\n25\u202fto >22.0\u202fpts<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Excellent<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nThe response accurately and clearly explains in detail the diagnosis for the patient, including an accurate and thorough rationale for the diagnosis that supports clinical judgment.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n | 22\u202fto >19.0\u202fpts<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Good<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nThe response provides a basic explanation of 1-2 diagnoses for the patient, including an accurate rationale for the diagnosis that may support clinical judgment.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n | 19\u202fto >17.0\u202fpts<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Fair<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nThe response inaccurately or vaguely explains the diagnosis for the patient, including an inaccurate or vague rationale for the diagnosis that may or may not support clinical judgment.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n | 17\u202fto >0\u202fpts<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Poor<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nThe response inaccurately and vaguely explains the diagnosis for the patient, including an inaccurate and vague rationale for the diagnosis that does not support clinical judgment, or is missing.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n | 25\u202fpts<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescribe an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient’s history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n | \n\n\n\n30\u202fto >26.0\u202fpts<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Excellent<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nThe response accurately and completely describes in detail an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient’s history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n | 26\u202fto >23.0\u202fpts<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Good<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nThe response describes a basic explanation of the appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient’s history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n | 23\u202fto >20.0\u202fpts<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Fair<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nThe response inaccurately or vaguely describes an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient’s history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n | 20\u202fto >0\u202fpts<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Poor<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nThe response inaccurately and vaguely describes an appropriate drug therapy plan based on the patient’s history, diagnosis, and drugs currently prescribed.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n | 30\u202fpts<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeJustify why you would recommend this drug therapy plan for this patient. Be specific and provide examples.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n | \n\n\n\n30\u202fto >26.0\u202fpts<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Excellent<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nThe response provides an accurate, clear, and detailed justification for the recommended drug therapy plan for this patient. … The response includes specific, accurate, and detailed examples that fully support the justification provided.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n | 26\u202fto >23.0\u202fpts<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Good<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nThe response provides a basic justification for the recommended drug therapy plan for this patient. … The response includes only 1-2 examples that fully support the justification provided.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n | 23\u202fto >20.0\u202fpts<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Fair<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nThe response provides an inaccurate or vague justification for the recommended drug therapy plan for this patient. … The response may include examples, which may inaccurately or vaguely support the justification provided.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n | 20\u202fto >0\u202fpts<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Poor<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nThe response provides an inaccurate and vague justification for the recommended drug therapy plan for this patient, or is missing. … The response does not include examples that support the justification provided, or is missing.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n | 30\u202fpts<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n | \n\n\n\n5\u202fto >4.0\u202fpts<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Excellent<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n | 4\u202fto >3.5\u202fpts<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Good<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n | 3.5\u202fto >3.0\u202fpts<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Fair<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%\u201379% of the time.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n | 3\u202fto >0\u202fpts<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Poor<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n | 5\u202fpts<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n | \n\n\n\n5\u202fto >4.0\u202fpts<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Excellent<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n | 4\u202fto >3.5\u202fpts<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Good<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nContains a few (1\u20132) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n | 3.5\u202fto >3.0\u202fpts<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Fair<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nContains several (3\u20134) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n | 3\u202fto >0\u202fpts<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Poor<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nContains many (\u2265 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader\u2019s understanding<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n | 5\u202fpts<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing,\u202fmargins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical\/in-text citations, and reference list.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n | \n\n\n\n5\u202fto >4.0\u202fpts<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Excellent<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n | | | | | | | | | | |