Where in the World Is Evidence-Based Practice?
Sample Answer for Where in the World Is Evidence-Based Practice? Included After Question
Where in the World Is Evidence-Based Practice?
March 21, 2010, was not EBP’s date of birth, but it may be the date the approach “grew up” and left home to take on the world.
When the Affordable Care Act was passed, it came with a requirement of empirical evidence. Research on EBP increased significantly. Application of EBP spread to allied health professions, education, healthcare technology, and more. Health organizations began to adopt and promote EBP.
In this Discussion, you will consider this adoption. You will examine healthcare organization websites and analyze to what extent these organizations use EBP.
To Prepare:
- Review the Resources and reflect on the definition and goal of EBP.
- Choose a professional healthcare organization’s website (e.g., a reimbursing body, an accredited body, or a national initiative).
- Explore the website to determine where and to what extent EBP is evident.
By Day 3 of Week 1
Post a description of the healthcare organization website you reviewed. Describe where, if at all, EBP appears (e.g., the mission, vision, philosophy, and/or goals of the healthcare organization, or in other locations on the website). Then, explain whether this healthcare organization’s work is grounded in EBP and why or why not. Finally, explain whether the information you discovered on the healthcare organization’s website has changed your perception of the healthcare organization. Be specific and provide examples.
By Day 6 of Week 1
Respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days by visiting the websites they shared and offering additional examples of EBP or alternative views/interpretations to those shared in your colleagues’ posts.
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: Where in the World Is Evidence-Based Practice?
Title: Where in the World Is Evidence-Based Practice?
Where in the World Is Evidence-Based Practice?
Evidence-Based Practice Discussion
The passage of Affordable Care Act in 2010 requires providers to use empirical evidence in improving care, access, and cost. Consequently, the use of evidence-based practice (EBP) has increased significantly as providers use research-backed interventions to achieve the goals under ACA. EBP involves that utilization of problem-solving and conscientious model in care practice. EBP integrates best research outcomes that incorporate patient preferences in clinical care and decision making among organizations and providers (Laureate Education, 2018). EBP enhances quality of care, patient outcomes, lowers costs and empowers providers in making effective decisions. As such, it aligns with the Quadruple Aims of health (Boller, 2017). Organizations like The Joint Commission promotes and use EBP in their activities as demonstrate by information from the website.
The Joint Commission is an independent non-profit accreditation body that certifies healthcare organizations and programs in the country and even beyond. The entity is a symbol of quality whose accreditation and certification standards show a commitment to enhance performance and patient safety. At the core of these standards include enhancing quality, improving accessibility and lowering costs while promoting providers’ welfare (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2018). Through their National Patient Safety Goal (NPSG) framework, TJC ensures that organizations have best practices and benchmarks to offer quality care.
The standards advanced by the entity are founded and grounded in the EBP model. The organization’s mission statement prioritizes
collaboration to improve public health and evaluation of health care entities so that they can excel in providing not just safe but effective care for patient value and preferences (The Joint Commission, 2021). The vision statement of the entity also shows EBP as it advances that all people, irrespective of their status, should get safety, highest quality and value-based care in all facilities.
The Joint Commission’s activities and operations are well supported by EBP model as demonstrated through the rationale it provides for the NPSG framework. For example, its goal on infection prevention offers a rationale grounded in evidence from research findings (The Joint Commission, 2021). The commission ensures that benchmarked organizations offer best services consistent with best practices across the world. The organization publishes a host of accreditation guidelines, books and periodicals to embed best practices in healthcare providers.
Upon the evaluation of the commission’s website, I would say that it has changed my perspective about TJC. Previously, I did not know that the commission’s activities are based on EBP framework. However, I now appreciate the critical role that the commission plays in enhancing EBP and attainment of the Quadruple Aim as propagated by the Institute of Health.
Where in the World Is Evidence-Based Practice? References
Boller, J. (2017). Nurse educators: Leading health care to the quadruple aim sweet spot. Journal
of Nursing Education, 56(12), 707–708. doi:10.3928/01484834-20171120-01
Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Evidence-based Practice and the Quadruple Aim [Video
file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2018). Evidence-based practice in nursing &
healthcare: A guide to best practice (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.
Chapter 1, “Making the Case for Evidence-Based Practice and Cultivating a Spirit of Inquiry” (pp. 7–32)
The Joint Commission (2021). Standards: Measure, assess, and improve your performance.
https://www.jointcommission.org/standards/
The Joint Commission (2021). National Patient Safety Goals.
https://www.jointcommission.org/standards/national-patient-safety-goals/
Hi Nancy. The mission of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics is to improve health and professional outcomes through research, education, and advocacy. In its mission statement, the organization remains committed to accelerating global health improvements through the integration of the best research evidence with expert judgment during the formulation of food and nutrition decisions for increasingly diverse patient populations. Amid the increasing chronic disease burden, the formulation of viable dietary and nutritional decisions is a product of continued commitment to clinical inquiry for the identification of best practices that are consistent with the values and preferences of patients and their families (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2018). Evidence-based care by nutrition and dietetics practitioners is linked to improved food choices by patients and their families in the fight against chronic conditions attributed to poor dieting. The organization remains committed to fostering innovation and discovery through the professional development of member practitioners and the exploration of the best research evidence to identify effective strategies for alleviating global malnutrition (Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, n.d.). The organization emphasizes the improvement of global health through continued collaboration with key stakeholders and practitioner mentorship during the implementation of practice changes based on the best available research evidence. With evidence-based innovation and discovery, practitioners continually push the EBP agenda in their workplaces to develop a science-based profession and improve population wellbeing.
References
Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. (n.d.). About the academy. https://www.eatright.org/about-the-academy
Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2018). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice (4th ed.). Wolters Kluwe