Sociology of health, illness, and health care PHC 181
Sociology of health, illness, and health care PHC 181
College of Health Sciences Department of Public Health ASSIGNMENT COVER SHEET Course name: Sociology of health, illness, and health care Course number: PHC 181 CRN XXXX The distribution of health is determined by a wide variety of individual, family, social, cultural and community factors. There is a growing body of evidence documenting inequalities in both the distribution of health and access to health care. Elderly population are of utmost importance group who can suffer from such inequalities. Assignment title or task: (You can write a question) On the light of this statement and relevant recent evidence, elaborate on the following: – The social lived experience of elderly population in Saudi Arabia. – Pay special emphasis to specification of the relevant theoretical explanation for the nature of the relationship between aging and health. Students ID xxxxx Student name: xxxxxx Submission date: xxxxxx Instructor name: Jumah Alkhaibari Grade: …. Out of 10 College of Health Sciences Department of Public Health Guidelines: • • • • • • • Written in a Word document (not less than 500 words) divided as introduction, body conclusion and references, PDF is not accepted. Assignment must be submitted with properly filled cover sheet (Name, ID, CRN, Submission date). Font should be 12 Times New Roman Heading should be Bold Color should be Black AVOID PLAGIARISM All assignments must carry the references using APA style. Please see below web link about how to cite APA reference style. https://guides.libraries.psu.edu/apaquickguide/intext. Click or tap to follow the link Releasing and due date The paper assignment will be released at the beginning of week 6 (Sunday at 11.59 pm (2-102022) and should be submitted by the end of week 9 (27-10-2021- Thursday 11:59 pm). Grading Criteria Completion and accuracy of response: 0 – 5 points based on the following rubric: Thinking Conte Presentation nt Criteria Proficienc y Some Proficiency Limited Proficiency No Proficienc y 1 0.75 0.50 0.25 The purpose and focus are clear and consistent Punctuation, grammar, spelling, and mechanics are appropriate Information and evidence are accurate, appropriate, and integrated effectively Analysis/synthesis/evaluation/interpretation are effective and consistent Connections between and among ideas are made Total /5
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||
| Main Postinga | 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
Supported by at least three current, credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.
Supported by at least three credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s).
One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.
Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Post is cited with two credible sources.
Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Contains some APA formatting errors. |
0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.
Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.
Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Contains only one or no credible sources.
Not written clearly or concisely.
Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
|
| Main Post: Timeliness | 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Posts main post by day 3. |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not post by day 3. |
|
| First Response | 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
15 (15%) – 16 (16%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
13 (13%) – 14 (14%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 12 (12%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited. |
|
| Second Response | 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 11 (11%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited. |
|
| Participation | 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days. |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days. |
|
| Total Points: 100 | |||||