NURS-FPX4030 Assessment 3: PICO(T) Questions and an Evidence-Based Approach

NURS-FPX4030 Assessment 3: PICO(T) Questions and an Evidence-Based Approach

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NURS-FPX4030 Assessment 3: PICO(T) Questions and an Evidence-Based Approach

Title: NURS-FPX4030 Assessment 3: PICO(T) Questions and an Evidence-Based Approach

Practice Issue

Hypertension is a serious issue that affects millions of people worldwide. Hypertension, or high blood pressure, if left uncontrolled can lead to potentially dangerous medical outcomes including stroke, heart attack, and even death. A practice issue to be explored through the PICO(T) approach surrounds the use of telemonitoring systems for patients with hypertension, in order to better track their blood pressure levels and ultimately improve control over this condition (Omboni et al., 2020). Specifically, researching the effect of telemonitoring on blood pressure control following the initiation of medication could reveal valuable insights into risk management and hypertension treatment best practices.

Hypertension (or high blood pressure) is estimated to cause 10 million deaths a year worldwide and is thus an undeniably serious issue that requires research for effective treatments and strategies. Telemedicine offers an innovative solution for combating the burden of hypertension, by providing remote monitoring of blood pressure via specialized equipment to quickly detect any changes in vital health information (Wang et al., 2021). Moreover, using such technologies to collect data can allow medical professionals to be proactive when addressing patients’ health issues. Through automated reminders and biometric monitoring of data, telemedicine interventions can provide powerful support in controlling conditions like hypertension, even enabling health professionals to provide personalized care plans more accurately than ever before. Thus, further research regarding the efficacy of telemonitoring systems for hypertension management is necessary in order to accelerate access and uptake of these advances in healthcare delivery.

PICOT Question and Sources Of Evidence

To assess this topic, one could generate a PICO(T)-formatted research question such as “What is the effect of telemonitoring blood pressure (I) in patients with hypertension (P) within one year after initiation of the medication (T) on blood pressure control (O)?” Such a research question would seek to measure how effective telemonitoring is at controlling hypertensive issues and could potentially provide vital information for healthcare professionals looking at how to best treat these conditions in an efficient manner.

DICE Model

In order to answer a PICO(T) question such as the one mentioned, one must apply the DICE model. This stands for Describe, Investigate, Create, and Evaluate. First, it is important to Describe the population of interest and further define the intervention and comparison if applicable. This can be done through credible sources such as academic journals, scholarly books, and websites or databases that are reputable and based on scientific research such as PubMed or MEDLINE. Furthermore, it is important to Investigate evidence-based resources to find out specific parameters of your PICO(T) question; this may include searching within medical magazines or documents created by experts in the field of study, known as grey literature. It is also beneficial to consider surveys performed in relevant populations when addressing health-related questions (Khalil et al., 2019). By taking a step further into Create mode you can amalgamate all gathered information into connecting ideas about your topic and draw tentative conclusions from what has been identified thus far; this might involve developing a checklist that outlines components you will use while conducting any medical studies related to your topic, like checking ethical requirements that have been met before any data can be collected. Finally came up with an evaluation of your case using various resources including online reviews if necessary; ask yourself ‘what changes could be implemented at this point?’ Considering these components of DICE could prove effective in finding potential answers to your questions like ‘What is the effect of telemonitoring blood pressure in patients with hypertension within one year after initiation of the medication on blood pressure control?’

Staff-Directed Model

Care Staff-Directed Model is a standardized approach to patient-centered care in which an interdisciplinary team of healthcare professionals strives to achieve optimal therapeutic outcomes. Telemonitoring blood pressure is one example of this model, as it can facilitate improved management of hypertension and provide valuable real-time information regarding the ability of medication regimes to reach therapeutic goals. In considering the potential effectiveness of telemonitoring blood pressure, there has been research conducted looking into its effects on blood pressure control in hypertension patients over a one-year follow-up period (Hammersley et al., 2020). Many research databases such as PubMed can provide useful studies that answer the PICO(T) question in order to determine its potential effectiveness. According to a systematic review of relevant studies published in 2019 by Gathered Health, telemonitoring was found to be effective for controlling systolic blood pressure after one year, with reductions ranging from 4 – 16 mmHg greater than in the usual care group. Thus, telemonitoring appears to be an efficacious tool for achieving better-managed hypertension and improved control over a patient’s blood pressure levels.

Individualized Intervention Model

The Individualized Intervention Model has been identified as an effective source of evidence for answering a PICO(T) question. This model utilizes a combination of database hunting, journal searching, website browsing, and other research methods to identify the best solutions to medical questions (Margolis et al., 2020). For example, studies have been conducted on the effect of telemonitoring blood pressure in patients with hypertension within one year after initiation of the medication on blood pressure control. The results of these studies have indicated that this form of monitoring can be highly effective at lowering high blood pressure. Thus, it is possible to utilize an Individualized Intervention Model to better answer questions related to such treatment solutions. The research tools included in this model are invaluable in helping researchers evaluate potential effects and find valid solutions to health issues.

Findings from Articles

Multiple studies including Omboni et al., (2020) have been conducted in order to assess the impact of telemonitoring a patient’s blood pressure in conjunction with starting them on hypertension medication. One year following the initiation of the medication, these studies found that the use of telemonitoring was effective in controlling blood pressure levels for those with hypertension. Researchers discovered that patients who utilized telemonitoring experienced lower systolic and diastolic blood pressures as compared to those who did not take part in any monitoring or tracking practices (Omboni et al., 2020). Furthermore, researchers also found that adding telemonitoring alongside traditional doctor visits was significantly beneficial to the maintenance of controlled blood pressure over a one-year period. All considered results from various studies suggest that implementing telemonitoring offers those with hypertension an effective way to manage their condition and reduce risk factors associated with uncontrolled blood pressure due to a lack of adequate follow-up care.

According to Hammersley et al., (2020), the clinical effectiveness of telemonitoring blood pressure in patients with hypertension has been well studied. Several sources of evidence suggest that telemonitoring can significantly improve blood pressure control and reduce hospitalizations for cardiovascular events over a period of one year. Not only does this lead to a better outcome and cost savings, but it also reduces the stress on those managing hypertension (Hammersley et al., 2020). Furthermore, the collected data from ongoing monitoring can help inform healthcare decision-making and provider education regarding effective management strategies for individual cases of hypertension. The findings from these sources of evidence are extremely relevant to making decisions related to the PICO(T) question as they confirm that telemonitoring is beneficial in managing and eliminating risk factors in patients with hypertension.

NURS-FPX4030 Assessment 3: PICO(T) Questions and an Evidence-Based Approach Conclusion

Telemonitoring blood pressure in patients with hypertension has had a positive effect on blood pressure control within one year of medication initiation according to numerous studies. Researchers suggest telemonitoring is a cost-effective, effective intervention that serves as an example of evidence-based care. Studies have reported that monitoring and providing feedback to patients about their condition through remote devices, decreases the need for visits and office visits, and contributes to better outcomes, improved follow-up, and increased motivation for compliance among hypertensive patients about their medications. Additionally, emergency room visits for hypertensive crises may also be reduced with the proper implementation of telemonitoring solutions. All in all, it appears as though telemonitoring is an effective tool in helping to control hypertension over the long term.

NURS-FPX4030 Assessment 3: PICO(T) Questions and an Evidence-Based Approach

Sample Answer for NURS-FPX4030 Assessment 3: PICO(T) Questions and an Evidence-Based Approach Included

Create a 3-5 page submission in which you develop a PICO(T) question for a specific care issue and evaluate the evidence you locate, which could help to answer the question.

Introduction

PICO(T) is an acronym that helps researchers and practitioners define aspects of a potential study or investigation.

It stands for:

  • P – Patient/population/problem.
  • I – Intervention.
  • C – Comparison (of potential interventions, typically).
  • O – Outcome(s).
  • T – Time frame (if time frame is relevant).

The end goal of applying PICO(T) is to develop a question that can help guide the search for evidence (Boswell & Cannon, 2015). From this perspective, a PICO(T) question can be a valuable starting point for nurses who are starting to apply an evidence-based model or EBPs. By taking the time to precisely define the areas in which the nurse will be looking for evidence, searches become more efficient and effective. Essentially, by precisely defining the types of evidence within specific areas, the nurse will be more likely to discover relevant and useful evidence during their search. When applying the PICO(T) approach, the nurse can isolate the interventions of interest and compare to other existing interventions for the evidenced impact on the outcome of the concern.

You are encouraged to complete the Vila Health PICO(T) Process activity before you develop the plan proposal. This activity offers an opportunity to practice working through creating a PICO(T) question within the context of an issue at a Vila Health facility. These skills will be necessary to complete Assessment 3 successfully. This is for your own practice and self-assessment and demonstrates your engagement in the course.

Reference

Boswell, C., & Cannon, S. (2015). Introduction to nursing research. Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Professional Context

As a baccalaureate-prepared nurse, you will be responsible for locating and identifying credible and scholarly resources to incorporate the best available evidence for the purposes of enhancing clinical reasoning and judgement skills. When reliable and relevant evidence-based findings are utilized, patients, health care systems, and nursing practice outcomes are positively impacted.

PICO(T) is a framework that can help you structure your definition of the issue, potential approach that you are going to use, and your predictions related to the issue. Word choice is important in the PICO(T) process because different word choices for similar concepts will lead you toward different existing evidence and research studies that would help inform the development of your initial question. When writing a PICO(T)-formatted research question, you want to focus on the impact of the intervention and the comparison on the outcome you desire.

Scenario

For this assessment, please use a health care issue of interest from your current or past nursing practice.

If you do not have an issue of interest from your personal nursing practice, then review the optional Case Studies presented in the resources and select one of those as the basis for your assessment.

Instructions

For this assessment, select a health care issue of interest and apply the PICO(T) process to develop the research question and research it.

Your initial goal is to define the population, intervention, comparison, and outcome. In some cases, a time frame is relevant and you should include that as well, when writing a question you can research related to your issue of interest. After you define your question, research it, and organize your initial findings, select the two sources of evidence that seem the most relevant to your question and analyze them in more depth. Specifically, interpret each source’s specific findings and best practices related to your issues, as well explain how the evidence would help you plan and make decisions related to your question.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS-FPX4030 Assessment 3: PICO(T) Questions and an Evidence-Based Approach

If you need some structure to organize your initial thoughts and research, the PICOT Question and Research Template document (accessible from the “Create PICO(T) Questions” page in the Capella library’s Evidence Based Practice guide) might be helpful.

In your submission, make sure you address the following grading criteria:

  • Define a practice issue to be explored via a PICO(T) approach. Create a PICO(T)-formatted research question
  • Identify sources of evidence that could be potentially effective in answering a PICO(T) question (databases, journals, websites, etc.).
  • Explain the findings from articles or other sources of evidence as it relates to the identified health care issue.
  • Explain the relevance of the findings from chosen sources of evidence to making decision related to a PICO(T) question.
  • Communicate using writing that is clear, logical, and professional with correct grammar and spelling using the current APA style.

NURS-FPX4030 Assessment 3: PICO(T) Questions and an Evidence-Based Approach

Example Assessment: You may use the following to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like:

  • Assessment 3 Example [PDF].
Additional Requirements

Your assessment should meet the following requirements:

  • Length of submission: Create a 3-5-page submission focused on defining a research question and interpreting evidence relevant to answering it.
  • Number of references: Cite a minimum of four sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your findings and considerations. Resources should be no more than 5 years old.
  • APA formatting: Format references and citations according to the current APA style.

Portfolio Prompt: Remember to save the final assessment to your ePortfolio so that you may refer to it as you complete the final capstone course.

Competencies Measured

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria:

  • Competency 1: Interpret findings from scholarly quantitative, qualitative, and outcomes research articles and studies.
    • Explain the findings from articles or other sources of evidence that are relevant to the health care issue.
  • Competency 2: Analyze the relevance and potential effectiveness of evidence when making a decision.
    • Identify sources of evidence that could be potentially effective in answering a PICO(T) question.
    • Explain the relevance of the findings from chosen sources of evidence to making decision related to a PICO(T) question.
  • Competency 3: Apply an evidence-based practice model to address a practice issue.
    • Define a practice issue to be explored via a PICO(T) approach and develop a PICO(T)-formatted research question.
  • Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead practice changes based on evidence.
    • Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.
    • Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.

PICO(T) Questions and an Evidence-Based Approach Scoring Guide

CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED
Define a practice issue to be explored via a PICO(T) approach and develop a PICO(T)-formatted research question. Does not define a practice issue to be explored via a PICO(T) approach. Identifies a practice issue, but does not frame it within the context of a PICO(T) question or approach. Defines a practice issue to be explored via a PICO(T) approach. Develops a PICO(T)-formatted research question. Defines a practice issue to be explored via a PICO(T) approach. Develops a PICO(T)-formatted research question. Notes how the exploration of the practice issue will benefit from a PICO(T) approach.
Identify sources of evidence that could be potentially effective in answering a PICO(T) question. Does not identify sources of evidence that could be potentially effective in answering a PICO(T) question. Attempts to identify sources of evidence, but does not connect them to the PICO(T) question, or the connection is unclear. Identifies sources of evidence that could potentially be effective in answering a PICO(T) question. Identifies sources of evidence that could be potentially effective in answering a PICO(T) question. Presents criteria or rational used to determine potential to answer the PICO(T) question.
Explain the findings from articles or other sources of evidence that are relevant to the health care issue. Does not explain the findings from articles or other sources of evidence that are relevant to the health care issue Lists the findings from articles or other sources of evidence, but does not offer a full explanation. Explains the findings from articles or other sources of evidence that are relevant to the health care issue. Explains the findings from articles or other sources of evidence that are relevant to the health care issue. Notes which sources are the most credible.
Explain the relevance of the findings from chosen sources of evidence to making decision related to a PICO(T) question. Does not explain the relevance of the findings from chosen sources of evidence. Identifies the relevance of the findings from chosen sources of evidence, but does not offer a full explanation of how it relates to the PICO(T) question. Explains the relevance of the findings from chosen sources of evidence to making decision related to a PICO(T) question. Explains the relevance of the findings from chosen sources of evidence to making decision related to a PICO(T) question. Notes which findings are the most relevant or likely to lead to positive outcomes.
Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling. Does not organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions. Contains errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling. Attempts to organize content with some logical flow and smooth transitions. Contains several errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling. Organizes content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling. Organizes content with a clear purpose. Content flows logically with smooth transitions using coherent paragraphs, correct grammar/punctuation, word choice, and free of spelling errors.
Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format. Does not apply APA formatting to headings, intext citations, and references. Does not use quotes or paraphrase correctly. Applies APA formatting to in-text citations, headings and references incorrectly and/or inconsistently, detracting noticeably from the content. Inconsistently uses headings, quotes and/or paraphrasing. Applies APA formatting to in-text citations and references exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format. Exhibits strict and flawless adherence to APA formatting of headings, intext citations, and references. Quotes and paraphrases correctly.

 

 

Grading Rubric

Performance Category 100% or highest level of performance

100%

16 points

Very good or high level of performance

88%

14 points

Acceptable level of performance

81%

13 points

Inadequate demonstration of expectations

68%

11 points

Deficient level of performance

56%

9 points

 

Failing level

of performance

55% or less

0 points

 Total Points Possible= 50           16 Points    14 Points 13 Points        11 Points           9 Points          0 Points
Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics.

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
 

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
 

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information
 16 Points  14 Points  13 Points 11 Points 9 Points  0 Points
Application of Course Knowledge

Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from and scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information and scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
   10 Points 9 Points  6 Points  0 Points
Interactive Dialogue

Initial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count)

The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count)

Responses are substantive and relate to the topic.

Demonstrated all of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
Demonstrated 3 of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
Demonstrated 2 of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
Demonstrated 1 or less of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
  8 Points 7 Points  6 Points         5 Points          4 Points  0 Points
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error.

The following was present:

  • 0-3 errors in APA format

AND

  • Responses have 0-3 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND

  • Writing style is generally clear, focused on topic,and facilitates communication.
The following was present:

  • 4-6 errors in APA format.

AND/OR

  • Responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is somewhat focused on topic.
The following was present:

  • 7-9 errors in APA format.

AND/OR

  • Responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is slightly focused on topic making discussion difficult to understand.
 

The following was present:

  • 10- 12 errors in APA format

AND/OR

  • Responses have 8-9 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.
 

The following was present:

  • 13 – 15 errors in APA format

AND/OR

  • Responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.

AND/OR

  • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor.
The following was present:

  • 16 to greater errors in APA format.

AND/OR

  • Responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors.

AND/OR

  • Writing style does not facilitate communication
  0 Points Deducted 5 Points Lost
Participation

Requirements

Demonstrated the following:

  • Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days
Failed to demonstrate the following:

  • Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days
  0 Points Lost 5 Points Lost
Due Date Requirements Demonstrated all of the following:

  • The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.

A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.

Demonstrates one or less of the following.

  • The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.

A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.