Sample Answer for POLITICAL AND THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT NURS 6050 Included After Question<\/strong><\/em><\/h2>\nRegardless of political affiliation, individuals often grow concerned when considering perceived competing interests of government and their impact on topics of interest to them. The realm of healthcare is no different. Some people feel that local, state, and federal policies and legislation can be either helped or hindered by interests other than the benefit to society.<\/p>\n
Consider for example that the number one job of a legislator is to be reelected. Cost can be measured in votes as well as dollars. Thus, it is important to consider the legislator\u2019s perspective on either promoting or not promoting a certain initiative in the political landscape.<\/p>\n
RESOURCES<\/h2>\n
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
\nClick the weekly resources link to access the resources.<\/p>\n
WEEKLY RESOURCES<\/strong><\/a><\/h2>\nTo Prepare:<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n- Review the Resources and reflect on efforts to repeal\/replace the Affordable Care Act (ACA).<\/li>\n
- Consider who benefits the most when policy is developed and in the context of policy implementation.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
BY DAY 3 OF WEEK 3<\/h2>\n
Post<\/strong>\u00a0an explanation for how you think the cost-benefit analysis in terms of legislators being reelected affected efforts to repeal\/replace the ACA. Then, explain how analyses of the voters views may affect decisions by legislative leaders in recommending or positioning national policies (e.g., Congress’ decisions impacting Medicare or Medicaid). Remember, the number one job of a legislator is to be re-elected. Please check your discussion grading rubric to ensure your responses meet the criteria.<\/p>\nBY DAY 6 OF WEEK 3<\/h2>\n
Respond<\/strong>\u00a0to at least\u00a0two<\/strong>\u00a0of your colleagues* on two different days<\/strong>\u00a0by expanding on their explanation and providing an example that supports their explanation or respectfully challenging their explanation and providing an example.<\/p>\n*Note:<\/em><\/strong>\u00a0Throughout this program, your fellow students are referred to as colleagues.<\/em><\/p>\nA Sample Answer For the Assignment: POLITICAL AND THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT NURS 6050<\/strong><\/h2>\nTitle: <\/strong> POLITICAL AND THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT NURS 6050<\/strong><\/h2>\nThe Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA) is a revolutionary policy. This Act wanted to address social injustices in the American healthcare system<\/a>. However, this policy has met stiff opposition from Republican legislators who openly opposed it. When Donald Trump came to power, repealing ACA was one of his number one priorities. They, however, did not get the requisite number to repeal ACA since other legislators felt like many Americans would be affected. Many Republican lawmakers started seeing that they may not get reelected if they continued to support the repeal of ACA.<\/p>\nIn May 2017, the House of Representatives passed the American Health Care Act (Jost, 2017). This was the first attempt at repealing ACA. The Trump administration wanted to use this act to repeal ACA.\u00a0\u00a0However, this Act would make millions of Americans lose health insurance<\/a> coverage. AHCA proposed that tax credit be based on age, which would increase healthcare costs. This Act also created the Patient and State Stability Fund, which would reduce premiums by 25% after 2026 (Jost, 2017). This would increase healthcare costs for Americans with preexisting comorbid conditions.<\/p>\nA cost-benefit analysis by Republican lawmakers revealed that they would not get reelected because of the negative effects of repealing. Repealing ACA would lead to millions of Americans losing insurance coverage (Straw & Aron-Dine, 2020). This was the main reason for implementing ACA. ACA aimed to increase insurance coverage to millions of Americans and reduce healthcare costs (Sommers, 2020). Due to reelection purposes, the Senate Majority Leader McConnell found it hard to garner support for AHCA. To protect their political interest, the US senators came up with another proposal known as the Better Care Reconciliation Act of 2017 (Smith & Gibbs, 2017).<\/p>\n
Members of Congress and Senators are elected leaders who must be voted for by the public. Due to this, their positions on policies such as Obamacare are influenced by how their electorates feel. Because of this, their interest is reelection and not ACA.<\/p>\n
References<\/h2>\n
Jost,\u00a0T.\u00a0S. (2017). House passes AHCA; HHS acts on regulations.\u00a0Health Affairs<\/em>,\u00a036<\/em>(6), 982-983.<\/p>\nSmith,\u00a0K., & Gibbs,\u00a0T.\u00a0E. (2017). The APHA PHACT campaign in action in Delaware.\u00a0Delaware Journal of Public Health<\/em>,\u00a03<\/em>(4), 6-11.<\/p>\nSommers,\u00a0B.\u00a0D. (2020). Health insurance coverage: What comes after the ACA?\u00a0Health Affairs<\/em>,\u00a039<\/em>(3), 502-508.<\/p>\nStraw,\u00a0T., & Aron-Dine,\u00a0A. (2020).\u00a0Commentary: ACA Repeal Even More Dangerous During Pandemic and Economic Crisis<\/em>. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.\u00a0https:\/\/www.cbpp.org\/research\/health\/commentary-aca-repeal-even-more-dangerous-during-pandemic-and-economic-crisis<\/a>![\"POLITICAL](\"https:\/\/nursingassignmentcrackers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/POLITICAL-AND-THE-PATIENT-PROTECTION-AND-AFFORDABLE-CARE-ACT-NURS-6050-300x145.png\")
<\/p>\n <\/p>\n
A Sample Answer 2 For the Assignment: POLITICAL AND THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT NURS 6050<\/strong><\/h2>\nTitle: <\/strong> POLITICAL AND THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT NURS 6050<\/strong><\/h2>\nYour post well describes the outcome of cost-benefit analysis and recognizes how it was represented regarding attempts to repeal\/replace the ACA during the Trump administration. It is clear that that is no longer a threat during the Biden administration.<\/p>\n
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: POLITICAL AND THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT NURS 6050<\/strong><\/a><\/em><\/span><\/h3>\nI agree with you. According\u202fto Rand, the proposal to repeal ACA without replacement is anticipated to allow the government to save on ACA expenditure, a figure of close to $1 trillion allocated toward other government endeavors. This proposal would appeal to the taxpayers, especially the high-income earners, to increase insurance prices by 8% and deny more than 12 million Americans access to health care. In other words, it would appeal to the voters who can access healthcare without the ACA. Unfortunately, it would not appeal to voters who cannot afford healthcare without the ACA. Therefore, there is fear that the repeal of the ACA will result in massive loss of jobs with the reduction of people who have access to insurance cover. If the act is repealed, many people who acquired their insurance coverage under the affordable healthcare program will automatically lose them. Millions of low-income earners who got covered under the Medicaid program will lose them, and consequently, many Americans will end up uninsured.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nReference<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h2>\nRand Corporation (2019). The Future of U.S. Health Care: Replace or Revise the Affordable Care Act? Retrieved from\u202f<\/span>https:\/\/www.rand.org\/health-care\/key-topics\/health-policy\/in-depth.html<\/span><\/a>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nA Sample Answer 3 For the Assignment: POLITICAL AND THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT NURS 6050<\/strong><\/h2>\nTitle: <\/strong> POLITICAL AND THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT NURS 6050<\/strong><\/h2>\nThe last statement of\u00a0\u00a0“….their interest is re-election and not ACA.”\u00a0This statement highlights the level of politics within politics.\u00a0Interest groups spend resources on trying to remove legislators who do not share in their intentions.\u00a0Americans would be better served by policy-motivated committees that dissect and evaluate the benefit of a bill before allowing it to be considered (Lorenz,\u00a02020).\u00a0Everything boils down to the dollar.\u00a0I understand health care and politics are as much of a business as anything else. However,\u00a0it is unfortunate the system is overly saturated with misguided interests, and how does this benefit me.\u00a0Personal experiences weigh heavily on attitudes\u00a0toward the government and health care policies within contemporary societies (Larson, 2020). Lobbyists aid in providing and identifying agendas; these “agenda setters” would be more likely to perform in the public’s best interest if a policy-motivated committee was the influence behind new bills (Lorenz, 2020).<\/p>\n
Larsen, G. (2020. Personal politics? Healthcare policies, personal experiences and government attitudes.\u00a0Journal of European Social\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0Policy<\/em>.<\/p>\nhttps:\/\/doi.10.1177\/0958928720904319<\/p>\n
Lorenz, G. (2020). Prioritized interests: Diverse lobbying coalitions and congressional committee agenda setting.\u00a0University of Chicago Press Journals.<\/em><\/p>\n\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0<\/em>https:\/\/www.journals.uchicago.edu\/doi\/abs\/10.1086\/705744<\/a><\/p>\nA Sample Answer 4 For the Assignment: POLITICAL AND THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT NURS 6050<\/strong><\/h2>\nTitle: <\/strong> POLITICAL AND THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT NURS 6050<\/strong><\/h2>\nHi Sasha,\u00a0I think your discussion post was a great summary of how beneficial the ACA was and the detriment to the entire population we would have seen if the AHCA had been passed. The elderly population would have suffered the most as far as coverage due to costs, and the younger population would have had a harder time finding accessible care because of constituents based on age. Also, I like that you mentioned that health care costs would increase for Americans with comorbidities, as this has been a growing concern over the years.<\/p>\n
Thank you for your response to the discussion.\u00a0The way you ended your post really stands out and is a little unsettling.\u00a0It is unfortunate that there are politicians who’s main goal is to keep their position or maintain their image for re-election.\u00a0 I would hope that the majority of politicians stand by their ethics and vote based off their true feelings and advocate for the populations they represent. I would like to see improvements continue to be made in relation to health care without driving the costs of care up. It is obvious that politicians want to make changes, for example,\u00a0the Better Care Reconciliation Act was created in order to make changes but not to be as controversial (Smith &\u00a0Gibbs, 2017).<\/p>\n
References:<\/h2>\n
Smith,\u00a0K., & Gibbs,\u00a0T.\u00a0E. (2017). The APHA PHACT campaign in action in Delaware.\u00a0Delaware\u00a0\u00a0Journal of Public Health,\u00a03(4), 6-11.<\/p>\n
A Sample Answer 5 For the Assignment: POLITICAL AND THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT NURS 6050<\/strong><\/h2>\nTitle: <\/strong> POLITICAL AND THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT NURS 6050<\/strong><\/h2>\nI love that you kept the explanation of the health care acts and attempted repeal short and simple but explained it all perfectly. It is a shame that in recent times, politician\u2019s true colors have shown. They are making it more transparent that some, unfortunately most, do not always have the American people\u2019s best interest in mind. With legislators being driven with the primary goal of being re-elected and not solely for the benefit for its constituents (Milstead & Short, 2019), I am grateful we live in a country that allows us to be a part of a democracy in order to have some control in how our amazing country is ran. According to Dr. Nwogu, \u201cdemocracy is a system of government with four key elements: a system for choosing and replacing the government through free and fair elections, active participation of the people, as citizens in politics and civic life, protection of the human rights of all citizens and a rule of law in which the laws and procedures apply equally to all citizens\u201d (2015). I genuinely believe, if we allowed these elements to guide our country, the government wouldn\u2019t be viewed as corrupt, and we wouldn\u2019t have to analyze how politicians balance cost vs benefit for their gain instead of the American people like it was originally intended way back when.<\/p>\n
References<\/h2>\n
Milstead, J. A., & Short, N. M. (2019. Informing public policy: An important role for registered nurses. In\u00a0Health Policy and Polictics: A nurse\u2019s guide\u00a0<\/em>(6th<\/sup>\u00a0ed., p. 40). Jones and Bartlett Learning.<\/p>\nNwogu, G. A. I. (2015). Democracy: Its Meaning and Dissenting Opinions of the Political Class in Nigeria: A Philosophical Approach .\u00a0Journal of Education and Practice<\/em>,\u00a06<\/em>(4). Retrieved 2021, from\u00a0https:\/\/files.eric.ed.gov\/fulltext\/EJ1083739.pdf.<\/a><\/p>\nA Sample Answer 6 For the Assignment: POLITICAL AND THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT NURS 6050<\/strong><\/h2>\nTitle: <\/strong> POLITICAL AND THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT NURS 6050<\/strong><\/h2>\nI enjoyed reading your informative discussion board post on the importance and benefits of the Affordable Care Act. Without this bill passed by President Obama, vulnerable populations, the Elderly and young population, cannot receive healthcare services. The affordable care act is essential as it reduces the insurance premium coverage. In turn, patients can pay for doctor\u2019s visits and deliver their medication. Replacing and repealing ACA will affect millions of Americans in a negative way who rely on this act to have their medical needs met. According to<\/p>\n
Cusick \u201cThe ACA codified protection for people with pre-existing conditions and eliminated patient cost-sharing for high values preventive care (Cusick Director et al., 2021). With that in mind, ACA has helped millions of Americans to afford to pay for health services. Replacing the ACA will not be a good idea.<\/p>\n
References<\/h2>\n
\nClick the weekly resources link to access the resources.<\/p>\n
To Prepare:<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n- Review the Resources and reflect on efforts to repeal\/replace the Affordable Care Act (ACA).<\/li>\n
- Consider who benefits the most when policy is developed and in the context of policy implementation.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
BY DAY 3 OF WEEK 3<\/h2>\n
Post<\/strong>\u00a0an explanation for how you think the cost-benefit analysis in terms of legislators being reelected affected efforts to repeal\/replace the ACA. Then, explain how analyses of the voters views may affect decisions by legislative leaders in recommending or positioning national policies (e.g., Congress’ decisions impacting Medicare or Medicaid). Remember, the number one job of a legislator is to be re-elected. Please check your discussion grading rubric to ensure your responses meet the criteria.<\/p>\nBY DAY 6 OF WEEK 3<\/h2>\n
Respond<\/strong>\u00a0to at least\u00a0two<\/strong>\u00a0of your colleagues* on two different days<\/strong>\u00a0by expanding on their explanation and providing an example that supports their explanation or respectfully challenging their explanation and providing an example.<\/p>\n*Note:<\/em><\/strong>\u00a0Throughout this program, your fellow students are referred to as colleagues.<\/em><\/p>\nA Sample Answer For the Assignment: POLITICAL AND THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT NURS 6050<\/strong><\/h2>\nTitle: <\/strong> POLITICAL AND THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT NURS 6050<\/strong><\/h2>\nThe Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA) is a revolutionary policy. This Act wanted to address social injustices in the American healthcare system<\/a>. However, this policy has met stiff opposition from Republican legislators who openly opposed it. When Donald Trump came to power, repealing ACA was one of his number one priorities. They, however, did not get the requisite number to repeal ACA since other legislators felt like many Americans would be affected. Many Republican lawmakers started seeing that they may not get reelected if they continued to support the repeal of ACA.<\/p>\nIn May 2017, the House of Representatives passed the American Health Care Act (Jost, 2017). This was the first attempt at repealing ACA. The Trump administration wanted to use this act to repeal ACA.\u00a0\u00a0However, this Act would make millions of Americans lose health insurance<\/a> coverage. AHCA proposed that tax credit be based on age, which would increase healthcare costs. This Act also created the Patient and State Stability Fund, which would reduce premiums by 25% after 2026 (Jost, 2017). This would increase healthcare costs for Americans with preexisting comorbid conditions.<\/p>\nA cost-benefit analysis by Republican lawmakers revealed that they would not get reelected because of the negative effects of repealing. Repealing ACA would lead to millions of Americans losing insurance coverage (Straw & Aron-Dine, 2020). This was the main reason for implementing ACA. ACA aimed to increase insurance coverage to millions of Americans and reduce healthcare costs (Sommers, 2020). Due to reelection purposes, the Senate Majority Leader McConnell found it hard to garner support for AHCA. To protect their political interest, the US senators came up with another proposal known as the Better Care Reconciliation Act of 2017 (Smith & Gibbs, 2017).<\/p>\n
Members of Congress and Senators are elected leaders who must be voted for by the public. Due to this, their positions on policies such as Obamacare are influenced by how their electorates feel. Because of this, their interest is reelection and not ACA.<\/p>\n
References<\/h2>\n
Jost,\u00a0T.\u00a0S. (2017). House passes AHCA; HHS acts on regulations.\u00a0Health Affairs<\/em>,\u00a036<\/em>(6), 982-983.<\/p>\nSmith,\u00a0K., & Gibbs,\u00a0T.\u00a0E. (2017). The APHA PHACT campaign in action in Delaware.\u00a0Delaware Journal of Public Health<\/em>,\u00a03<\/em>(4), 6-11.<\/p>\nSommers,\u00a0B.\u00a0D. (2020). Health insurance coverage: What comes after the ACA?\u00a0Health Affairs<\/em>,\u00a039<\/em>(3), 502-508.<\/p>\nStraw,\u00a0T., & Aron-Dine,\u00a0A. (2020).\u00a0Commentary: ACA Repeal Even More Dangerous During Pandemic and Economic Crisis<\/em>. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.\u00a0https:\/\/www.cbpp.org\/research\/health\/commentary-aca-repeal-even-more-dangerous-during-pandemic-and-economic-crisis<\/a><\/p>\n <\/p>\n
A Sample Answer 2 For the Assignment: POLITICAL AND THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT NURS 6050<\/strong><\/h2>\nTitle: <\/strong> POLITICAL AND THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT NURS 6050<\/strong><\/h2>\nYour post well describes the outcome of cost-benefit analysis and recognizes how it was represented regarding attempts to repeal\/replace the ACA during the Trump administration. It is clear that that is no longer a threat during the Biden administration.<\/p>\n
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: POLITICAL AND THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT NURS 6050<\/strong><\/a><\/em><\/span><\/h3>\nI agree with you. According\u202fto Rand, the proposal to repeal ACA without replacement is anticipated to allow the government to save on ACA expenditure, a figure of close to $1 trillion allocated toward other government endeavors. This proposal would appeal to the taxpayers, especially the high-income earners, to increase insurance prices by 8% and deny more than 12 million Americans access to health care. In other words, it would appeal to the voters who can access healthcare without the ACA. Unfortunately, it would not appeal to voters who cannot afford healthcare without the ACA. Therefore, there is fear that the repeal of the ACA will result in massive loss of jobs with the reduction of people who have access to insurance cover. If the act is repealed, many people who acquired their insurance coverage under the affordable healthcare program will automatically lose them. Millions of low-income earners who got covered under the Medicaid program will lose them, and consequently, many Americans will end up uninsured.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nReference<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h2>\nRand Corporation (2019). The Future of U.S. Health Care: Replace or Revise the Affordable Care Act? Retrieved from\u202f<\/span>https:\/\/www.rand.org\/health-care\/key-topics\/health-policy\/in-depth.html<\/span><\/a>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nA Sample Answer 3 For the Assignment: POLITICAL AND THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT NURS 6050<\/strong><\/h2>\nTitle: <\/strong> POLITICAL AND THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT NURS 6050<\/strong><\/h2>\nThe last statement of\u00a0\u00a0“….their interest is re-election and not ACA.”\u00a0This statement highlights the level of politics within politics.\u00a0Interest groups spend resources on trying to remove legislators who do not share in their intentions.\u00a0Americans would be better served by policy-motivated committees that dissect and evaluate the benefit of a bill before allowing it to be considered (Lorenz,\u00a02020).\u00a0Everything boils down to the dollar.\u00a0I understand health care and politics are as much of a business as anything else. However,\u00a0it is unfortunate the system is overly saturated with misguided interests, and how does this benefit me.\u00a0Personal experiences weigh heavily on attitudes\u00a0toward the government and health care policies within contemporary societies (Larson, 2020). Lobbyists aid in providing and identifying agendas; these “agenda setters” would be more likely to perform in the public’s best interest if a policy-motivated committee was the influence behind new bills (Lorenz, 2020).<\/p>\n
Larsen, G. (2020. Personal politics? Healthcare policies, personal experiences and government attitudes.\u00a0Journal of European Social\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0Policy<\/em>.<\/p>\nhttps:\/\/doi.10.1177\/0958928720904319<\/p>\n
Lorenz, G. (2020). Prioritized interests: Diverse lobbying coalitions and congressional committee agenda setting.\u00a0University of Chicago Press Journals.<\/em><\/p>\n\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0<\/em>https:\/\/www.journals.uchicago.edu\/doi\/abs\/10.1086\/705744<\/a><\/p>\nA Sample Answer 4 For the Assignment: POLITICAL AND THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT NURS 6050<\/strong><\/h2>\nTitle: <\/strong> POLITICAL AND THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT NURS 6050<\/strong><\/h2>\nHi Sasha,\u00a0I think your discussion post was a great summary of how beneficial the ACA was and the detriment to the entire population we would have seen if the AHCA had been passed. The elderly population would have suffered the most as far as coverage due to costs, and the younger population would have had a harder time finding accessible care because of constituents based on age. Also, I like that you mentioned that health care costs would increase for Americans with comorbidities, as this has been a growing concern over the years.<\/p>\n
Thank you for your response to the discussion.\u00a0The way you ended your post really stands out and is a little unsettling.\u00a0It is unfortunate that there are politicians who’s main goal is to keep their position or maintain their image for re-election.\u00a0 I would hope that the majority of politicians stand by their ethics and vote based off their true feelings and advocate for the populations they represent. I would like to see improvements continue to be made in relation to health care without driving the costs of care up. It is obvious that politicians want to make changes, for example,\u00a0the Better Care Reconciliation Act was created in order to make changes but not to be as controversial (Smith &\u00a0Gibbs, 2017).<\/p>\n
References:<\/h2>\n
Smith,\u00a0K., & Gibbs,\u00a0T.\u00a0E. (2017). The APHA PHACT campaign in action in Delaware.\u00a0Delaware\u00a0\u00a0Journal of Public Health,\u00a03(4), 6-11.<\/p>\n
A Sample Answer 5 For the Assignment: POLITICAL AND THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT NURS 6050<\/strong><\/h2>\nTitle: <\/strong> POLITICAL AND THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT NURS 6050<\/strong><\/h2>\nI love that you kept the explanation of the health care acts and attempted repeal short and simple but explained it all perfectly. It is a shame that in recent times, politician\u2019s true colors have shown. They are making it more transparent that some, unfortunately most, do not always have the American people\u2019s best interest in mind. With legislators being driven with the primary goal of being re-elected and not solely for the benefit for its constituents (Milstead & Short, 2019), I am grateful we live in a country that allows us to be a part of a democracy in order to have some control in how our amazing country is ran. According to Dr. Nwogu, \u201cdemocracy is a system of government with four key elements: a system for choosing and replacing the government through free and fair elections, active participation of the people, as citizens in politics and civic life, protection of the human rights of all citizens and a rule of law in which the laws and procedures apply equally to all citizens\u201d (2015). I genuinely believe, if we allowed these elements to guide our country, the government wouldn\u2019t be viewed as corrupt, and we wouldn\u2019t have to analyze how politicians balance cost vs benefit for their gain instead of the American people like it was originally intended way back when.<\/p>\n
References<\/h2>\n
Milstead, J. A., & Short, N. M. (2019. Informing public policy: An important role for registered nurses. In\u00a0Health Policy and Polictics: A nurse\u2019s guide\u00a0<\/em>(6th<\/sup>\u00a0ed., p. 40). Jones and Bartlett Learning.<\/p>\nNwogu, G. A. I. (2015). Democracy: Its Meaning and Dissenting Opinions of the Political Class in Nigeria: A Philosophical Approach .\u00a0Journal of Education and Practice<\/em>,\u00a06<\/em>(4). Retrieved 2021, from\u00a0https:\/\/files.eric.ed.gov\/fulltext\/EJ1083739.pdf.<\/a><\/p>\nA Sample Answer 6 For the Assignment: POLITICAL AND THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT NURS 6050<\/strong><\/h2>\nTitle: <\/strong> POLITICAL AND THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT NURS 6050<\/strong><\/h2>\nI enjoyed reading your informative discussion board post on the importance and benefits of the Affordable Care Act. Without this bill passed by President Obama, vulnerable populations, the Elderly and young population, cannot receive healthcare services. The affordable care act is essential as it reduces the insurance premium coverage. In turn, patients can pay for doctor\u2019s visits and deliver their medication. Replacing and repealing ACA will affect millions of Americans in a negative way who rely on this act to have their medical needs met. According to<\/p>\n
Cusick \u201cThe ACA codified protection for people with pre-existing conditions and eliminated patient cost-sharing for high values preventive care (Cusick Director et al., 2021). With that in mind, ACA has helped millions of Americans to afford to pay for health services. Replacing the ACA will not be a good idea.<\/p>\n
References<\/h2>\n
BY DAY 3 OF WEEK 3<\/h2>\n
Post<\/strong>\u00a0an explanation for how you think the cost-benefit analysis in terms of legislators being reelected affected efforts to repeal\/replace the ACA. Then, explain how analyses of the voters views may affect decisions by legislative leaders in recommending or positioning national policies (e.g., Congress’ decisions impacting Medicare or Medicaid). Remember, the number one job of a legislator is to be re-elected. Please check your discussion grading rubric to ensure your responses meet the criteria.<\/p>\n Respond<\/strong>\u00a0to at least\u00a0two<\/strong>\u00a0of your colleagues* on two different days<\/strong>\u00a0by expanding on their explanation and providing an example that supports their explanation or respectfully challenging their explanation and providing an example.<\/p>\n *Note:<\/em><\/strong>\u00a0Throughout this program, your fellow students are referred to as colleagues.<\/em><\/p>\n The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA) is a revolutionary policy. This Act wanted to address social injustices in the American healthcare system<\/a>. However, this policy has met stiff opposition from Republican legislators who openly opposed it. When Donald Trump came to power, repealing ACA was one of his number one priorities. They, however, did not get the requisite number to repeal ACA since other legislators felt like many Americans would be affected. Many Republican lawmakers started seeing that they may not get reelected if they continued to support the repeal of ACA.<\/p>\n In May 2017, the House of Representatives passed the American Health Care Act (Jost, 2017). This was the first attempt at repealing ACA. The Trump administration wanted to use this act to repeal ACA.\u00a0\u00a0However, this Act would make millions of Americans lose health insurance<\/a> coverage. AHCA proposed that tax credit be based on age, which would increase healthcare costs. This Act also created the Patient and State Stability Fund, which would reduce premiums by 25% after 2026 (Jost, 2017). This would increase healthcare costs for Americans with preexisting comorbid conditions.<\/p>\n A cost-benefit analysis by Republican lawmakers revealed that they would not get reelected because of the negative effects of repealing. Repealing ACA would lead to millions of Americans losing insurance coverage (Straw & Aron-Dine, 2020). This was the main reason for implementing ACA. ACA aimed to increase insurance coverage to millions of Americans and reduce healthcare costs (Sommers, 2020). Due to reelection purposes, the Senate Majority Leader McConnell found it hard to garner support for AHCA. To protect their political interest, the US senators came up with another proposal known as the Better Care Reconciliation Act of 2017 (Smith & Gibbs, 2017).<\/p>\n Members of Congress and Senators are elected leaders who must be voted for by the public. Due to this, their positions on policies such as Obamacare are influenced by how their electorates feel. Because of this, their interest is reelection and not ACA.<\/p>\n Jost,\u00a0T.\u00a0S. (2017). House passes AHCA; HHS acts on regulations.\u00a0Health Affairs<\/em>,\u00a036<\/em>(6), 982-983.<\/p>\n Smith,\u00a0K., & Gibbs,\u00a0T.\u00a0E. (2017). The APHA PHACT campaign in action in Delaware.\u00a0Delaware Journal of Public Health<\/em>,\u00a03<\/em>(4), 6-11.<\/p>\n Sommers,\u00a0B.\u00a0D. (2020). Health insurance coverage: What comes after the ACA?\u00a0Health Affairs<\/em>,\u00a039<\/em>(3), 502-508.<\/p>\n Straw,\u00a0T., & Aron-Dine,\u00a0A. (2020).\u00a0Commentary: ACA Repeal Even More Dangerous During Pandemic and Economic Crisis<\/em>. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.\u00a0https:\/\/www.cbpp.org\/research\/health\/commentary-aca-repeal-even-more-dangerous-during-pandemic-and-economic-crisis<\/a> <\/p>\n Your post well describes the outcome of cost-benefit analysis and recognizes how it was represented regarding attempts to repeal\/replace the ACA during the Trump administration. It is clear that that is no longer a threat during the Biden administration.<\/p>\n I agree with you. According\u202fto Rand, the proposal to repeal ACA without replacement is anticipated to allow the government to save on ACA expenditure, a figure of close to $1 trillion allocated toward other government endeavors. This proposal would appeal to the taxpayers, especially the high-income earners, to increase insurance prices by 8% and deny more than 12 million Americans access to health care. In other words, it would appeal to the voters who can access healthcare without the ACA. Unfortunately, it would not appeal to voters who cannot afford healthcare without the ACA. Therefore, there is fear that the repeal of the ACA will result in massive loss of jobs with the reduction of people who have access to insurance cover. If the act is repealed, many people who acquired their insurance coverage under the affordable healthcare program will automatically lose them. Millions of low-income earners who got covered under the Medicaid program will lose them, and consequently, many Americans will end up uninsured.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Rand Corporation (2019). The Future of U.S. Health Care: Replace or Revise the Affordable Care Act? Retrieved from\u202f<\/span>https:\/\/www.rand.org\/health-care\/key-topics\/health-policy\/in-depth.html<\/span><\/a>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n The last statement of\u00a0\u00a0“….their interest is re-election and not ACA.”\u00a0This statement highlights the level of politics within politics.\u00a0Interest groups spend resources on trying to remove legislators who do not share in their intentions.\u00a0Americans would be better served by policy-motivated committees that dissect and evaluate the benefit of a bill before allowing it to be considered (Lorenz,\u00a02020).\u00a0Everything boils down to the dollar.\u00a0I understand health care and politics are as much of a business as anything else. However,\u00a0it is unfortunate the system is overly saturated with misguided interests, and how does this benefit me.\u00a0Personal experiences weigh heavily on attitudes\u00a0toward the government and health care policies within contemporary societies (Larson, 2020). Lobbyists aid in providing and identifying agendas; these “agenda setters” would be more likely to perform in the public’s best interest if a policy-motivated committee was the influence behind new bills (Lorenz, 2020).<\/p>\n Larsen, G. (2020. Personal politics? Healthcare policies, personal experiences and government attitudes.\u00a0Journal of European Social\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0Policy<\/em>.<\/p>\n https:\/\/doi.10.1177\/0958928720904319<\/p>\n Lorenz, G. (2020). Prioritized interests: Diverse lobbying coalitions and congressional committee agenda setting.\u00a0University of Chicago Press Journals.<\/em><\/p>\n \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0<\/em>https:\/\/www.journals.uchicago.edu\/doi\/abs\/10.1086\/705744<\/a><\/p>\n Hi Sasha,\u00a0I think your discussion post was a great summary of how beneficial the ACA was and the detriment to the entire population we would have seen if the AHCA had been passed. The elderly population would have suffered the most as far as coverage due to costs, and the younger population would have had a harder time finding accessible care because of constituents based on age. Also, I like that you mentioned that health care costs would increase for Americans with comorbidities, as this has been a growing concern over the years.<\/p>\n Thank you for your response to the discussion.\u00a0The way you ended your post really stands out and is a little unsettling.\u00a0It is unfortunate that there are politicians who’s main goal is to keep their position or maintain their image for re-election.\u00a0 I would hope that the majority of politicians stand by their ethics and vote based off their true feelings and advocate for the populations they represent. I would like to see improvements continue to be made in relation to health care without driving the costs of care up. It is obvious that politicians want to make changes, for example,\u00a0the Better Care Reconciliation Act was created in order to make changes but not to be as controversial (Smith &\u00a0Gibbs, 2017).<\/p>\n Smith,\u00a0K., & Gibbs,\u00a0T.\u00a0E. (2017). The APHA PHACT campaign in action in Delaware.\u00a0Delaware\u00a0\u00a0Journal of Public Health,\u00a03(4), 6-11.<\/p>\n I love that you kept the explanation of the health care acts and attempted repeal short and simple but explained it all perfectly. It is a shame that in recent times, politician\u2019s true colors have shown. They are making it more transparent that some, unfortunately most, do not always have the American people\u2019s best interest in mind. With legislators being driven with the primary goal of being re-elected and not solely for the benefit for its constituents (Milstead & Short, 2019), I am grateful we live in a country that allows us to be a part of a democracy in order to have some control in how our amazing country is ran. According to Dr. Nwogu, \u201cdemocracy is a system of government with four key elements: a system for choosing and replacing the government through free and fair elections, active participation of the people, as citizens in politics and civic life, protection of the human rights of all citizens and a rule of law in which the laws and procedures apply equally to all citizens\u201d (2015). I genuinely believe, if we allowed these elements to guide our country, the government wouldn\u2019t be viewed as corrupt, and we wouldn\u2019t have to analyze how politicians balance cost vs benefit for their gain instead of the American people like it was originally intended way back when.<\/p>\n Milstead, J. A., & Short, N. M. (2019. Informing public policy: An important role for registered nurses. In\u00a0Health Policy and Polictics: A nurse\u2019s guide\u00a0<\/em>(6th<\/sup>\u00a0ed., p. 40). Jones and Bartlett Learning.<\/p>\n Nwogu, G. A. I. (2015). Democracy: Its Meaning and Dissenting Opinions of the Political Class in Nigeria: A Philosophical Approach .\u00a0Journal of Education and Practice<\/em>,\u00a06<\/em>(4). Retrieved 2021, from\u00a0https:\/\/files.eric.ed.gov\/fulltext\/EJ1083739.pdf.<\/a><\/p>\n I enjoyed reading your informative discussion board post on the importance and benefits of the Affordable Care Act. Without this bill passed by President Obama, vulnerable populations, the Elderly and young population, cannot receive healthcare services. The affordable care act is essential as it reduces the insurance premium coverage. In turn, patients can pay for doctor\u2019s visits and deliver their medication. Replacing and repealing ACA will affect millions of Americans in a negative way who rely on this act to have their medical needs met. According to<\/p>\n Cusick \u201cThe ACA codified protection for people with pre-existing conditions and eliminated patient cost-sharing for high values preventive care (Cusick Director et al., 2021). With that in mind, ACA has helped millions of Americans to afford to pay for health services. Replacing the ACA will not be a good idea.<\/p>\nBY DAY 6 OF WEEK 3<\/h2>\n
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: POLITICAL AND THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT NURS 6050<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Title: <\/strong> POLITICAL AND THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT NURS 6050<\/strong><\/h2>\n
References<\/h2>\n
<\/p>\nA Sample Answer 2 For the Assignment: POLITICAL AND THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT NURS 6050<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Title: <\/strong> POLITICAL AND THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT NURS 6050<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: POLITICAL AND THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT NURS 6050<\/strong><\/a><\/em><\/span><\/h3>\n
Reference<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h2>\n
A Sample Answer 3 For the Assignment: POLITICAL AND THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT NURS 6050<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Title: <\/strong> POLITICAL AND THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT NURS 6050<\/strong><\/h2>\n
A Sample Answer 4 For the Assignment: POLITICAL AND THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT NURS 6050<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Title: <\/strong> POLITICAL AND THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT NURS 6050<\/strong><\/h2>\n
References:<\/h2>\n
A Sample Answer 5 For the Assignment: POLITICAL AND THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT NURS 6050<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Title: <\/strong> POLITICAL AND THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT NURS 6050<\/strong><\/h2>\n
References<\/h2>\n
A Sample Answer 6 For the Assignment: POLITICAL AND THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT NURS 6050<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Title: <\/strong> POLITICAL AND THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT NURS 6050<\/strong><\/h2>\n
References<\/h2>\n