wordpress-seo
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/intelligentwr/nursingassignmentcrackers/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114Select a health care policy and a policy analysis framework to utilize for this Assignment. You may use the policy and framework you identified in this week\u2019s Discussion or change your selection.<\/p>\n
Write an 8- to 10-page analysis paper (including references) in which you succinctly address the following:<\/p>\n
Part 1: Define the policy issue.
\nHow is the issue affecting the policy arena?
\nWhat are the current politics of the issue?
\nAt what level in the policy making process is the issue?
\nPart 2: Apply a policy analysis framework to explore the issue using the following contexts:
\nSocial
\nEthical
\nLegal
\nHistorical
\nFinancial\/economic
\nTheoretical underpinnings of the policy
\nInclude in this section:
\nWho are the stakeholders of interest?
\nIs there a nursing policy\/position statement on this health care issue? If so, who developed it?
\nPart 3: Policy options\/solutions
\nWhat are the policy options\/solutions for addressing the issue? Include at least three levels of options\/solutions: no change; partial change; radical change or maximum change.
\nWhat are the theoretical underpinnings of the policy options\/solutions?
\nWhat are the health advocacy aspects and leadership requirements of each option?
\nHow does each option\/solution provide an opportunity or need for inter-professional collaboration?
\nWhat are the pros and cons of each suggested change? Include the cost benefits, effectiveness, and efficiency of each option along with the utility and feasibility of each option.
\nPart 4: Building Consensus
\nOutline a plan for building consensus around your recommended option\/solution for solving the policy issue.
\nPart 5: References
\nLimit your references so this section is no more than 2 pages.<\/p>\n
The provision of quality healthcare is the aim of the American government. Achieving this objective entails a consideration of a number of issues. One of them is increasing the number of people who are covered by the medical insurance schemes. The other one is increasing the affordability, availability, and accessibility of high quality care. There is also a need to improve the cost efficiency of healthcare services<\/a>. Accordingly, the best available care should be provided with a focus on the optimization of the healthcare resources. In a bid to achieve these objectives, the Affordable Care Act was adopted in the US in 2010. The policy has been effective in delivering the objectives. The success can be seen from evidences such as increased insurance coverage for citizens, expanded accessibility of care, and reduction in costs of healthcare over time in the state (Morrison & Furlong, 2019). Despite these improvements, there have been policy recommendations to either repeal or replace the Affordable Care Act. Consequently, there is an increased need for the investigation of the effects, politics, and options associated with this policy. Therefore, this research paper explores the proposed policy to repeal or replace the Affordable Care Act. It explores aspects that include the definition of the policy issue, application of policy analysis framework, policy options, and building consensus on it.<\/p>\n The Affordable Care Act is perceived as one of the policies that have significantly shaped the healthcare system in America. The policy has expanded alongside improved insurance coverage in the U.S. in two mechanisms. Firstly, it has expanded the total number of citizens covered by the medical insurance. This has been achieved using Medicaid expansion and the provision of cost subsidies to those purchasing private insurance exchanges. The second way entails the fact that the policy has upgraded the scope of the coverage through its enhancement of benefit design (Willison & Singer, 2017). Despite these benefits, there have been policy initiatives aiming at the repeal or replacement of the Affordable Care Act. The first attempt to repeal the policy was between 2011 and 2012 where the Republicans and Democrats voted for the repealing of the Job-Killing Health Care Law act. However, the Democrats voted it down in the house of Senate, thereby, prompting Obama not to adopt the policy recommendations. The proposal was also unsuccessful despite the pressure from President Trump (Be\u0301land, Rocco & Waddan, 2016). Therefore, repealing or replacing the affordable Care act remains a hotly debated policy initiative for the Americans in the modern era.<\/p>\nDefinition of Policy<\/strong><\/h2>\n
The Effect of the Policy on the Policy Arena<\/strong><\/h2>\n