Social Determinants of Health . Tobacco Use -

Social Determinants of Health . Tobacco Use

Social Determinants of Health . Tobacco Use

Description

Tobacco use is a major global public health challenge, causing in excess of 7 million deaths each year. Of the 7 million tobacco-related deaths worldwide, roughly 70,000 Saudis die from smoking-related diseases (Itumalla & Aldhmadi, 2020). Research a national policy focusing on a specific tobacco prevention initiative.

Based on what you learned this week, address the following substantive requirements:

Specific age groups impacted by tobacco use in Saudi Arabia.
The role of public health organizations in minimizing the use of tobacco products.
The impact of the policy on tobacco prevention and how it may minimize the adverse health risks associated with the use of tobacco products.
Any social issues concerning the implementation of policy.

All patients deserve quality and accessible health care, and nurses have been instrumental in achieving this objective for a long time. To enhance outcomes, health care professionals apply different approaches such as collaboration and partnerships. Operation frameworks from states action coalitions have been pivotal in improving health and strengthening nursing. Action coalitions usually work to advance the Institute of Medicine (IOM) report’s recommendations. This discussion explores how Florida’s action coalition’s work aligns with IOM recommendations and the state’s progress toward meeting the recommendations.

Florida’s Action Coalition and IOM Recommendations

The IOM report on the future of nursing recommends four action areas for building a healthier America. They include nurses to deliver services to the full extent of their competence, nurses achieving the highest level of education possible, collaboration in practice, and effective workforce planning (Rekha, 2020). Florida’s action coalition’s work aligns with the four recommendations to a significant degree. For Floridians to access safe and high-quality care, the Florida Action Coalition leads in advancing the nursing profession and works towards a health care system where nurses work as essential partners in health care delivery (Campaign for Action, n.d.). The coalition has also established committees to work on the various action areas, including collaboration and workforce planning. On education, Florida is working to increase the number of registered nurses with a baccalaureate in nursing to 80% (FA Coalition, 2020). Undeniably, there are visible efforts to address each recommendation.

Florida Action Coalition has made remarkable progress towards meeting the IOM recommendations. For instance, the coalition’s membership has various entities, including co-leads, partners, and stakeholders, supporting action on the report recommendations. The entities further engage coalition partners at the state and local levels to improve Floridians’ health (Adams, 2021). Getting nurses to work on community boards promotes nursing leadership and education models to streamline learning to earn advanced degrees transform nursing education. Such interventions enable nurses to work to the best of their capacity.

Social Determinants of Health . Tobacco Use Conclusion

The IOM report guides states’ action coalitions in building healthier communities. Through action coalitions, nurses serve as essential partners in health care provision. Florida Action Coalition’s vision is creating a healthier America supported by nurses as essential partners. The coalition also promotes leadership and collaboration, enabling nurses to deliver services to the full extent of their competence, as the IOM report recommends

References

Adams, J. (2021). Nursing Action Coalition for Florida. Campaign for Action. https://campaignforaction.org/nursing-action-coalition-of-florida/

Campaign for Action. (n.d.). Florida Action Coalition. https://campaignforaction.org/state/florida/

FA Coalition. (2020). Florida Action Coalition. https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3416&context=flablue_text

Rekha, S. G. (2020). The future of nursing: leading change, advancing health. Journal of Pediatrics and Nursing Science, 3(3), 60-63. DOI:10.18231/j.ijpns.2020.013

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:Social Determinants of Health . Tobacco Use

Social Determinants of Health . Tobacco Use Grid View

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor
Main Postinga	45 (45%) – 50 (50%) Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. Supported by at least three current, credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.	40 (40%) – 44 (44%) Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least three credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.	35 (35%) – 39 (39%) Responds to some of the discussion question(s). One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Post is cited with two credible sources. Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Contains some APA formatting errors.	0 (0%) – 34 (34%) Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately. Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Contains only one or no credible sources. Not written clearly or concisely. Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.
Main Post: Timeliness	10 (10%) – 10 (10%) Posts main post by day 3.	0 (0%) – 0 (0%)	0 (0%) – 0 (0%)	0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Does not post by day 3.
First Response	17 (17%) – 18 (18%) Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.	15 (15%) – 16 (16%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.	13 (13%) – 14 (14%) Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.	0 (0%) – 12 (12%) Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited.
Second Response	16 (16%) – 17 (17%) Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.	14 (14%) – 15 (15%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.	12 (12%) – 13 (13%) Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.	0 (0%) – 11 (11%) Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited.
Participation	5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.	0 (0%) – 0 (0%)	0 (0%) – 0 (0%)	0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.
Total Points: 100