QUALITY AND SAFETY IN HEALTHCARE AND NURSING PRACTICE NURS 8302
Sample Answer for QUALITY AND SAFETY IN HEALTHCARE AND NURSING PRACTICE NURS 8302 Included After Question
How will you, as a future DNP-prepared nurse, keep patients safe? This is a multi-layered question with many different answers. Yet, it is important to note that as the nurse leader, quality and safety measures are at the forefront of how you deliver nursing practice.
Photo Credit: [Henglein and Steets]/[Cultura]/Getty Images
Quality and safety measures are integral components in healthcare. According to Nash et al. (2019), “Around the end of the twentieth century and the start of the twenty-first, a number of reports presented strong evidence of widespread quality deficiencies and highlighted a need for substantial change to ensure high-quality care for all patients” (p. 5). Understanding the prominence of error, it is important to consider your role as a DNP-prepared nurse.
For this Discussion, take a moment to consider your experience with quality and safety in your nursing practice. Reflect on your experience and consider how your role may support quality and safety measures.
Reference:
Nash, D. B., Joshi, M. S., Ransom, E. R., & Ransom, S. B. (Eds.). (2019). The healthcare quality book: Vision, strategy, and tools (4th ed.). Health Administration Press.
To Prepare:
- Review the Learning Resources for this week.
- Reflect on your experience with nursing practice, specifically as it relates to the function of quality and safety. For example, consider whether your current organization supports quality and safety. How might your role help to support these measures in your organization or nursing practice?
By Day 3 of Week 1
Post a brief description of any previous experience with quality and safety. Then, explain how your role as the DNP-prepared nurse represents a function of quality and safety for nursing practice and healthcare delivery. Be specific and provide examples.
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: QUALITY AND SAFETY IN HEALTHCARE AND NURSING PRACTICE NURS 8302
By Day 5 of Week 1
Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses and respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days by expanding upon your colleague’s post or suggesting an additional alternative perspective on quality and safety.
Note: For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the “Post to Discussion Question” link and then select “Create Thread” to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and you cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Submit!
Submission and Grading Information
Grading Criteria
To access your rubric:
Week 1 Discussion 1 Rubric
QUALITY AND SAFETY IN HEALTHCARE AND NURSING PRACTICE NURS 8302
Post by Day 3 of Week 1 and Respond by Day 5 of Week 1
To Participate in this Discussion:
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: QUALITY AND SAFETY IN HEALTHCARE AND NURSING PRACTICE NURS 8302
Title: QUALITY AND SAFETY IN HEALTHCARE AND NURSING PRACTICE NURS 8302
Safety and quality continue to be crucial elements in nursing practice and healthcare. Among other medical professionals, nurses are crucial to providing high-quality patient care.In order to guarantee that patients have the most excellent possible hospital experience, nurses must collaborate with interdisciplinary team members and make decisions based on predetermined goals (Dempsey & Assi, 2018). According to Hammersla et al. (2021), anticipating the best outcomes and facilitating the correct care for the right client at the right time are essential components of quality in healthcare. Healthcare safety is defined by Nash et al. (2019) as providing high-quality treatment free from medical errors and unwanted side effects. This essay considers how I want to represent safety and quality in nursing practice and healthcare delivery as a DNP-prepared nurse. The foundation of providing patients with high-quality care is safety. The adverse effects of care, including morbidity and mortality, are the main focus of the research that defines patient safety and harm prevention techniques.
Previous Experience with quality and safety
Throughout my nursing career, I have experienced safety and quality firsthand. Under the guidance of my superiors, I have been able to adhere to the use of evidence-based standard operating procedures (SOPs) throughout my career. This inspired me to provide my patients with efficient and timely care. One of my most significant accomplishments throughout my nursing practicum was enabling safe patient care while adhering to numerous patient safety guidelines. Lee et al. (2019) state that to deliver comprehensive, safe, and high-quality care, healthcare professionals should become familiar with these patient safety issues and acquire the necessary skills and knowledge.
In order to decrease the likelihood of unfavorable outcomes, nurses play a crucial role in monitoring and coordinating care (Sherwood & Barnsteiner, 2021). My prior experiences have leaned toward patient engagement because I work in a psychiatric mental health facility where safety is paramount. My areas of interest are providing high-quality healthcare, supporting recovery, and paying close attention to patients to improve their safety. Other categories include preventing health issues, and identifying disease causes and risk factors. Additionally, I have been instrumental in enhancing patients’ recuperation by educating and motivating them.
My role as a DNP-Prepared Nurse
Upon obtaining the DNP doctorate, I plan to take advantage of new opportunities to investigate and close the gap between healthy and unhealthy facilities and the gap between the best possible treatment and the quality and safety of the patients provided (Barkell & Synder, 2021). I will assist my facility in creating cohesive, healthy work environments that support patient safety and high-quality treatment. My primary goal as a nurse with a DNP is to provide patient-centered care. I have collaborated with other disciplinary teams in providing care. In addition, my duty as a DNP-prepared nurse is to understand and apply innovation to raise the standard of care provided. One of these is taking an active part in tech-driven advancements such as information systems and health informatics. Taking on leadership responsibilities in policy, education, and health care administration is another function of the DNP-prepared nurse. Mentoring nurses and improving their careers as educators are additional activities that reflect quality and safety for nursing practice and healthcare delivery (Trautman et al., 2018). Additionally, DNP nurses can assess practice and implement quality-improving measures. Also, nurses might strive to advocate for modifications and enhancements to various healthcare policies. My duty as a DNP-prepared nurse is to enforce adherence to the care services provided in my facility using methodical, evidence-based approaches. According to Dempsey and Assi (2018), the two main elements of evidence-based practice are patient safety and high-quality care. Completing my DNP program will allow me to provide better treatment, as evidenced by improved patient outcomes and safety. To increase safety and quality, I will support healthcare programs and advocate for the needs in this area.
References
Barkell, N. P. & Snyder, S. S. (2021). Just culture in healthcare: An integrative review.
Nursing Forum, 56(1), 103-111.https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12525
Dempsey, C., & Assi, M. J. (2018). The Impact of Nurse Engagement on Quality, Safety, and the
Experience of Care: What Nurse Leaders Should Know.Nursing administration
Quarterly 42(3), 278-283. https://doi.org/10.1097/NAQ.0000000000000305
Hammersla, M., Belcher, A., Ruccio, L. R., Martin, J., & Bingham, D. (2021). Practice and
Quality Improvement Leaders Survey of Expectations of DNP Graduates’ Quality
Improvement Expertise.Nurse educator 46(6),361365.https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000001009
Lee, S. E., Scott, L. D., Dahinten, V. S., Vincent, C., Lopez, K. D., & Park, C. G. (2019). Safety
culture, patient safety, and quality of care outcomes: a literature review.Western Journal
of nursing research 41(2), 279-304.
Nash, D. B., Joshi, M. S., Ransom, E. R., & Ransom, S. B. (Eds.). (2019).The healthcare quality
book: Vision, strategy, and tools (4th ed.). Health Administration Press
Sherwood, G., & Barnsteiner, J. (Eds.). (2021).Quality and safety in nursing: A competency
approach to improving outcomes. John Wiley & Sons
Trautman, D. E., Idzik, S., Hammersla, M., & Rosseter, R. (2018). Advancing scholarship
through translational research: The role of Ph.D. and DNP prepared nurses.
Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 23(2)
A Sample Answer 2 For the Assignment: QUALITY AND SAFETY IN HEALTHCARE AND NURSING PRACTICE NURS 8302
Title: QUALITY AND SAFETY IN HEALTHCARE AND NURSING PRACTICE NURS 8302
Alternative Perspective: Holistic and Patient-Centered Care
In addition to focusing on the prevention of adverse effects and medical errors, a holistic and patient-centered perspective can provide a valuable alternative lens for approaching quality and safety in nursing practice and healthcare (Brooks, Winship & Kuzel, 2020). This perspective emphasizes the importance of considering the patient as a whole individual, taking into account not only their physical health but also their mental, emotional, and social well-being.
Holistic care recognizes that patients are unique, and their health is influenced by various factors such as their lifestyle, cultural background, and personal preferences (Brooks, Winship & Kuzel, 2020). In order to truly ensure quality and safety, nurses can adopt an approach that involves active collaboration with patients in their care. This means engaging in shared decision-making, respecting patient autonomy, and considering the patient’s values and beliefs when planning and delivering healthcare services.
Moreover, a patient-centered perspective goes beyond the immediate treatment of illnesses and focuses on promoting overall well-being and enhancing the patient’s quality of life (Scott, 2020). This might involve addressing psychosocial aspects of care, providing adequate support for coping with illnesses, and fostering open communication between healthcare providers and patients.
By incorporating holistic and patient-centered care into nursing practice, healthcare professionals can not only prevent harm and errors but also enhance the overall patient experience (Scott, 2020). This approach aligns with the principles of person-centered care and emphasizes the importance of building a therapeutic relationship between healthcare providers and patients. Ultimately, it contributes to a more comprehensive understanding of quality and safety that extends beyond the traditional medical model.
References
Brooks EM, Winship JM, Kuzel AJ. A “Behind-the-Scenes” Look at Interprofessional Care Coordination: How Person-Centered Care in Safety-Net Health System Complex Care Clinics Produce Better Outcomes. Int J Integr Care. 2020 Apr 28;20(2):5. doi: 10.5334/ijic.4734. PMID: 32405282; PMCID: PMC7207252.
Scott Barss K. Spiritual Care in Holistic Nursing Education: A Spirituality and Health Elective Rooted in T.R.U.S.T. and Contemplative Education. Journal of Holistic Nursing. 2020;38(1):122-130. doi:10.1177/0898010119889703
A Sample Answer 3 For the Assignment: QUALITY AND SAFETY IN HEALTHCARE AND NURSING PRACTICE NURS 8302
Title: QUALITY AND SAFETY IN HEALTHCARE AND NURSING PRACTICE NURS 8302
Laura, your primary focus on safety and quality as essential elements in nursing practice establishes a robust basis for your conversation. Recognizing nurses’ critical role in providing high-quality patient care is consistent with the patient-centered, team-based strategy that characterizes modern healthcare. Furthermore, your understanding of the importance of making decisions and working together in interdisciplinary teams aligns with accepted best practices.
Previous Experience with Quality and Safety
Your direct encounters with safety and quality, notably your adherence to evidence-based SOPs, demonstrate your dedication to delivering effective and prompt care. It aligns with principles endorsed by Lee et al. (2019), stressing thorough, safe, and top-tier care through a grasp of patient safety concerns. Your focus on patient participation in a psychiatric mental wellness context highlights the critical role that safety plays and the need to accommodate each patient’s needs.
Your Role as a DNP-Prepared Nurse
Your aspirations as a DNP-prepared nurse are praiseworthy and ambitious. Your commitment to bridging gaps between healthy and unhealthy facilities aligning treatment with the quality and safety of patient care, demonstrates a holistic and forward-thinking perspective (Barkell & Snyder, 2021). Incorporating technology-driven advancements, such as information systems and health informatics, resonates with the imperative for healthcare innovation (Hammersla et al., 2021). Your multifaceted position as a leader in regulations, the educational process, and healthcare management demonstrates a sophisticated comprehension of the all-encompassing influence of DNPs.
Alternative Perspective
While emphasizing technological progress is vital, exploring the human dimension of care is equally essential. Enhancing the care that is a patient-oriented experience will come from incorporating cultural awareness, compassion, and effective interaction into your DNP job. Furthermore, addressing healthcare inequities and recognizing the socioeconomic aspects influencing patient outcomes could greatly support your advocacy efforts.
In summary, your dedication to evidence-based practice, ensuring patient safety, and delivering high-quality care resonates in your post. I wish you the best on your DNP journey, and I eagerly anticipate learning more about your contributions to the progression of nursing practice and healthcare.
References
Barkell, N. P., & Snyder, S. S. (2020). Just culture in healthcare: An integrative review. Nursing Forum, 56(1), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12525Links to an external site.
Hammersla, M., Belcher, A., Ruccio, L. R., Martin, J., & Bingham, D. (2021). Practice and Quality Improvement Leaders Survey of Expectations of DNP Graduates’ Quality Improvement Expertise. Nurse Educator, 46(6), 361-365.
Lee, S. E., Scott, L. D., Dahinten, V. S., Vincent, C., Lopez, K. D., & Park, C. G. (2019). Safety culture, patient safety, and quality of care outcomes: a literature review. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 41(2), 279-304.
Name: NURS_8302_Week1_Discussion2_Rubric
- Grid View
- List View
| Excellent
90–100 |
Good
80–89 |
Fair
70–79 |
Poor
: 0–69 |
|||
| Main Posting:
Response to the Discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. |
40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Thoroughly responds to the Discussion question(s). Is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. No less than 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least three current credible sources. |
35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to most of the Discussion question(s). Is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. 50% of the post has exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least three credible references. |
31 (31%) – 34 (34%)
Responds to some of the Discussion question(s). One to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Cited with fewer than two credible references. |
0 (0%) – 30 (30%)
Does not respond to the Discussion question(s). Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Contains only one or no credible references. |
||
| Main Posting:
Writing |
6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
Written clearly and concisely. Contains no grammatical or spelling errors. Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Written concisely. May contain one to two grammatical or spelling errors. Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Written somewhat concisely. May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Contains some APA formatting errors. |
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Not written clearly or concisely. Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
||
| Main Posting:
Timely and full participation |
9 (9%) – 10 (10%)
Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation. Posts main Discussion by due date. |
8 (8%) – 8 (8%)
Meets requirements for full participation. Posts main Discussion by due date. |
7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
Posts main Discussion by due date. |
0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Does not meet requirements for full participation. Does not post main Discussion by due date. |
||
| First Response:
Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources. |
9 (9%) – 9 (9%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Responds to questions posed by faculty. The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. |
8 (8%) – 8 (8%)
Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting. |
7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth. |
0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. |
||
| First Response: Writing |
6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues. Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed. Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources. Response is written in standard, edited English. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Response posed in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication. Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective communication. Response to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. |
||
| First Response: Timely and full participation |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation. Posts by due date. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Meets requirements for full participation. Posts by due date. |
3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Posts by due date. |
0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Does not meet requirements for full participation. Does not post by due date. |
||
| Second Response: Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources. |
9 (9%) – 9 (9%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Responds to questions posed by faculty. The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. |
8 (8%) – 8 (8%)
Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting. |
7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth. |
0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. |
||
| Second Response: Writing |
6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues. Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed. Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources. Response is written in standard, edited English. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Response posed in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication. Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective communication. Response to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. |
||
| Second Response: Timely and full participation |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation. Posts by due date. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Meets requirements for full participation. Posts by due date. |
3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Posts by due date. |
0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Does not meet requirements for full participation. Does not post by due date. |
||
| Total Points: 100 | ||||||
Name: NURS_8302_Week1_Discussion2_Rubric