Sample Answer for NR 599 Week 7: Post TANIC Self-Assessment and Reflection Post Included After Question<\/strong><\/h2>\nNR 599 Week 7 Post TANIC Self Assessment and Reflection Post<\/p>\n
Discussion<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\nPurpose<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\nThe self-assessment is completed using the TIGER-based Assessment of Nursing Informatics Competencies (TANIC) tool. TIGER refers to the Technology Informatics Guiding Education Reform Initiative which identified a list of the minimum informatics competencies for all nurses and students graduating from pre- and post-licensure programs. The graded self-evaluation of your informatics competencies is required in order to increase one’s own understanding of competencies in nursing informatics which will enable the planning of strategies to enhance knowledge and skills.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nCourse Outcomes<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\nThis assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h4>\n\n- Apply knowledge of nursing informatics<\/a> and non-nursing science (CO 1 and 2)<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\n- Assess nursing informatics competencies (CO2)<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\n- Evaluate progress in enhancing nursing informatics competencies (CO4)<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\n- Foster professional and personal development with planning strategies to enhance these competencies (CO4)<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\n- Examine ethical decision making in relation to these competencies (CO3)<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
Due Date<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\nThis assignment is due no later than the\u202f<\/span>Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 7<\/span><\/b>.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nTotal Points Possible: 75<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nPreparing the Assignment<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\n\n- In order to prepare for this assignment, read the lessons as well as the assigned readings BEFORE attempting the self-assessment.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\n- Please use the following hyperlink to access and complete the survey:\u202f<\/span>Week 7 Post-TANIC Self-Assessment SurveyLinks to an external site.<\/span><\/b><\/a>
\n\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n- FAILURE TO COMPLETE THE SURVEY WILL RESULT IN A GRADE OF ZERO (0) FOR THE ASSIGNMENT.<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\n- After completing the survey, navigate to the Week 7 Module in Canvas and respond to EACH of the questions for your Reflection Post .<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\n- The Reflection Posts DOES NOT require cross-posting to a peer or faculty .<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\n- Scholarly Sources: Only scholarly sources are acceptable for citation and reference in this course. These include peer-reviewed publications, government reports, or sources written by a professional or scholar in the field. The textbooks and lessons are NOT considered to be outside scholarly sources. For the threaded discussions and reflection posts, reputable internet sources such as websites by government agencies (URL ends in .gov) and respected organizations (often ends in .org) can be counted as scholarly sources. The best outside scholarly source to use is a peer-reviewed nursing journal. You are encouraged to use the Chamberlain library and search one of the available databases for a peer-reviewed journal article. The following sources should not be used: Wikipedia, Wikis, or blogs. These websites are not considered scholarly as anyone can add to these. Please be aware that .com websites can vary in scholarship and quality. For example, the American Heart Association is a .com site with<\/span><\/span>\n
![\"NR](\"http:\/\/nursingassignmentcrackers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/NR-599-Week-7-Post-TANIC-Self-Assessment-and-Reflection-Post-1-300x132.png\")
NR 599 Week 7 Post TANIC Self Assessment and Reflection Post<\/figcaption><\/figure>\nscholarship and quality. It is the responsibility of the student to determine the scholarship and quality of any .com site. Ask your instructor before using any site if you are unsure. Points will be deducted from the rubric if the site does not demonstrate scholarship or quality. Current outside scholarly sources must be published with the last 5 years. Instructor permission must be obtained BEFORE the assignment is due if using a source that is older than 5 years.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\nATTENTION: Students will not receive results following completion of this survey. For the reflection questions, please recall how you rated your proficiency\/competency with the skills on the survey.<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n*IMPORTANT* Upon completing the TANIC self-assessment survey, please TAKE A SCREENSHOT of the last page of the survey using a program such as Snipping Tool and save as a PDF or JPG and for your records. If you are unable to take a screenshot, please inform your faculty.<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n\u202fReflection Questions:\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\nReflect and respond to\u202f<\/span>EACH\u202f<\/span><\/b>of the following questions. \u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h4>\n\n- Regarding the Post-TANIC Self-Assessment for this week, how does your competency level compare to the Week 2 Self-Assessment?<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\n- Which two competencies do you think may benefit you in your future role as an APN and why?<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\n- As discussed in the lesson this week, healthcare providers must be competent in informatics in order to make ethical decisions about informatics technologies and patients’ intimate healthcare data and information. To the extent that information technology is reshaping healthcare practices or promises to improve patient care, healthcare professionals must possess certain competencies which will assist with consistency and quality. Which two competencies did you achieve in this course? Explain.<\/span>
![\"NR](\"https:\/\/nursingassignmentcrackers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/Downloader.la-649b1e148fdd3-300x200-1.webp\")
<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\nASSIGNMENT CONTENT\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nCategory\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n Points\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n %\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n Description\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nApplication of Course Knowledge\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n
40\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n 53\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n This category is evaluated on the quality of the student\u2019s ability to: Compare their competency results to that of their Week 2 assessment; identify competencies that may be useful as an APN and why; discuss how information technology is reshaping healthcare, and explain which competencies were achieved in this course.\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nScholarliness and Scholarly Resources\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n
20\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n 27\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n This category is evaluated on the quality of the student\u2019s ability to: Support writing with appropriate, scholarly sources; provide relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions; evaluate literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis; use sources published within the last 5 years; match reference list and in-text citations match, and minimize or appropriately format direct quotations.<\/span>\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n 60\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n \u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n Total CONTENT Points=60 pts\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nASSIGNMENT FORMAT\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nCategory\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n Points\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n %\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n Description\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nGrammar, Spelling, Syntax, Mechanics and APA Format\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n 15\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n 20\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n Reflection post has minimal grammar, spelling, syntax, punctuation, and APA* \u202ferrors. Direct quotes (if used) is limited to 1 short statement** which adds substantively to the post.\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n* APA style references and in text citations are required; however, there are no deductions for errors in indentation or spacing of references. All elements of the reference otherwise must be included.\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n**Direct quote should not to exceed 15 words & must \u202fadd substantively to the discussion\u202f<\/span>\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n \u202f\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n \u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n Total FORMAT Points= 15pts \u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n 75\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n 100%\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n ASSIGNMENT TOTAL= 75pts \u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\nRegarding the Post-TANIC Self-Assessment for this week, how does your competency level compare to the Week 2 Self-Assessment?<\/span><\/i><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\nA Sample Answer For the Assignment: NR 599 Week 7: Post TANIC Self-Assessment and Reflection Post<\/strong><\/h2>\nTitle: NR 599 Week 7: Post TANIC Self-Assessment and Reflection Post<\/strong><\/h2>\nBefore taking the Post-TANIC self-assessment I felt really confident that I did improve a little in the area of information literacy, however, I still need to make further improvements to be more competent and proficient at utilizing resources and literature databases effectively for the research of information management, being able to evaluate the quality of the resources and research with educating and developing a skillset on defining the specific target area of research. My dilemma with information literacy is being able to pinpoint the correct terms and keywords for searching the necessary content that is needed for my search.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span>Which two competencies do you think may benefit you in your future role as an APN and why?<\/span><\/i><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\nNurses play a significant role in recognizing, understanding, progressing, and translating the necessary education and informational needs of patients, these skills all serve as a benefit to advanced practice nursing because it helps to enhance patient compliance in their healthcare treatment plan and promote efficient and optimal holistic healthcare (Buchanan & Nicol, 2019). Thus, to become fluent, proficient, and competent in informational literacy including facilitating the development of information literacy in patients\u2019 nurses need to become familiar with informational literacy models and frameworks (Buchanan & Nicol, 2019). <\/span><\/p>\nAs also stated by Farokhzadian et al (2021), one of the most essential requirements for nurses\u2019 readiness to implement evidence-based practice is to improve their information literacy skills, and through learned evidence-based practice skills nurses will be able to apply the appropriate and effective research findings in their nursing practice to provide high-quality, safe and compassionate nursing care and be able to make decisions based on the most recent evidence in clinical settings. Therefore, nurses need to be provisioned with the necessary information literacy skills to obtain the most recent research findings to provide sympathetic, safe, ethical, and cost-effective health care as it is fundamental for the successful implementation of evidence-based clinical practice (Farokhzadian et al, 2021).<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nThe competency of clinical information management is associated with the quality of care, critical thinking, problem-solving, ethical knowledge, clinical decision-making, focusing on skills, teamwork, and collaboration. Advanced practice nurses need to remain efficient in clinical decision-making competence to maintain the retention of traditional life-saving nursing skills, ethics, effective patient care, and fundamentals for maintaining patient safety (Wallin et al., 2022).<\/span><\/p>\nClick here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NR 599 Week 7: Post TANIC Self-Assessment and Reflection Post \u00a0<\/strong><\/a><\/span><\/span><\/h3>\n\u202f<\/span><\/i><\/b>\u00a0<\/span>Which two competencies did you achieve in this course? Explain.<\/span><\/i><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\nThe two competencies in this class that I achieved educational efficiency were informational literacy and clinical information management. This course has taught me how to analyze current and emerging technologies to support safe practice environments and to optimize patient safety, cost-effectiveness, and health outcomes by maximizing the skillset of having proficient and competent clinical information management. I have learned how to utilize the TIGER framework to help integrate informatics competencies by identifying knowledge and skillsets in my clinical decision-making. <\/span><\/p>\nAlso, through studying the efficacy of informational literacy I have gained proficiency and competency in being able to recognize when further educational and evidence-based research is needed, how to search for the specifically targeted information that is needed, and how to navigate the informatic technologies and provided CDS, which is critical in obtaining optimal holistic patient-centered care, patient compliance, patient safety, and safe professional nursing practice.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\u202f<\/span>NUR599 WEEK 7 Post-TANIC Self-Assessment-2.docx<\/span><\/a>Download NUR599 WEEK 7 Post-TANIC Self-Assessment-2.docx<\/span><\/a>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span>References<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\nBuchanan, S., & Nicol, E. (2019). Developing health information literacy in disengaged at-risk populations.\u202f<\/span>Journal of Documentation<\/span><\/i>,\u202f<\/span>75<\/span><\/i>(1), 172\u2013189.\u202f<\/span>
Purpose<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\nThe self-assessment is completed using the TIGER-based Assessment of Nursing Informatics Competencies (TANIC) tool. TIGER refers to the Technology Informatics Guiding Education Reform Initiative which identified a list of the minimum informatics competencies for all nurses and students graduating from pre- and post-licensure programs. The graded self-evaluation of your informatics competencies is required in order to increase one’s own understanding of competencies in nursing informatics which will enable the planning of strategies to enhance knowledge and skills.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nCourse Outcomes<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\nThis assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h4>\n\n- Apply knowledge of nursing informatics<\/a> and non-nursing science (CO 1 and 2)<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\n- Assess nursing informatics competencies (CO2)<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\n- Evaluate progress in enhancing nursing informatics competencies (CO4)<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\n- Foster professional and personal development with planning strategies to enhance these competencies (CO4)<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\n- Examine ethical decision making in relation to these competencies (CO3)<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
Due Date<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\nThis assignment is due no later than the\u202f<\/span>Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 7<\/span><\/b>.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nTotal Points Possible: 75<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nPreparing the Assignment<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\n\n- In order to prepare for this assignment, read the lessons as well as the assigned readings BEFORE attempting the self-assessment.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\n- Please use the following hyperlink to access and complete the survey:\u202f<\/span>Week 7 Post-TANIC Self-Assessment SurveyLinks to an external site.<\/span><\/b><\/a>
\n\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n- FAILURE TO COMPLETE THE SURVEY WILL RESULT IN A GRADE OF ZERO (0) FOR THE ASSIGNMENT.<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\n- After completing the survey, navigate to the Week 7 Module in Canvas and respond to EACH of the questions for your Reflection Post .<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\n- The Reflection Posts DOES NOT require cross-posting to a peer or faculty .<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\n- Scholarly Sources: Only scholarly sources are acceptable for citation and reference in this course. These include peer-reviewed publications, government reports, or sources written by a professional or scholar in the field. The textbooks and lessons are NOT considered to be outside scholarly sources. For the threaded discussions and reflection posts, reputable internet sources such as websites by government agencies (URL ends in .gov) and respected organizations (often ends in .org) can be counted as scholarly sources. The best outside scholarly source to use is a peer-reviewed nursing journal. You are encouraged to use the Chamberlain library and search one of the available databases for a peer-reviewed journal article. The following sources should not be used: Wikipedia, Wikis, or blogs. These websites are not considered scholarly as anyone can add to these. Please be aware that .com websites can vary in scholarship and quality. For example, the American Heart Association is a .com site with<\/span><\/span>\n
NR 599 Week 7 Post TANIC Self Assessment and Reflection Post<\/figcaption><\/figure>\nscholarship and quality. It is the responsibility of the student to determine the scholarship and quality of any .com site. Ask your instructor before using any site if you are unsure. Points will be deducted from the rubric if the site does not demonstrate scholarship or quality. Current outside scholarly sources must be published with the last 5 years. Instructor permission must be obtained BEFORE the assignment is due if using a source that is older than 5 years.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\nATTENTION: Students will not receive results following completion of this survey. For the reflection questions, please recall how you rated your proficiency\/competency with the skills on the survey.<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n*IMPORTANT* Upon completing the TANIC self-assessment survey, please TAKE A SCREENSHOT of the last page of the survey using a program such as Snipping Tool and save as a PDF or JPG and for your records. If you are unable to take a screenshot, please inform your faculty.<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n\u202fReflection Questions:\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\nReflect and respond to\u202f<\/span>EACH\u202f<\/span><\/b>of the following questions. \u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h4>\n\n- Regarding the Post-TANIC Self-Assessment for this week, how does your competency level compare to the Week 2 Self-Assessment?<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\n- Which two competencies do you think may benefit you in your future role as an APN and why?<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\n- As discussed in the lesson this week, healthcare providers must be competent in informatics in order to make ethical decisions about informatics technologies and patients’ intimate healthcare data and information. To the extent that information technology is reshaping healthcare practices or promises to improve patient care, healthcare professionals must possess certain competencies which will assist with consistency and quality. Which two competencies did you achieve in this course? Explain.<\/span> <\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\n\n\nASSIGNMENT CONTENT\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nCategory\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n Points\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n %\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n Description\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nApplication of Course Knowledge\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n
40\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n 53\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n This category is evaluated on the quality of the student\u2019s ability to: Compare their competency results to that of their Week 2 assessment; identify competencies that may be useful as an APN and why; discuss how information technology is reshaping healthcare, and explain which competencies were achieved in this course.\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nScholarliness and Scholarly Resources\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n
20\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n 27\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n This category is evaluated on the quality of the student\u2019s ability to: Support writing with appropriate, scholarly sources; provide relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions; evaluate literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis; use sources published within the last 5 years; match reference list and in-text citations match, and minimize or appropriately format direct quotations.<\/span>\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n 60\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n \u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n Total CONTENT Points=60 pts\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nASSIGNMENT FORMAT\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nCategory\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n Points\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n %\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n Description\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nGrammar, Spelling, Syntax, Mechanics and APA Format\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n 15\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n 20\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n Reflection post has minimal grammar, spelling, syntax, punctuation, and APA* \u202ferrors. Direct quotes (if used) is limited to 1 short statement** which adds substantively to the post.\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n* APA style references and in text citations are required; however, there are no deductions for errors in indentation or spacing of references. All elements of the reference otherwise must be included.\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n**Direct quote should not to exceed 15 words & must \u202fadd substantively to the discussion\u202f<\/span>\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n \u202f\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n \u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n Total FORMAT Points= 15pts \u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n 75\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n 100%\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n ASSIGNMENT TOTAL= 75pts \u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\nRegarding the Post-TANIC Self-Assessment for this week, how does your competency level compare to the Week 2 Self-Assessment?<\/span><\/i><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\nA Sample Answer For the Assignment: NR 599 Week 7: Post TANIC Self-Assessment and Reflection Post<\/strong><\/h2>\nTitle: NR 599 Week 7: Post TANIC Self-Assessment and Reflection Post<\/strong><\/h2>\nBefore taking the Post-TANIC self-assessment I felt really confident that I did improve a little in the area of information literacy, however, I still need to make further improvements to be more competent and proficient at utilizing resources and literature databases effectively for the research of information management, being able to evaluate the quality of the resources and research with educating and developing a skillset on defining the specific target area of research. My dilemma with information literacy is being able to pinpoint the correct terms and keywords for searching the necessary content that is needed for my search.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span>Which two competencies do you think may benefit you in your future role as an APN and why?<\/span><\/i><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\nNurses play a significant role in recognizing, understanding, progressing, and translating the necessary education and informational needs of patients, these skills all serve as a benefit to advanced practice nursing because it helps to enhance patient compliance in their healthcare treatment plan and promote efficient and optimal holistic healthcare (Buchanan & Nicol, 2019). Thus, to become fluent, proficient, and competent in informational literacy including facilitating the development of information literacy in patients\u2019 nurses need to become familiar with informational literacy models and frameworks (Buchanan & Nicol, 2019). <\/span><\/p>\nAs also stated by Farokhzadian et al (2021), one of the most essential requirements for nurses\u2019 readiness to implement evidence-based practice is to improve their information literacy skills, and through learned evidence-based practice skills nurses will be able to apply the appropriate and effective research findings in their nursing practice to provide high-quality, safe and compassionate nursing care and be able to make decisions based on the most recent evidence in clinical settings. Therefore, nurses need to be provisioned with the necessary information literacy skills to obtain the most recent research findings to provide sympathetic, safe, ethical, and cost-effective health care as it is fundamental for the successful implementation of evidence-based clinical practice (Farokhzadian et al, 2021).<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nThe competency of clinical information management is associated with the quality of care, critical thinking, problem-solving, ethical knowledge, clinical decision-making, focusing on skills, teamwork, and collaboration. Advanced practice nurses need to remain efficient in clinical decision-making competence to maintain the retention of traditional life-saving nursing skills, ethics, effective patient care, and fundamentals for maintaining patient safety (Wallin et al., 2022).<\/span><\/p>\nClick here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NR 599 Week 7: Post TANIC Self-Assessment and Reflection Post \u00a0<\/strong><\/a><\/span><\/span><\/h3>\n\u202f<\/span><\/i><\/b>\u00a0<\/span>Which two competencies did you achieve in this course? Explain.<\/span><\/i><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\nThe two competencies in this class that I achieved educational efficiency were informational literacy and clinical information management. This course has taught me how to analyze current and emerging technologies to support safe practice environments and to optimize patient safety, cost-effectiveness, and health outcomes by maximizing the skillset of having proficient and competent clinical information management. I have learned how to utilize the TIGER framework to help integrate informatics competencies by identifying knowledge and skillsets in my clinical decision-making. <\/span><\/p>\nAlso, through studying the efficacy of informational literacy I have gained proficiency and competency in being able to recognize when further educational and evidence-based research is needed, how to search for the specifically targeted information that is needed, and how to navigate the informatic technologies and provided CDS, which is critical in obtaining optimal holistic patient-centered care, patient compliance, patient safety, and safe professional nursing practice.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\u202f<\/span>NUR599 WEEK 7 Post-TANIC Self-Assessment-2.docx<\/span><\/a>Download NUR599 WEEK 7 Post-TANIC Self-Assessment-2.docx<\/span><\/a>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span>References<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\nBuchanan, S., & Nicol, E. (2019). Developing health information literacy in disengaged at-risk populations.\u202f<\/span>Journal of Documentation<\/span><\/i>,\u202f<\/span>75<\/span><\/i>(1), 172\u2013189.\u202f<\/span>
Course Outcomes<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\nThis assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h4>\n\n- Apply knowledge of nursing informatics<\/a> and non-nursing science (CO 1 and 2)<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\n- Assess nursing informatics competencies (CO2)<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\n- Evaluate progress in enhancing nursing informatics competencies (CO4)<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\n- Foster professional and personal development with planning strategies to enhance these competencies (CO4)<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\n- Examine ethical decision making in relation to these competencies (CO3)<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
Due Date<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\nThis assignment is due no later than the\u202f<\/span>Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 7<\/span><\/b>.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nTotal Points Possible: 75<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nPreparing the Assignment<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\n\n- In order to prepare for this assignment, read the lessons as well as the assigned readings BEFORE attempting the self-assessment.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\n- Please use the following hyperlink to access and complete the survey:\u202f<\/span>Week 7 Post-TANIC Self-Assessment SurveyLinks to an external site.<\/span><\/b><\/a>
\n\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n- FAILURE TO COMPLETE THE SURVEY WILL RESULT IN A GRADE OF ZERO (0) FOR THE ASSIGNMENT.<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\n- After completing the survey, navigate to the Week 7 Module in Canvas and respond to EACH of the questions for your Reflection Post .<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\n- The Reflection Posts DOES NOT require cross-posting to a peer or faculty .<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\n- Scholarly Sources: Only scholarly sources are acceptable for citation and reference in this course. These include peer-reviewed publications, government reports, or sources written by a professional or scholar in the field. The textbooks and lessons are NOT considered to be outside scholarly sources. For the threaded discussions and reflection posts, reputable internet sources such as websites by government agencies (URL ends in .gov) and respected organizations (often ends in .org) can be counted as scholarly sources. The best outside scholarly source to use is a peer-reviewed nursing journal. You are encouraged to use the Chamberlain library and search one of the available databases for a peer-reviewed journal article. The following sources should not be used: Wikipedia, Wikis, or blogs. These websites are not considered scholarly as anyone can add to these. Please be aware that .com websites can vary in scholarship and quality. For example, the American Heart Association is a .com site with<\/span><\/span>\n
NR 599 Week 7 Post TANIC Self Assessment and Reflection Post<\/figcaption><\/figure>\nscholarship and quality. It is the responsibility of the student to determine the scholarship and quality of any .com site. Ask your instructor before using any site if you are unsure. Points will be deducted from the rubric if the site does not demonstrate scholarship or quality. Current outside scholarly sources must be published with the last 5 years. Instructor permission must be obtained BEFORE the assignment is due if using a source that is older than 5 years.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\nATTENTION: Students will not receive results following completion of this survey. For the reflection questions, please recall how you rated your proficiency\/competency with the skills on the survey.<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n*IMPORTANT* Upon completing the TANIC self-assessment survey, please TAKE A SCREENSHOT of the last page of the survey using a program such as Snipping Tool and save as a PDF or JPG and for your records. If you are unable to take a screenshot, please inform your faculty.<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n\u202fReflection Questions:\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\nReflect and respond to\u202f<\/span>EACH\u202f<\/span><\/b>of the following questions. \u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h4>\n\n- Regarding the Post-TANIC Self-Assessment for this week, how does your competency level compare to the Week 2 Self-Assessment?<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\n- Which two competencies do you think may benefit you in your future role as an APN and why?<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\n- As discussed in the lesson this week, healthcare providers must be competent in informatics in order to make ethical decisions about informatics technologies and patients’ intimate healthcare data and information. To the extent that information technology is reshaping healthcare practices or promises to improve patient care, healthcare professionals must possess certain competencies which will assist with consistency and quality. Which two competencies did you achieve in this course? Explain.<\/span> <\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\n\n\nASSIGNMENT CONTENT\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nCategory\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n Points\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n %\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n Description\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nApplication of Course Knowledge\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n
40\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n 53\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n This category is evaluated on the quality of the student\u2019s ability to: Compare their competency results to that of their Week 2 assessment; identify competencies that may be useful as an APN and why; discuss how information technology is reshaping healthcare, and explain which competencies were achieved in this course.\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nScholarliness and Scholarly Resources\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n
20\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n 27\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n This category is evaluated on the quality of the student\u2019s ability to: Support writing with appropriate, scholarly sources; provide relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions; evaluate literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis; use sources published within the last 5 years; match reference list and in-text citations match, and minimize or appropriately format direct quotations.<\/span>\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n 60\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n \u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n Total CONTENT Points=60 pts\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nASSIGNMENT FORMAT\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nCategory\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n Points\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n %\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n Description\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\nGrammar, Spelling, Syntax, Mechanics and APA Format\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n 15\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n 20\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n Reflection post has minimal grammar, spelling, syntax, punctuation, and APA* \u202ferrors. Direct quotes (if used) is limited to 1 short statement** which adds substantively to the post.\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n* APA style references and in text citations are required; however, there are no deductions for errors in indentation or spacing of references. All elements of the reference otherwise must be included.\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n**Direct quote should not to exceed 15 words & must \u202fadd substantively to the discussion\u202f<\/span>\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n \u202f\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n \u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n Total FORMAT Points= 15pts \u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n 75\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n 100%\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n ASSIGNMENT TOTAL= 75pts \u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\nRegarding the Post-TANIC Self-Assessment for this week, how does your competency level compare to the Week 2 Self-Assessment?<\/span><\/i><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\nA Sample Answer For the Assignment: NR 599 Week 7: Post TANIC Self-Assessment and Reflection Post<\/strong><\/h2>\nTitle: NR 599 Week 7: Post TANIC Self-Assessment and Reflection Post<\/strong><\/h2>\nBefore taking the Post-TANIC self-assessment I felt really confident that I did improve a little in the area of information literacy, however, I still need to make further improvements to be more competent and proficient at utilizing resources and literature databases effectively for the research of information management, being able to evaluate the quality of the resources and research with educating and developing a skillset on defining the specific target area of research. My dilemma with information literacy is being able to pinpoint the correct terms and keywords for searching the necessary content that is needed for my search.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span>Which two competencies do you think may benefit you in your future role as an APN and why?<\/span><\/i><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\nNurses play a significant role in recognizing, understanding, progressing, and translating the necessary education and informational needs of patients, these skills all serve as a benefit to advanced practice nursing because it helps to enhance patient compliance in their healthcare treatment plan and promote efficient and optimal holistic healthcare (Buchanan & Nicol, 2019). Thus, to become fluent, proficient, and competent in informational literacy including facilitating the development of information literacy in patients\u2019 nurses need to become familiar with informational literacy models and frameworks (Buchanan & Nicol, 2019). <\/span><\/p>\nAs also stated by Farokhzadian et al (2021), one of the most essential requirements for nurses\u2019 readiness to implement evidence-based practice is to improve their information literacy skills, and through learned evidence-based practice skills nurses will be able to apply the appropriate and effective research findings in their nursing practice to provide high-quality, safe and compassionate nursing care and be able to make decisions based on the most recent evidence in clinical settings. Therefore, nurses need to be provisioned with the necessary information literacy skills to obtain the most recent research findings to provide sympathetic, safe, ethical, and cost-effective health care as it is fundamental for the successful implementation of evidence-based clinical practice (Farokhzadian et al, 2021).<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nThe competency of clinical information management is associated with the quality of care, critical thinking, problem-solving, ethical knowledge, clinical decision-making, focusing on skills, teamwork, and collaboration. Advanced practice nurses need to remain efficient in clinical decision-making competence to maintain the retention of traditional life-saving nursing skills, ethics, effective patient care, and fundamentals for maintaining patient safety (Wallin et al., 2022).<\/span><\/p>\nClick here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NR 599 Week 7: Post TANIC Self-Assessment and Reflection Post \u00a0<\/strong><\/a><\/span><\/span><\/h3>\n\u202f<\/span><\/i><\/b>\u00a0<\/span>Which two competencies did you achieve in this course? Explain.<\/span><\/i><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\nThe two competencies in this class that I achieved educational efficiency were informational literacy and clinical information management. This course has taught me how to analyze current and emerging technologies to support safe practice environments and to optimize patient safety, cost-effectiveness, and health outcomes by maximizing the skillset of having proficient and competent clinical information management. I have learned how to utilize the TIGER framework to help integrate informatics competencies by identifying knowledge and skillsets in my clinical decision-making. <\/span><\/p>\nAlso, through studying the efficacy of informational literacy I have gained proficiency and competency in being able to recognize when further educational and evidence-based research is needed, how to search for the specifically targeted information that is needed, and how to navigate the informatic technologies and provided CDS, which is critical in obtaining optimal holistic patient-centered care, patient compliance, patient safety, and safe professional nursing practice.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\u202f<\/span>NUR599 WEEK 7 Post-TANIC Self-Assessment-2.docx<\/span><\/a>Download NUR599 WEEK 7 Post-TANIC Self-Assessment-2.docx<\/span><\/a>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span>References<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\nBuchanan, S., & Nicol, E. (2019). Developing health information literacy in disengaged at-risk populations.\u202f<\/span>Journal of Documentation<\/span><\/i>,\u202f<\/span>75<\/span><\/i>(1), 172\u2013189.\u202f<\/span>
- \n
- Apply knowledge of nursing informatics<\/a> and non-nursing science (CO 1 and 2)<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
- \n
- Assess nursing informatics competencies (CO2)<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
- \n
- Evaluate progress in enhancing nursing informatics competencies (CO4)<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
- \n
- Foster professional and personal development with planning strategies to enhance these competencies (CO4)<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
- \n
- Examine ethical decision making in relation to these competencies (CO3)<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
Due Date<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\n
This assignment is due no later than the\u202f<\/span>Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 7<\/span><\/b>.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
Total Points Possible: 75<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
Preparing the Assignment<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\n
- \n
- In order to prepare for this assignment, read the lessons as well as the assigned readings BEFORE attempting the self-assessment.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
- \n
- Please use the following hyperlink to access and complete the survey:\u202f<\/span>Week 7 Post-TANIC Self-Assessment SurveyLinks to an external site.<\/span><\/b><\/a>
\n\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n- \n
- FAILURE TO COMPLETE THE SURVEY WILL RESULT IN A GRADE OF ZERO (0) FOR THE ASSIGNMENT.<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
- \n
- After completing the survey, navigate to the Week 7 Module in Canvas and respond to EACH of the questions for your Reflection Post .<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
- \n
- The Reflection Posts DOES NOT require cross-posting to a peer or faculty .<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
- \n
- Scholarly Sources: Only scholarly sources are acceptable for citation and reference in this course. These include peer-reviewed publications, government reports, or sources written by a professional or scholar in the field. The textbooks and lessons are NOT considered to be outside scholarly sources. For the threaded discussions and reflection posts, reputable internet sources such as websites by government agencies (URL ends in .gov) and respected organizations (often ends in .org) can be counted as scholarly sources. The best outside scholarly source to use is a peer-reviewed nursing journal. You are encouraged to use the Chamberlain library and search one of the available databases for a peer-reviewed journal article. The following sources should not be used: Wikipedia, Wikis, or blogs. These websites are not considered scholarly as anyone can add to these. Please be aware that .com websites can vary in scholarship and quality. For example, the American Heart Association is a .com site with<\/span><\/span>\n
NR 599 Week 7 Post TANIC Self Assessment and Reflection Post<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n scholarship and quality. It is the responsibility of the student to determine the scholarship and quality of any .com site. Ask your instructor before using any site if you are unsure. Points will be deducted from the rubric if the site does not demonstrate scholarship or quality. Current outside scholarly sources must be published with the last 5 years. Instructor permission must be obtained BEFORE the assignment is due if using a source that is older than 5 years.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
ATTENTION: Students will not receive results following completion of this survey. For the reflection questions, please recall how you rated your proficiency\/competency with the skills on the survey.<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
*IMPORTANT* Upon completing the TANIC self-assessment survey, please TAKE A SCREENSHOT of the last page of the survey using a program such as Snipping Tool and save as a PDF or JPG and for your records. If you are unable to take a screenshot, please inform your faculty.<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n
\u202fReflection Questions:\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\n
Reflect and respond to\u202f<\/span>EACH\u202f<\/span><\/b>of the following questions. \u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h4>\n
- \n
- Regarding the Post-TANIC Self-Assessment for this week, how does your competency level compare to the Week 2 Self-Assessment?<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
- \n
- Which two competencies do you think may benefit you in your future role as an APN and why?<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
- \n
- As discussed in the lesson this week, healthcare providers must be competent in informatics in order to make ethical decisions about informatics technologies and patients’ intimate healthcare data and information. To the extent that information technology is reshaping healthcare practices or promises to improve patient care, healthcare professionals must possess certain competencies which will assist with consistency and quality. Which two competencies did you achieve in this course? Explain.<\/span> <\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\n\n
\n ASSIGNMENT CONTENT\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Category\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n Points\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n %\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n Description\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Application of Course Knowledge\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n \u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n
40\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n 53\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n This category is evaluated on the quality of the student\u2019s ability to: Compare their competency results to that of their Week 2 assessment; identify competencies that may be useful as an APN and why; discuss how information technology is reshaping healthcare, and explain which competencies were achieved in this course.\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n \u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n Scholarliness and Scholarly Resources\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n \u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n
20\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n 27\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n This category is evaluated on the quality of the student\u2019s ability to: Support writing with appropriate, scholarly sources; provide relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions; evaluate literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis; use sources published within the last 5 years; match reference list and in-text citations match, and minimize or appropriately format direct quotations.<\/span>\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n \u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n \u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n 60\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n \u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n Total CONTENT Points=60 pts\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n ASSIGNMENT FORMAT\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Category\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n Points\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n %\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n Description\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n Grammar, Spelling, Syntax, Mechanics and APA Format\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n 15\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n 20\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n Reflection post has minimal grammar, spelling, syntax, punctuation, and APA* \u202ferrors. Direct quotes (if used) is limited to 1 short statement** which adds substantively to the post.\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n * APA style references and in text citations are required; however, there are no deductions for errors in indentation or spacing of references. All elements of the reference otherwise must be included.\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
**Direct quote should not to exceed 15 words & must \u202fadd substantively to the discussion\u202f<\/span>\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n \u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n \u202f\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n \u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n Total FORMAT Points= 15pts \u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n \u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n 75\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n 100%\u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n ASSIGNMENT TOTAL= 75pts \u202f<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n Regarding the Post-TANIC Self-Assessment for this week, how does your competency level compare to the Week 2 Self-Assessment?<\/span><\/i><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\n
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NR 599 Week 7: Post TANIC Self-Assessment and Reflection Post<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Title: NR 599 Week 7: Post TANIC Self-Assessment and Reflection Post<\/strong><\/h2>\n
Before taking the Post-TANIC self-assessment I felt really confident that I did improve a little in the area of information literacy, however, I still need to make further improvements to be more competent and proficient at utilizing resources and literature databases effectively for the research of information management, being able to evaluate the quality of the resources and research with educating and developing a skillset on defining the specific target area of research. My dilemma with information literacy is being able to pinpoint the correct terms and keywords for searching the necessary content that is needed for my search.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span>Which two competencies do you think may benefit you in your future role as an APN and why?<\/span><\/i><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\n
Nurses play a significant role in recognizing, understanding, progressing, and translating the necessary education and informational needs of patients, these skills all serve as a benefit to advanced practice nursing because it helps to enhance patient compliance in their healthcare treatment plan and promote efficient and optimal holistic healthcare (Buchanan & Nicol, 2019). Thus, to become fluent, proficient, and competent in informational literacy including facilitating the development of information literacy in patients\u2019 nurses need to become familiar with informational literacy models and frameworks (Buchanan & Nicol, 2019). <\/span><\/p>\n
As also stated by Farokhzadian et al (2021), one of the most essential requirements for nurses\u2019 readiness to implement evidence-based practice is to improve their information literacy skills, and through learned evidence-based practice skills nurses will be able to apply the appropriate and effective research findings in their nursing practice to provide high-quality, safe and compassionate nursing care and be able to make decisions based on the most recent evidence in clinical settings. Therefore, nurses need to be provisioned with the necessary information literacy skills to obtain the most recent research findings to provide sympathetic, safe, ethical, and cost-effective health care as it is fundamental for the successful implementation of evidence-based clinical practice (Farokhzadian et al, 2021).<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
The competency of clinical information management is associated with the quality of care, critical thinking, problem-solving, ethical knowledge, clinical decision-making, focusing on skills, teamwork, and collaboration. Advanced practice nurses need to remain efficient in clinical decision-making competence to maintain the retention of traditional life-saving nursing skills, ethics, effective patient care, and fundamentals for maintaining patient safety (Wallin et al., 2022).<\/span><\/p>\n
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NR 599 Week 7: Post TANIC Self-Assessment and Reflection Post \u00a0<\/strong><\/a><\/span><\/span><\/h3>\n
\u202f<\/span><\/i><\/b>\u00a0<\/span>Which two competencies did you achieve in this course? Explain.<\/span><\/i><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\n
The two competencies in this class that I achieved educational efficiency were informational literacy and clinical information management. This course has taught me how to analyze current and emerging technologies to support safe practice environments and to optimize patient safety, cost-effectiveness, and health outcomes by maximizing the skillset of having proficient and competent clinical information management. I have learned how to utilize the TIGER framework to help integrate informatics competencies by identifying knowledge and skillsets in my clinical decision-making. <\/span><\/p>\n
Also, through studying the efficacy of informational literacy I have gained proficiency and competency in being able to recognize when further educational and evidence-based research is needed, how to search for the specifically targeted information that is needed, and how to navigate the informatic technologies and provided CDS, which is critical in obtaining optimal holistic patient-centered care, patient compliance, patient safety, and safe professional nursing practice.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\u202f<\/span>NUR599 WEEK 7 Post-TANIC Self-Assessment-2.docx<\/span><\/a>Download NUR599 WEEK 7 Post-TANIC Self-Assessment-2.docx<\/span><\/a>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span>References<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\n
Buchanan, S., & Nicol, E. (2019). Developing health information literacy in disengaged at-risk populations.\u202f<\/span>Journal of Documentation<\/span><\/i>,\u202f<\/span>75<\/span><\/i>(1), 172\u2013189.\u202f<\/span>
- As discussed in the lesson this week, healthcare providers must be competent in informatics in order to make ethical decisions about informatics technologies and patients’ intimate healthcare data and information. To the extent that information technology is reshaping healthcare practices or promises to improve patient care, healthcare professionals must possess certain competencies which will assist with consistency and quality. Which two competencies did you achieve in this course? Explain.<\/span>
- Which two competencies do you think may benefit you in your future role as an APN and why?<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
- Regarding the Post-TANIC Self-Assessment for this week, how does your competency level compare to the Week 2 Self-Assessment?<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
- Scholarly Sources: Only scholarly sources are acceptable for citation and reference in this course. These include peer-reviewed publications, government reports, or sources written by a professional or scholar in the field. The textbooks and lessons are NOT considered to be outside scholarly sources. For the threaded discussions and reflection posts, reputable internet sources such as websites by government agencies (URL ends in .gov) and respected organizations (often ends in .org) can be counted as scholarly sources. The best outside scholarly source to use is a peer-reviewed nursing journal. You are encouraged to use the Chamberlain library and search one of the available databases for a peer-reviewed journal article. The following sources should not be used: Wikipedia, Wikis, or blogs. These websites are not considered scholarly as anyone can add to these. Please be aware that .com websites can vary in scholarship and quality. For example, the American Heart Association is a .com site with<\/span><\/span>\n
- The Reflection Posts DOES NOT require cross-posting to a peer or faculty .<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
- After completing the survey, navigate to the Week 7 Module in Canvas and respond to EACH of the questions for your Reflection Post .<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
- FAILURE TO COMPLETE THE SURVEY WILL RESULT IN A GRADE OF ZERO (0) FOR THE ASSIGNMENT.<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
- Please use the following hyperlink to access and complete the survey:\u202f<\/span>Week 7 Post-TANIC Self-Assessment SurveyLinks to an external site.<\/span><\/b><\/a>
- In order to prepare for this assignment, read the lessons as well as the assigned readings BEFORE attempting the self-assessment.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
- Examine ethical decision making in relation to these competencies (CO3)<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
- Foster professional and personal development with planning strategies to enhance these competencies (CO4)<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
- Evaluate progress in enhancing nursing informatics competencies (CO4)<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
- Assess nursing informatics competencies (CO2)<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n