Boost your Grades with us today!
Reflective Analysis Case Report Component Paper 1
Reflective Analysis Case Report Component Paper 1
Reflective Analysis Case Report Component Paper
Inbox
Reflective Analysis Case Report Component Paper Upcoming Assessment Description In this assignment, learners are required to construct a reflective analysis incorporating a personal nursing philosophy. The Reflective Analysis Case Report Component Paper assignment may be written in first-person language as appropriate to express personal perspectives but must otherwise adhere to the guidelines below. General Guidelines: Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
Directions: Compose a reflective analysis (1,000-1,250 words) incorporating your personal philosophy of nursing, including the following core elements:
Portfolio Practice Immersion Hours: It may be possible to earn portfolio practice immersion hours for this assignment. Enter the following after the References section of your paper: Practice Immersion Hours Completion Statement DNP-815A I, (INSERT NAME), verify that I have completed and logged (NUMBER OF) clock hours in association with the goals and objectives for this assignment. I also have tracked said practice immersion hours in the Lopes Activity Tracker for verification purposes and will be sure that all approvals are in place from my faculty and practice immersion preceptor/mentor before the end of the course.
RUBRIC Very Important tools for AA the ASSIGNMENTS Reflective Analysis Case Report Component Paper – Rubric Criteria Description ****Discussion of How Personal Worldview Influences Approach to Patients**** 5. Excellent 6.4 points A discussion of how personal worldview influences approach to patients is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. 4. Good 5.89 points A discussion of how personal worldview influences approach to patients is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. 3. Satisfactory 5.63 points A discussion of how personal worldview influences approach to patients is present but at a perfunctory level. 2. Less Than Satisfactory 5.12 points A discussion of how personal worldview influences approach to patients is present but insufficient in detail or incomplete. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points A discussion of how personal worldview influences approach to patients is not present. Criteria Description What Constitutes the Environment 5. Excellent 6.4 points A discussion of what constitutes the environment is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. 4. Good 5.89 points A discussion of what constitutes the environment is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. 3. Satisfactory 5.63 points A discussion of what constitutes the environment is present but at a perfunctory level. 2. Less Than Satisfactory 5.12 points A discussion of what constitutes the environment is present but insufficient in detail or incomplete. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points A discussion of what constitutes the environment is not present. Criteria Description How Illness Relates to Health 5. Excellent 6.4 points A discussion of how illness relates to health is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. 4. Good 5.89 points A discussion of how illness relates to health is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. 3. Satisfactory 5.63 points A discussion of how illness relates to health is present but at a perfunctory level. 2. Less Than Satisfactory 5.12 points A discussion of how illness relates to health is present but insufficient in detail or incomplete. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points A discussion of how illness relates to health is not present. Criteria Description View of What Constitutes Health 5. Excellent 6.4 points A discussion of the view of the learner on what constitutes health is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. 4. Good 5.89 points A discussion of the view of the learner on what constitutes health is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. 3. Satisfactory 5.63 points A discussion of the view of the learner on what constitutes health is present but at a perfunctory level. 2. Less Than Satisfactory 5.12 points A discussion of the view of the learner on what constitutes health is present but insufficient in detail or incomplete. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points A discussion of the view of the learner on what constitutes health is not present. Criteria Description Discussion of Central Belief About the Individual Person 5. Excellent 6.4 points A discussion of central belief about the individual person is present in full. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. 4. Good 5.89 points A discussion of central belief about the individual person is present in full. Discussion is convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. 3. Satisfactory 5.63 points A discussion of central belief about the individual person is present but at a perfunctory level. 2. Less Than Satisfactory 5.12 points A discussion of central belief about the individual person is present but insufficient in detail or incomplete. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points A discussion of central belief about the individual person is not present. Criteria Description How the Individual Person and the Environment Interact 5. Excellent 6.4 points A discussion of how the individual person and the environment interact is present, convincing, and thorough. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. 4. Good 5.89 points A discussion of how the individual person and the environment interact is present, convincing, and thorough. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. 3. Satisfactory 5.63 points A discussion of how the individual person and the environment interact is present but at a perfunctory level. 2. Less Than Satisfactory 5.12 points A discussion of how the individual person and the environment interact is present but insufficient in detail or incomplete. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points A discussion of how the individual person and the environment interact is not present. Criteria Description How Nursing Leaders Might Serve Others 5. Excellent 6.4 points How nursing leaders might serve others in ways that promote human flourishing is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. 4. Good 5.89 points How nursing leaders might serve others in ways that promote human flourishing is present in full. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. 3. Satisfactory 5.63 points How nursing leaders might serve others in ways that promote human flourishing is present but at a perfunctory level. 2. Less Than Satisfactory 5.12 points How nursing leaders might serve others in ways that promote human flourishing is present but insufficient in detail or incomplete. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points How nursing leaders might serve others in ways that promote human flourishing is not discussed. Criteria Description Central Reason for the Existence of Nursing 5. Excellent 6.4 points A discussion of the central reason for the existence of nursing is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. 4. Good 5.89 points A discussion of the central reason for the existence of nursing is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. 3. Satisfactory 5.63 points A discussion of the central reason for the existence of nursing is present but at a perfunctory level. 2. Less Than Satisfactory 5.12 points A discussion of the central reason for the existence of nursing is present but insufficient in detail or incomplete. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points A discussion of the central reason for the existence of nursing is not present. Criteria Description Central Reason for the Existence of Nursing Research 5. Excellent 4.8 points Research is supportive of the rationale presented. Sources are distinctive and address all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria. 4. Good 4.42 points Research is timely and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria. 3. Satisfactory 4.22 points Research is adequate. Sources are standard in relevance, quality of outside sources, or timeliness. 2. Less Than Satisfactory 3.84 points Few outside sources were used to support the assignment. Limited research is apparent. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points No outside sources were used to support the assignment. Criteria Description Thesis Development and Purpose 5. Excellent 4 points Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. 4. Good 3.68 points Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. 3. Satisfactory 3.52 points Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. 2. Less Than Satisfactory 3.2 points Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Criteria Description (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5. Excellent 4 points Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. 4. Good 3.68 points Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. 3. Satisfactory 3.52 points Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. 2. Less Than Satisfactory 3.2 points Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Criteria Description Argument Logic and Construction 5. Excellent 4 points Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. 4. Good 3.68 points Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. 3. Satisfactory 3.52 points Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. 2. Less Than Satisfactory 3.2 points Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Criteria Description (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5. Excellent 6.4 points All format elements are correct. 4. Good 5.89 points Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. 3. Satisfactory 5.63 points Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. 2. Less Than Satisfactory 5.12 points Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Criteria Description (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style) 5. Excellent 5.6 points In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. 4. Good 5.15 points Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. 3. Satisfactory 4.93 points Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. 2. Less Than Satisfactory 4.48 points Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. 1. Unsatisfactory 0 points No reference page is included. No citations are used. |
Grading Rubric
Performance Category | 100% or highest level of performance
100% 16 points |
Very good or high level of performance
88% 14 points |
Acceptable level of performance
81% 13 points |
Inadequate demonstration of expectations
68% 11 points |
Deficient level of performance
56% 9 points
|
Failing level
of performance 55% or less 0 points |
Total Points Possible= 50 | 16 Points | 14 Points | 13 Points | 11 Points | 9 Points | 0 Points |
Scholarliness
Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics. |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements
|
16 Points | 14 Points | 13 Points | 11 Points | 9 Points | 0 Points | |
Application of Course Knowledge
Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements
|
10 Points | 9 Points | 6 Points | 0 Points | |||
Interactive Dialogue
Initial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count) The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count) Responses are substantive and relate to the topic. |
Demonstrated all of the following:
|
Demonstrated 3 of the following:
|
Demonstrated 2 of the following:
|
Demonstrated 1 or less of the following:
|
||
8 Points | 7 Points | 6 Points | 5 Points | 4 Points | 0 Points | |
Grammar, Syntax, APA
Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing. The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error. |
The following was present:
AND
AND
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
0 Points Deducted | 5 Points Lost | |||||
Participation
Requirements |
Demonstrated the following:
|
Failed to demonstrate the following:
|
||||
0 Points Lost | 5 Points Lost | |||||
Due Date Requirements | Demonstrated all of the following:
A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT. |
Demonstrates one or less of the following.
A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT. |
Also Check Out: DNP 815 Topic 8 Reflective Journal