The theoretical foundations of qualitative and quantitative methods are very different, but many researchers believe both methods should be used in the research study to increase validity and reliability NRS 433

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: The theoretical foundations of qualitative and quantitative methods are very different, but many researchers believe both methods should be used in the research study to increase validity and reliability NRS 433

Title: The theoretical foundations of qualitative and quantitative methods are very different, but many researchers believe both methods should be used in the research study to increase validity and reliability NRS 433

The theoretical foundations of qualitative and quantitative methods are very different, but many researchers believe both methods should be used in the research study to increase validity and reliability. What advantages or disadvantages do you see in using both types of methods in a nursing study? Support your answer with current evidence-based literature.

Nursing research is performed by utilizing various sorts of techniques such as qualitative, quantitative, experimental, etc, and descriptive approaches. Qualitative research is regarded as experimental analysis for the deep knowledge of the research difficulty and delivers a way for quantitative research. In a few studies, both qualitative and quantitative techniques employed in the investigations are called mixed forms of study.

The advantages of mixed techniques can be utilizing both qualitative and quantitative methods to minimize the weakness of the study. It improves the questioning and statistical breakdown of the study and mixed-methods gain the availability of analysis tools that help to accumulate more comprehensive data. Additionally, mixed-method facilitates personal biases.

The disadvantages of mixed methods are utilizing both qualitative and quantitative procedures is time-consuming and investigators require to be well-versed in both the data. More aids are to be used for gathering both types of data. Finally, the development findings should be represented distinctly for a better performance of the audience.

Grand Canyon University (Ed). (2018). Nursing research: Understanding methods for best practice. Retrieved from https://lc.gcumedia.com/nrs433v/nursing-research-understanding-methods-for-best-practice/v1.1

Thank you for sharing great information. I will talk about mixed methods research is a methodology for conducting research that involves collecting, analyzing, and integrating quantitative (e.g., experiments, surveys) and qualitative (e.g., focus groups, interviews) research. This mixed-method study has various advantages it provides a more complete and comprehensive understanding of the research problem than either quantitative or qualitative approaches alone. It provides an approach for developing better, more context-specific instruments (Food Rise Resource Centre, 2016). The mixed-method has some disadvantages the research design can be very complex. It takes much more time and resources to plan and implement this type of research.

The theoretical foundations of qualitative and quantitative methods are very different, but many researchers believe both methods should be used in the research study to increase validity and reliability NRS 433 Reference:

Food Rise Resource Centre. (2016). Mixed methods research. Retrieved from http://resourcecentre.foodrisc.org/mixed-methods-research_185.html

Replies

Thank you for your explanation. You are right the mixed method research combines of both qualitative and quantitative study helps to generalize the findings to a population and develop a detailed view of the meaning of a phenomenon or concept for individuals. You are right mixed methods research is about heightened knowledge and validity. Since the study involves both qualitative and quantitative research, this method needs more time to complete the study.

Schoonenboom, J., & Johnson, R. B. (2017). How to Construct a Mixed Methods Research Design. Kolner Zeitschrift fur Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 69(Suppl 2), 107–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-017-0454-1

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: The theoretical foundations of qualitative and quantitative methods are very different, but many researchers believe both methods should be used in the research study to increase validity and reliability NRS 433

Very applicable advantages and disadvantages in using both types of methods in a nursing study supported with current evidence-based literature.

Replies

Replies to Shinu Saju

Hi Shinu! Both quantitative and qualitative research methods have different qualities. Using mixed research methods plays an important role in the nursing field. We use the research to have a better understanding of ways to improve the care we provide to our patients. Both together gives us better insight than they would alone.

Victoria Smith

replied toShinu Saju

Mar 5, 2022, 12:37 PM

Replies to Shinu Saju

Good points on your decussion question. I think both is needed especially it the nursing field for research we just it everyday to get verified answers to questions. It is need to determine if a method is working like turning a patient every 2 hours is helpful for preventing skin Breakdown or for research on ensure a new drug us working for blood pressure. The disadvantage maybe more foot work but it also shows the dedication that is giving to the research.

Omolara Ogundare

replied toShinu Saju

Mar 5, 2022, 6:27 PM

Replies to Shinu Saju

Hi Shinu,

When choosing a mixed methods design for a study, researchers should consider the research problem to be studied. A primary consideration is that the design should match the research problem. In addition, researchers should evaluate their own expertise and consider the quantitative and qualitative skills that they possess. If they lack expertise with certain methods e.g., quantitative survey skills or collection of qualitative field notes, they should consider working in a team or selecting a design that does not emphasize that method. Consideration must also be given to the available resources, such as the length of time available to complete the study.

The theoretical foundations of qualitative and quantitative methods are very different, but many researchers believe both methods should be used in the research study to increase validity and reliability NRS 433 Reference

https://www.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/upm-binaries/10982_Chapter_4.pdf

Lee Ann Coffer

replied toShinu Saju

Mar 6, 2022, 8:19 AM

Replies to Shinu Saju

Hi Shinu, I appreciate your explanation of the advantages of mixed-method of utilizing both qualitative and quantitative studies. One study I found that was a great example of how mixed-method is used in the research was, Combining research and design: A mixed-methods approach aimed at understanding and optimizing inpatient medication storage systems. In this research, they combined qualitative and quantitative research methods as they explored how hospitals can prevent medication errors by using better medication storage systems. They used the quantitative method by taking descriptive surveys of storage facilities and then they used the qualitative method to observe medication administrating and interview staff and patients (Wheeler et al., 2021). This type of research method seems very holistic to me as it combines subjective and objective material to give a better understanding.

The theoretical foundations of qualitative and quantitative methods are very different, but many researchers believe both methods should be used in the research study to increase validity and reliability NRS 433 Reference:

Wheeler, C, Blencowe, A, Jacklin, A., Franklin, B. (2021). Combining research and design: A mixed-methods approach aimed at understanding and optimizing inpatient medication storage systems. Plos One 16(12). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260197.

Great post! I think there are great advantages and disadvantages to both types of research and I think the application of using mixed methods like you said is very important to try and get benefits from both while trying to minimize disadvantages. Qualitative is one type that i think has a great advantage of being able to distribute surveys to many participants (Noyes et al., 2019). This can be helpful because quantitative can have issues related to budget and being able to have an overall increase in data collection. It is important that researchers have a lot of data to help increase the impact of their results.

The theoretical foundations of qualitative and quantitative methods are very different, but many researchers believe both methods should be used in the research study to increase validity and reliability NRS 433 Reference

Noyes, J., Booth, A., Moore, G., Flemming, K., Tunçalp, Ö., & Shakibazadeh, E. (2019). Synthesising quantitative and qualitative evidence to inform guidelines on complex interventions: clarifying the purposes, designs and outlining some methods. BMJ global health, 4(Suppl 1), e000893. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000893

The theoretical foundations of qualitative and quantitative methods are very different, but many researchers believe both methods should be used in the research study to increase validity and reliability NRS 433 Grading Rubric

Performance Category	100% or highest level of performance 100% 16 points	Very good or high level of performance 88% 14 points	Acceptable level of performance 81% 13 points	Inadequate demonstration of expectations 68% 11 points	Deficient level of performance 56% 9 points	Failing level of performance 55% or less 0 points
Total Points Possible= 50	16 Points	14 Points	13 Points	11 Points	9 Points	0 Points
Scholarliness Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics.	Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.	Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.	Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements: Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements: Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements: Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information
	16 Points	14 Points	13 Points	11 Points	9 Points	0 Points
Application of Course Knowledge Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations	Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.	Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.	Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements: Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from and scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements: Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements Applies principles, knowledge and information and scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
	10 Points	9 Points			6 Points	0 Points
Interactive Dialogue Initial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count) The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count) Responses are substantive and relate to the topic.	Demonstrated all of the following: Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words. The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each. Responses are substantive Responses are related to the topic of discussion.	Demonstrated 3 of the following: Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words. The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each. Responses are substantive Responses are related to the topic of discussion.			Demonstrated 2 of the following: Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words. The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each. Responses are substantive Responses are related to the topic of discussion.	Demonstrated 1 or less of the following: Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words. The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each. Responses are substantive Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
	8 Points	7 Points	6 Points	5 Points	4 Points	0 Points
Grammar, Syntax, APA Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing. The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error.	The following was present: 0-3 errors in APA format AND Responses have 0-3 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors AND Writing style is generally clear, focused on topic,and facilitates communication.	The following was present: 4-6 errors in APA format. AND/OR Responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors AND/OR Writing style is somewhat focused on topic.	The following was present: 7-9 errors in APA format. AND/OR Responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors AND/OR Writing style is slightly focused on topic making discussion difficult to understand.	The following was present: 10- 12 errors in APA format AND/OR Responses have 8-9 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors AND/OR Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.	The following was present: 13 – 15 errors in APA format AND/OR Responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors AND/OR Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand. AND/OR The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor.	The following was present: 16 to greater errors in APA format. AND/OR Responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. AND/OR Writing style does not facilitate communication
	0 Points Deducted					5 Points Lost
Participation Requirements	Demonstrated the following: Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days					Failed to demonstrate the following: Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days
	0 Points Lost					5 Points Lost
Due Date Requirements	Demonstrated all of the following: The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT. A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.					Demonstrates one or less of the following. The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT. A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.