RES 709 Virginia State University Legalization of Organ Sales Discussion

RES 709 Virginia State University Legalization of Organ Sales Discussion

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: RES 709 Virginia State University Legalization of Organ Sales Discussion

Title:  RES 709 Virginia State University Legalization of Organ Sales Discussion

1 RES/709 Research Outline Your Name Institution Name Course Name Instructor’s Name Assignment Due Date 2 Proposed Dissertation Title 1. Program of Study (DBA, DHA, DM, EDD): including specialization, when applicable 2. Background of the Problem and Problem Statement Per Week 3’s assignment description, write 1 to 2 paragraphs providing a brief description and background of the identified problem that is backed by literature. Avoid “just talking about” the problem as the literature must be used to build your discussion. Also, provide your one-sentence substantiated problem statement. Substantiated refers to the one-sentence problem statement being backed by literature; there must be a citation to validate that the problem exists and that it is more than just your thoughts, observations, and/or opinions. 3. Purpose Statement Provide your purpose statement from Week 4’s assignment and complete Appendix B explaining how your purpose statement aligns with the problem statement. 4. Research Question State your proposed research question from Week 5’s assignment, and in Appendix D provide a summary of how your research questions align with your purpose statement. 5. Research Method Provide a statement of the proposed method and briefly describe why the methodology is appropriate from Week 6’s assignment. 6. Research Design Provide a statement of the proposed research design and why the design is appropriate from Week 7’s assignment. 7. Framework 3 Describe the theoretical or conceptual framework for your proposed study from Week 8’s assignment. 8. Significance of the Study Provide a statement of the significance or importance of your study from Week 8’s assignment. 4 References Note: The reference page is not sub-divided by type of literature and the following provides examples of how to format different pieces of literature. All references are in alphabetical order according to authors’ last names. Journal Article Example Ainsworth, S., & Purss, A. (2009). Same time, next year? Personnel Review, 38(3), 217-235. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483480910943304 Authored Book Example Bateman, T. S., & Snell, S. A. (2007). Management: Leading and collaborating in a competitive world (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill/Irwin. Chapter in an Edited Book Example Eatough, V., & Smith, J. (2008). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In C. Willig & W. Stainton-Rogers (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology (pp. 179-195). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848607927.n11 [Note: References are listed in alphabetical order. All references listed in the reference list must have an in-text citation from that source in the body of the paper. For additional examples of reference formatting, see Ch. 10 of the APA Manual.] For APA tutorials on formatting citations and references, please visit CDS Central > Student Resources > Writing & APA Resources 5 Appendix A Change Matrix: Week 3 Feedback A reflective practitioner looks back at the work they do, and the work process, and considers how they can improve. The revision matrix provides the opportunity to experience being a reflective practitioner during the doctoral journey. Critical thinking, a necessary skill for scholarly writing, incorporates the need to be a reflective practitioner as learning from personal experiences, as well as others, helps to answer the questions: Can anything be improved? Can anything be done better? Review the feedback from your instructor and record the instructor’s feedback in the first column. In the second column, state in your own words the feedback provided. In the third column, explain what you have done to address the feedback and include APA Manual page numbers as appropriate. Use Microsoft® Word formatting features to add rows to the template, as needed. The information in the table are examples. Please delete before providing your responses. Student (e)Signature: __________________________________ Date: ___________________ Faculty Feedback (Include comment numbers, as appropriate) Avoid unnecessary words/phrases. Remember the goal is to just provide information as concisely and specifically as possible. Please review the APA Manual. Comment MH1: Too conversational in tone and doesn’t add to the discussion. Be concise and specific. You may find it helpful to read the first 5-10 pages of a Faculty Feedback in My Own Words I will practice it first by reading good dissertations, paying attention to the use of transitions, expressions and overall style of writing. Also, I will remove all phrases and redundant words in my paper that are not essential or are too conversational. I will expose myself to some good texts, and I will learn by example and imitation. My Detailed and Specific Action Plan to Integrate Faculty Feedback in My Revised Essay (Include APA manual page numbers, as appropriate) I removed all phrases and redundant words that are not essential or too conversational in tone. I replaced them with simple declarative sentences (APA, 2020, pp. 113-114). 6 dissertation to gain a sense of “how” concise and specific scholarly writing is. 7 Appendix B Week 4: Alignment of Problem and Purpose Statements Provide an explanation of how your purpose statement aligns with the problem statement. 8 Appendix C Change Matrix: Week 4 Feedback Review the feedback from your instructor and record the instructor’s feedback in the first column, including comment numbers as appropriate. In the second column, state in your own words the feedback provided. In the third column, explain what you have done to address the feedback and include APA Manual page numbers as appropriate. Use Microsoft® Word formatting features to add rows to the template, as needed. The information in the table are examples. Please delete before providing your responses. Student (e)Signature: __________________________________ Date: ___________________ Faculty Feedback Avoid unnecessary words/phrases. Remember the goal is to just provide information as concisely and specifically as possible. Please review the APA Manual. Comment MH1: Too conversational in tone and doesn’t add to the discussion. Be concise and specific. You may find it helpful to read the first 5-10 pages of a dissertation to gain a sense of “how” concise and specific scholarly writing is. Faculty Feedback in My Own Words I will practice it first by reading good dissertations, paying attention to the use of transitions, expressions and overall style of writing. Also, I will remove all phrases and redundant words in my paper that are not essential or are too conversational. I will expose myself to some good texts, and I will learn by example and imitation. My Detailed and Specific Action Plan to Integrate Faculty Feedback in My Revised Essay I removed all phrases and redundant words that are not essential or too conversational in tone. I replaced them with simple declarative sentences (APA, 2020, pp. 113-114). 9 Appendix D Week 5: Research Questions Alignment Summary Provide a 300- to 500-word summary of how your research question aligns with your study’s purpose. 10 Appendix E Change Matrix: Week 5 Feedback Review the feedback from your instructor and record the instructor’s feedback in the first column, including comment numbers as appropriate. In the second column, state in your own words the feedback provided. In the third column, explain what you have done to address the feedback and include APA Manual page numbers as appropriate. Use Microsoft® Word formatting features to add rows to the template, as needed. The information in the table are examples. Please delete before providing your responses. Student (e)Signature: __________________________________ Date: ___________________ Faculty Feedback Avoid unnecessary words/phrases. Remember the goal is to just provide information as concisely and specifically as possible. Please review the APA Manual. Comment MH1: Too conversational in tone and doesn’t add to the discussion. Be concise and specific. You may find it helpful to read the first 5-10 pages of a dissertation to gain a sense of “how” concise and specific scholarly writing is. Faculty Feedback in My Own Words I will practice it first by reading good dissertations, paying attention to the use of transitions, expressions and overall style of writing. Also, I will remove all phrases and redundant words in my paper that are not essential or are too conversational. I will expose myself to some good texts, and I will learn by example and imitation. My Detailed and Specific Action Plan to Integrate Faculty Feedback in My Revised Essay I removed all phrases and redundant words that are not essential or too conversational in tone. I replaced them with simple declarative sentences (APA, 2020, pp. 113-114). 11 Appendix F Change Matrix: Week 6 Feedback Review the feedback from your instructor and record the instructor’s feedback in the first column, including comment numbers as appropriate. In the second column, state in your own words the feedback provided. In the third column, explain what you have done to address the feedback and include APA Manual page numbers as appropriate. Use Microsoft® Word formatting features to add rows to the template, as needed. The information in the table are examples. Please delete before providing your responses. Student (e)Signature: __________________________________ Date: ___________________ Faculty Feedback (Include comment numbers, as appropriate) Avoid unnecessary words/phrases. Remember the goal is to just provide information as concisely and specifically as possible. Please review the APA Manual. Comment MH1: Too conversational in tone and doesn’t add to the discussion. Be concise and specific. You may find it helpful to read the first 5-10 pages of a dissertation to gain a sense of “how” concise and specific scholarly writing is. Faculty Feedback in My Own Words I will practice it first by reading good dissertations, paying attention to the use of transitions, expressions and overall style of writing. Also, I will remove all phrases and redundant words in my paper that are not essential or are too conversational. I will expose myself to some good texts, and I will learn by example and imitation. My Detailed and Specific Action Plan to Integrate Faculty Feedback in My Revised Essay (Include APA manual page numbers, as appropriate) I removed all phrases and redundant words that are not essential or too conversational in tone. I replaced them with simple declarative sentences (APA, 2020, pp. 113-114). 12 Appendix G Change Matrix: Week 7 Feedback Review the feedback from your instructor and record the instructor’s feedback in the first column, including comment numbers as appropriate. In the second column, state in your own words the feedback provided. In the third column, explain what you have done to address the feedback and include APA Manual page numbers as appropriate. Use Microsoft® Word formatting features to add rows to the template, as needed. The information in the table are examples. Please delete before providing your responses. Student (e)Signature: __________________________________ Date: ___________________ Faculty Feedback Avoid unnecessary words/phrases. Remember the goal is to just provide information as concisely and specifically as possible. Please review the APA Manual. Comment MH1: Too conversational in tone and doesn’t add to the discussion. Be concise and specific. You may find it helpful to read the first 5-10 pages of a dissertation to gain a sense of “how” concise and specific scholarly writing is. Faculty Feedback in My Own Words I will practice it first by reading good dissertations, paying attention to the use of transitions, expressions and overall style of writing. Also, I will remove all phrases and redundant words in my paper that are not essential or are too conversational. I will expose myself to some good texts, and I will learn by example and imitation. My Detailed and Specific Action Plan to Integrate Faculty Feedback in My Revised Essay I removed all phrases and redundant words that are not essential or too conversational in tone. I replaced them with simple declarative sentences (APA, 2020, pp. 113-114). 13 Appendix H Paragraphing with the MEAL Plan M – Main Idea Every paragraph should have one main idea. If you find that your paragraphs have more than one main idea, separate your paragraphs so that each has only one main point. The idea behind a paragraph is to introduce an idea and expand upon it. If you veer off into a new topic, begin a new paragraph. E – Evidence or Examples Your main idea needs support, either in the form of evidence that buttresses your argument or examples that explain your idea. If you don’t have any evidence or examples to support your main idea, your idea may not be strong enough to warrant a complete paragraph. In this case, reevaluate your idea and see whether you even need to keep it in the paper. A – Analysis Analysis is the heart of academic writing. While your readers want to see evidence or examples of your idea, the real “meat” of your idea is your interpretation of your evidence or examples: how you break them apart, compare them to other ideas, use them to build a persuasive case, demonstrate their strengths or weaknesses, and so on. Analysis is especially important if your evidence (E) is a quote from another author. Always follow a quote with your analysis of the quote, demonstrating how that quote helps you to make your case. If you let a quote stand on its own, then the author of that quote will have a stronger voice in your paragraph (and maybe even your paper) than you will. L – Link Links help your reader to see how your paragraphs fit together. When you end a paragraph, try to link it to something else in your paper, such as your thesis or argument, the previous paragraph or main idea, or the following paragraph. Creating links will help your reader understand the logic and organization of your paper, as well as the logic and organization of your argument or main points. Reference Duke University (2006). Paragraphing: The MEAL plan. Retrieved from https://twp.duke.edu/sites/twp.duke.edu/files/file-attachments/meal-plan.original.pdf 14 Example Using Each Letter of the MEAL Plan: M – Supporters and opponents of the death penalty have justified their beliefs on a number of grounds. E – Supporters, for instance, argue that the death penalty is the ultimate specific deterrent in that someone who is put to death will never be able to murder again (Pataki, 1997). A – The threat of being put to death for an offense may also act as a general deterrent, promoting a safer community (van den Haag & Conrad, 1983). Further, some argue that the death penalty provides retribution and answers individual and societal needs to punish offenders (Fein, 1993) and that the death penalty is cheaper than life imprisonment. L – Based on these arguments, supporters believe that the justice system has a duty to impose the death penalty on certain offenders (van den Haag & Conrad, 1983). Sample Paragraph: Supporters and opponents of the death penalty have justified their beliefs on a number of grounds. Supporters, for instance, argued the death penalty is the ultimate specific deterrent as someone who is put to death will never be able to murder again (Pataki, 1997). The threat of being put to death for an offense may also act as a general deterrent, promoting a safer community (van den Haag & Conrad, 1983). Further, Fein (1993) argued the death penalty provides retribution, answers individual and societal needs to punish offenders, and the death penalty is cheaper than life imprisonment. Based on these arguments, supporters believe the justice system has a duty to impose the death penalty on certain offenders (van den Haag & Conrad, 1983). Problem Statement Development Guidelines and Examples The following guidelines should be used in problem statement development: • The problem statement should be concise; under one page. o Paragraphs should be short, such as three to five sentences each. • Lack of research or lack of knowledge is not a problem in and of itself. o Ensure that the problem section focuses on the issue driving the study; not on the purpose of the study. • The problem must reflect an existing and published issue and must be cited. o The citations should be academic sources, whenever possible. o Include statistics supporting the existence of the problem, if possible o Ensure that the statistics are recent—use the most recent publication year available. o If the problem is limited to a specific organization then the problem can be supported by personal communication. Click on the following APA source for personal communication formatting: citation formatting • A problem statement that includes a clear general and specific problem is preferred. o It is also acceptable to state “the problem” without including a general and specific problem. • The specific problem (or “the problem”) must mirror the purpose. o There should be a clear alignment between the problem and purpose. The three sections attached include samples of: 1. A sample problem statement with a general and specific problem; 2. A sample problem statement with a general and specific problem and personal communication citation, and; 3. A sample problem statement without a general and specific problem. Please note that the data and citations in the following examples do not necessarily represent actual data or references—they are for illustration purposes only. Sample Problem Statement with a General and Specific Problem (Typical Problem Statement Format) Students often begin an online higher education program with unrealistic expectations. According to Leeds (2012) students often enter online programs based on the assumption that obtaining an online degree is far easier than traditional college. Although online education is much more convenient than attending college at an on-ground campus, the academic requirements are not less rigorous (Leeds, 2012). The general problem is that graduation rates for online students are relatively low (Wilson & Allen, 2013). Leeds (2012) contended that in addition to realistic awareness of academic expectations, online college students should be self-aware regarding their personal suitability for the online environment. Although the online environment provides opportunities to work synchronously and asynchronously with other students globally and often provides improved access to the instructor, the lack of face-to-face social interaction may be disconcerting for some students (Chahino, 2014). The specific problem is that students are often not prepared to succeed in an online academic program because their personality and intrinsic preferences are not well suited for the online environment (Chahino, 2014). Sample Problem Statement with a General and Specific Problem and Personal Communication Citation Nurses represent the largest group of health care providers, spend the most time providing direct patient care, and significantly impact the patient experience. Nurses are essential for maintaining the capability, efficiency, safety, and quality of health care. According to the United States Department of Health and Human Services (2014), institutions with low nurse to patient staffing levels experience reduced adverse events and have the lowest rates of hospital mortality from cardiac and respiratory arrest and pneumonia acquired in the hospital. The general problem is that since the 1980s the United States has experienced a nursing shortage (Masselink & Jones, 2014). According to the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics (2014), although the job growth for RNs is expected to increase by 26% over the next decade, the United States will experience a deficit of 1.2 million RNs by 2020. The specific problem is there is a high RN turnover rate in the neonatal unit of one Massachusetts hospital resulting in high patient-to-nurse ratios, compromising the quality of patient care (J. Doe, personal communication, September 17, 2015). According to The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (2003), low RN-to-patient staffing ratios reduce incidences of adverse patient outcomes. Sample Problem Statement without a General and Specific Problem Leaders of over 400 of the Fortune 500 companies have made investments in China (Child & Rodrigues, 2013). In 2014 foreign direct investment into China exceeded $100 billion (Oliver, 2015). Despite continued growth of foreign direct investment into China, leaders of multi-national corporations face difficulties finding and recruiting local leadership (Brady & Roberts, 2013). Chouhan (2013) revealed that based on a 2012 survey of administrators from multinational firms in China, 54% of the firms reported problems with turnover of local business professionals or support staff. Based on issues experienced with locally hired personnel, many companies operating in China have turned to recruiting their business operations managers from the U.S., yet these expatriates also fail at high rates when dispatched to their foreign assignment (Celaya & Swift, 2013). The problem is that leaders of multi-national corporations have not been effective in improving expatriate cross-cultural adaptation in China (Littrell et al., 2014). The resulting costs to the company can range from 30% to 400% of the expatriates’ annual salary (Blake, 2014).

RES 709 Virginia State University Legalization of Organ Sales Discussion
RES 709 Virginia State University Legalization of Organ Sales Discussion

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:RES 709 Virginia State University Legalization of Organ Sales Discussion

  Excellent Good Fair Poor
Main Postinga 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)

Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

 

Supported by at least three current, credible sources.

 

Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

40 (40%) – 44 (44%)

Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.

 

Supported by at least three credible sources.

 

Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

Responds to some of the discussion question(s).

 

One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.

 

Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

 

Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

Post is cited with two credible sources.

 

Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

 

Contains some APA formatting errors.

0 (0%) – 34 (34%)

Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.

 

Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.

 

Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

 

Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

Contains only one or no credible sources.

 

Not written clearly or concisely.

 

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

 

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Main Post: Timeliness 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)

Posts main post by day 3.

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not post by day 3.

First Response 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

 

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

 

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

15 (15%) – 16 (16%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

13 (13%) – 14 (14%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

 

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 12 (12%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

 

No credible sources are cited.

Second Response 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

 

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

 

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

12 (12%) – 13 (13%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

 

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 11 (11%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

 

No credible sources are cited.

Participation 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.

Total Points: 100