Assignment: Article Critique Study<\/span><\/h2>\n

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: Assignment: Article Critique Study<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Title: Assignment: Article Critique Study<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Assignment\u00a0 Article Critique Study<\/em><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

In the randomized trial by Grey et al. (2009), the investigators carried out their study to discover an appropriate approach to help kids with type 1 diabetes deal with negative physiological and psychosocial outcomes. The focus was mainly on adolescent children. The investigators conducted a randomized trial to find out the variables, moderators, and effects of training for school-aged kids about coping skills as opposed to providing general education on diabetes. The trial was carried out due to the realization that the management of type 1 diabetes is challenging because it necessitates daily insulin treatment, frequent monitoring of levels of blood sugar, regulating and checking the intake of carbohydrates, as well as matching insulin dose with activity patterns and diet. The researchers were interested in this subject because a majority of adolescent children endeavor to attain autonomy, implying that parents’ efforts to control or monitor their treatment may be considered nagging or intrusive, which might lead to resistance, defiance, and noncompliance.<\/p>\n

Training on coping skills is grounded on social cognition, which posits that people can shape different life aspects in an active manner, especially health and coping behaviors. This theory assumes that rehearsing and practicing a new behavior, for instance learning to deal efficaciously with a problematic issue, can promote positive behaviors and improve self-efficacy. Grey et al. (2009) reported the impact of training on coping skills administered for some time on children from 8 to 12 years of age. The control group received supplementary diabetes education. The researchers used an experimental design involving two groups and collected data through research assistants with special training who did not know about the assignment involving groups. Participants had to meet the age specifications and diagnosed with type 1 diabetes. They must have used insulin for at least half a year and free of other major health issues.<\/a><\/p>\n

The sample comprised of 82 subjects, which was determined using power analysis. The intervention involved the use of Coping Skills Training, whose goal was to increase the kids\u2019 and their parents’ extend of mastery and competence of learning nonconstructive or inappropriate coping strategies and engaging in more auspicious behavioral patterns and styles. The intervention was provided as a family-based measure to both kids and parents. This was unlike other studies where the intervention was administered to children only. The intervention coping skills that the investigators addressed were problem-solving in social settings, communication, recognizing the links between feelings, behavior, and thoughts and guided stress coping mechanisms, resolution of conflict, and self-dialogue regarding diabetes-related stressors. The investigators conducted six sessions that took place weekly in groups of between 2 and 6 kids. In these sessions, parents met separately but simultaneously. The end of each session was marked by parents and their children meeting together to discuss and share outstanding issues and discussing possible relationships between family concerns and group themes. They presented and discussed coping skills. The researchers also employed role-play to help participants practice particular coping skills in a potentially hard social setting. Children or parents received coaching from trainers to help them in giving more skillful responses.<\/p>\n

As a control, group education was provided because of its popular use with youth with type 1 diabetes. Each of the participating children in the trial benefited from on-going diabetes education provided in quarterly clinic visits. The investigators reviewed intensive insulin regimens, sick days and sports, nutrition and carbohydrate counting, as well as updates on diabetes technology and care. The researchers provided written materials appropriate to the children\u2019s age at every session. The finding was that both the intervention and control groups improved after a period. Researchers reported less parental control, better coping with diabetes among children, the lesser impact of diabetes and depressive symptoms, as well as better diabetes self-efficacy. These findings imply that group-based interventions might benefit kids with type 1 diabetes.<\/p>\n

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: Assignment: Article Critique Study<\/strong><\/a><\/span><\/h3>\n

 <\/p>\n

Strengths of the Study<\/strong><\/p>\n

This randomized trial has a number of strengths, and two of them are discussed here. The first strength is that the researchers apply restrictions in the population eligible for recruitment. They define the exclusion and inclusion criteria and strike a balance<\/p>\n