PM 3000 Unit 3 Assignment: Project Budget and Schedule
PM 3000 Unit 3 Assignment: Project Budget and Schedule
Project Budget and Schedule
Instructions
In this assignment, you use Microsoft Project to create a Project Budget and a Project Schedule. You first develop your Project Schedule. Then, you include the budget for all the project-related costs. Include tasks for a minimum of five phases in your Project Schedule, with at least three levels of tasks beneath each of the phases.
Complete the following steps for this assignment:
Create your Project Schedule in Microsoft Project. Include tasks, durations, dependencies, resources, and a Gantt chart.
Develop a Budget in Microsoft Project or Microsoft Excel that includes the cost for each task, as well as subtotals for each of the five phases and a total cost.
PM 3000 Unit 3 Assignment: Project Budget and Schedule
Add references to your project budget and schedule, in the Project Plan Template.
Submit your final Project Plan, including your budget and schedule.
Portfolio Prompt: You are required to save this learning activity to your e Portfolio.
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: PM 3000 Unit 3 Assignment: Project Budget and Schedule
Additional Requirements
Written communication: Ensure written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.
Length: Use the Project Plan Template.
Font and font size: Use Times New Roman, 12-point font.
Submission: Submit your final Project Plan with all sections completed.
Using MS Project or other software, develop a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) based on your selected business or IT project.
WBS should include, at a minimum, four levels.
Use Kaltura to present the PowerPoint and submit a video presentation. Refer to Using Kaltura for directions on recording and/or uploading your presentation in the courseroom.
Note: If you require the use of assistive technology or alternative communication methods to participate in these activities, please contact DisabilityServices@Capella.edu to request accommodations.
Grading Rubric
Performance Category |
100% or highest level of performance
100%
16 points |
Very good or high level of performance
88%
14 points |
Acceptable level of performance
81%
13 points |
Inadequate demonstration of expectations
68%
11 points |
Deficient level of performance
56%
9 points
|
Failing level
of performance
55% or less
0 points |
Total Points Possible= 50 |
16 Points |
14 Points |
13 Points |
11 Points |
9 Points |
0 Points |
Scholarliness
Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics. |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
- Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
- Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
- Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
- Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
|
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
- Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
- Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
- Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
- Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
|
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:
- Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
- Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
- Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
- Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:
- Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
- Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
- Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
- Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:
- Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
- Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
- Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
- Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements
- Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
- Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
- Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
- Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information
|
|
16 Points |
14 Points |
13 Points |
11 Points |
9 Points |
0 Points |
Application of Course Knowledge
Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
- Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
- Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
- Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
|
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
- Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
- Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
- Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
|
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:
- Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
- Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
- Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:
- Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
- Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from and scholarly resources to a professional experience.
- Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:
- Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
- Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
- Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements
- Applies principles, knowledge and information and scholarly resources to the required topic.
- Applies facts, principles or concepts learned scholarly resources to a professional experience.
- Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
|
|
10 Points |
9 Points |
|
|
6 Points |
0 Points |
Interactive Dialogue
Initial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count)
The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count)
Responses are substantive and relate to the topic. |
Demonstrated all of the following:
- Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
- The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
- Responses are substantive
- Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
|
Demonstrated 3 of the following:
- Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
- The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
- Responses are substantive
- Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
|
|
|
Demonstrated 2 of the following:
- Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
- The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
- Responses are substantive
- Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
|
Demonstrated 1 or less of the following:
- Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
- The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
- Responses are substantive
- Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
|
|
8 Points |
7 Points |
6 Points |
5 Points |
4 Points |
0 Points |
Grammar, Syntax, APA
Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.
The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition
Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error. |
The following was present:
AND
- Responses have 0-3 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors
AND
- Writing style is generally clear, focused on topic,and facilitates communication.
|
The following was present:
- 4-6 errors in APA format.
AND/OR
- Responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors
AND/OR
- Writing style is somewhat focused on topic.
|
The following was present:
- 7-9 errors in APA format.
AND/OR
- Responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors
AND/OR
- Writing style is slightly focused on topic making discussion difficult to understand.
|
The following was present:
- 10- 12 errors in APA format
AND/OR
- Responses have 8-9 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors
AND/OR
- Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.
|
The following was present:
- 13 – 15 errors in APA format
AND/OR
- Responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors
AND/OR
- Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.
AND/OR
- The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor.
|
The following was present:
- 16 to greater errors in APA format.
AND/OR
- Responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors.
AND/OR
- Writing style does not facilitate communication
|
|
0 Points Deducted |
|
|
|
|
5 Points Lost |
Participation
Requirements |
Demonstrated the following:
- Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days
|
|
|
|
|
Failed to demonstrate the following:
- Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days
|
|
0 Points Lost |
|
|
|
|
5 Points Lost |
Due Date Requirements |
Demonstrated all of the following:
- The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.
A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT. |
|
|
|
|
Demonstrates one or less of the following.
- The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.
A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT. |