SPSU Health Information Management Profession Papers
SPSU Health Information Management Profession Papers
Description
Paper 1:
The HIM profession has undergone a major transformation since it’s inception. It is important for students to understand the reasons why.
Summarize the development of the Health Information Management (HIM) profession from its beginnings to the present. Read the Who We Are / Our Story sections of the AHIMA website and refer to Chapter 1 reading to gather information for the summary.
Paper 2:
Certification is a vital step when finishing the HIM program. It is essential for students to begin preparing for the certification exam as soon as possible by doing things such as holding onto books throughout the program, saving notes and flashcards, and remaining organized.
In this assignment, you will Outline AHIMA’s certification processes in a creative manner. First, read the Certification section of the AHIMA website and refer to Chapter 1 reading to gather information.
You can use your choice of software to present the certification information creatively.
One free tool with free accounts for students that may be helpful for this project is LucidChart, an online tool to create charts and diagrams. If interested, you can sign up for a free Lucidhart educational account using your SPC “.edu” email address.
View the example listed below to get an idea of how Lucidchart might be useful for this task.
Paper 3
In this assignment, you will create a Career Map in a creative manner. First, review the Career Map on the AHIMA website and refer to Chapter 1 reading to gather information. Feel free to reach out to any HIM professionals you may know to gather information as well.
Health Information Management provides many paths for a student to consider. This assignment will help you begin to narrow down the path you might take. It will be interesting for you to look back on as you graduate and look for employment in the HIM field.
You can use your choice of software to create your Career Map.
One free tool that may be helpful for this project is LucidChart, an online tool to create charts and diagrams. If interested, you can sign up for a free Lucidhart educational account using your SPC “.edu” email address.
View the example listed below to get an idea of how Lucidchart might be useful for this task.
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:SPSU Health Information Management Profession Papers
https://www.lucidchart.com/pages/templates
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||
| Main Postinga | 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
Supported by at least three current, credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.
Supported by at least three credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s).
One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.
Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Post is cited with two credible sources.
Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Contains some APA formatting errors. |
0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.
Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.
Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Contains only one or no credible sources.
Not written clearly or concisely.
Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
|
| Main Post: Timeliness | 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Posts main post by day 3. |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not post by day 3. |
|
| First Response | 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
15 (15%) – 16 (16%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
13 (13%) – 14 (14%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 12 (12%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited. |
|
| Second Response | 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 11 (11%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited. |
|
| Participation | 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days. |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days. |
|
| Total Points: 100 | |||||