li>\n
- If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for\u00a0I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database<\/strong>.<\/li>\n
- Click on the\u00a0Submit<\/strong>\u00a0button to complete your submission.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Grading Criteria<\/p>\n
To access your rubric:<\/p>\n
Module 4 Assignment Rubric<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity<\/p>\n
To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:<\/p>\n
Submit your Module 4 Assignment draft and review the originality report.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 9<\/p>\n
To participate in this Assignment:<\/p>\n
Module 4 Assignment<\/p>\n
LOCATING AND CRITICALLY ANALYZING PRIMARY RESEARCH ARTICLES NURS 8002<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n
THE ASSIGNMENT: (6 PARAGRAPHS)<\/h2>\n
Write a 6-paragraph APA-formatted paper in which you do the following:<\/p>\n
- \n
- Write a 1-pararaph introduction of how you conducted your literature search and the databases consulted in your search in relation to your practice area or area of interest. Be specific and provide examples.<\/li>\n
- Write a 1-paragraph summary of each of the articles you have selected (a total of 3 paragraphs).<\/li>\n
- Write 1 paragraph that\u00a0synthesizes<\/em>the three articles using a scholarly voice.<\/li>\n
- Write a final paragraph in which you discuss the differences between summarizing and synthesizing research. Be specific and provide examples.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Reminder:<\/strong>\u00a0The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at\u00a0https:\/\/academicguides.waldenu.edu\/writingcenter\/templates\/general#s-lg-box-20293632<\/a>). All papers submitted must use this formatting.<\/p>\n
BY DAY 7 OF WEEK 9<\/h2>\n
Submit<\/strong>\u00a0your Assignment by\u00a0Day 7 of Week 9<\/strong>.<\/p>\n
SUBMISSION INFORMATION<\/h2>\n
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the\u00a0Turnitin Drafts<\/strong>\u00a0from the\u00a0Start Here<\/strong>\u00a0area.<\/p>\n
- \n
- To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as\u00a0M4Assgn+last name+first initial.<\/strong><\/li>\n
- Then, click on\u00a0Start Assignment<\/strong>\u00a0near the top of the page.<\/li>\n
- Next, click on\u00a0Upload File<\/strong>\u00a0and select\u00a0Submit Assignment<\/strong>\u00a0for review.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: LOCATING AND CRITICALLY ANALYZING PRIMARY RESEARCH ARTICLES NURS 8002<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Title: <\/strong> LOCATING AND CRITICALLY ANALYZING PRIMARY RESEARCH ARTICLES NURS 8002<\/strong><\/h2>\n
One of the major activities that a DNP nurse participates in is research, usually evidence-based research. As indicated earlier, my interest is in researching reducing catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI). This condition is a clinical issue that needs to be mitigated to ensure that the patients have better health outcomes. This write-entails a summary and synthesis of two peer-reviewed articles obtained through the Walden Library search pertaining to reducing catheter-associated urinary tract infections.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
Summary of The Articles<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h2>\n
One of the articles with the title \u201c<\/span>Chlorhexidine for meatal cleaning in reducing catheter-associated urinary tract infections: a multicentre stepped-wedge randomized controlled trial\u201d reported by Fasugba et al<\/span>. (2019) entails reducing CAUTI. The report compares the efficacy of the use of normal saline and 0.1% chlorhexidine solution in cleaning the meatal area prior to inserting urinary catheters in lowering the incidences of CAUTI. The study used a cross-sectional randomized control trial in the hospitals for a period of three weeks, with a total of 1642 research subjects recruited in three hospitals (<\/span>Fasugba et al., 2019)<\/span>. While 58% of them were in the intervention period, the remaining 42% were in the control phase. Among the findings is that among the control group, 13 cases of CAUTI were recorded as compared to only 4 cases among the intervention group; hence the intervention was connected to a 94% reduction of the rates of catheter-associated urinary tract infections.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
More recently, a study has been reported by <\/span>Nassikas et al<\/span>. (2020) with the title “<\/span>Intensive care unit rounding checklists to reduce catheter-associated urinary tract infections\u201d This study purposed to determine whether the use of rounding checklist in an intensive care unit lowers the incidences of catheter-associated urinary tract infections. These researchers used a retrospective before-and-after study design. Done in an academic community hospital with a 16 bed ICU unit, the intervention used was an ICU rounding checklist which ensured that the caregivers addressed the use of the indwelling catheters. Analysis was then done to compare the pre-intervention duration with the post-intervention after implementing the checklist. Pre and post-intervention strategy is one of the best ways of determining the efficacy of an intervention in the management of a condition or disease (Spurlock, 2018).\u00a0 Among the findings obtained from the research is that before the intervention, the unit recorded nineteen CAUTI cases per one thousand catheter days. The rate was found to reduce to 2.12 after the intervention from 4.62 before the implementation of the checklist.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
Synthesis of The Sources<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h2>\n
The findings of Fasugba et al. (2019) implies that by taking care of the meatal area through thorough cleaning, the rates of CAUTI incidences can greatly be reduced. By employing the normal intervention of using the 0.9% saline solution, whose efficacy has also been shown in previous studies (Khahakaew et al., 2019), this current research was able to demonstrate that the use of <\/span>0.1% chlorhexidine solution is more efficacious hence introducing better evidence to practice. Indeed, the findings are in agreement with other studies (<\/span>Mitchell et al., 2019). However, the findings also differ from other reports where the use of chlorhexidine did not lead to lower incidences of CAUTI, even though that study was a single-site randomized control site.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
Several interventions exist for controlling CAUTI. Patients at the ICU particularly need to be free from the infections to give them a better chance of healing; therefore, the study by Nassikas et al. (2020) is significant. They were able to demonstrate that using the checklist in the ICU setting can be vital. These findings can be generalizable in an ICU setting in other locations since the intervention focuses on just using a checklist. It is important to note that this intervention is relatively cost effective, even though at first it may lead to increased use of indwelling catheters, eventually it allows for lower usage rates. The findings are also supported by other studies. For instance, a study done to combine checklist and education intervention effectively reduced the rates of CAUTI (Menegueti et al., 2019).<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
LOCATING AND CRITICALLY ANALYZING PRIMARY RESEARCH ARTICLES NURS 8002<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n References<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h2>\n
Fasugba, O., Cheng, A. C., Gregory, V., Graves, N., Koerner, J., Collignon, P., … & Mitchell, B. G. (2019). Chlorhexidine for meatal cleaning in reducing catheter-associated urinary tract infections: a multicentre stepped-wedge randomised controlled trial.\u202f<\/span>The Lancet Infectious Diseases<\/span><\/i>,\u202f<\/span>19<\/span><\/i>(6), 611-619. Doi:<\/span> 10.1016\/S1473-3099(18)30736-9<\/span><\/a>.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
Khahakaew, S., Suwanpimolkul, G., Wongkeskij, T., Punakabutra, N., & Suankratay, C. (2019, October). 1151. A Comparison of Periurethral Cleaning Between Normal Saline and Savlon Solutions Before Indwelling Urinary Catheterization in Reducing Catheter-Associated Bacteriuria: A Randomized Controlled Study. In\u202f<\/span>Open Forum Infectious Diseases<\/span><\/i>\u202f(Vol. 6, No. Supplement_2, pp. S411-S411). US: Oxford University Press. <\/span>https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/ofid\/ofz360.1015<\/span><\/a>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
Menegueti, M. G., Ciol, M. A., Bellissimo-Rodrigues, F., Auxiliadora-Martins, M., Gaspar, G. G., da Silva Canini, S. R. M., … & Laus, A. M. (2019). Long-term prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections among critically ill patients through the implementation of an educational program and a daily checklist for maintenance of indwelling urinary catheters: a quasi-experimental study.\u202f<\/span>Medicine<\/span><\/i>,\u202f<\/span>98<\/span><\/i>(8). Doi <\/span>10.1097\/MD.0000000000014417<\/span><\/a>.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
Mitchell, B. G., Fasugba, O., Cheng, A. C., Gregory, V., Koerner, J., Collignon, P., … & Graves, N. (2019). Chlorhexidine versus saline in reducing the risk of catheter associated urinary tract infection: a cost-effectiveness analysis.\u202f<\/span>International journal of nursing studies<\/span><\/i>,\u202f<\/span>97<\/span><\/i>, 1-6. <\/span>https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijnurstu.2019.04.003<\/span><\/a>.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
Nassikas, N. J., Monteiro, J. F. G., Pashnik, B., Lynch, J., Carino, G., & Levinson, A. T. (2020). Intensive Care Unit Rounding Checklists to Reduce Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections.\u202f<\/span>Infection control and hospital epidemiology<\/span><\/i>,\u202f<\/span>41<\/span><\/i>(6), 680-683.\u00a0 Doi:<\/span> 10.1017\/ice.2020.43<\/span><\/a>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
Spurlock Jr, D. R. (2018). The single-group, pre-and posttest design in nursing education research: It’s time to move on.\u202f<\/span>Journal of Nursing Education<\/span><\/i>,\u202f<\/span>57<\/span><\/i>(2), 69-71. Doi: <\/span>https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3928\/01484834-20180123-02<\/span><\/a>.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
A Sample Answer 2 For the Assignment: LOCATING AND CRITICALLY ANALYZING PRIMARY RESEARCH ARTICLES NURS 8002<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Title: <\/strong> LOCATING AND CRITICALLY ANALYZING PRIMARY RESEARCH ARTICLES NURS 8002<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Students pursuing advanced nursing education require and should develop research skills so that they can locate and critically analyze articles to attain evidence for implementation in their practice settings. Through this approach, they attain not just success in nursing research but also advance in their careers as well-informed practitioners who leverage evidence-based practice (EBP) interventions to offer patient-centered care and reduce hospital readmission (Charosaei et al., 2021). The Walden University library offers resources and databases for advanced nursing students to conduct research and locate scholarly articles. Imperatively, through these databases which include PubMed Central, Medline, and CINAHL as well as BMC Central, one can locate articles on the topic of interest using keywords or terms. The purpose of this paper is to locate and analyze three articles from online resources provided by the identified databases or journals, summarize, and synthesize them from a scholarly perspective. In its final part, the paper explores the differences between summarizing and synthesizing research articles.<\/p>\n
Article 1<\/strong><\/h2>\n
The first article is by Bokhour et al. (2018) and focuses on strategies that healthcare organizations can implement to offer patient-centered care. According to the authors, a core part of implementing patient-centered care (PCC) is transforming the organization’s culture of care. Using the Department of Veterans Affairs, the authors conducted qualitative semi-structured interviews with employees to identify various factors that help entities to offer patient-centered care like effective leadership, patient and family engagement, engaging the staff, and focusing on innovation among other aspects. In their conclusion, the authors are categorical that an effective organizational culture is key to offering patient-centered care.<\/p>\n
Article 2<\/strong><\/h2>\n
The article by Hower et al. (2019) explores the organizational determinants from decision makers\u2019 point-of-view on implementing patient-centered care. Using a qualitative approach across different health and social care organizations (HSCOs), the authors found that various aspects were important and determined the level of patient-centered care (PCC) that each facility can offer. Among these include effective communication among staff, addressing staff welfare to motivate them, and overcoming resource constraints, especially financial and human resource issues. The authors conclude by imploring HSCOs to tailor their interventions based on their situations to meet these needs.<\/p>\n
Article 3<\/strong><\/h2>\n
The third article by Rammohan et al. (2023) discusses the implementation of care transition teams to reduce hospital readmission and enhance patient outcomes. Using a two-phase study approach to investigate readmission rates and associated risk factors in a community hospital for about five years, and a care transition team after discharge and patient support to evaluate the social determinants of health (SDOHs). As such, the authors emphasize the critical role that care transition teams play in lowering the rates of hospital readmissions rates and mitigating the financial strain on healthcare organizations. The researchers assert that hospitals through care transition teams can lower the overall readmission rates by identifying and addressing individual risk factors that include evaluation of social determinants of health (SDOHs).<\/p>\n
Synthesis of the Articles<\/strong><\/h2>\n
The three articles emphasize the need for healthcare organizations to develop and implement effective strategies aimed at providing patient-centered care that can reduce hospital readmissions. According to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) (2020), patient-tailored interventions lead to increased participation of patients in their care plans and management of their condition. Tailoring these interventions ensures that patients get quality care based on care transition teams to reduce possible readmissions. Through these articles, one can identify the relationship between patient-centered care and reduced rates of readmissions, especially within the first thirty days after discharge. The articles are categorical that providing patient-centered care leads to improved care quality and reduces the possibility of readmissions.<\/p>\n
Differences Between Summary and Synthesis of Articles<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Article summary and synthesis are different based on the goals and focus. At the core of the article’s summary is detailing the topic of the study, methods, and approaches used, the results of the research, and the conclusion. The summary also outlines the main themes of the article. Conversely, synthesizing an article means identifying and critically analyzing the themes and areas of study covered by the authors. Article synthesis entails giving a more in-depth interpretation of the sources and their relevance to the practice issue being researched.<\/p>\n
Conclusion<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Locating and critically analyzing research articles is a core part of nurturing advanced nursing students’ research skills and attributes. Through this approach, nursing students enhance their ability to attain research evidence and implement it in practice settings to solve patient issues. The implication is that critical analysis entails synthesizing the articles to determine the common themes and their connection to the research goals and interests of the research.\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n
References<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) (2020). Rethinking the Role of Primary <\/em><\/p>\n
Care in Reducing Hospital Readmissions. <\/em>https:\/\/www.ahrq.gov\/news\/blog\/ahrqviews\/rethinking-role-of-primary-care.html<\/a><\/p>\n
Bokhour, B. G., Fix, G. M., Mueller, N. M., Barker, A. M., Lavela, S. L., Hill, J. N., … & Lukas,<\/p>\n
- \n
- V. (2018). How can healthcare organizations implement patient-centered care? Examining a large-scale cultural transformation. BMC health services research,<\/em> 18(1), 1-11. DOI: https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1186\/s12913-018-2949-5<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
Charosaei, F., Rostami, S., Esmaeili, M., Molavynejad, S., & Vanaki, Z. (2021). Effective<\/p>\n
strategies for implementing patient-centered care in cardiac care unit: An opportunity for change. Journal of education and health promotion,<\/em> 10. DOI: 10.1007\/s11606-019-05428-2<\/p>\n
Hower, K. I., Vennedey, V., Hillen, H. A., Kuntz, L., Stock, S., Pfaff, H., & Ansmann, L. (2019).<\/p>\n
Implementation of patient-centered care: which organizational determinants matter from the decision maker’s perspective? Results from a qualitative interview study across various health and social care organizations. BMJ open,<\/em> 9(4), e027591. DOI: 10.1136\/bmjopen-2018-027591<\/p>\n
Rammohan R, Joy M, Magam S, et al. (May 15, 2023) The Path to Sustainable Healthcare:<\/p>\n
Implementing Care Transition Teams to Mitigate Hospital Readmissions and Improve Patient Outcomes. Cureus,<\/em> 15(5): e39022. DOI:10.7759\/cureus.39022<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
What steps do you take to locate primary and peer-reviewed research articles when performing a literature search<\/a>?<\/p>\n
What resources are available to you to engage in a meaningful and successful literature search?<\/p>\n
Photo Credit: [erhui1979]\/[Digital Vision Vectors]\/Getty Images<\/em><\/p>\n
As you have explored throughout this course, Walden University provides vast resources for student support to ensure success in their academic program of study. When it comes to research and using Library resources, several support mechanisms are available to you as well.<\/p>\n
Taking the first step to think about a research topic<\/a> or area of interest and filtering that topic using a series of keywords and operations will be a fundamental component for performing a literature search in Walden Library\u2019s databases. While the ultimate goal is to produce a set or results that match your search criteria, you must keep in mind that that the quality of the research articles obtained will likely vary. Thus, you must critically examine and analyze the aims of the research produced and how it aligns, confirms, or negates your topic or area of research. As you develop proficiency in this area, you will discover that you can extract content themes and frameworks to enhance future research and the need to identify additional research support.<\/p>\n
For this Assignment, consult the Walden Library webinars and resources provided. These resources serve as a general good first step for performing literature searches and engaging with the databases of research available to you. Think about a research topic or area of interest to focus on for this Assignment. Then, search the Walden Library to locate and retrieve peer-reviewed research articles that pertain to your topic or area of interest.<\/p>\n
To prepare:<\/h2>\n
- \n
- Review the Walden Library webinars presented in the media Learning Resources for this week.<\/li>\n
- Then, search the Walden Library and locate three peer-reviewed primary research articles that pertain to your practice area and are of particular interest to you.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
The Assignment: (6 paragraphs)<\/p>\n
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: LOCATING AND CRITICALLY ANALYZING PRIMARY RESEARCH ARTICLES NURS 8002<\/em> <\/strong><\/a><\/span><\/h3>\n
Write a 6-paragraph APA-formatted paper in which you do the following:<\/p>\n
- \n
- Write a 1-pararaph introduction of how you conducted your literature search and the databases consulted in your search in relation to your practice area or area of interest. Be specific and provide examples.<\/li>\n
- Write a 1-paragraph summary of each of the articles you have selected (a total of 3 paragraphs).<\/li>\n
- Write 1 paragraph that\u00a0synthesizes<\/em>\u00a0the three articles using a scholarly voice.<\/li>\n
- Write a final paragraph in which you discuss the differences between summarizing and synthesizing research. Be specific and provide examples.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Reminder:<\/strong>\u00a0The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at\u00a0https:\/\/academicguides.waldenu.edu\/writingcenter\/templates\/general#s-lg-box-20293632<\/a>). All papers submitted must use this formatting.<\/p>\n
By Day 7 of Week 9<\/h2>\n
Submit<\/strong>\u00a0your Assignment by\u00a0Day 7 of Week 9<\/strong>.<\/p>\n
Submission and Grading Information<\/p>\n
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:<\/strong><\/p>\n
- \n
- Please save your Assignment using the naming convention \u201cM4Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)\u201d as the name.<\/li>\n
- Click the\u00a0Module 4 Assignment Rubric\u00a0<\/strong>to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.<\/li>\n
- Click the\u00a0Module 4\u00a0Assignment\u00a0<\/strong>link. You will also be able to \u201cView Rubric\u201d for grading criteria from this area.<\/li>\n
- Next, from the Attach File area, click on the\u00a0Browse My Computer<\/strong>\u00a0button. Find the document you saved as \u201cM4Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)\u201d and click\u00a0Open<\/strong>.<\/li>\n
- If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for\u00a0I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database<\/strong>.<\/li>\n
- Click on the\u00a0Submit<\/strong>\u00a0button to complete your submission.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Grading Criteria<\/p>\n
To access your rubric:<\/p>\n
Module 4 Assignment Rubric<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity<\/p>\n
To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:<\/p>\n
Submit your Module 4 Assignment draft and review the originality report.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 9<\/p>\n
To participate in this Assignment:<\/p>\n
Module 4 Assignment<\/p>\n
LOCATING AND CRITICALLY ANALYZING PRIMARY RESEARCH ARTICLES NURS 8002<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n
- Click the\u00a0Module 4\u00a0Assignment\u00a0<\/strong>link. You will also be able to \u201cView Rubric\u201d for grading criteria from this area.<\/li>\n
- Write a final paragraph in which you discuss the differences between summarizing and synthesizing research. Be specific and provide examples.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
- Then, click on\u00a0Start Assignment<\/strong>\u00a0near the top of the page.<\/li>\n
- Write a final paragraph in which you discuss the differences between summarizing and synthesizing research. Be specific and provide examples.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n