University of New Haven Humanitarian Crises Are on The Rise Response
University of New Haven Humanitarian Crises Are on The Rise Response
Question Description
I’m working on a Health & Medical question and need guidance to help me study.
I need someone to respond to this essay with 500 words APA citation with 2 references, your thoughts have to be included in the respond
essay
Securities play a wide role during post-disaster situation. People’s thought and point of view have changed a lot as compared to the responses a decade ago. In some underdeveloped countries, dealing with post disaster situations is still an issue. Such countries lack the ability of rapidly adapting to the post disaster situations. But it can be asserted that in most of these countries people have improved a lot, their psychological perspective has changed and apart from that, the governments are adapting new techniques of handling post disaster situation.
More importantly, the security is playing a big role in such post-disaster conditions, the governments are handling such situations with new terminologies, improved technologies and standards, and militaries are proposing new ideas and are lending a helping hand. There are many challenges faced while assessing the effected populations need, their chronic situations and mental health; which is a lot affected by the losses in such disasters.
A variety of skills are required in such situations, different departments are being involved and it is a very technical situation for the security to maintain harmony during such circumstances.
Response to a disaster is the first-most step, which is taken by the government and security departments. Their immediate responses to such circumstances are the evacuation of the affected area. A warning letter is issued to the citizens by the security. Research and Rescue teams start to provide assistance to the effected people. Little, but immediate aid is provided to the refugees. Shelter camps are provided to the refugees with food supplements and other basic necessities. An immediate restoration plan of the infrastructure is enacted. The main focus of the security department is to make sure that the people are safe, and everyone is out of danger.
In some situations where the government of the affected country lacks in providing such aids to the affected or refugees, the humanitarian organizations come in to help. Humanitarian organizations bring short relief for the refugees, until or unless a permanent aiding plan is proposed by the government.
Basically, aid is funded by donations from corporations, individuals, governments and other organizations. The funding and delivery of humanitarian aid is increasingly international, making it much faster, more responsive, and more effective in coping to major emergencies affecting large numbers of people, e.g. Central Emergency Response Fund (Who We Are | CERF, 2019).
Humanitarian organizations plan for security sometimes do not execute well because of the corrupt staff in the organization. To strengthen the organizations base and to be sure about the aids being provided to the refugees a complete check needs to be maintained.
Some researches talk about how humanitarian system will be in 2030 with respect to the security concerns, the humanitarian system will most probably get more reliable in terms of the fundraisers. More laws will be introduced. The structure of the system will be improved with the passage of time, new innovative ideas will be introduced, and people will be more educated and aware about the post disaster situation and how to deal with it (Maurer, 2016).
The best way to save more lives and make sure that the residents of the affected areas are secure during a catastrophic situation is that citizens of the country should be given awareness about such situations. They should be prepared to face any kind of sudden catastrophe. Training and short lectures should be provided to the students in order to acknowledge them about ‘how to respond in such circumstances (National Research Council, 1991).
References:
Maurer, P. (2016, November 13). Humanitarian crises are on the rise. By 2030, this is how we’ll respond. Retrieved November 5, 2019, from World Economic Forum: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/11/humanitaria…
National Research Council. (1991). CHAPTER 3 AWARENESS AND EDUCATION. In A Safer Future: Reducing the Impacts of Natural Disasters (pp. 17-20). Washington, DC, USA: The National Academies Press.
Who We Are | CERF. (2019). Retrieved November 5, 2019, from Cerf.un.org: https://cerf.un.org/about-us/who-we-are
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||
| Main Postinga | 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
Supported by at least three current, credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.
Supported by at least three credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s).
One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.
Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Post is cited with two credible sources.
Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Contains some APA formatting errors. |
0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.
Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.
Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Contains only one or no credible sources.
Not written clearly or concisely.
Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
|
| Main Post: Timeliness | 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Posts main post by day 3. |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not post by day 3. |
|
| First Response | 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
15 (15%) – 16 (16%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
13 (13%) – 14 (14%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 12 (12%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited. |
|
| Second Response | 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 11 (11%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited. |
|
| Participation | 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days. |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days. |
|
| Total Points: 100 | |||||