The Community College of Baltimore County Strengths and Weaknesses of My Diet Essay
The Community College of Baltimore County Strengths and Weaknesses of My Diet Essay
Description
As part of your CCBC Aging and Health 120 course, you performed a nutritional analysis and completed a survey to provide insights and pros and cons of your diet. Based on the nutritional analysis and survey you will write a paper worth 75 points. Use the checklist as a reference in terms of how to set the paper up. Complete the checklist and submit it along with your nutritional paper. DO NOT type the questions below and then their answers.
Paragraph I: Introduction: In this paragraph, you are to explain using at least 4-5 sentences, the purpose of writing the paper.
Paragraph II: You are to answer the following questions:
Question One: – List 2 strengths of your diet and EXPLAIN in detail why you think they are strengths. Select one of your strengths and use a scientific resource(s) to prove why it is a strength. Note: if you make a statement such as one of the strengths in my diet is I did get the required amount of fruit in my daily diet. This is strength because fruit “helps to lower my …” This should be stated as a quote from your source and the source is to be stated in the body of your paper, APA style as stated in the projects/papers module. This is NOT your research or work and if you do not state your reference, you are PLAGIARISING.
Question Two: List 2 weaknesses of your diet and EXPLAIN in detail why you think they are weaknesses. Select one of your weaknesses and use a scientific resource(s) to prove why it is a weakness. Note: if you make a statement such as one of the weaknesses in my diet is I consumed over 600 calories from alcohol. This is a weakness because alcohol can “cause me to …” This should be stated as a quote from your source and the source is to be stated in the body of your paper, APA style as stated in the projects/papers module. This is NOT your research or work and if you do not state your reference, you are PLAGIARISING.
Paragraph III: Explain IN DETAIL what behavioral and dietary changes will need to be made by you to make each of the above weaknesses, strengths rather than weaknesses? This section should be your own thoughts.
Paragraph IV: If you continue with your current eating habits (diet) what is a health issue/ disease that you are at risk for at this point in your life and why? Be thorough and again, state your sources in the body of the paper!
Paragraph V: Conclusion
Explain (summarize) what you learned
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:The Community College of Baltimore County Strengths and Weaknesses of My Diet Essay
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||
| Main Postinga | 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
Supported by at least three current, credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.
Supported by at least three credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s).
One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.
Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Post is cited with two credible sources.
Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Contains some APA formatting errors. |
0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.
Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.
Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Contains only one or no credible sources.
Not written clearly or concisely.
Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
|
| Main Post: Timeliness | 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Posts main post by day 3. |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not post by day 3. |
|
| First Response | 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
15 (15%) – 16 (16%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
13 (13%) – 14 (14%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 12 (12%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited. |
|
| Second Response | 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 11 (11%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited. |
|
| Participation | 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days. |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days. |
|
| Total Points: 100 | |||||