Quality Improvement and Professional Nursing Practice Healthcare Quality

Quality Improvement and Professional Nursing Practice Healthcare Quality

Sample Answer for Quality Improvement and Professional Nursing Practice Healthcare Quality Included After Question

Quality Improvement and Professional Nursing Practice Healthcare Quality

Description

After reading Chapter 9 and reviewing the lecture power point (located in lectures tab),  please answer the following questions.

1.  Discuss the role of the nurse in quality improvement.

2.  Describe nursing-sensitive measurements and why they are important in Nursing care delivery.

 

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: Quality Improvement and Professional Nursing Practice Healthcare Quality

Title: Quality Improvement and Professional Nursing Practice Healthcare Quality

Chapter 9 Quality Improvement and Professional Nursing Practice Healthcare Quality (1 of 2) Quality is the degree to which health services for individuals and populations increase the likelihood of desired health outcomes and are consistent with current professional knowledge Healthcare Quality (2 of 2) Quality improvement refers to the use of data to monitor the outcomes of care processes, and uses improvement methods to design and test changes to continuously improve the quality and safety of healthcare systems Crossing the Quality Chasm (IOM, 2001) • Safe, timely, effective, efficient, equitable, and patient-centered (STEEEP) • 10 rules for redesign to move the healthcare system toward the identified performance expectations 10 Rules for Redesign (1 of 3) • Care is based on continuous healing relationships with patients receiving care whenever and wherever it is needed • Care can be customized according to the patient’s needs and preferences even though the system is designed to meet the most common types of needs • The patient is the source of control and as such, should be given enough information and opportunity to exercise the degree of control he or she chooses regarding decisions that affect him or her 10 Rules for Redesign (2 of 3) • Knowledge is shared and information flows freely so that patients have access to their own medical information • Decision making is evidence based; that is, it is based on the best available scientific knowledge and should not vary illogically between clinicians or locations • Safety is a system property and patients should be safe from harm caused by the healthcare system 10 Rules for Redesign (3 of 3) • Transparency is necessary where systems make information available to patients and families that enable them to make informed decisions when selecting a health plan, hospital, or clinic, or when choosing alternative treatments. • Patient needs are anticipated rather reacted to • Waste of resources and patient time is continuously decreased • Cooperation among clinicians is a priority to ensure appropriate exchange of information and coordination of care Healthcare Transparency (1 of 2) • Medicare’s Hospital Compare at: www.hospitalcompare.hhs.gov • Medicare’s Home Health Compare at: https://www.medicare.gov/homehealthcompare/ • Quality Check’s Find a Health Care Organization at: http://www.qualitycheck.org/ consumer/searchQCR.aspx • The Leapfrog Group’s Hospital Safety Score at: http://www.hospitalsafetyscore.org Healthcare Transparency (2 of 2) • America’s Health Rankings by the United Health Foundation at: http://www.americashealthrankings.org • Improving Healthcare for the Common Good (IPRO) at: http://ipro.org/for-consumers • IPRO’s Why Not the Best? at: http://www.whynotthebest.org • The Commonwealth Fund at: http://www.commonwealthfund.org Measures of Quality • Benchmarking • Core measures • Accountability • Composite measures Measures of Nursing Care • Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) Hospital Survey • National Voluntary Consensus Standards for Nursing-Sensitive Care • National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators (NDNQI) Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) Structured organizational process that involves personnel in planning and implementing the continuous flow of improvements in the provision of quality health care that meets or exceeds expectations Processes or Pathways for CQI • First process occurs as data that is regularly collected is monitored; if the data indicate that a problem exists, then an analysis is done to identify possible causes and a process is initiated to pilot a change • Second process involves the identification of a problem outside of the routine data monitoring system Example Fishbone Diagram People Process Equipment Problem Materials Environment Management Quality Improvement Methodologies • “Plan, Do, Study, Act” • Six Sigma – Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control • Swiss Cheese Model Act Plan Study Do American Nurses Association (ANA) Standard #10 ANA standard of professional performance: The registered nurse contributes to quality nursing practice with competencies that include the nurse’s role in various quality improvement activities such as collecting data to monitor quality and collaboration to implement quality improvement plans and interventions Challenges • Adequacy of resources • Engaging nurses from management to the bedside in the process • Increasing number of QI activities • Administrative burden of QI initiatives • Lack of preparation of nurses in traditional nursing education programs for role in QI

Quality Improvement and Professional Nursing Practice Healthcare Quality
Quality Improvement and Professional Nursing Practice Healthcare Quality

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:Quality Improvement and Professional Nursing Practice Healthcare Quality

  Excellent Good Fair Poor
Main Postinga 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)

Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

 

Supported by at least three current, credible sources.

 

Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

40 (40%) – 44 (44%)

Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.

 

Supported by at least three credible sources.

 

Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

Responds to some of the discussion question(s).

 

One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.

 

Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

 

Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

Post is cited with two credible sources.

 

Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

 

Contains some APA formatting errors.

0 (0%) – 34 (34%)

Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.

 

Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.

 

Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

 

Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

Contains only one or no credible sources.

 

Not written clearly or concisely.

 

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

 

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Main Post: Timeliness 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)

Posts main post by day 3.

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not post by day 3.

First Response 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

 

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

 

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

15 (15%) – 16 (16%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

13 (13%) – 14 (14%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

 

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 12 (12%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

 

No credible sources are cited.

Second Response 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

 

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

 

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

12 (12%) – 13 (13%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

 

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 11 (11%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

 

No credible sources are cited.

Participation 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.

Total Points: 100