Sample Answer for NR 439 Week 3 Discussion: The Literature Review and Searching for Evidence (graded) Included<\/strong><\/h2>\nA Sample Answer For the Assignment: NR 439 Week 3 Discussion: The Literature Review and Searching for Evidence (graded)<\/strong><\/h2>\nTitle: NR 439 Week 3 Discussion: The Literature Review and Searching for Evidence (graded)<\/strong><\/h2>\nNR 439 Week 3 Discussion: The Literature Review and Searching for Evidence (graded)<\/strong><\/p>\n
You have provided an in-depth analysis of Boyle\u2019s (2020) article, and there is a lot to learn from your discussion regarding a literature review. In the literature review section, Boyle (2020) discusses the various ways nurses can improve their competence, and the issue of educational courses forms a significant portion. Attending educational courses is mentioned as one way that nurses can earn new knowledge regarding practice. However, it is crucial to review literature in-depth to ensure that a researcher’s information is relevant to the topic in context. Accordingly, Di Leonardi et al. (2020) further explored educational sessions and suggested that they have some shortcomings, and nurses should opt for more comprehensive programs. As you have also noted, Di Leonardi et al. (2020) found that nurses may not retain the information obtained from educational courses and should consider certification and recertification.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
It is interesting to learn that simulations did not qualify as a means of evaluating continued competence. In many cases, simulations are highly rated and bringing such a point in the article was thought-provoking. Always, it is crucial to create a strong literature review section. I like your suggestion that examining the level of evidence is vital, and research studies should depend on the level I evidence as much as possible. The literature review is primarily a summary of a study\u2019s key findings. However, a summary of sources may not meet the threshold of a strong literature review section. As demonstrated in Boyle\u2019s (2020) article, one characteristic of a strong literature review section is evidence varying form interpreting other sources, data, and illustrations current and relevant to the topic and practice.\u202f The literature review should be selective, implying that it should contain crucial information only.\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
References<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h2>\nBoyle, D. K. (2020). CMSRNs’ Continuing Competence Methods and Perceived Value of Certification: A Descriptive Study.\u202f<\/span>Medsurg Nursing<\/span><\/i>,\u202f<\/span>29<\/span><\/i>(4), 229-254.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
Di Leonardi, B. C., Hagler, D., Marshall, D. R., Stobinski, J. X., & Welsh, S. S. (2020). From competence to continuing competency.\u202f<\/span>The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing<\/span><\/i>,\u202f<\/span>51<\/span><\/i>(1), 15-24.\u202fhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.3928\/00220124-20191217-05<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
NR 439 Week 3 Discussion: The Literature Review and Searching for Evidence (graded)<\/span><\/p>\n
Purpose<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\nThis week’s graded topics relate to the following Course Outcomes (COs).<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\n- CO 1: Examine the sources of evidence that contribute to professional nursing practice<\/a>. (PO 7)<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n
- CO 2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (POs 4 & 8)<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n
- CO 4: Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and clinical significance related to evidence-based practice. (POs 4 & 8)<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Due Date<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\n\n- During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week):<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\n- Posts in the discussion at least two times, and<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n
- Posts in the discussion on two different days<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Points Possible<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
50 points<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
Directions<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\n\n- Discussions are designed to promote dialogue between faculty and students, and students and their peers. In discussions students:<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\n- Demonstrate understanding of concepts for the week<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n
- Integrate outside scholarly sources when required<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\n- Engage in meaningful dialogue with classmates and\/or instructor<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n
- Express opinions clearly and logically, in a professional manner<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\n- Use the rubric on this page as you compose your answers.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n
- Best Practices include:<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\n- Participation early in the week is encouraged to stimulate meaningful discussion among classmates and instructor.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\n- Enter the discussion often during the week to read and learn from posts.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n
- Select different classmates for your reply each week.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Discussion Questions<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\n\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span>You must access the following article to answer the questions:<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
Boyle, D. K. (2020). CMSRNs’ continuing competence methods and perceived value of certification: A descriptive study.\u202f<\/span>MEDSURG Nursing, 29<\/span><\/i>(4), 229-254.\u202f<\/span>https:\/\/chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org\/login?url=https:\/\/search.ebscohost.com\/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=145282314&site=eds-live&scope=siteLinks to an external site.<\/span><\/a>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\n- Locate the literature review section. Summarize using your own words from\u202f<\/span>one<\/span><\/i>\u202fof the study\/literature findings. Be sure to identify which study you are summarizing.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\n- Discuss how the author\u2019s review of literature (studies) supported the research purpose\/problem. Share something that was interesting to you as you read through the literature review section.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\n- Describe one strategy that you learned that would help you create a strong literature review\/search for evidence. Share your thoughts on the importance of a thorough review of the literature.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NR 439 Week 3 Discussion: The Literature Review and Searching for Evidence (graded)\u00a0<\/strong><\/a><\/em><\/span><\/h3>\nGrading<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\nTo view the grading criteria\/rubric, please click on the 3 dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the discussion board title and then Show Rubric. See Syllabus for Grading Rubric Definitions.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
This topic is closed for comments.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
The first question asks you to<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\n- Locate the literature review section. Summarize using your own words from\u202f<\/span>one\u202f<\/span><\/i>of the study\/literature findings. Be sure to identify which study you are summarizing.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
To clarify, you are not supposed to summarize the findings from THIS study – you are supposed to summarize one of the study findings from within the literature review, and make sure to identify which you are summarizing.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
The second question asks you to “Discuss how the author\u2019s review of literature (studies) supported the research purpose\/problem.” (This means how did Boyle & Thompson’s review of the literature support Boyle & Thompson’s research purpose\/question.)<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
In order to answer the third question, I strongly suggest that you read the required readings in Houser this week.\u202f You really won’t be able to answer the questions without doing so.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
There was a slight error in the discussion questions.\u202f The correct reference for the article for this week should be:<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\n- Literature review and summarize by using my own words.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
After Conducting a large-number survey, The American Board of Nursing Specialties (ABNS) summarized three top facilitators and barriers of obtaining and maintaining nursing certification (Niebuhr & Biel, 2007).<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
The top three facilitators are:<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\n- Reimbursement for exam fees<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n
- Renewal fees<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n
- Continuing education<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\u202fThe top three barriers are:<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\n- Cost of the exam<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n
- Lack of institutional support<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n
- Lack of time and materials preparing for the exam<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\n- Discuss how the author\u2019s review of studies supported the research problem. Share something that was interesting to me as I read through the literature review section.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
Boyle uses Niebuhr\u2019s quantitative study \u201cThe value of specialty nursing certification\u201d to support her subject matter. Niebuhr\u2019s survey was done on 8,615 certified nurses from 20 ABNS member organizations (Boyle, 2020). Boyle use Niebuhr\u2019s large-sample study to support her theme. The quantitative study gathers information and analyze the data. The study has no report for response percentages. This type of study is attempting to understand the phenomena (Houser, 2018). I was surprised to the fact that lack of institutional support is one of the top three barriers. I have been working in three different medical organizations, and most of my friends are in nursing field. This has never been a barrier for us.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\n- Describe one strategy that I learned that would help me create a strong literature review\/research for evidence. Share my thoughts on the importance of a thorough review of the literature.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
One strategy I learned that would help me to create a strong literature review\/research for evidence is the following. When conducting research, use standard designs, methods, and procedure whenever possible (Houser, 2018). I have also learned to follow steps when evaluating the quality of a research report, and the importance of utilizing trusted unbiased literature to support my research (Houser, 2018). I should use the most recent application literatures as possible. It will help me saving time and having a higher start point. It is also very importance to focus on the research topic and to know designed audiences for the study results. I have learned that besides primary resource information, such as clinical trials; secondary source information, potential search tools that I can trust are CINAHL, MEDLINE\/PubMed, PsycINFO, and Cochrane central Register of Controlled trails (Houser, 2018).<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
Reference:<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\nBoyle, D. K., & Thompson, S. A. (2020). CMSRNs’ continuing competence methods and perceived value of certification: A descriptive study.\u202f<\/span>MEDSURG Nursing, 29<\/span><\/i>(4), 229-254.\u202f<\/span>https:\/\/chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org\/login?url=https:\/\/search.ebscohost.com\/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=145282314&site=eds-live&scope=siteLinks to an external site.<\/span><\/a>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
![\"NR](\"http:\/\/nursingassignmentcrackers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/4-300x125.png\")
NR 439 Week 3 Discussion: The Literature Review and Searching for Evidence (graded)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\nProfessor and Class,<\/span><\/p>\n
\u202f\u202f\u202f\u202f\u202f\u202f Question 1<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\n\n- Locate the literature review section \u202fSummarize using your own words from one of the study\/literature findings.\u202f Be sure to identify which study you are summarizing.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
I choose to summarize the Research article: Continuing Competencies: There were four categories of literature noted in the study from 2012-2020.\u202f They were Validation, international, and competencies in the disciplines other than nursing.\u202f It was found that some educational sessions that were utilized lacked quality of knowledge, needed.\u202f The study highlighted that professionals might attend cheap and convenient education courses that lacked quality or are not in what particularly necessary in the practice and in greatest need (Boyle2020).\u202f It also stated that participants \u201cmay not be to understand, retain, or use the information provided and attendance in the courses does not ensure changes in practice\u201d (Boyle. 2020).\u202f<\/span><\/p>\n
The review discussed several means of continuing competency \u202f\u202f\u202fmethods through publication and professional presentation, portfolios, and performance formal 360 degree assessment. (Boyle. 2020).\u202f The article mentioned simulations on virtual and actual patients are also accepted but felt there was not enough evidence to support \u202fSimulations were used as means of evaluating competence in credentialing and certifying.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\u202f\u202fQuestion 2<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\n\u202fDiscuss how the author\u2019s review of literature (studies) supported the research\u202f\u202f\u202f purpose\/problem.\u202f Share something that was interesting to you as you read through the literature review section.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
The research was focused on review of continuing competencies for ensuring certification and credentialing.\u202f The research had four components.\u202f There were 50 or more articles over a time span, so accuracy is evident.\u202f The author quoted Di Leonardi several times.\u202f Di Leonardi was a member of a task force of authors which were sponsored by an organization that has accreditation Board of Specialty Nurse Certification (Leonardi. Et.at. 2019).\u202f \u201cThe task force discovered perspectives on continuing competency and found although licensing and credentialing organization addressed the topic thoroughly, little attention has be devoted to the perspectives of individual clinicians, and recipients of clinician services\u201d. \u202f(Leonardi. Et.al 2019).\u202f<\/span><\/p>\n
It was stated by the members of the task force that conducted the study Boyle had did a successful job at contributing research to her review of the studies done by Di Leonardi to address continuing competence by quoting the researcher several times which supported the review.\u202f I found it interesting that the literature review section for continuing competencies didn\u2019t give much merit to using simulation for evaluation\u202f I worked in a \u202f\u202f\u202f.facility which we had quarterly mock simulation and codes.\u202f It was called over the P.A. system, all necessary departments responded.\u202f We would go the full drill as if it were a real code, then have a debriefing to discuss what could be improved..\u202f This involved nursing, doctors, anesthesia, lab and the house supervisor etc.\u202f I found it quite useful and informative.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
Question 3<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\nDescribe one strategy that you learned that would help you create a strong literature review research for evidence.\u202f Share your thoughts on the importance of a though review of literature.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
The strategy tatt I learned and will adopt is using as much research literature that is available for your Evidence Based research.\u202f Get yourself comfortable with the process, be through in your search don\u2019t be uncomfortable about asking for help.\u202f Don\u2019t try to reinvent the wheel.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
Reference<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\n
Boyle, D. K. & Thompson, S. A. (2020). CMSRNs’ continuing competence methods and perceived value of certification: A descriptive study.\u202f<\/span>MEDSURG Nursing, 29<\/span><\/i>(4), 229-254.\u202f<\/span>https:\/\/chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org\/login?url=https:\/\/search.ebscohost.com\/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=145282314&site=eds-live&scope=siteLinks to an external site.<\/span><\/a>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\u202fLeonardi, B., Search for more papers by this author, Hagler, D., Marshall, D., Stobinski, J., & Welsh, S. (2019, December 17). From competence to continuing competency. Retrieved March 16, 2021, from\u202f<\/span>https:\/\/journals.healio.com\/doi\/10.3928\/00220124-20191217-05Links to an external site.<\/span><\/a>\u00a0<\/span>egy tatt I learned and will adopt is using as much research literature that is available for your Evidence Based research.”<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
While it is great to have a lot of research literature, too MUCH literature can be overwhelming.\u202f You need to have a plan to narrow down your search.\u202f What strategy or strategies would you use to help you narrow down a search rlated to your topic?<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
You said, “I have also learned to follow steps when evaluating the quality of a research report, and the importance of utilizing trusted unbiased literature to support my research”<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
See my response to Jamie about a good resource that helps you to determine if a source is scholarly.<\/span> NR 439 Week 3 Discussion: The Literature Review and Searching for Evidence (graded)<\/span><\/p>\n
Great discussion – thanks for sharing with the class!<\/span> I am not at all surprised at the lack of institutional support.\u202f Usually at most facilities, the nurse has to get approval before the certification courses.\u202f Once approved the course is taken, a certificate is issued a copy has to be turned in to the HR department for approval.\u202f There is usually a maximum amount of 1000-1500 per year. \u202fThis is a drop in the bucket to me.\u202f Especially, when you\u2019re doing advance degree programs and certifications.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
I found your post very interesting to read. I agree that obtaining a a nursing license is very expensive not only do you pay for school but then you have to pay a fee to obtain a license after spending tons of money on school. Also the exam preparations are super expensive I studied through uworld to prepare for nclex and that cost an arm and a leg also! Where I work they push for you to obtain certifications and further education I have never had a lack of institutional support in anything I have done in regards to my education. “The current lack of nursing students does not stem from a disinterested generation, but rather from a lack of funding and educational resources to accommodate qualified applicants” (Monster, 2019). I found this interesting to read. Thanks again for the great post!<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
Reference:<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\nMonster. (2019).\u202f<\/span>The Nursing Shortage Isn\u2019t Due to Lack of Interest<\/span><\/i>. Monster Career Advice.\u202f<\/span>https:\/\/www.monster.com\/career-advice\/article\/nursing-shortageLinks to an external site.<\/span><\/a>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\n- A current, active, unencumbered license as a registered nurse in the US, its territories or Canada at the time of…<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\n- A minimum of two years (24 months) of experience as an RN within the four years (48 months) prior to application, and<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\n- A minimum of 2,000 hours of adult oncology nursing practice within the four years (48…<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
Oncology Certified Nurse<\/span><\/b>\u202f(OCN\u00ae) | ONCCLinks to an external site.<\/span><\/a>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
www.oncc.org\/certifications\/oncology-certified-nur<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
References:<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\n
Boyle, D. K. & Thompson, S. A. (2020). CMSRNs’ continuing competence methods and perceived value of certification: A descriptive study.\u202f<\/span>MEDSURG Nursing, 29<\/span><\/i>(4), 229-254.\u202f<\/span>https:\/\/chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org\/login?url=https:\/\/search.ebscohost.com\/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=145282314&site=eds-live&scope=siteLinks to an external site.<\/span><\/a>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
Title: NR 439 Week 3 Discussion: The Literature Review and Searching for Evidence (graded)<\/strong><\/h2>\nNR 439 Week 3 Discussion: The Literature Review and Searching for Evidence (graded)<\/strong><\/p>\n
You have provided an in-depth analysis of Boyle\u2019s (2020) article, and there is a lot to learn from your discussion regarding a literature review. In the literature review section, Boyle (2020) discusses the various ways nurses can improve their competence, and the issue of educational courses forms a significant portion. Attending educational courses is mentioned as one way that nurses can earn new knowledge regarding practice. However, it is crucial to review literature in-depth to ensure that a researcher’s information is relevant to the topic in context. Accordingly, Di Leonardi et al. (2020) further explored educational sessions and suggested that they have some shortcomings, and nurses should opt for more comprehensive programs. As you have also noted, Di Leonardi et al. (2020) found that nurses may not retain the information obtained from educational courses and should consider certification and recertification.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
It is interesting to learn that simulations did not qualify as a means of evaluating continued competence. In many cases, simulations are highly rated and bringing such a point in the article was thought-provoking. Always, it is crucial to create a strong literature review section. I like your suggestion that examining the level of evidence is vital, and research studies should depend on the level I evidence as much as possible. The literature review is primarily a summary of a study\u2019s key findings. However, a summary of sources may not meet the threshold of a strong literature review section. As demonstrated in Boyle\u2019s (2020) article, one characteristic of a strong literature review section is evidence varying form interpreting other sources, data, and illustrations current and relevant to the topic and practice.\u202f The literature review should be selective, implying that it should contain crucial information only.\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
References<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h2>\nBoyle, D. K. (2020). CMSRNs’ Continuing Competence Methods and Perceived Value of Certification: A Descriptive Study.\u202f<\/span>Medsurg Nursing<\/span><\/i>,\u202f<\/span>29<\/span><\/i>(4), 229-254.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
Di Leonardi, B. C., Hagler, D., Marshall, D. R., Stobinski, J. X., & Welsh, S. S. (2020). From competence to continuing competency.\u202f<\/span>The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing<\/span><\/i>,\u202f<\/span>51<\/span><\/i>(1), 15-24.\u202fhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.3928\/00220124-20191217-05<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
NR 439 Week 3 Discussion: The Literature Review and Searching for Evidence (graded)<\/span><\/p>\n
Purpose<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\nThis week’s graded topics relate to the following Course Outcomes (COs).<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\n- CO 1: Examine the sources of evidence that contribute to professional nursing practice<\/a>. (PO 7)<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n
- CO 2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (POs 4 & 8)<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n
- CO 4: Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and clinical significance related to evidence-based practice. (POs 4 & 8)<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Due Date<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\n\n- During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week):<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\n- Posts in the discussion at least two times, and<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n
- Posts in the discussion on two different days<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Points Possible<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
50 points<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
Directions<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\n\n- Discussions are designed to promote dialogue between faculty and students, and students and their peers. In discussions students:<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\n- Demonstrate understanding of concepts for the week<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n
- Integrate outside scholarly sources when required<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\n- Engage in meaningful dialogue with classmates and\/or instructor<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n
- Express opinions clearly and logically, in a professional manner<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\n- Use the rubric on this page as you compose your answers.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n
- Best Practices include:<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\n- Participation early in the week is encouraged to stimulate meaningful discussion among classmates and instructor.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\n- Enter the discussion often during the week to read and learn from posts.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n
- Select different classmates for your reply each week.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Discussion Questions<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\n\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span>You must access the following article to answer the questions:<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
Boyle, D. K. (2020). CMSRNs’ continuing competence methods and perceived value of certification: A descriptive study.\u202f<\/span>MEDSURG Nursing, 29<\/span><\/i>(4), 229-254.\u202f<\/span>https:\/\/chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org\/login?url=https:\/\/search.ebscohost.com\/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=145282314&site=eds-live&scope=siteLinks to an external site.<\/span><\/a>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\n- Locate the literature review section. Summarize using your own words from\u202f<\/span>one<\/span><\/i>\u202fof the study\/literature findings. Be sure to identify which study you are summarizing.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\n- Discuss how the author\u2019s review of literature (studies) supported the research purpose\/problem. Share something that was interesting to you as you read through the literature review section.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\n- Describe one strategy that you learned that would help you create a strong literature review\/search for evidence. Share your thoughts on the importance of a thorough review of the literature.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NR 439 Week 3 Discussion: The Literature Review and Searching for Evidence (graded)\u00a0<\/strong><\/a><\/em><\/span><\/h3>\nGrading<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\nTo view the grading criteria\/rubric, please click on the 3 dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the discussion board title and then Show Rubric. See Syllabus for Grading Rubric Definitions.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
This topic is closed for comments.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
The first question asks you to<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\n- Locate the literature review section. Summarize using your own words from\u202f<\/span>one\u202f<\/span><\/i>of the study\/literature findings. Be sure to identify which study you are summarizing.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
To clarify, you are not supposed to summarize the findings from THIS study – you are supposed to summarize one of the study findings from within the literature review, and make sure to identify which you are summarizing.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
The second question asks you to “Discuss how the author\u2019s review of literature (studies) supported the research purpose\/problem.” (This means how did Boyle & Thompson’s review of the literature support Boyle & Thompson’s research purpose\/question.)<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
In order to answer the third question, I strongly suggest that you read the required readings in Houser this week.\u202f You really won’t be able to answer the questions without doing so.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
There was a slight error in the discussion questions.\u202f The correct reference for the article for this week should be:<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\n- Literature review and summarize by using my own words.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
After Conducting a large-number survey, The American Board of Nursing Specialties (ABNS) summarized three top facilitators and barriers of obtaining and maintaining nursing certification (Niebuhr & Biel, 2007).<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
The top three facilitators are:<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\n- Reimbursement for exam fees<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n
- Renewal fees<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n
- Continuing education<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\u202fThe top three barriers are:<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\n- Cost of the exam<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n
- Lack of institutional support<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n
- Lack of time and materials preparing for the exam<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\n- Discuss how the author\u2019s review of studies supported the research problem. Share something that was interesting to me as I read through the literature review section.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
Boyle uses Niebuhr\u2019s quantitative study \u201cThe value of specialty nursing certification\u201d to support her subject matter. Niebuhr\u2019s survey was done on 8,615 certified nurses from 20 ABNS member organizations (Boyle, 2020). Boyle use Niebuhr\u2019s large-sample study to support her theme. The quantitative study gathers information and analyze the data. The study has no report for response percentages. This type of study is attempting to understand the phenomena (Houser, 2018). I was surprised to the fact that lack of institutional support is one of the top three barriers. I have been working in three different medical organizations, and most of my friends are in nursing field. This has never been a barrier for us.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\n- Describe one strategy that I learned that would help me create a strong literature review\/research for evidence. Share my thoughts on the importance of a thorough review of the literature.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
One strategy I learned that would help me to create a strong literature review\/research for evidence is the following. When conducting research, use standard designs, methods, and procedure whenever possible (Houser, 2018). I have also learned to follow steps when evaluating the quality of a research report, and the importance of utilizing trusted unbiased literature to support my research (Houser, 2018). I should use the most recent application literatures as possible. It will help me saving time and having a higher start point. It is also very importance to focus on the research topic and to know designed audiences for the study results. I have learned that besides primary resource information, such as clinical trials; secondary source information, potential search tools that I can trust are CINAHL, MEDLINE\/PubMed, PsycINFO, and Cochrane central Register of Controlled trails (Houser, 2018).<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
Reference:<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\nBoyle, D. K., & Thompson, S. A. (2020). CMSRNs’ continuing competence methods and perceived value of certification: A descriptive study.\u202f<\/span>MEDSURG Nursing, 29<\/span><\/i>(4), 229-254.\u202f<\/span>https:\/\/chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org\/login?url=https:\/\/search.ebscohost.com\/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=145282314&site=eds-live&scope=siteLinks to an external site.<\/span><\/a>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
NR 439 Week 3 Discussion: The Literature Review and Searching for Evidence (graded)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\nProfessor and Class,<\/span><\/p>\n
\u202f\u202f\u202f\u202f\u202f\u202f Question 1<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\n\n- Locate the literature review section \u202fSummarize using your own words from one of the study\/literature findings.\u202f Be sure to identify which study you are summarizing.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
I choose to summarize the Research article: Continuing Competencies: There were four categories of literature noted in the study from 2012-2020.\u202f They were Validation, international, and competencies in the disciplines other than nursing.\u202f It was found that some educational sessions that were utilized lacked quality of knowledge, needed.\u202f The study highlighted that professionals might attend cheap and convenient education courses that lacked quality or are not in what particularly necessary in the practice and in greatest need (Boyle2020).\u202f It also stated that participants \u201cmay not be to understand, retain, or use the information provided and attendance in the courses does not ensure changes in practice\u201d (Boyle. 2020).\u202f<\/span><\/p>\n
The review discussed several means of continuing competency \u202f\u202f\u202fmethods through publication and professional presentation, portfolios, and performance formal 360 degree assessment. (Boyle. 2020).\u202f The article mentioned simulations on virtual and actual patients are also accepted but felt there was not enough evidence to support \u202fSimulations were used as means of evaluating competence in credentialing and certifying.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\u202f\u202fQuestion 2<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\n\u202fDiscuss how the author\u2019s review of literature (studies) supported the research\u202f\u202f\u202f purpose\/problem.\u202f Share something that was interesting to you as you read through the literature review section.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
The research was focused on review of continuing competencies for ensuring certification and credentialing.\u202f The research had four components.\u202f There were 50 or more articles over a time span, so accuracy is evident.\u202f The author quoted Di Leonardi several times.\u202f Di Leonardi was a member of a task force of authors which were sponsored by an organization that has accreditation Board of Specialty Nurse Certification (Leonardi. Et.at. 2019).\u202f \u201cThe task force discovered perspectives on continuing competency and found although licensing and credentialing organization addressed the topic thoroughly, little attention has be devoted to the perspectives of individual clinicians, and recipients of clinician services\u201d. \u202f(Leonardi. Et.al 2019).\u202f<\/span><\/p>\n
It was stated by the members of the task force that conducted the study Boyle had did a successful job at contributing research to her review of the studies done by Di Leonardi to address continuing competence by quoting the researcher several times which supported the review.\u202f I found it interesting that the literature review section for continuing competencies didn\u2019t give much merit to using simulation for evaluation\u202f I worked in a \u202f\u202f\u202f.facility which we had quarterly mock simulation and codes.\u202f It was called over the P.A. system, all necessary departments responded.\u202f We would go the full drill as if it were a real code, then have a debriefing to discuss what could be improved..\u202f This involved nursing, doctors, anesthesia, lab and the house supervisor etc.\u202f I found it quite useful and informative.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
Question 3<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\nDescribe one strategy that you learned that would help you create a strong literature review research for evidence.\u202f Share your thoughts on the importance of a though review of literature.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
The strategy tatt I learned and will adopt is using as much research literature that is available for your Evidence Based research.\u202f Get yourself comfortable with the process, be through in your search don\u2019t be uncomfortable about asking for help.\u202f Don\u2019t try to reinvent the wheel.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
Reference<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\n
Boyle, D. K. & Thompson, S. A. (2020). CMSRNs’ continuing competence methods and perceived value of certification: A descriptive study.\u202f<\/span>MEDSURG Nursing, 29<\/span><\/i>(4), 229-254.\u202f<\/span>https:\/\/chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org\/login?url=https:\/\/search.ebscohost.com\/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=145282314&site=eds-live&scope=siteLinks to an external site.<\/span><\/a>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\u202fLeonardi, B., Search for more papers by this author, Hagler, D., Marshall, D., Stobinski, J., & Welsh, S. (2019, December 17). From competence to continuing competency. Retrieved March 16, 2021, from\u202f<\/span>https:\/\/journals.healio.com\/doi\/10.3928\/00220124-20191217-05Links to an external site.<\/span><\/a>\u00a0<\/span>egy tatt I learned and will adopt is using as much research literature that is available for your Evidence Based research.”<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
While it is great to have a lot of research literature, too MUCH literature can be overwhelming.\u202f You need to have a plan to narrow down your search.\u202f What strategy or strategies would you use to help you narrow down a search rlated to your topic?<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
You said, “I have also learned to follow steps when evaluating the quality of a research report, and the importance of utilizing trusted unbiased literature to support my research”<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
See my response to Jamie about a good resource that helps you to determine if a source is scholarly.<\/span> NR 439 Week 3 Discussion: The Literature Review and Searching for Evidence (graded)<\/span><\/p>\n
Great discussion – thanks for sharing with the class!<\/span> I am not at all surprised at the lack of institutional support.\u202f Usually at most facilities, the nurse has to get approval before the certification courses.\u202f Once approved the course is taken, a certificate is issued a copy has to be turned in to the HR department for approval.\u202f There is usually a maximum amount of 1000-1500 per year. \u202fThis is a drop in the bucket to me.\u202f Especially, when you\u2019re doing advance degree programs and certifications.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
I found your post very interesting to read. I agree that obtaining a a nursing license is very expensive not only do you pay for school but then you have to pay a fee to obtain a license after spending tons of money on school. Also the exam preparations are super expensive I studied through uworld to prepare for nclex and that cost an arm and a leg also! Where I work they push for you to obtain certifications and further education I have never had a lack of institutional support in anything I have done in regards to my education. “The current lack of nursing students does not stem from a disinterested generation, but rather from a lack of funding and educational resources to accommodate qualified applicants” (Monster, 2019). I found this interesting to read. Thanks again for the great post!<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
Reference:<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\nMonster. (2019).\u202f<\/span>The Nursing Shortage Isn\u2019t Due to Lack of Interest<\/span><\/i>. Monster Career Advice.\u202f<\/span>https:\/\/www.monster.com\/career-advice\/article\/nursing-shortageLinks to an external site.<\/span><\/a>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\n- A current, active, unencumbered license as a registered nurse in the US, its territories or Canada at the time of…<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\n- A minimum of two years (24 months) of experience as an RN within the four years (48 months) prior to application, and<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\n- A minimum of 2,000 hours of adult oncology nursing practice within the four years (48…<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
Oncology Certified Nurse<\/span><\/b>\u202f(OCN\u00ae) | ONCCLinks to an external site.<\/span><\/a>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
www.oncc.org\/certifications\/oncology-certified-nur<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
References:<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\n
Boyle, D. K. & Thompson, S. A. (2020). CMSRNs’ continuing competence methods and perceived value of certification: A descriptive study.\u202f<\/span>MEDSURG Nursing, 29<\/span><\/i>(4), 229-254.\u202f<\/span>https:\/\/chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org\/login?url=https:\/\/search.ebscohost.com\/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=145282314&site=eds-live&scope=siteLinks to an external site.<\/span><\/a>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
Boyle, D. K. (2020). CMSRNs’ Continuing Competence Methods and Perceived Value of Certification: A Descriptive Study.\u202f<\/span>Medsurg Nursing<\/span><\/i>,\u202f<\/span>29<\/span><\/i>(4), 229-254.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
Di Leonardi, B. C., Hagler, D., Marshall, D. R., Stobinski, J. X., & Welsh, S. S. (2020). From competence to continuing competency.\u202f<\/span>The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing<\/span><\/i>,\u202f<\/span>51<\/span><\/i>(1), 15-24.\u202fhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.3928\/00220124-20191217-05<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
NR 439 Week 3 Discussion: The Literature Review and Searching for Evidence (graded)<\/span><\/p>\n
Purpose<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\nThis week’s graded topics relate to the following Course Outcomes (COs).<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\n- CO 1: Examine the sources of evidence that contribute to professional nursing practice<\/a>. (PO 7)<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n
- CO 2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (POs 4 & 8)<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n
- CO 4: Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and clinical significance related to evidence-based practice. (POs 4 & 8)<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Due Date<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\n\n- During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week):<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\n- Posts in the discussion at least two times, and<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n
- Posts in the discussion on two different days<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Points Possible<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
50 points<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
Directions<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\n\n- Discussions are designed to promote dialogue between faculty and students, and students and their peers. In discussions students:<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\n- Demonstrate understanding of concepts for the week<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n
- Integrate outside scholarly sources when required<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\n- Engage in meaningful dialogue with classmates and\/or instructor<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n
- Express opinions clearly and logically, in a professional manner<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\n- Use the rubric on this page as you compose your answers.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n
- Best Practices include:<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\n- Participation early in the week is encouraged to stimulate meaningful discussion among classmates and instructor.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\n- Enter the discussion often during the week to read and learn from posts.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n
- Select different classmates for your reply each week.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Discussion Questions<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\n\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span>You must access the following article to answer the questions:<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
Boyle, D. K. (2020). CMSRNs’ continuing competence methods and perceived value of certification: A descriptive study.\u202f<\/span>MEDSURG Nursing, 29<\/span><\/i>(4), 229-254.\u202f<\/span>https:\/\/chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org\/login?url=https:\/\/search.ebscohost.com\/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=145282314&site=eds-live&scope=siteLinks to an external site.<\/span><\/a>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\n- Locate the literature review section. Summarize using your own words from\u202f<\/span>one<\/span><\/i>\u202fof the study\/literature findings. Be sure to identify which study you are summarizing.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\n- Discuss how the author\u2019s review of literature (studies) supported the research purpose\/problem. Share something that was interesting to you as you read through the literature review section.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\n- Describe one strategy that you learned that would help you create a strong literature review\/search for evidence. Share your thoughts on the importance of a thorough review of the literature.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NR 439 Week 3 Discussion: The Literature Review and Searching for Evidence (graded)\u00a0<\/strong><\/a><\/em><\/span><\/h3>\nGrading<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\nTo view the grading criteria\/rubric, please click on the 3 dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the discussion board title and then Show Rubric. See Syllabus for Grading Rubric Definitions.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
This topic is closed for comments.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
The first question asks you to<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\n- Locate the literature review section. Summarize using your own words from\u202f<\/span>one\u202f<\/span><\/i>of the study\/literature findings. Be sure to identify which study you are summarizing.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
To clarify, you are not supposed to summarize the findings from THIS study – you are supposed to summarize one of the study findings from within the literature review, and make sure to identify which you are summarizing.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
The second question asks you to “Discuss how the author\u2019s review of literature (studies) supported the research purpose\/problem.” (This means how did Boyle & Thompson’s review of the literature support Boyle & Thompson’s research purpose\/question.)<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
In order to answer the third question, I strongly suggest that you read the required readings in Houser this week.\u202f You really won’t be able to answer the questions without doing so.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
There was a slight error in the discussion questions.\u202f The correct reference for the article for this week should be:<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\n- Literature review and summarize by using my own words.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
After Conducting a large-number survey, The American Board of Nursing Specialties (ABNS) summarized three top facilitators and barriers of obtaining and maintaining nursing certification (Niebuhr & Biel, 2007).<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
The top three facilitators are:<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\n- Reimbursement for exam fees<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n
- Renewal fees<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n
- Continuing education<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\u202fThe top three barriers are:<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\n- Cost of the exam<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n
- Lack of institutional support<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n
- Lack of time and materials preparing for the exam<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\n- Discuss how the author\u2019s review of studies supported the research problem. Share something that was interesting to me as I read through the literature review section.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
Boyle uses Niebuhr\u2019s quantitative study \u201cThe value of specialty nursing certification\u201d to support her subject matter. Niebuhr\u2019s survey was done on 8,615 certified nurses from 20 ABNS member organizations (Boyle, 2020). Boyle use Niebuhr\u2019s large-sample study to support her theme. The quantitative study gathers information and analyze the data. The study has no report for response percentages. This type of study is attempting to understand the phenomena (Houser, 2018). I was surprised to the fact that lack of institutional support is one of the top three barriers. I have been working in three different medical organizations, and most of my friends are in nursing field. This has never been a barrier for us.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\n- Describe one strategy that I learned that would help me create a strong literature review\/research for evidence. Share my thoughts on the importance of a thorough review of the literature.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
One strategy I learned that would help me to create a strong literature review\/research for evidence is the following. When conducting research, use standard designs, methods, and procedure whenever possible (Houser, 2018). I have also learned to follow steps when evaluating the quality of a research report, and the importance of utilizing trusted unbiased literature to support my research (Houser, 2018). I should use the most recent application literatures as possible. It will help me saving time and having a higher start point. It is also very importance to focus on the research topic and to know designed audiences for the study results. I have learned that besides primary resource information, such as clinical trials; secondary source information, potential search tools that I can trust are CINAHL, MEDLINE\/PubMed, PsycINFO, and Cochrane central Register of Controlled trails (Houser, 2018).<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
Reference:<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\nBoyle, D. K., & Thompson, S. A. (2020). CMSRNs’ continuing competence methods and perceived value of certification: A descriptive study.\u202f<\/span>MEDSURG Nursing, 29<\/span><\/i>(4), 229-254.\u202f<\/span>https:\/\/chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org\/login?url=https:\/\/search.ebscohost.com\/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=145282314&site=eds-live&scope=siteLinks to an external site.<\/span><\/a>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
NR 439 Week 3 Discussion: The Literature Review and Searching for Evidence (graded)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\nProfessor and Class,<\/span><\/p>\n
\u202f\u202f\u202f\u202f\u202f\u202f Question 1<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\n\n- Locate the literature review section \u202fSummarize using your own words from one of the study\/literature findings.\u202f Be sure to identify which study you are summarizing.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
I choose to summarize the Research article: Continuing Competencies: There were four categories of literature noted in the study from 2012-2020.\u202f They were Validation, international, and competencies in the disciplines other than nursing.\u202f It was found that some educational sessions that were utilized lacked quality of knowledge, needed.\u202f The study highlighted that professionals might attend cheap and convenient education courses that lacked quality or are not in what particularly necessary in the practice and in greatest need (Boyle2020).\u202f It also stated that participants \u201cmay not be to understand, retain, or use the information provided and attendance in the courses does not ensure changes in practice\u201d (Boyle. 2020).\u202f<\/span><\/p>\n
The review discussed several means of continuing competency \u202f\u202f\u202fmethods through publication and professional presentation, portfolios, and performance formal 360 degree assessment. (Boyle. 2020).\u202f The article mentioned simulations on virtual and actual patients are also accepted but felt there was not enough evidence to support \u202fSimulations were used as means of evaluating competence in credentialing and certifying.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\u202f\u202fQuestion 2<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\n\u202fDiscuss how the author\u2019s review of literature (studies) supported the research\u202f\u202f\u202f purpose\/problem.\u202f Share something that was interesting to you as you read through the literature review section.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
The research was focused on review of continuing competencies for ensuring certification and credentialing.\u202f The research had four components.\u202f There were 50 or more articles over a time span, so accuracy is evident.\u202f The author quoted Di Leonardi several times.\u202f Di Leonardi was a member of a task force of authors which were sponsored by an organization that has accreditation Board of Specialty Nurse Certification (Leonardi. Et.at. 2019).\u202f \u201cThe task force discovered perspectives on continuing competency and found although licensing and credentialing organization addressed the topic thoroughly, little attention has be devoted to the perspectives of individual clinicians, and recipients of clinician services\u201d. \u202f(Leonardi. Et.al 2019).\u202f<\/span><\/p>\n
It was stated by the members of the task force that conducted the study Boyle had did a successful job at contributing research to her review of the studies done by Di Leonardi to address continuing competence by quoting the researcher several times which supported the review.\u202f I found it interesting that the literature review section for continuing competencies didn\u2019t give much merit to using simulation for evaluation\u202f I worked in a \u202f\u202f\u202f.facility which we had quarterly mock simulation and codes.\u202f It was called over the P.A. system, all necessary departments responded.\u202f We would go the full drill as if it were a real code, then have a debriefing to discuss what could be improved..\u202f This involved nursing, doctors, anesthesia, lab and the house supervisor etc.\u202f I found it quite useful and informative.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
Question 3<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\nDescribe one strategy that you learned that would help you create a strong literature review research for evidence.\u202f Share your thoughts on the importance of a though review of literature.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
The strategy tatt I learned and will adopt is using as much research literature that is available for your Evidence Based research.\u202f Get yourself comfortable with the process, be through in your search don\u2019t be uncomfortable about asking for help.\u202f Don\u2019t try to reinvent the wheel.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
Reference<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\n
Boyle, D. K. & Thompson, S. A. (2020). CMSRNs’ continuing competence methods and perceived value of certification: A descriptive study.\u202f<\/span>MEDSURG Nursing, 29<\/span><\/i>(4), 229-254.\u202f<\/span>https:\/\/chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org\/login?url=https:\/\/search.ebscohost.com\/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=145282314&site=eds-live&scope=siteLinks to an external site.<\/span><\/a>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\u202fLeonardi, B., Search for more papers by this author, Hagler, D., Marshall, D., Stobinski, J., & Welsh, S. (2019, December 17). From competence to continuing competency. Retrieved March 16, 2021, from\u202f<\/span>https:\/\/journals.healio.com\/doi\/10.3928\/00220124-20191217-05Links to an external site.<\/span><\/a>\u00a0<\/span>egy tatt I learned and will adopt is using as much research literature that is available for your Evidence Based research.”<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
While it is great to have a lot of research literature, too MUCH literature can be overwhelming.\u202f You need to have a plan to narrow down your search.\u202f What strategy or strategies would you use to help you narrow down a search rlated to your topic?<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
You said, “I have also learned to follow steps when evaluating the quality of a research report, and the importance of utilizing trusted unbiased literature to support my research”<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
See my response to Jamie about a good resource that helps you to determine if a source is scholarly.<\/span> NR 439 Week 3 Discussion: The Literature Review and Searching for Evidence (graded)<\/span><\/p>\n
Great discussion – thanks for sharing with the class!<\/span> I am not at all surprised at the lack of institutional support.\u202f Usually at most facilities, the nurse has to get approval before the certification courses.\u202f Once approved the course is taken, a certificate is issued a copy has to be turned in to the HR department for approval.\u202f There is usually a maximum amount of 1000-1500 per year. \u202fThis is a drop in the bucket to me.\u202f Especially, when you\u2019re doing advance degree programs and certifications.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
I found your post very interesting to read. I agree that obtaining a a nursing license is very expensive not only do you pay for school but then you have to pay a fee to obtain a license after spending tons of money on school. Also the exam preparations are super expensive I studied through uworld to prepare for nclex and that cost an arm and a leg also! Where I work they push for you to obtain certifications and further education I have never had a lack of institutional support in anything I have done in regards to my education. “The current lack of nursing students does not stem from a disinterested generation, but rather from a lack of funding and educational resources to accommodate qualified applicants” (Monster, 2019). I found this interesting to read. Thanks again for the great post!<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
Reference:<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\nMonster. (2019).\u202f<\/span>The Nursing Shortage Isn\u2019t Due to Lack of Interest<\/span><\/i>. Monster Career Advice.\u202f<\/span>https:\/\/www.monster.com\/career-advice\/article\/nursing-shortageLinks to an external site.<\/span><\/a>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\n- A current, active, unencumbered license as a registered nurse in the US, its territories or Canada at the time of…<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\n- A minimum of two years (24 months) of experience as an RN within the four years (48 months) prior to application, and<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\n- A minimum of 2,000 hours of adult oncology nursing practice within the four years (48…<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
Oncology Certified Nurse<\/span><\/b>\u202f(OCN\u00ae) | ONCCLinks to an external site.<\/span><\/a>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
www.oncc.org\/certifications\/oncology-certified-nur<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
References:<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\n
Boyle, D. K. & Thompson, S. A. (2020). CMSRNs’ continuing competence methods and perceived value of certification: A descriptive study.\u202f<\/span>MEDSURG Nursing, 29<\/span><\/i>(4), 229-254.\u202f<\/span>https:\/\/chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org\/login?url=https:\/\/search.ebscohost.com\/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=145282314&site=eds-live&scope=siteLinks to an external site.<\/span><\/a>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
Due Date<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\n\n- During the assigned week (Sunday the start of the assigned week through Sunday the end of the assigned week):<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\n- Posts in the discussion at least two times, and<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n
- Posts in the discussion on two different days<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Points Possible<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
50 points<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
Directions<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\n\n- Discussions are designed to promote dialogue between faculty and students, and students and their peers. In discussions students:<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\n- Demonstrate understanding of concepts for the week<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n
- Integrate outside scholarly sources when required<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\n- Engage in meaningful dialogue with classmates and\/or instructor<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n
- Express opinions clearly and logically, in a professional manner<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\n- Use the rubric on this page as you compose your answers.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n
- Best Practices include:<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\n- Participation early in the week is encouraged to stimulate meaningful discussion among classmates and instructor.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\n- Enter the discussion often during the week to read and learn from posts.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n
- Select different classmates for your reply each week.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Discussion Questions<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\n\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span>You must access the following article to answer the questions:<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
Boyle, D. K. (2020). CMSRNs’ continuing competence methods and perceived value of certification: A descriptive study.\u202f<\/span>MEDSURG Nursing, 29<\/span><\/i>(4), 229-254.\u202f<\/span>https:\/\/chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org\/login?url=https:\/\/search.ebscohost.com\/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=145282314&site=eds-live&scope=siteLinks to an external site.<\/span><\/a>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\n- Locate the literature review section. Summarize using your own words from\u202f<\/span>one<\/span><\/i>\u202fof the study\/literature findings. Be sure to identify which study you are summarizing.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\n- Discuss how the author\u2019s review of literature (studies) supported the research purpose\/problem. Share something that was interesting to you as you read through the literature review section.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\n- Describe one strategy that you learned that would help you create a strong literature review\/search for evidence. Share your thoughts on the importance of a thorough review of the literature.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NR 439 Week 3 Discussion: The Literature Review and Searching for Evidence (graded)\u00a0<\/strong><\/a><\/em><\/span><\/h3>\nGrading<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\nTo view the grading criteria\/rubric, please click on the 3 dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the discussion board title and then Show Rubric. See Syllabus for Grading Rubric Definitions.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
This topic is closed for comments.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
The first question asks you to<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\n- Locate the literature review section. Summarize using your own words from\u202f<\/span>one\u202f<\/span><\/i>of the study\/literature findings. Be sure to identify which study you are summarizing.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
To clarify, you are not supposed to summarize the findings from THIS study – you are supposed to summarize one of the study findings from within the literature review, and make sure to identify which you are summarizing.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
The second question asks you to “Discuss how the author\u2019s review of literature (studies) supported the research purpose\/problem.” (This means how did Boyle & Thompson’s review of the literature support Boyle & Thompson’s research purpose\/question.)<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
In order to answer the third question, I strongly suggest that you read the required readings in Houser this week.\u202f You really won’t be able to answer the questions without doing so.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
There was a slight error in the discussion questions.\u202f The correct reference for the article for this week should be:<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\n- Literature review and summarize by using my own words.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
After Conducting a large-number survey, The American Board of Nursing Specialties (ABNS) summarized three top facilitators and barriers of obtaining and maintaining nursing certification (Niebuhr & Biel, 2007).<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
The top three facilitators are:<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\n- Reimbursement for exam fees<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n
- Renewal fees<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n
- Continuing education<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\u202fThe top three barriers are:<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\n- Cost of the exam<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n
- Lack of institutional support<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n
- Lack of time and materials preparing for the exam<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\n- Discuss how the author\u2019s review of studies supported the research problem. Share something that was interesting to me as I read through the literature review section.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
Boyle uses Niebuhr\u2019s quantitative study \u201cThe value of specialty nursing certification\u201d to support her subject matter. Niebuhr\u2019s survey was done on 8,615 certified nurses from 20 ABNS member organizations (Boyle, 2020). Boyle use Niebuhr\u2019s large-sample study to support her theme. The quantitative study gathers information and analyze the data. The study has no report for response percentages. This type of study is attempting to understand the phenomena (Houser, 2018). I was surprised to the fact that lack of institutional support is one of the top three barriers. I have been working in three different medical organizations, and most of my friends are in nursing field. This has never been a barrier for us.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\n- Describe one strategy that I learned that would help me create a strong literature review\/research for evidence. Share my thoughts on the importance of a thorough review of the literature.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
One strategy I learned that would help me to create a strong literature review\/research for evidence is the following. When conducting research, use standard designs, methods, and procedure whenever possible (Houser, 2018). I have also learned to follow steps when evaluating the quality of a research report, and the importance of utilizing trusted unbiased literature to support my research (Houser, 2018). I should use the most recent application literatures as possible. It will help me saving time and having a higher start point. It is also very importance to focus on the research topic and to know designed audiences for the study results. I have learned that besides primary resource information, such as clinical trials; secondary source information, potential search tools that I can trust are CINAHL, MEDLINE\/PubMed, PsycINFO, and Cochrane central Register of Controlled trails (Houser, 2018).<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
Reference:<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\nBoyle, D. K., & Thompson, S. A. (2020). CMSRNs’ continuing competence methods and perceived value of certification: A descriptive study.\u202f<\/span>MEDSURG Nursing, 29<\/span><\/i>(4), 229-254.\u202f<\/span>https:\/\/chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org\/login?url=https:\/\/search.ebscohost.com\/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=145282314&site=eds-live&scope=siteLinks to an external site.<\/span><\/a>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
NR 439 Week 3 Discussion: The Literature Review and Searching for Evidence (graded)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\nProfessor and Class,<\/span><\/p>\n
\u202f\u202f\u202f\u202f\u202f\u202f Question 1<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\n\n- Locate the literature review section \u202fSummarize using your own words from one of the study\/literature findings.\u202f Be sure to identify which study you are summarizing.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
I choose to summarize the Research article: Continuing Competencies: There were four categories of literature noted in the study from 2012-2020.\u202f They were Validation, international, and competencies in the disciplines other than nursing.\u202f It was found that some educational sessions that were utilized lacked quality of knowledge, needed.\u202f The study highlighted that professionals might attend cheap and convenient education courses that lacked quality or are not in what particularly necessary in the practice and in greatest need (Boyle2020).\u202f It also stated that participants \u201cmay not be to understand, retain, or use the information provided and attendance in the courses does not ensure changes in practice\u201d (Boyle. 2020).\u202f<\/span><\/p>\n
The review discussed several means of continuing competency \u202f\u202f\u202fmethods through publication and professional presentation, portfolios, and performance formal 360 degree assessment. (Boyle. 2020).\u202f The article mentioned simulations on virtual and actual patients are also accepted but felt there was not enough evidence to support \u202fSimulations were used as means of evaluating competence in credentialing and certifying.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\u202f\u202fQuestion 2<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\n\u202fDiscuss how the author\u2019s review of literature (studies) supported the research\u202f\u202f\u202f purpose\/problem.\u202f Share something that was interesting to you as you read through the literature review section.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
The research was focused on review of continuing competencies for ensuring certification and credentialing.\u202f The research had four components.\u202f There were 50 or more articles over a time span, so accuracy is evident.\u202f The author quoted Di Leonardi several times.\u202f Di Leonardi was a member of a task force of authors which were sponsored by an organization that has accreditation Board of Specialty Nurse Certification (Leonardi. Et.at. 2019).\u202f \u201cThe task force discovered perspectives on continuing competency and found although licensing and credentialing organization addressed the topic thoroughly, little attention has be devoted to the perspectives of individual clinicians, and recipients of clinician services\u201d. \u202f(Leonardi. Et.al 2019).\u202f<\/span><\/p>\n
It was stated by the members of the task force that conducted the study Boyle had did a successful job at contributing research to her review of the studies done by Di Leonardi to address continuing competence by quoting the researcher several times which supported the review.\u202f I found it interesting that the literature review section for continuing competencies didn\u2019t give much merit to using simulation for evaluation\u202f I worked in a \u202f\u202f\u202f.facility which we had quarterly mock simulation and codes.\u202f It was called over the P.A. system, all necessary departments responded.\u202f We would go the full drill as if it were a real code, then have a debriefing to discuss what could be improved..\u202f This involved nursing, doctors, anesthesia, lab and the house supervisor etc.\u202f I found it quite useful and informative.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
Question 3<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\nDescribe one strategy that you learned that would help you create a strong literature review research for evidence.\u202f Share your thoughts on the importance of a though review of literature.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
The strategy tatt I learned and will adopt is using as much research literature that is available for your Evidence Based research.\u202f Get yourself comfortable with the process, be through in your search don\u2019t be uncomfortable about asking for help.\u202f Don\u2019t try to reinvent the wheel.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
Reference<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\n
Boyle, D. K. & Thompson, S. A. (2020). CMSRNs’ continuing competence methods and perceived value of certification: A descriptive study.\u202f<\/span>MEDSURG Nursing, 29<\/span><\/i>(4), 229-254.\u202f<\/span>https:\/\/chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org\/login?url=https:\/\/search.ebscohost.com\/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=145282314&site=eds-live&scope=siteLinks to an external site.<\/span><\/a>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\u202fLeonardi, B., Search for more papers by this author, Hagler, D., Marshall, D., Stobinski, J., & Welsh, S. (2019, December 17). From competence to continuing competency. Retrieved March 16, 2021, from\u202f<\/span>https:\/\/journals.healio.com\/doi\/10.3928\/00220124-20191217-05Links to an external site.<\/span><\/a>\u00a0<\/span>egy tatt I learned and will adopt is using as much research literature that is available for your Evidence Based research.”<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
While it is great to have a lot of research literature, too MUCH literature can be overwhelming.\u202f You need to have a plan to narrow down your search.\u202f What strategy or strategies would you use to help you narrow down a search rlated to your topic?<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
You said, “I have also learned to follow steps when evaluating the quality of a research report, and the importance of utilizing trusted unbiased literature to support my research”<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
See my response to Jamie about a good resource that helps you to determine if a source is scholarly.<\/span> NR 439 Week 3 Discussion: The Literature Review and Searching for Evidence (graded)<\/span><\/p>\n
Great discussion – thanks for sharing with the class!<\/span> I am not at all surprised at the lack of institutional support.\u202f Usually at most facilities, the nurse has to get approval before the certification courses.\u202f Once approved the course is taken, a certificate is issued a copy has to be turned in to the HR department for approval.\u202f There is usually a maximum amount of 1000-1500 per year. \u202fThis is a drop in the bucket to me.\u202f Especially, when you\u2019re doing advance degree programs and certifications.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
I found your post very interesting to read. I agree that obtaining a a nursing license is very expensive not only do you pay for school but then you have to pay a fee to obtain a license after spending tons of money on school. Also the exam preparations are super expensive I studied through uworld to prepare for nclex and that cost an arm and a leg also! Where I work they push for you to obtain certifications and further education I have never had a lack of institutional support in anything I have done in regards to my education. “The current lack of nursing students does not stem from a disinterested generation, but rather from a lack of funding and educational resources to accommodate qualified applicants” (Monster, 2019). I found this interesting to read. Thanks again for the great post!<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
Reference:<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\nMonster. (2019).\u202f<\/span>The Nursing Shortage Isn\u2019t Due to Lack of Interest<\/span><\/i>. Monster Career Advice.\u202f<\/span>https:\/\/www.monster.com\/career-advice\/article\/nursing-shortageLinks to an external site.<\/span><\/a>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\n- A current, active, unencumbered license as a registered nurse in the US, its territories or Canada at the time of…<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\n- A minimum of two years (24 months) of experience as an RN within the four years (48 months) prior to application, and<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\n- A minimum of 2,000 hours of adult oncology nursing practice within the four years (48…<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
Oncology Certified Nurse<\/span><\/b>\u202f(OCN\u00ae) | ONCCLinks to an external site.<\/span><\/a>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
www.oncc.org\/certifications\/oncology-certified-nur<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
References:<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\n
Boyle, D. K. & Thompson, S. A. (2020). CMSRNs’ continuing competence methods and perceived value of certification: A descriptive study.\u202f<\/span>MEDSURG Nursing, 29<\/span><\/i>(4), 229-254.\u202f<\/span>https:\/\/chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org\/login?url=https:\/\/search.ebscohost.com\/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=145282314&site=eds-live&scope=siteLinks to an external site.<\/span><\/a>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
- \n
- Posts in the discussion at least two times, and<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n
- Posts in the discussion on two different days<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Points Possible<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
50 points<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
Directions<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\n
- \n
- Discussions are designed to promote dialogue between faculty and students, and students and their peers. In discussions students:<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
- \n
- Demonstrate understanding of concepts for the week<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n
- Integrate outside scholarly sources when required<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
- \n
- Engage in meaningful dialogue with classmates and\/or instructor<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n
- Express opinions clearly and logically, in a professional manner<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
- \n
- Use the rubric on this page as you compose your answers.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n
- Best Practices include:<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
- \n
- Participation early in the week is encouraged to stimulate meaningful discussion among classmates and instructor.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
- \n
- Enter the discussion often during the week to read and learn from posts.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n
- Select different classmates for your reply each week.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Discussion Questions<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\n
\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span>You must access the following article to answer the questions:<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
Boyle, D. K. (2020). CMSRNs’ continuing competence methods and perceived value of certification: A descriptive study.\u202f<\/span>MEDSURG Nursing, 29<\/span><\/i>(4), 229-254.\u202f<\/span>https:\/\/chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org\/login?url=https:\/\/search.ebscohost.com\/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=145282314&site=eds-live&scope=siteLinks to an external site.<\/span><\/a>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
- \n
- Locate the literature review section. Summarize using your own words from\u202f<\/span>one<\/span><\/i>\u202fof the study\/literature findings. Be sure to identify which study you are summarizing.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
- \n
- Discuss how the author\u2019s review of literature (studies) supported the research purpose\/problem. Share something that was interesting to you as you read through the literature review section.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
- \n
- Describe one strategy that you learned that would help you create a strong literature review\/search for evidence. Share your thoughts on the importance of a thorough review of the literature.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NR 439 Week 3 Discussion: The Literature Review and Searching for Evidence (graded)\u00a0<\/strong><\/a><\/em><\/span><\/h3>\n
Grading<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\n
To view the grading criteria\/rubric, please click on the 3 dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the discussion board title and then Show Rubric. See Syllabus for Grading Rubric Definitions.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
This topic is closed for comments.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
The first question asks you to<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
- \n
- Locate the literature review section. Summarize using your own words from\u202f<\/span>one\u202f<\/span><\/i>of the study\/literature findings. Be sure to identify which study you are summarizing.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
To clarify, you are not supposed to summarize the findings from THIS study – you are supposed to summarize one of the study findings from within the literature review, and make sure to identify which you are summarizing.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
The second question asks you to “Discuss how the author\u2019s review of literature (studies) supported the research purpose\/problem.” (This means how did Boyle & Thompson’s review of the literature support Boyle & Thompson’s research purpose\/question.)<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
In order to answer the third question, I strongly suggest that you read the required readings in Houser this week.\u202f You really won’t be able to answer the questions without doing so.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
There was a slight error in the discussion questions.\u202f The correct reference for the article for this week should be:<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
- \n
- Literature review and summarize by using my own words.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
After Conducting a large-number survey, The American Board of Nursing Specialties (ABNS) summarized three top facilitators and barriers of obtaining and maintaining nursing certification (Niebuhr & Biel, 2007).<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
The top three facilitators are:<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
- \n
- Reimbursement for exam fees<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n
- Renewal fees<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n
- Continuing education<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\u202fThe top three barriers are:<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
- \n
- Cost of the exam<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n
- Lack of institutional support<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n
- Lack of time and materials preparing for the exam<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
- \n
- Discuss how the author\u2019s review of studies supported the research problem. Share something that was interesting to me as I read through the literature review section.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
Boyle uses Niebuhr\u2019s quantitative study \u201cThe value of specialty nursing certification\u201d to support her subject matter. Niebuhr\u2019s survey was done on 8,615 certified nurses from 20 ABNS member organizations (Boyle, 2020). Boyle use Niebuhr\u2019s large-sample study to support her theme. The quantitative study gathers information and analyze the data. The study has no report for response percentages. This type of study is attempting to understand the phenomena (Houser, 2018). I was surprised to the fact that lack of institutional support is one of the top three barriers. I have been working in three different medical organizations, and most of my friends are in nursing field. This has never been a barrier for us.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
- \n
- Describe one strategy that I learned that would help me create a strong literature review\/research for evidence. Share my thoughts on the importance of a thorough review of the literature.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
One strategy I learned that would help me to create a strong literature review\/research for evidence is the following. When conducting research, use standard designs, methods, and procedure whenever possible (Houser, 2018). I have also learned to follow steps when evaluating the quality of a research report, and the importance of utilizing trusted unbiased literature to support my research (Houser, 2018). I should use the most recent application literatures as possible. It will help me saving time and having a higher start point. It is also very importance to focus on the research topic and to know designed audiences for the study results. I have learned that besides primary resource information, such as clinical trials; secondary source information, potential search tools that I can trust are CINAHL, MEDLINE\/PubMed, PsycINFO, and Cochrane central Register of Controlled trails (Houser, 2018).<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\u202f<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
Reference:<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\n
Boyle, D. K., & Thompson, S. A. (2020). CMSRNs’ continuing competence methods and perceived value of certification: A descriptive study.\u202f<\/span>MEDSURG Nursing, 29<\/span><\/i>(4), 229-254.\u202f<\/span>https:\/\/chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org\/login?url=https:\/\/search.ebscohost.com\/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=145282314&site=eds-live&scope=siteLinks to an external site.<\/span><\/a>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
NR 439 Week 3 Discussion: The Literature Review and Searching for Evidence (graded)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n Professor and Class,<\/span><\/p>\n
\u202f\u202f\u202f\u202f\u202f\u202f Question 1<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\n
- \n
- Locate the literature review section \u202fSummarize using your own words from one of the study\/literature findings.\u202f Be sure to identify which study you are summarizing.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
I choose to summarize the Research article: Continuing Competencies: There were four categories of literature noted in the study from 2012-2020.\u202f They were Validation, international, and competencies in the disciplines other than nursing.\u202f It was found that some educational sessions that were utilized lacked quality of knowledge, needed.\u202f The study highlighted that professionals might attend cheap and convenient education courses that lacked quality or are not in what particularly necessary in the practice and in greatest need (Boyle2020).\u202f It also stated that participants \u201cmay not be to understand, retain, or use the information provided and attendance in the courses does not ensure changes in practice\u201d (Boyle. 2020).\u202f<\/span><\/p>\n
The review discussed several means of continuing competency \u202f\u202f\u202fmethods through publication and professional presentation, portfolios, and performance formal 360 degree assessment. (Boyle. 2020).\u202f The article mentioned simulations on virtual and actual patients are also accepted but felt there was not enough evidence to support \u202fSimulations were used as means of evaluating competence in credentialing and certifying.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\u202f\u202fQuestion 2<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\n
\u202fDiscuss how the author\u2019s review of literature (studies) supported the research\u202f\u202f\u202f purpose\/problem.\u202f Share something that was interesting to you as you read through the literature review section.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
The research was focused on review of continuing competencies for ensuring certification and credentialing.\u202f The research had four components.\u202f There were 50 or more articles over a time span, so accuracy is evident.\u202f The author quoted Di Leonardi several times.\u202f Di Leonardi was a member of a task force of authors which were sponsored by an organization that has accreditation Board of Specialty Nurse Certification (Leonardi. Et.at. 2019).\u202f \u201cThe task force discovered perspectives on continuing competency and found although licensing and credentialing organization addressed the topic thoroughly, little attention has be devoted to the perspectives of individual clinicians, and recipients of clinician services\u201d. \u202f(Leonardi. Et.al 2019).\u202f<\/span><\/p>\n
It was stated by the members of the task force that conducted the study Boyle had did a successful job at contributing research to her review of the studies done by Di Leonardi to address continuing competence by quoting the researcher several times which supported the review.\u202f I found it interesting that the literature review section for continuing competencies didn\u2019t give much merit to using simulation for evaluation\u202f I worked in a \u202f\u202f\u202f.facility which we had quarterly mock simulation and codes.\u202f It was called over the P.A. system, all necessary departments responded.\u202f We would go the full drill as if it were a real code, then have a debriefing to discuss what could be improved..\u202f This involved nursing, doctors, anesthesia, lab and the house supervisor etc.\u202f I found it quite useful and informative.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
Question 3<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\n
Describe one strategy that you learned that would help you create a strong literature review research for evidence.\u202f Share your thoughts on the importance of a though review of literature.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
The strategy tatt I learned and will adopt is using as much research literature that is available for your Evidence Based research.\u202f Get yourself comfortable with the process, be through in your search don\u2019t be uncomfortable about asking for help.\u202f Don\u2019t try to reinvent the wheel.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
Reference<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\n
Boyle, D. K. & Thompson, S. A. (2020). CMSRNs’ continuing competence methods and perceived value of certification: A descriptive study.\u202f<\/span>MEDSURG Nursing, 29<\/span><\/i>(4), 229-254.\u202f<\/span>https:\/\/chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org\/login?url=https:\/\/search.ebscohost.com\/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=145282314&site=eds-live&scope=siteLinks to an external site.<\/span><\/a>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
\u202fLeonardi, B., Search for more papers by this author, Hagler, D., Marshall, D., Stobinski, J., & Welsh, S. (2019, December 17). From competence to continuing competency. Retrieved March 16, 2021, from\u202f<\/span>https:\/\/journals.healio.com\/doi\/10.3928\/00220124-20191217-05Links to an external site.<\/span><\/a>\u00a0<\/span>egy tatt I learned and will adopt is using as much research literature that is available for your Evidence Based research.”<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
While it is great to have a lot of research literature, too MUCH literature can be overwhelming.\u202f You need to have a plan to narrow down your search.\u202f What strategy or strategies would you use to help you narrow down a search rlated to your topic?<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
You said, “I have also learned to follow steps when evaluating the quality of a research report, and the importance of utilizing trusted unbiased literature to support my research”<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
See my response to Jamie about a good resource that helps you to determine if a source is scholarly.<\/span> NR 439 Week 3 Discussion: The Literature Review and Searching for Evidence (graded)<\/span><\/p>\n
Great discussion – thanks for sharing with the class!<\/span> I am not at all surprised at the lack of institutional support.\u202f Usually at most facilities, the nurse has to get approval before the certification courses.\u202f Once approved the course is taken, a certificate is issued a copy has to be turned in to the HR department for approval.\u202f There is usually a maximum amount of 1000-1500 per year. \u202fThis is a drop in the bucket to me.\u202f Especially, when you\u2019re doing advance degree programs and certifications.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
I found your post very interesting to read. I agree that obtaining a a nursing license is very expensive not only do you pay for school but then you have to pay a fee to obtain a license after spending tons of money on school. Also the exam preparations are super expensive I studied through uworld to prepare for nclex and that cost an arm and a leg also! Where I work they push for you to obtain certifications and further education I have never had a lack of institutional support in anything I have done in regards to my education. “The current lack of nursing students does not stem from a disinterested generation, but rather from a lack of funding and educational resources to accommodate qualified applicants” (Monster, 2019). I found this interesting to read. Thanks again for the great post!<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
Reference:<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\n
Monster. (2019).\u202f<\/span>The Nursing Shortage Isn\u2019t Due to Lack of Interest<\/span><\/i>. Monster Career Advice.\u202f<\/span>https:\/\/www.monster.com\/career-advice\/article\/nursing-shortageLinks to an external site.<\/span><\/a>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
- \n
- A current, active, unencumbered license as a registered nurse in the US, its territories or Canada at the time of…<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
- \n
- A minimum of two years (24 months) of experience as an RN within the four years (48 months) prior to application, and<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
- \n
- A minimum of 2,000 hours of adult oncology nursing practice within the four years (48…<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
Oncology Certified Nurse<\/span><\/b>\u202f(OCN\u00ae) | ONCCLinks to an external site.<\/span><\/a>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
www.oncc.org\/certifications\/oncology-certified-nur<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
References:<\/span><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/h3>\n
Boyle, D. K. & Thompson, S. A. (2020). CMSRNs’ continuing competence methods and perceived value of certification: A descriptive study.\u202f<\/span>MEDSURG Nursing, 29<\/span><\/i>(4), 229-254.\u202f<\/span>https:\/\/chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org\/login?url=https:\/\/search.ebscohost.com\/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=145282314&site=eds-live&scope=siteLinks to an external site.<\/span><\/a>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n
- A minimum of 2,000 hours of adult oncology nursing practice within the four years (48…<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
- A minimum of two years (24 months) of experience as an RN within the four years (48 months) prior to application, and<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
- Locate the literature review section \u202fSummarize using your own words from one of the study\/literature findings.\u202f Be sure to identify which study you are summarizing.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
- Describe one strategy that I learned that would help me create a strong literature review\/research for evidence. Share my thoughts on the importance of a thorough review of the literature.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
- Discuss how the author\u2019s review of studies supported the research problem. Share something that was interesting to me as I read through the literature review section.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
- Literature review and summarize by using my own words.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
- Locate the literature review section. Summarize using your own words from\u202f<\/span>one\u202f<\/span><\/i>of the study\/literature findings. Be sure to identify which study you are summarizing.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
- Describe one strategy that you learned that would help you create a strong literature review\/search for evidence. Share your thoughts on the importance of a thorough review of the literature.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
- Discuss how the author\u2019s review of literature (studies) supported the research purpose\/problem. Share something that was interesting to you as you read through the literature review section.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
- Locate the literature review section. Summarize using your own words from\u202f<\/span>one<\/span><\/i>\u202fof the study\/literature findings. Be sure to identify which study you are summarizing.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
- Participation early in the week is encouraged to stimulate meaningful discussion among classmates and instructor.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
- Discussions are designed to promote dialogue between faculty and students, and students and their peers. In discussions students:<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n