SMC Biology Dinosaurs in The News Article Summary Paper

SMC Biology Dinosaurs in The News Article Summary Paper

SMC Biology Dinosaurs in The News Article Summary Paper

Description

This weeks article should be related to the Ornithischian dinosaur or any member of ornithischian.  Read the PowerPoints for the week to get topic ideas. The article can be no older than 5 years old. You will need to write a summary about the article in your own words and include how the article relates to the topic we are discussing in class. You will also need to respond to at least two other students summaries.

1-The article I chose is called ‘Bird-hipped’ Jurassic dinosaur was one of the first to live in herds. In this article they focus on the Lesothosaurus. It goes into detail about the excavation of a “bonebed” in South Africa. They are trying to uncover how the Lesothosaurus lived, socialized,, and fought off preditors together.

From their findings, they concluded that Lesothosaurus lived in herds. The bones of 17 Lesothosaurus were discovered. This suggested that they were social dinosaurs. The article then moves to talk about Lesothosaurus size. They explain how it was a small bipedal creature. They also discovered that these dinosaurs grew until they were about 6 years old.

They looked at and reviewed over 27 specimen to find out how these dinosaurs grew. Their findings of the Lesothosaurus bones are helping to understand what the beginning of the Jurassic period looked like. They are still digging up more specimens in order to gain a better understanding of these dinosaurs and their living habits.

2-This week we covered the topic of the Ornithischian dinosaur. One thing to note about this group is that the Triceratops make up a part of these creatures. The Triceratops is an iconic dinosaur used in many instances in the film industry. One famous example is a blue Triceratops named Trixie in Toy Story 3. These creatures are so fun to not only learn about in class, but also see where else these dinosaurs are used in.

The article published by Britannica mentions that the Ornithischian dinosaurs are actually not even related to birds. Although their name literally means “bird-hipped”, they really are not related at all. It is only like that because their hip bones are very similar to the composition of birds. We have discussed this previously with how important it is to note similarities between bone structures. Bone structures tell us a lot about their ancestral history, and who they are closely related to.

The Ornithischian dinosaurs are interesting to study. They have a lot of physical features that helped with survival and defense. The bony tendons and horns helped with defensive strategies. Meanwhile, the type of teeth they possessed allowed them to eat various types of plants. The numerous creatures that fall under Ornithischian dinosaurs were all fascinating to learn about this week.

SMC Biology Dinosaurs in The News Article Summary Paper
SMC Biology Dinosaurs in The News Article Summary Paper

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:SMC Biology Dinosaurs in The News Article Summary Paper

  Excellent Good Fair Poor
Main Postinga 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)

Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

 

Supported by at least three current, credible sources.

 

Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

40 (40%) – 44 (44%)

Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.

 

Supported by at least three credible sources.

 

Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

Responds to some of the discussion question(s).

 

One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.

 

Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

 

Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

Post is cited with two credible sources.

 

Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

 

Contains some APA formatting errors.

0 (0%) – 34 (34%)

Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.

 

Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.

 

Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

 

Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

Contains only one or no credible sources.

 

Not written clearly or concisely.

 

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

 

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Main Post: Timeliness 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)

Posts main post by day 3.

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not post by day 3.

First Response 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

 

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

 

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

15 (15%) – 16 (16%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

13 (13%) – 14 (14%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

 

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 12 (12%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

 

No credible sources are cited.

Second Response 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

 

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

 

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

12 (12%) – 13 (13%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

 

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 11 (11%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

 

No credible sources are cited.

Participation 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.

Total Points: 100