PHE-327 Res and Asses- Public Health
PHE-327 Res and Asses- Public Health
PHE 327 Milestone One Chart Activity Chart Template Complete the column at right with the required information. Research Question: Propose a research question for a health issue where you have identified a gap in the existing scientific literature. Source: Cite at least one article you have found that addresses your selected public health issue. What is the significance of this data? Relevance/Goals: How is this article relevant to your final project research? That is, what are some broader goals you hope to accomplish by proposing further research? PHE 327 Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric Overview: For this first milestone, due in Module One, you will complete a chart identifying a public health issue that you plan to address for your final project. You will propose a research question to guide your research on your selected public health issue, cite at least one article you have found that addresses your selected public health issue, and briefly explain how this article is relevant to your final project research. Prompt: Review Chapters 1 and 2 in your textbook, as well as your response to the Module One journal activity. Consider a public health issue where a gap exists among a certain population, and complete the Milestone One Chart Activity document by addressing the following: Research Question: Propose a research question for a health issue where you have identified a gap in the existing scientific literature. Source: Cite at least one article you have found that addresses your selected public health issue. What is the significance of this data? Relevance/Goals: How is this article relevant to your final project research? That is, what are some broader goals you hope to accomplish by proposing further research? Be sure to briefly discuss any potential relevance your proposed research question has to you personally. Also, think about which public health organization you might turn to for help with funding the research. You will be considering these organizations more fully in Module Two. Incorporate instructor feedback on this milestone into your final project submission. Rubric Guidelines for Submission: Complete the Milestone One Chart Activity document and submit it to your instructor for feedback. Note: You must score “Evident” on every critical element to earn your points. See the feedback provided by your instructor. You should revise and resubmit the milestone after receiving feedback from your instructor. You have unlimited attempts to correct and resubmit your work until you have scored “Evident” on each critical element. Critical Elements Research Question Evident (100%) Proposes a research question for a health issue where a gap in the existing scientific literature has been identified Source Cites at least one article that addresses the selected public health issue and describes the significance of the data Describes how the article is relevant to the final project research and outlines the broader goals that will be accomplished by proposing further research Relevance/Goals Not Evident (0%) Does not propose a research question for a health issue where a gap in the existing scientific literature has been identified Does not cite at least one article that addresses the selected public health issue Value 30 Does not describe how the article is relevant to the final project research or outline the broader goals that will be accomplished by proposing further research 30 30 Articulation of Response Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy to read format Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas Total 10 100%
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||
| Main Postinga | 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
Supported by at least three current, credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.
Supported by at least three credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s).
One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.
Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Post is cited with two credible sources.
Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Contains some APA formatting errors. |
0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.
Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.
Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Contains only one or no credible sources.
Not written clearly or concisely.
Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
|
| Main Post: Timeliness | 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Posts main post by day 3. |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not post by day 3. |
|
| First Response | 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
15 (15%) – 16 (16%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
13 (13%) – 14 (14%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 12 (12%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited. |
|
| Second Response | 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 11 (11%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited. |
|
| Participation | 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days. |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days. |
|
| Total Points: 100 | |||||