USING THE WALDEN LIBRARY NURS 6003

Sample Answer for USING THE WALDEN LIBRARY NURS 6003 Included After Question

Where can you find evidence to inform your thoughts and scholarly writing? Throughout your degree program, you will use research literature to explore ideas, guide your thinking, and gain new insights. As you search the research literature, it is important to use resources that are peer-reviewed and from scholarly journals. You may already have some favorite online resources and databases that you use or have found useful in the past. For this Discussion, you explore databases available through the Walden Library. 

To Prepare: 

  • Review the information presented in the Learning Resources for using the Walden Library, searching the databases, and evaluating online resources. 
  • Begin searching for a peer-reviewed article that pertains to your practice area and interests you. 

By Day 3 of Week 6 

Post the following: 

Using proper APA formatting, cite the peer-reviewed article you selected that pertains to your practice area and is of particular interest to you and identify the database that you used to search for the article. Explain any difficulties you experienced while searching for this article. Would this database be useful to your colleagues? Explain why or why not. Would you recommend this database? Explain why or why not. 

 

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: USING THE WALDEN LIBRARY NURS 6003

Title: USING THE WALDEN LIBRARY NURS 6003

I’ve decided to pursue a career as a psychiatric/mental health nurse practitioner. After 28 years of working as a mental nurse, I made the decision to advance my career. The peer-reviewed article used is entitled. “How PMHNP Program Directors Facilitate Psychotherapeutic Skill Acquisition by the authors Wesemann, Convoy, Goldstein, and Melino. I looked for this article by typing “PMHNP” into the Walden library tab. Next, I selected the “peer-reviewed” link on the left and entered the keyword “psychotherapeutic,” I then restricted my search. A list of articles from the Thoreau/EBSCO search engine appeared, and I chose this particular one.

Finding this peer-reviewed article was not difficult for me. The library database at Walden University is quite trustworthy. Yes, I would recommend this database, because it is accessible, and the full articles are available for usage. “A good database should begin with valuable metadata and data”, (Siyavula. n.d.). Criteria used for selecting a good database is using one that is a reliable monitoring and alerting system, (Guo, 2022). This database will be very helpful to my colleagues for the reasons stated above. My search was able to be limited by a large number of alternatives. The Walden library’s EBSCO database has excellent themes and a big selection of articles, therefore I would definitely recommend it.

References

Guo, L. (2022). How to efficiently choose the right database for your applications. PingCAP. Retrieved from https://www.pingcap.com/blog/how-to-efficiently-choose-the-right-database-for-your-applications/

Siyavula. (n.d.). Characteristics of a good database. Retrieved from https://www.siyavula.com/read/it/grade-12-it/database-design-concepts/02-database-design-concepts

Wesemann, D., Convoy, S., Goldstein, D., & Melino, K. (2022). How PMHNP Program Directors Facilitate Psychotherapeutic Skill Acquisition. Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association, 10783903221091980. https://doi.org/10.1177/10783903221091980

USING THE WALDEN LIBRARY NURS 6003
USING THE WALDEN LIBRARY NURS 6003

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: USING THE WALDEN LIBRARY NURS 6003

 

A Sample Answer 2 For the Assignment: USING THE WALDEN LIBRARY NURS 6003

Title: USING THE WALDEN LIBRARY NURS 6003

I am very excited for you to pursue a Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner (PMHNP) career, and I wish you the very best of luck!

Your article references psychotherapy and how it is underutilized in PMHNP practice. The abstract talks about how the reduced use of this skill has potentially led to an under-emphasis in the PMHNP curriculum. This prompted me to search Walden’s curriculum and see whether it would be a skill we would acquire. Reviewing the course catalog, it appears that we will have opportunities to learn about this skill in psychotherapy with individuals and with groups and families (Walden University, n.d.).

I am thrilled to have the opportunity to learn and study psychotherapy in the future. I feel that one new area our learning may address is telepsychotherapy. Markowitz et al., report that as practitioners, the differences between treating patients with psychotherapy via video or phone rather than in person may be alarming. The researchers reported concerns that these forms of therapy can impede emotional engagement and lead to an under-display or underreporting of symptoms or behaviors by the client (Markowitz et al., 2020).

Regarding the article you found and coming from a place of wanting to learn more about suggestions or strategies for improving database searches, I have a question for you. I could not find access to the full text, which I feel happens often for me. Do you have any tips on how to do this when searching in a database? I have honestly encountered this issue a few times for articles I would like to read and utilize. I was able to find something called ResearchGate, and I was able to make an account. I requested permission to read the full text, but I do not know how long this will take. When I created my account with ResearchGate, it brought up a few prompts to verify my identity. There were many articles by several people who go by M. Ham, and I was asked to select myself as the author of the work in question or decline that I was the author. It was definitely something you could skip, but I got a kick out of seeing how many M. Ham’s that exist and wondered if I would ever have research published.

This inspired me to learn more about ResearchGate, an investor-funded start-up and global community to connect researchers who share and put forth science (ResearchGate, n.d.). One of their dreams is that world leaders look to scientific advisors before corporate donors, and I feel that my heart and professional goals resonate with that. Have you heard of ResearchGate?

Happy Week 4, Cheryl

References

ResearchGate. (n.d.). About researchgatehttps://www.researchgate.net/about

Markowitz, J. C., Milrod, B., Heckman, T. G., Bergman, M., Amsalem, D., Zalman, H., Ballas, T., & Neria, Y. (2020). Psychotherapy at a Distance. American Journal of Psychiatry178(3), appi.ajp.2020.2. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2020.20050557

Walden University. (n.d.). Catalog search – Walden University – Acalog ACMSTM. Catalog.waldenu.edu. https://catalog.waldenu.edu/search_advanced.php?cur_cat_oid=196&search_database=Search&search_db=Search&cpage=1&ecpage=1&ppage=1&spage=1&tpage=1&location=33&filter%5Bkeyword%5D=PMHNP

A Sample Answer 3 For the Assignment: USING THE WALDEN LIBRARY NURS 6003

Title: USING THE WALDEN LIBRARY NURS 6003

Thank you for your post. I totally agree with you about the easy process involved in finding these peer reviewed articles at Walden University Library. I am glad you did not face any dificulty in finding these resources at the Walden Library due to it’s easy access and user-friendly nature. One can see that the Walden Library was built with students in mind. Being a student is hard enough and having such resources as support go a long way. I really appreciated the study of how you looked up your peer-reviewed article in the Walden database. I’ll have to make an effort to follow your instructions step by step. I thought this discussion forum was quite beneficial because it helped a great deal. It is a genuine academic and professional networking initiative geared toward success. I’m grateful. Professional networking, according to Jain, D’Souza, and Shukri (2011), is “the process of creating a relationship with other professionals that is beneficial to both parties.” This is incredibly helpful, so I’m going to give it a shot and hope it works.

References

Jain, A. G., D’Souza, R. Q. P., & Shukri, R. (2011). Personal and professional networking: A way forward in achieving quality nursing care.

International Journal of Nursing Education(1), 1-3.

Walden University Library. (n.d.). Evaluating resources: Journals. Retrieved September 20, 2022, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/evaluating/resource-types/journals

A Sample Answer 4 For the Assignment: USING THE WALDEN LIBRARY NURS 6003

Title: USING THE WALDEN LIBRARY NURS 6003

As a fellow future PMHNP, your article is very relevant and frightening to me. From what I gathered from reading it, it seems like if PMHNP’s want to have control over what type of work they do/how they practice they need to develop their skills independently. “However, PMHNP programs frequently rely on other professions (psychology and social work being the top two) to provide psychotherapy practicum experiences” (Wesemann et al., 2022). To me, that seems like nurses are going to have to prove their value in order to maintain their place in the future of mental health as the practice evolves. Another thing that scared me is how difficult it was for me to find the article that you cited. You cited it perfectly, but it took me longer than it should have to find the full thing. The reason for this is kind of embarrassing considering I just did this earlier this week. Once I reoriented myself to the Library’s resources I was quickly able to find what I needed.

I also found reading your post very helpful. The way you broke down how you can limit your results in several ways is super helpful and intriguing to me. I mentioned in my post the need for any nurse’s using this program to know how to tell the difference between good and bad articles quickly. Using these alternatives could help a nurse search for specific topics and exclude what they do not want. I will look at it more later today, but I wonder if you can search by topic AND type of research/study performed. That could be very useful.

 

References

Wesemann, D., Convoy, S., Goldstein, D., & Melino, K. (2022). How PMHNP Program Directors Facilitate Psychotherapeutic Skill Acquisition. Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association, 10783903221091980. https://doi.org/10.1177/10783903221091980

I also had a good experience with EBSCO.  The results pulled up for my search fit my criteria.  I also fould it very user friendly and it was easy to narrow my search.  The article you researched seems very interesting.  According to Wesemann & Handrup (2022), there have been difficulties implementing psychotherapy content into the program.  Hopefully with more time, this can be integrated more heavily in the PMHNP programs as it is an important aspect of our practice.

Reference

Wesemann, D. E., & Handrup, C. (2022). Where is the psychotherapy content in PMHNP programs?. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care58(3), 1077-1081.

A Sample Answer 5 For the Assignment: USING THE WALDEN LIBRARY NURS 6003

Title: USING THE WALDEN LIBRARY NURS 6003

I enjoyed reading your post and I can relate to a lot of what you said in it. I feel that more then ever with the amount of research, journals, articles and opinions that will be published in regard to COVID we need to step back and critically analyze whether the article or data is scholarly. According to Laureate Education “it is important for nurses to conduct research; we are at the bedside and we see problems that need to be addressed that perhaps others would not see” (2018). This is critical when we begin to analyze the data that is being published by multiple parties. We are in a good position to do our own research and start the process of changing what does not work for these patients and we can accomplish this with credible data and peer review research ourselves. As bedside nurses we are in a crucial role to change health care and get our findings out to other organizations that can benefit from what we have learned.

I also agree with you that research poses challenges when using the online libraries. I also struggled with it. When I looked up education and COVID for example I was presented with so much information that it was overwhelming and when I researched it more I found a lot of the information was not scholarly but public press releases and opinions without much data to them.  When I was evaluating the articles and journals I relied on the Walden Library’s page on Evaluating Resources for some key points to check for the credibility of the publication. I found a lot of trade publications which according to the library “are written by staff writers or practitioners in a given trade or profession. The intent is to share industry news, trends and advances”( Walden Library, n.d.). Some of the articles are peer reviewed but a majority do not get peer reviewed. In the future I am going to use your recommendation to use the “Advanced Search” tab and see if I cannot rein in some of the topics that come up when I do a complete search. This may help with some of my frustration and time it takes me to research articles. Thank you.

References

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). The Walden Journey to a Masters in Nursing: Scholarship [Video file]. Baltimore, MD; Author.

Walden University Library,. (n.d.). Evaluating resources: Journals. Retrieved October 4th, 2019 from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/evaluating/resource-types/journals

A Sample Answer 6 For the Assignment: USING THE WALDEN LIBRARY NURS 6003

Title: USING THE WALDEN LIBRARY NURS 6003

Hi Irene, I agree with your post that technology is moving at an alarming speed in healthcare. It is, therefore, a good idea to research technology in the nursing practice. From my experience, the Walden University library indeed directs a person to a database organized from A-Z with the 15 best nursing databases (Walden University Library, 2019). The secret to using online databases is having keywords that help to locate relevant articles and journals accurately. In most cases, there are challenges such as the one you faced when trying to open the full text. Walden University, however, offers a platform and guidance on how to access whole test sources Walden University Library. (N.d). Therefore, the Walden University Database is a valuable online source for journals, scholarly articles, and periodicals related to nursing. There is a variety of unlimited sources of information with different years of publication. Additionally, the journals and articles from this database are reliable, credible, and unbiased. Interestingly, the database has a filtering option depending on an individual’s preference.

  The nursing profession is continuously evolving in its approach to patient care, and outcomes as members continue to undertake research, leading to evidence-based practice. For the scope of this discussion the peer-review article selected which relates to my current job as a dialysis nurse and interest is “Improving Patient Experience and Treatment Adherence in the Adult, Outpatient Hemodialysis Population” (Saunders et al., 2019). When searching for this article, the database used was CINAHL Plus with Full Text. I chose this database because it encompasses many nursing journals, standards of practice, and allied health evidence-based practice; therefore, I recommend its’ use. Also, the database holds familiarity since I used it during my undergraduate BSN program. There were no significant difficulties during the search for my article. I ensured that I did not use full sentences in the search fields but keywords related to my particular interest. To assess if a journal article was peer-reviewed, I utilize the periodical directory, Ulrich’s. This software does not contain stored articles but verifies if a journal uses peer-review. Besides using Ulrich’s software, I selected on the database the option to narrow search options to peer-reviewed journals only (Walden Library, 2020). 

As a scholarly writer, the use of peer-review articles is an asset. Scholarly papers referenced with peer review articles provide expert verification of thoughts since experts review peer-review articles within their discipline (Glasgow Caledonian University, n.d.). 

Peer-review research also forms an integral part in the development of the professional practice of nursing. History shows that nurses previously depended on individual experience, advice from senior nurses, and potentially outdated educational information, which led to varying patient outcomes. Due to the inconsistency in patient outcomes, physician David L. Sackett developed evidence-based practice. Patient care and treatment are based on research; current evidence, so optimal care can be provided. Therefore, since peer-reviewed research involves verifying information by established experts in the nursing field, information validity is increased (St. Thomas University, 2019). 

 References 

Glasgow Caledonian University. (n.d.). Peer review | PILOT. 

Glasgow Caledonian University: The University for the Common Good GCU. https://www.gcu.ac.uk/library/pilot/publication/peerreview/ 

Saunders, J., Ahmadzadeh, S., Bush, M., Wright, R., & Granger, B. (2019). Improving patient 

experience and treatment adherence in the adult, outpatient hemodialysis population. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 34(4), 330-336. https://doi.org/10.1097/ncq.0000000000000373 

St. Thomas University. (2019, March 23). What You Need to Know About Evidence- 

Based Practice in Nursing. https://online.stu.edu/articles/nursing/about-evidence-based-practice-in-nursing 

Walden Library. (2020, March 26). How do I verify that my article is peer reviewed? – Quick     

        answers. Quick Answers – Quick Answers. https://academicanswers.waldenu.edu/faq/72613 

 

NURS_6002_Week_3_Discussion_Rubric

You’ve already rated students with this rubric. Any major changes could affect their assessment results.
NURS_6002_Week_3_Discussion_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts

Main Posting

50 to >44.0 pts

Excellent
Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. … Supported by at least three current, credible sources. … Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

44 to >39.0 pts

Good
Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. … At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. … Supported by at least three credible sources. … Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

39 to >34.0 pts

Fair
Responds to some of the discussion question(s). … One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. … Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. … Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. … Post is cited with two credible sources. … Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. … Contains some APA formatting errors.

34 to >0 pts

Poor
Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately. … Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. … Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. … Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. … Contains only one or no credible sources. … Not written clearly or concisely. … Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. … Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.
50 pts

Main Post: Timeliness

10 to >0.0 pts

Excellent
Posts main post by day 3.

0 pts

Poor
Does not post by day 3.
10 pts

First Response

18 to >16.0 pts

Excellent
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. … Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. … Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. … Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. … Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. … Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. … Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

16 to >14.0 pts

Good
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. … Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. … Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. … Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. … Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

14 to >12.0 pts

Fair
Response is on topic and may have some depth. … Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. … Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. … Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

12 to >0 pts

Poor
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. … Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. … Responses to faculty questions are missing. … No credible sources are cited.
18 pts

Second Response

17 to >15.0 pts

Excellent
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. … Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. … Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. … Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. … Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. … Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. … Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

15 to >13.0 pts

Good
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. … Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. … Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. … Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. … Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

13 to >11.0 pts

Fair
Response is on topic and may have some depth. … Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. … Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. … Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

11 to >0 pts

Poor
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. … Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. … Responses to faculty questions are missing. … No credible sources are cited.
17 pts

Participation

5 to >0.0 pts

Excellent
Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.

0 pts

Poor
Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.
5 pts
Total Points: 100