PUB 540 History, Principles, and Application of Epidemiology IN

PUB 540 History, Principles, and Application of Epidemiology IN

PUB 540 History, Principles, and Application of Epidemiology IN

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: PUB 540 History, Principles, and Application of Epidemiology IN

Assessment Description

The purpose of this assignment is to familiarize yourself with individuals who have made major contributions to the field of epidemiology. Looking back at history, epidemics of infectious diseases have been acknowledged dating back to the earliest times, describing epidemics of smallpox, measles, the bubonic plague, syphilis, and leprosy, all of which have influenced the outcome of exploration, military adventures, and colonization, as well as industrial development and the arts. Public health must continue to focus on identifying effective ways of improving health related to factors that contribute to morbidity and mortality by developing interventions that involve whole communities to be more health conscious.

Research the following individuals and their roles in shaping contemporary epidemiology:

  • John Graunt
  • James Lind
  • Edward Jenner
  • Ignaz Semmelweis
  • John Snow

Examine the history, principles, and application of epidemiology and write a 1,000-1,250-paper to explain your findings. Choose one of the individuals from your research and include the following:

  1. Define epidemiology and discuss its purpose and importance to public health.
  2. Describe the disease and the event or major contribution in which the individual you selected was involved. Using descriptive epidemiology, discuss how common the disease was at the time, who was infected, when it occurred (time of year or season), and the mode of transmission. If the individual is not associated with a specific disease, discuss a significant disease happening during that period.
  3. Explain how the individual influenced epidemiology and discuss the advanced epidemiological methods and process the individual used to describe and control disease. Discuss how the individual’s contributions helped to inform the application definition of epidemiology in public health.
  4. Describe three subspecialties within epidemiology. Refer to the “Subspecialties in Epidemiology” resource, as needed for assistance.

You are required to cite to a minimum of three sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and public health content.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Attachments

PUB-540-RS1-Subspecialties in Epidemiolog

 

Subspecialties in Epidemiology

  • Environmental epidemiology
  • Clinical epidemiology
  • Genetic epidemiology
  • Molecular epidemiology
  • Nutritional epidemiology
  • Social epidemiology
  • Lifecourse epidemiology
  • Epi methods development / Biostatistics
  • Meta-analysis
  • Spatial epidemiology
  • Biomarker epidemiology
  • Pharmacoepidemiology
  • Primary care epidemiology
  • Infection control and hospital epidemiology
  • Public health practice epidemiology
  • Surveillance epidemiology
  • Disease informatics
  • Infectious disease epidemiology
  • Cardiovascular disease epidemiology
  • Cancer epidemiology
  • Neuroepidemiology
  • Epidemiology of aging
  • Oral/Dental epidemiology
  • Reproductive epidemiology
  • Obesity/Diabetes epidemiology
  • Renal epidemiology
  • Injury epidemiology
  • Psychiatric epidemiology
  • Veterinary epidemiology
  • Epidemiology of zoonosis
  • Respiratory epidemiology
  • Pediatric epidemiology
PUB 540 History, Principles, and Application of Epidemiology IN
PUB 540 History, Principles, and Application of Epidemiology IN

PUB 540 History, Principles, and Application of Epidemiology IN Rubric Criteria

Total125 points

Criterion 1. Unsatisfactory 2. Insufficient 3. Approaching 4. Acceptable 5. Target
Format/Documentation

Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.

 0 points

Appropriate format is not used. No documentation of sources is provided.

 4.63 points

Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors in documentation of sources are evident.

 4.94 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious errors.

 5.44 points

Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.

 6.25 points

No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated.
Evidence

Selects and integrates evidence to support and advance position/purpose; considers other perspectives.

 0 points

Evidence to support the thesis, position, or purpose is absent. The writing relies entirely on the perspective of the writer.

 4.63 points

Evidence is used but is insufficient or of limited relevance. Simplistic explanation or integration of other perspectives is present.

 4.94 points

Relevant evidence that includes other perspectives is used.

 5.44 points

Specific and appropriate evidence is included. Other perspectives are integrated.

 6.25 points

Comprehensive and compelling evidence is included. Multiple other perspectives are integrated effectively.
Subspecialties in Epidemiology

Subspecialties in Epidemiology

 0 points

Three subspecialties in epidemiology are omitted.

 9.25 points

Three subspecialties in epidemiology are presented but are incomplete or contain major inaccuracies.

 9.88 points

Three subspecialties in epidemiology are summarized. There are some inaccuracies or minor omissions.

 10.88 points

Three subspecialties in epidemiology are described. Some detail is needed for accuracy or clarity.

 12.5 points

Three subspecialties in epidemiology are clearly and accurately described.
Thesis, Position, or Purpose

Communicates reason for writing and demonstrates awareness of audience.

 0 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is not discernible. No awareness of the appropriate audience is evident.

 6.48 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is discernable in most aspects but is occasionally weak or unclear. There is limited awareness of the appropriate audience.

 6.91 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is adequately developed. An awareness of the appropriate audience is demonstrated.

 7.61 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is clearly communicated throughout and clearly directed to a specific audience.

 8.75 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is persuasively developed throughout and skillfully directed to a specific audience.
Disease, Event, and Descriptive Epidemiology

Disease, Event, and Descriptive Epidemiology

 0 points

A description of the disease, event, or major contribution from the individual selected, including application of descriptive epidemiology, is omitted.

 27.75 points

A description of the disease, event, or major contribution from the individual selected, including application of descriptive epidemiology, is incomplete.

 29.63 points

The disease and event or major contribution from the individual selected are summarized. Descriptive epidemiology is generally used to discuss the commonality of disease for the time, who was infected, when it occurred, and mode of transmission. There are some inaccuracies or minor omissions. Some support is needed.

 32.63 points

The disease and event or major contribution from the individual selected are discussed. Descriptive epidemiology is used to discuss commonality of disease for the time, who was infected, when it occurred, and mode of transmission. Applicable individuals or a significant disease for the period are discussed. Some detail is needed for accuracy or clarity. Adequate support is provided.

 37.5 points

The disease and event or major contribution from the individual selected are detailed. Descriptive epidemiology is used to thoroughly discuss commonality of disease for the time, who was infected, when it occurred, and mode of transmission. Applicable individuals or a significant disease for the period are discussed. The narrative is well developed, and strong support is provided.
Mechanics of Writing

Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.

 0 points

Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout.

 4.63 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent.

 4.94 points

Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.

 5.44 points

Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used.

 6.25 points

No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout.
Definition of Epidemiology and Significance to Public Health

Definition of Epidemiology and Significance to Public Health

 0 points

Definition of epidemiology and significance to public health is omitted.

 13.88 points

Definition of epidemiology and significance to public health is incomplete.

 14.81 points

Definition of epidemiology and significance to public health is summarized. There are some inaccuracies or minor omissions.

 16.31 points

An adequate definition of epidemiology is presented and its purpose and importance to public health are discussed. Some detail is needed for accuracy or clarity.

 18.75 points

An accurate definition of epidemiology is presented and its purpose and importance to public health are clearly discussed.
Development, Structure, and Conclusion

Advances position or purpose throughout writing; conclusion aligns to and evolves from development.

 0 points

No advancement of the thesis, position, or purpose is evident. Connections between paragraphs are missing or inappropriate. No conclusion is offered.

 7.4 points

Limited advancement of thesis, position, or purpose is discernable. There are inconsistencies in organization or the relationship of ideas. Conclusion is simplistic and not fully aligned to the development of the purpose.

 7.9 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is advanced in most aspects. Ideas clearly build on each other. Conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

 8.7 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is logically advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A clear and plausible conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.

 10 points

The thesis, position, or purpose is coherently and cohesively advanced throughout. The progression of ideas is coherent and unified. A convincing and unambiguous conclusion aligns to the development of the purpose.
Influence of Individual or Advanced Epidemiological Method

Influence of Individual or Advanced Epidemiological Method

 0 points

An explanation for how the individual influenced epidemiology and the advanced methods and process used to describe and control disease is omitted.

 13.88 points

An explanation for how the individual influenced epidemiology and the advanced methods and process used to describe and control disease is incomplete.

 14.81 points

A general explanation for how the individual influenced epidemiology is presented. The advanced methods and the process used to describe and control disease are summarized. There are some inaccuracies or minor omissions. Some support is needed.

 16.31 points

An explanation for how the individual influenced epidemiology is presented. The advanced methods and the process used to describe and control disease are discussed. Some detail is needed for accuracy or clarity. Adequate support is provided.

 18.75 points

A clear explanation for how the individual influenced epidemiology is presented. The advanced methods and the process used to describe and control disease are thoroughly discussed. The narrative is well-supported.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: PUB 540 History, Principles, and Application of Epidemiology IN

PUB 540 History, Principles, and Application of Epidemiology IN Grading Rubric

Performance Category 100% or highest level of performance

100%

16 points

 Very good or high level of performance

88%

14 points

 Acceptable level of performance

81%

13 points

 Inadequate demonstration of expectations

68%

11 points

 Deficient level of performance

56%

9 points

 

 Failing level

of performance

55% or less

0 points
 Total Points Possible= 50           16 Points    14 Points 13 Points        11 Points           9 Points          0 Points
Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics.

 Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
 Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
 Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
  

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
  

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
 Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information
 16 Points  14 Points  13 Points 11 Points 9 Points  0 Points
Application of Course Knowledge

Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

 Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
 Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
 Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
 Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from and scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
 Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
 Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information and scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
   10 Points 9 Points  6 Points  0 Points
Interactive Dialogue

Initial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count)

The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count)

Responses are substantive and relate to the topic.

 Demonstrated all of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
 Demonstrated 3 of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
 Demonstrated 2 of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
 Demonstrated 1 or less of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
  8 Points 7 Points  6 Points         5 Points          4 Points  0 Points
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error.

 The following was present:

  • 0-3 errors in APA format

AND

  • Responses have 0-3 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND

  • Writing style is generally clear, focused on topic,and facilitates communication.
 The following was present:

  • 4-6 errors in APA format.

AND/OR

  • Responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is somewhat focused on topic.
 The following was present:

  • 7-9 errors in APA format.

AND/OR

  • Responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is slightly focused on topic making discussion difficult to understand.
  

The following was present:

  • 10- 12 errors in APA format

AND/OR

  • Responses have 8-9 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.
  

The following was present:

  • 13 – 15 errors in APA format

AND/OR

  • Responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.

AND/OR

  • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor.
 The following was present:

  • 16 to greater errors in APA format.

AND/OR

  • Responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors.

AND/OR

  • Writing style does not facilitate communication
  0 Points Deducted 5 Points Lost
Participation

Requirements

Demonstrated the following:

  • Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days
 Failed to demonstrate the following:

  • Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days
  0 Points Lost 5 Points Lost
Due Date Requirements Demonstrated all of the following:

  • The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.

A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.

Demonstrates one or less of the following.

  • The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.

A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.

Read Also:  PUB 540 Calculating Odds Ratio