Sample Answer for NR 505 Week 4 Discussion: Qualitative Design and Sampling Included After Question<\/strong><\/h2>\nWith the focus on qualitative design and sampling, this is a great opportunity to compare and contrast quantitative and qualitative research approaches. For each of the following areas, apply information that considers one advantage and one disadvantage regarding<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\ncontrol over study conditions with the quantitative research<\/a> approach;<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\ncontrol over study conditions with the qualitative research approach;<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nextending or generalizing results from a sample to a larger group or population with the quantitative research approach; and<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nextending or generalizing results from a sample to a larger group or population with the qualitative research approach.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nBe sure to include scholarly references to support your information.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nA Sample Answer For the Assignment: NR 505 Week 4 Discussion: Qualitative Design and Sampling<\/strong><\/h2>\nTitle: NR 505 Week 4 Discussion: Qualitative Design and Sampling<\/strong><\/h2>\nResearch is categorized as quantitative or qualitative in nature.\u202f Quantitative research employs the use of numbers and accuracy while qualitative research focuses on lived experiences and human perception (Rutberg & Bouikidis, 2018).\u202f There are some advantages and disadvantages to both forms of research queries.\u202f The common goal of both is to conclude with positive, well-designed results that promotes change or introduces an intervention that is accurate and useful.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nControl over Study Conditions Research Approach: Advantage<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h2>\nQuantitative<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\nOne advantage with the control over study conditions with quantitative research approach is the way the data is collected.\u202f One form of research method that is used is the use of surveys for collection of data.\u202f With the use of surveys, data can be analyzed in an easy and fast manner, therefore consumption of time is less. The quantitative research approach consists of less time consumption, which allows a large amount of data to be collected.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nQualitative<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h2>\nQualitative research allows gathering of more in-depth data.\u202f Its use of in-depth, one-on-one interviews allows gaining a better understanding of collected data, thus allowing a better understanding of complex situations (Rutberg & Boukidis, 2018).<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nControl over Study Conditions Qualitative Research Approach: Disadvantage<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h2>\nQuantitative<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\nA disadvantage with the control over study conditions with quantitative research approach is that research is less in-depth.\u202f The observation of collected data and pertinent information can be overlooked with this form of research.\u202f The results can become vague and useless to the research. \u202f\u202fThis may cause a waste of time and resources, if the data is not reviewed for the intended outcome and accuracy.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nQualitative<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h2>\nA disadvantage of qualitative is its low credibility due to an inability to quantify predictors (Rutberg & Bouikidis, 2018).\u202f For example, the inability to give percentages of an unwarranted event\u2019s chance of reoccurrence in the future.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nExtending or Generalizing results from a sample or larger group or population with quantitative research approach:<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h2>\nAdvantage:<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\nBecause quantitative research uses a larger population, a larger volume of data is collected, a broader study can be made with more subjects to be reviewed, thus allowing more generalization to occur (Rutberg & Boukidis, 2018).<\/span><\/p>\nClick here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NR 505 Week 4 Discussion: Qualitative Design and Sampling\u00a0<\/strong><\/a><\/em><\/span><\/h3>\n![\"NR](\"http:\/\/nursingassignmentcrackers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/NR-505-Week-4-Discussion-Qualitative-Design-and-Sampling-300x138.png\")
NR 505 Week 4 Discussion Qualitative Design and Sampling<\/figcaption><\/figure>\nDisadvantage:<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\nThe results are based on quantity and most participants will not offer much insight into their thoughts, causing a lack of reliable context (Rutberg & Boukidis, 2018).<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nExtending or Generalizing results from a sample or larger group or population with qualitative research approach:<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h2>\nAdvantage:<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\nQualitative usually collects data through one \u2013on \u2013one interviews, focus groups, and discussions (Rutberg & Boukidis, 2018). The sample sizes are smaller allowing for a more in-depth collection of data to be utilized for research.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nDisadvantage:<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\nThe use of a smaller sample size makes it difficult for this research method to generalize the results of the qualitative study.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span>Reference<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\nRutberg, S., & Boukidis, C.D. (2018).\u202f Exploring the Evidence.\u202f Focusing on the Fundamentals: A Simplistic Differentiation Between Qualitative and Quantitative Research.\u202f\u202f<\/span>Nephrology Nursing Journal,\u202f<\/span><\/i>45(2), 209-213<\/span><\/p>\nA Sample Answer 2 For the Assignment: NR 505 Week 4 Discussion: Qualitative Design and Sampling<\/strong><\/h2>\nTitle: NR 505 Week 4 Discussion: Qualitative Design and Sampling<\/strong><\/h2>\nWhat a comprehensive post illustrating the differences between quant\/qual research control! Thank you for sharing this with the class! Linda and class, as we now have a pretty good background of both quant\/qual research, can you provide a comprehensive description of the design tradition that you have selected for your proposal? \u202f\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nI will attempt to provide a description of the design tradition for the proposal of unplanned health care for the rural population. \u202fThe research design is used to connect related elements of the study in a rational manner in order to conclude with useful knowledge that can improve the issues. \u202fWhile it may not be comprehensive enough at this point, I plan to use the quantitative method of research which uses measurements that focuses on cause and effect predictions. \u202fIn this study, I will attempt to integrate the factors that contribute to unplanned healthcare for the rural population. \u202fThe planned design tradition that I plan to use quasi-experimental. \u202fThe quasi- experimental design lacks randomaization in the study (Stichler, 2016). \u202fThe use of surveys for members of the rural population that are affected by unplanned healthcare will be used to gather the research data. The surveys will be self – designed or programmed, allowing for quantification of data to occur. \u202fWhile I am not fully aware of how the design will fit into my research method, or if I completely understand the design tradition, my goal is to achieve the knowledge needed to fulfill the reasearch study in order to fully address the issues for the proposal. \u202fThanks again for your post.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nReference<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h2>\nStichler, J. (2016). \u202fResearch, Research-Informed Design, Evidence-Based Design: Whatis theDifference and Does it Matter?\u202f<\/span>HERD: Health<\/span><\/i>\u202f<\/span>Environments Research & Design Journal.\u202f<\/span><\/i>\u202fRetrieved from:\u202f<\/span>http:\/\/ebscohostcom.chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org<\/span><\/a> ![\"NR](\"https:\/\/nursingassignmentcrackers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/111.jpg\")
<\/span><\/p>\nA Sample Answer 3 For the Assignment: NR 505 Week 4 Discussion: Qualitative Design and Sampling<\/strong><\/h2>\nTitle: NR 505 Week 4 Discussion: Qualitative Design and Sampling<\/strong><\/h2>\nI was very impressed by your post on\u202fcomparing and contrasting quantitative and qualitative research approaches.\u202fYour discussion board post was clear and concise in regard to control over sample conditions for both qualitative and quantitative research methods. \u202fThe way that you broke your findings down about both qualitative and quantitative extension\/generalization of results ensured that your scholarly information was easily understood. I believe that your intended message was well\u202freceived by all who read it. You obviously chose an excellent reference article. I feel that by preparing this assignment we will have a better, more in depth look into which approach to research will be more pertinent to our personal area of interest. I am a bit intimidated by preparing this project, but I know that the knowledge I acquire through each week’s lesson will improve my research abilities and add to my overall wisdom. I look forward to reading your posts in the future.\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\u202f\u202f\u202f\u202f When looking at qualitative research and quantitative research we will be looking at the advantage and disadvantage in some areas.When looking at quantitative research and the control over the study conditions on advantage would be that with quantitative they “use objective methods designed to control the research situation with the goal of minimizing bias and maximizing validity” (Polit & Beck, 2017). One disadvantage to quantitative research and control over the study conditions would be that maybe they keep the area of study to narrow and don’t allow them selves to expand research further on a given area of interest.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\u202f\u202f\u202f\u202f When looking at the qualitative research approach and the control over study conditions that are an advantage would be that one area of research could lead to another area of interest and study and can be expanded upon and are more flexible. A disadvantage of using qualitative research approach is that this type of study usually involves a small group of people there for not including a wide range for details and statistics in groups.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\u202f\u202f\u202f\u202f Extending or generalizing results from a sample to a larger group or population with the quantitative research approach advantages would be that it tries to quantify a problem and understand how prevalent it can be by looking for project-able results to a larger population(Polit & Beck, 2017). A disadvantage to this would be that the population or group is to large to obtain accurate results or statistics to produce the results of the study.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\u202f\u202f\u202f Extending or generalizing results from a sample to a larger group or population with the qualitative research approach advantages could be that there are now new studies and guidelines that one can follow for this approach, they can be that new insights are gained and new questions emerge on the area of interest and maybe a larger group to study (Smith, Gelling, Haigh, Barnason, Allan, & Jackson, 2017). A disadvantage would be that if it is a larger group or similar sample then they could possibly arrive at the same conclusions or similar information and the study would not progress.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nPolit, D. F. & Beck, C. T. (2017).\u202f<\/span>Essentials of nursing research: Appraising evidence for nursing practice\u202f<\/span><\/i>(9th ed.). Philadelphia PA: Wolters Kluwer Health. Retrieved from e-book electronic source.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nSmith, G. D., Gelling, L., Haigh, C., Barnason, S., Allan, H., & Jackson, D. (2017). The position of reporting guidelines in qualitative nursing research.\u202f<\/span>Journal Of Clinical Nursing<\/span><\/i>,\u202f<\/span>27<\/span><\/i>(5-6), 889-891.Retrieved from\u202f<\/span>https:\/\/eds-a-ebscohost-com.chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org\/eds\/detail\/detail?vid<\/span>Links to an external site.<\/span><\/a><\/p>\nA Sample Answer 4 For the Assignment: NR 505 Week 4 Discussion: Qualitative Design and Sampling<\/strong><\/h2>\nTitle: NR 505 Week 4 Discussion: Qualitative Design and Sampling<\/strong><\/h2>\nT<\/span>hank you for your post, as in fact, samples for qual data can be increase in order to achieve data saturation, or redundancy, in which no more new information is reported by participants.\u202f\u202fWhat is interesting is that in qual studies, often, data collection\/data analysis are ongoing. \u202fThis is important b\/c, ongoing data analysis\/interpretation will help in to decide if you have sampled enough participants to answer the research question.\u202f If participants continue to report similar experiences, then it can be determined if data saturation has been achieved and recruitment of participants can cease.\u202f :D\u202f As a peer reviewer of qual studies, we determine if researchers have achieved data saturation as a way to determine credible findings. <\/span><\/p>\nData saturation is the terminology used to describe the point in a study when enough data has been acquired to replicate the study when no additional new information is attainable, and when further coding is no longer possible is an interesting concept.\u202f According to Fusch & Ness (2015), the failure to reach data saturation affects the research quality and impeded the validity of the content.\u202f The design a qualitative research study should address the number of interviews required to reach data saturation. Fusch & Ness (2015) argue that data saturation can be difficult to quantify because there is no set formula that fits every project because study\u202fdesigns are not universal.\u202f Furthermore, “when and how one reaches those levels of saturation will vary from study design to study design” (Fusch & Ness, 2015, p.1409).<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nAs I stated at the beginning of this post, data saturation is quite the interesting subject matter to me especially in regards to the qualitative research methods. Some of the more common methods of data collection include interviews, surveys and focus group sessions (Fusch & Ness, 2015). Conducting these methods in the research subjects natural habit would tend to leave room for the conversations to evolve and change depending on the participants’ mood and the answers provided at the time the interview or focus group took place.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
control over study conditions with the quantitative research<\/a> approach;<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n control over study conditions with the qualitative research approach;<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n extending or generalizing results from a sample to a larger group or population with the quantitative research approach; and<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n extending or generalizing results from a sample to a larger group or population with the qualitative research approach.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Be sure to include scholarly references to support your information.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Research is categorized as quantitative or qualitative in nature.\u202f Quantitative research employs the use of numbers and accuracy while qualitative research focuses on lived experiences and human perception (Rutberg & Bouikidis, 2018).\u202f There are some advantages and disadvantages to both forms of research queries.\u202f The common goal of both is to conclude with positive, well-designed results that promotes change or introduces an intervention that is accurate and useful.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n One advantage with the control over study conditions with quantitative research approach is the way the data is collected.\u202f One form of research method that is used is the use of surveys for collection of data.\u202f With the use of surveys, data can be analyzed in an easy and fast manner, therefore consumption of time is less. The quantitative research approach consists of less time consumption, which allows a large amount of data to be collected.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Qualitative research allows gathering of more in-depth data.\u202f Its use of in-depth, one-on-one interviews allows gaining a better understanding of collected data, thus allowing a better understanding of complex situations (Rutberg & Boukidis, 2018).<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n A disadvantage with the control over study conditions with quantitative research approach is that research is less in-depth.\u202f The observation of collected data and pertinent information can be overlooked with this form of research.\u202f The results can become vague and useless to the research. \u202f\u202fThis may cause a waste of time and resources, if the data is not reviewed for the intended outcome and accuracy.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n A disadvantage of qualitative is its low credibility due to an inability to quantify predictors (Rutberg & Bouikidis, 2018).\u202f For example, the inability to give percentages of an unwarranted event\u2019s chance of reoccurrence in the future.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Because quantitative research uses a larger population, a larger volume of data is collected, a broader study can be made with more subjects to be reviewed, thus allowing more generalization to occur (Rutberg & Boukidis, 2018).<\/span><\/p>\n The results are based on quantity and most participants will not offer much insight into their thoughts, causing a lack of reliable context (Rutberg & Boukidis, 2018).<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Qualitative usually collects data through one \u2013on \u2013one interviews, focus groups, and discussions (Rutberg & Boukidis, 2018). The sample sizes are smaller allowing for a more in-depth collection of data to be utilized for research.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n The use of a smaller sample size makes it difficult for this research method to generalize the results of the qualitative study.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Rutberg, S., & Boukidis, C.D. (2018).\u202f Exploring the Evidence.\u202f Focusing on the Fundamentals: A Simplistic Differentiation Between Qualitative and Quantitative Research.\u202f\u202f<\/span>Nephrology Nursing Journal,\u202f<\/span><\/i>45(2), 209-213<\/span><\/p>\n What a comprehensive post illustrating the differences between quant\/qual research control! Thank you for sharing this with the class! Linda and class, as we now have a pretty good background of both quant\/qual research, can you provide a comprehensive description of the design tradition that you have selected for your proposal? \u202f\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n I will attempt to provide a description of the design tradition for the proposal of unplanned health care for the rural population. \u202fThe research design is used to connect related elements of the study in a rational manner in order to conclude with useful knowledge that can improve the issues. \u202fWhile it may not be comprehensive enough at this point, I plan to use the quantitative method of research which uses measurements that focuses on cause and effect predictions. \u202fIn this study, I will attempt to integrate the factors that contribute to unplanned healthcare for the rural population. \u202fThe planned design tradition that I plan to use quasi-experimental. \u202fThe quasi- experimental design lacks randomaization in the study (Stichler, 2016). \u202fThe use of surveys for members of the rural population that are affected by unplanned healthcare will be used to gather the research data. The surveys will be self – designed or programmed, allowing for quantification of data to occur. \u202fWhile I am not fully aware of how the design will fit into my research method, or if I completely understand the design tradition, my goal is to achieve the knowledge needed to fulfill the reasearch study in order to fully address the issues for the proposal. \u202fThanks again for your post.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Stichler, J. (2016). \u202fResearch, Research-Informed Design, Evidence-Based Design: Whatis theDifference and Does it Matter?\u202f<\/span>HERD: Health<\/span><\/i>\u202f<\/span>Environments Research & Design Journal.\u202f<\/span><\/i>\u202fRetrieved from:\u202f<\/span>http:\/\/ebscohostcom.chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org<\/span><\/a> I was very impressed by your post on\u202fcomparing and contrasting quantitative and qualitative research approaches.\u202fYour discussion board post was clear and concise in regard to control over sample conditions for both qualitative and quantitative research methods. \u202fThe way that you broke your findings down about both qualitative and quantitative extension\/generalization of results ensured that your scholarly information was easily understood. I believe that your intended message was well\u202freceived by all who read it. You obviously chose an excellent reference article. I feel that by preparing this assignment we will have a better, more in depth look into which approach to research will be more pertinent to our personal area of interest. I am a bit intimidated by preparing this project, but I know that the knowledge I acquire through each week’s lesson will improve my research abilities and add to my overall wisdom. I look forward to reading your posts in the future.\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n \u202f\u202f\u202f\u202f When looking at qualitative research and quantitative research we will be looking at the advantage and disadvantage in some areas.When looking at quantitative research and the control over the study conditions on advantage would be that with quantitative they “use objective methods designed to control the research situation with the goal of minimizing bias and maximizing validity” (Polit & Beck, 2017). One disadvantage to quantitative research and control over the study conditions would be that maybe they keep the area of study to narrow and don’t allow them selves to expand research further on a given area of interest.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n \u202f\u202f\u202f\u202f When looking at the qualitative research approach and the control over study conditions that are an advantage would be that one area of research could lead to another area of interest and study and can be expanded upon and are more flexible. A disadvantage of using qualitative research approach is that this type of study usually involves a small group of people there for not including a wide range for details and statistics in groups.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n \u202f\u202f\u202f\u202f Extending or generalizing results from a sample to a larger group or population with the quantitative research approach advantages would be that it tries to quantify a problem and understand how prevalent it can be by looking for project-able results to a larger population(Polit & Beck, 2017). A disadvantage to this would be that the population or group is to large to obtain accurate results or statistics to produce the results of the study.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n \u202f\u202f\u202f Extending or generalizing results from a sample to a larger group or population with the qualitative research approach advantages could be that there are now new studies and guidelines that one can follow for this approach, they can be that new insights are gained and new questions emerge on the area of interest and maybe a larger group to study (Smith, Gelling, Haigh, Barnason, Allan, & Jackson, 2017). A disadvantage would be that if it is a larger group or similar sample then they could possibly arrive at the same conclusions or similar information and the study would not progress.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Polit, D. F. & Beck, C. T. (2017).\u202f<\/span>Essentials of nursing research: Appraising evidence for nursing practice\u202f<\/span><\/i>(9th ed.). Philadelphia PA: Wolters Kluwer Health. Retrieved from e-book electronic source.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Smith, G. D., Gelling, L., Haigh, C., Barnason, S., Allan, H., & Jackson, D. (2017). The position of reporting guidelines in qualitative nursing research.\u202f<\/span>Journal Of Clinical Nursing<\/span><\/i>,\u202f<\/span>27<\/span><\/i>(5-6), 889-891.Retrieved from\u202f<\/span>https:\/\/eds-a-ebscohost-com.chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org\/eds\/detail\/detail?vid<\/span>Links to an external site.<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n T<\/span>hank you for your post, as in fact, samples for qual data can be increase in order to achieve data saturation, or redundancy, in which no more new information is reported by participants.\u202f\u202fWhat is interesting is that in qual studies, often, data collection\/data analysis are ongoing. \u202fThis is important b\/c, ongoing data analysis\/interpretation will help in to decide if you have sampled enough participants to answer the research question.\u202f If participants continue to report similar experiences, then it can be determined if data saturation has been achieved and recruitment of participants can cease.\u202f :D\u202f As a peer reviewer of qual studies, we determine if researchers have achieved data saturation as a way to determine credible findings. <\/span><\/p>\n Data saturation is the terminology used to describe the point in a study when enough data has been acquired to replicate the study when no additional new information is attainable, and when further coding is no longer possible is an interesting concept.\u202f According to Fusch & Ness (2015), the failure to reach data saturation affects the research quality and impeded the validity of the content.\u202f The design a qualitative research study should address the number of interviews required to reach data saturation. Fusch & Ness (2015) argue that data saturation can be difficult to quantify because there is no set formula that fits every project because study\u202fdesigns are not universal.\u202f Furthermore, “when and how one reaches those levels of saturation will vary from study design to study design” (Fusch & Ness, 2015, p.1409).<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n As I stated at the beginning of this post, data saturation is quite the interesting subject matter to me especially in regards to the qualitative research methods. Some of the more common methods of data collection include interviews, surveys and focus group sessions (Fusch & Ness, 2015). Conducting these methods in the research subjects natural habit would tend to leave room for the conversations to evolve and change depending on the participants’ mood and the answers provided at the time the interview or focus group took place.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n \u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nA Sample Answer For the Assignment: NR 505 Week 4 Discussion: Qualitative Design and Sampling<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Title: NR 505 Week 4 Discussion: Qualitative Design and Sampling<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Control over Study Conditions Research Approach: Advantage<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h2>\n
Quantitative<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\n
Qualitative<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h2>\n
Control over Study Conditions Qualitative Research Approach: Disadvantage<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h2>\n
Quantitative<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\n
Qualitative<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h2>\n
Extending or Generalizing results from a sample or larger group or population with quantitative research approach:<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h2>\n
Advantage:<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\n
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NR 505 Week 4 Discussion: Qualitative Design and Sampling\u00a0<\/strong><\/a><\/em><\/span><\/h3>\n
Disadvantage:<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\n
Extending or Generalizing results from a sample or larger group or population with qualitative research approach:<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h2>\n
Advantage:<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\n
Disadvantage:<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\n
\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span>Reference<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\n
A Sample Answer 2 For the Assignment: NR 505 Week 4 Discussion: Qualitative Design and Sampling<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Title: NR 505 Week 4 Discussion: Qualitative Design and Sampling<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Reference<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h2>\n
<\/span><\/p>\nA Sample Answer 3 For the Assignment: NR 505 Week 4 Discussion: Qualitative Design and Sampling<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Title: NR 505 Week 4 Discussion: Qualitative Design and Sampling<\/strong><\/h2>\n
A Sample Answer 4 For the Assignment: NR 505 Week 4 Discussion: Qualitative Design and Sampling<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Title: NR 505 Week 4 Discussion: Qualitative Design and Sampling<\/strong><\/h2>\n