\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nYour post was very clear,<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nResearch produces positive and negative outcomes. It does not always produce what the researcher is looking for. When looking at different processes that can be used for research a pilot came to mind, an experiment before going live. One issue that will cause research to have a negative outcome would be inconsistence when not using all parts on all participants (Holt, et al. 2021). You can have positive outcomes as well but how accurate will your research be. Research in healthcare is to improve patient outcomes, provide quality care and patient satisfaction, if our evidence is not consistent, we could cause harm to our patients. Accurate research takes many years and patient consent to participate, time may not always be on our side depending on what the research may be trying to prove or provide information about. A perfect example is the COVID19 vaccine, who did they get to agree to test the vaccine before approving it? (not trying to be controversial \u2013 just an example). Research needs an adequate number of participants (Holt, et al. 2021) articles to be substantial. PICOT structure and the nursing process for patients\u2019 outcomes working together may provide the framework for a shorter time for review of results (Wikan, et al. 2020).<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n