Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

UTA NURS3345 Module 2 Quiz Lectures Progress Monitor Latest 2020 August

UTA NURS3345 Module 2 Quiz Lectures Progress Monitor Latest 2020 August

Question 1Evidence-based practice ultimately:

adds to the nurse’s credentials and advancement.

impresses patients and their families with big words.

improves patient outcomes and adds to nursing knowledge.

adds to nursing knowledge and credentials.

Question 2Nursing theory provides:

concepts and challenges.

common language and a decision-making framework.

a conceptual framework for study.

an application triad for study.

Question 3In ANA’s Code of Ethics, autonomy refers to:

telling the truth.

doing no harm.

acting on one’s own.

trusting.

Question 4Identify the correct citation of an author within the body of an article or within a paper at the end of a sentence.

Boyd, 2008.

(Boyd, 2008)

Boyd

(Boyd)

Question 5Studying nursing theory is important because:

by looking at where we’ve been, we can better understand where we need to be.

we can track how nursing practices have drastically changed over the years.

sleep and pure air are still part of the hospitalization experience.

patient care does not change over time.

UTA NURS3345 Module 2 Quiz Lectures Progress Monitor Latest 2020 August

UTA NURS3345 Module 2 Quiz Lectures Progress Monitor Latest 2020 August

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:UTA NURS3345 Module 2 Quiz Lectures Progress Monitor Latest 2020 August

NURS3345 TRANS PROFESSIONAL NURSING Module 1 Quiz  

Lectures Progress Monitor

Question 1The use of APA format and scholarly writing:

diminishes the author’s message.

strengthens and clarifies the message.

takes time and isn’t worth the effort.

is the standard for writing healthcare articles.

Question 2Which is not considered plagiarism?

Buying a research paper from the Internet and using it as your own work

Paraphrasing what someone else has written without proper citation

Using common phrases and adages in a research paper without citation

Copying word for word someone else’s writing and using it as your own work

Question 3Identify the correct entry for a book on the Reference page.

Chitty & Black. Professional nursing: Concepts and challenges. 2007. Saunders: St. Louis,MO.

Chitty, K. K., and Black, B. P. (2007). Professional nursing: Concepts and challenges. Saunders: St. Louis.

Chitty, K. K., & Black, B. P. (2007). Professional nursing: Concepts and challenges. St. Louis, MO: Saunders.

Chitty, K. K., & Black, B. P. (2007) Professional nursing: concepts and challenges. Saunders: St. Louis.

Question 4Identify the correct entry for an article from a journal on the Reference page.

Simones, J. Creating a Home Care Simulation Laboratory. Journal of Nursing Education. March, Vol. 47. No. 3, pp 131-133.

Simones, J. Creating a Home Care Simulation Laboratory. Journal of Nursing Education. March, Vol. 47. No. 3, pp 131-133.

Simones, J. (2008). Creating a home care simulation laboratory. Journal of Nursing Education, 47(3), 131-133.

Simones, J. Creating a Home Care Simulation Laboratory. Journal of Nursing Education. 47(3), pp 131-133.

Name:  Discussion Rubric

  Excellent

90–100

Good

80–89

Fair

70–79

Poor

0–69

Main Posting:

Response to the Discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

40 (40%) – 44 (44%)

Thoroughly responds to the Discussion question(s).

Is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

No less than 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.

Supported by at least three current credible sources.

35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

Responds to most of the Discussion question(s).

Is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

50% of the post has exceptional depth and breadth.

Supported by at least three credible references.

31 (31%) – 34 (34%)

Responds to some of the Discussion question(s).

One to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.

Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

Cited with fewer than two credible references.

0 (0%) – 30 (30%)

Does not respond to the Discussion question(s).

Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.

Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

Contains only one or no credible references.

Main Posting:

Writing

6 (6%) – 6 (6%)

Written clearly and concisely.

Contains no grammatical or spelling errors.

Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Written concisely.

May contain one to two grammatical or spelling errors.

Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Written somewhat concisely.

May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

Contains some APA formatting errors.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Not written clearly or concisely.

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Main Posting:

Timely and full participation

9 (9%) – 10 (10%)

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.

Posts main Discussion by due date.

8 (8%) – 8 (8%)

Meets requirements for full participation.

Posts main Discussion by due date.

7 (7%) – 7 (7%)

Posts main Discussion by due date.

0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

Does not meet requirements for full participation.

Does not post main Discussion by due date.

First Response:

Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.

9 (9%) – 9 (9%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

Responds to questions posed by faculty.

The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

8 (8%) – 8 (8%)

Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.

7 (7%) – 7 (7%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

First Response:

Writing

6 (6%) – 6 (6%)

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues.

Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed.

Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources.

Response is written in standard, edited English.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Response posed in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication.

Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

Few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective communication.

Response to faculty questions are missing.

No credible sources are cited.

First Response:

Timely and full participation

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.

Posts by due date.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Meets requirements for full participation.

Posts by due date.

3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Posts by due date.

0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Does not meet requirements for full participation.

Does not post by due date.

Second Response:
Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.
9 (9%) – 9 (9%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

Responds to questions posed by faculty.

The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

8 (8%) – 8 (8%)

Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.

7 (7%) – 7 (7%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

Second Response:
Writing
6 (6%) – 6 (6%)

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues.

Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed.

Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources.

Response is written in standard, edited English.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Response posed in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication.

Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

Few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective communication.

Response to faculty questions are missing.

No credible sources are cited.

Second Response:
Timely and full participation
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.

Posts by due date.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Meets requirements for full participation.

Posts by due date.

3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Posts by due date.

0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Does not meet requirements for full participation.

Does not post by due date.

Total Points: 100

Name:  Discussion Rubric

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.