Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

NURS 8201 Week 9 Discussion Using Qualitative Research to Inform Evidence-Based Practice ANSWERS

NURS 8201 Week 9 Discussion Using Qualitative Research to Inform Evidence-Based Practice ANSWERS

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 8201 Week 9 Discussion Using Qualitative Research to Inform Evidence-Based Practice ANSWERS

Week 9: Qualitative Methods

What is the lived experience of nurses working in healthcare during the year 2020?

What is the experience of patients when nurses utilize evidence-based practice (EBP)?

The above questions are examples of qualitative research questions. Qualitative studies allow for a broader, more complex study of individuals and factors, than that of quantitative studies. These studies provide a depth to the research beyond the data provided in quantitative research.

For example, consider the use of quantitative data in the study of end-of-life care. While quantitative data may certainly provide important data concerning patients, facilities, and caregivers, the data would certainly be missing the complexity of the human experience that qualitative research could offer through interviewing those in the experience.

This week, you will begin your analysis of qualitative research methods. You will consider how you might approach a qualitative study and evaluate the methods and considerations used in qualitative research. You will complete your CITI Program Training and will also continue working on your Article Critique Assignment.

Learning Objectives

Students will:

  • Formulate a research question for a qualitative research study
  • Analyze methods of qualitative research
  • Analyze ethical considerations for qualitative research questions
  • Complete human protection and ethics in research training program
  • Analyze strengths and weaknesses of research studies*
  • Analyze impact of research studies on nursing practice*
  • Recommend changes to study designs and methodologies to support research studies*

*Assigned in Week 7 of Module 3 and submitted in Week 10 of Module 4

Learning Resources

Required Readings (click to expand/reduce)

 

Gray, J. R., & Grove, S. K. (2020). Burns and Grove’s the practice of nursing research: Appraisal, synthesis, and generation of evidence (9th ed.). Elsevier.

  • Chapter 4, “Introduction to Qualitative Research” (pp. 46–74)
  • Chapter 12, “Qualitative Research Methods” (pp. 314–357)

Cypress, B. S. (2019). Qualitative research: Challenges and dilemmas. Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing, 38(5), 264–270. doi:10.1097/DCC.0000000000000374

Firnhaber, G. C., Roberson, D. W., & Kolasa, K. M. (2020). Nursing staff participation in end‐of‐life nutrition and hydration decision‐making in a nursing home: A qualitative study. Journal of Advanced Nursing76(11), 3059–3068. doi:10.1111/jan.14491

Recine, A. G., Recine, L., & Paldon, T. (2020). How people forgive: A systematic review of nurse-authored qualitative research. Journal of Holistic Nursing38(2), 233–251. doi:10.1177/0898010119828080

Document: CITI Program Learner Registration Guide (PDF)

 

Discussion: Using Qualitative Research to Inform Evidence-Based Practice

“Qualitative researchers are motivated to know more about a phenomenon, a social process, or a culture from the perspectives of the people who are experiencing the phenomenon, involved in the social process, or living in the culture (Gray & Grove, 2020).

Qualitative research requires extensive time commitment and dedication. While all research can be rigorous and time consuming, by nature, the qualitative researcher seeks to build connections and trust with participants, which adds an additional layer of dedication. However, before research can even begin, researchers must first develop a research question.

Photo Credit: Getty Images/iStockphoto

Qualitative research questions tend to be broader than quantitative research questions.  In a qualitative study, the researcher seeks to describe an experience or a phenomenon, so the questions are typically more global in scope. Additionally, many research questions describe and guide the research purpose, versus state it directly.  Oftentimes phrases such as, “lived experience, framework or theoretical development, society, culture, or narrative” are used to describe the purpose (Gray & Grove, 2020).

For this Discussion, reflect on an area of interest and develop your own qualitative research question. How might you approach this topic and purpose? What types of research methods and design might you employ to address your qualitative research question?

Reference: Gray, J. R., & Grove, S. K. (2020). Burns and Grove’s the practice of nursing research: Appraisal, synthesis, and generation of evidence (9th ed.). Elsevier.

To Prepare:

  • Review the Learning Resources for this week and reflect on qualitative research methods and designs.
  • Select a topic or issue in nursing practice to focus on for this Discussion.
  • Consider a qualitative research question that you might develop to address the topic or issue in nursing practice that you selected.
  • Reflect on how a qualitative research design might best support a research study to address your research question.

By Day 3 of Week 9

Post a qualitative research question in relation to your topic or issue of interest. Explain why a qualitative research design is best suited to support this research question. Then, describe potential ethical considerations you should keep in mind in relation to your qualitative research question. Be specific and provide examples.

By Day 6 of Week 9

Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses and respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days in one or more of the following ways:

  • Ask a probing question, substantiated with additional background information, evidence, or research.
  • Share an insight from having read your colleagues’ postings, synthesizing the information to provide new perspectives.
  • Offer and support an alternative perspective using readings from the classroom or from your own research in the Walden Library.
  • Validate an idea with your own experience and additional research.
  • Suggest an alternative perspective based on additional evidence drawn from readings or after synthesizing multiple postings.
  • Expand on your colleagues’ postings by providing additional insights or contrasting perspectives based on readings and evidence.

Submission and Grading Information

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 9 Discussion Rubric

 

Post by Day 3 of Week 9 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 9

To Participate in this Discussion:

Week 9 Discussion

 

Assignment 1: CITI Program Training

As a doctorally-prepared nurse, you may have opportunities to collaborate in research activities in your practice. The Collaborative Institutional Training Initiative (CITI Program) provides education on protection of human subjects. In the United States, the CITI Program is the training module that most research institutions use. Therefore, as a part of this course, you are required to successfully complete the CITI Program training by Day 7 of Week 9.

Photo Credit: Андрей Яланский / Adobe Stock

This online course may take up to 8 hours to complete. You will receive an electronic Certificate of Completion upon successfully passing the training. You will submit this Certificate of Completion to the Walden University Institutional Review Board office when you submit an application to conduct research.

To Prepare:

  • Follow the instructions on the CITI Program Learner Registration webpage to create your account (https://www.citiprogram.org/index.cfm?pageID=154&icat=0&clear=1).
    • Review the CITI Program Learner Registration Guide for step-by-step instructions on completing the registration process.
    • Be sure to select Walden University under the “Select Your Organization Affiliation” section. If you do not select Walden University, you will not be able to access the training at no cost.
  • Create and record your CITI Program User Name and Password for future reference.

To complete:

By Day 7 of Week 9

  • Complete the five required Citi Program training modules as well as the two elective modules.
  • Copy and paste the Certificate of Completion into a Word document and save the file as a “.doc” or “.rtf” file.

By Day 7

Submit your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 9.

Note: This Assignment must be completed by Day 7 of Week 9 in order for you to successfully complete this course.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

  • Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK9Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
  • Click the Week 9 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
  • Click the Week 9 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
  • Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK9Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
  • If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
  • Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 9 Assignment Rubric

 

Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

Submit your Week 9 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

 

Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 9

To participate in this Assignment:

Week 9 Assignment

 

Assignment 2: Article Critique

Continue to work on your article critique, assigned in Week 7 and due in Week 10. Continue evaluating your selected research article and developing the required sections of your paper.

You are not required to submit this Assignment this week. Your article critique is due by Day 7 of Week 10.

What’s Coming Up in Week 10?

Photo Credit: [BrianAJackson]/[iStock / Getty Images Plus]/Getty Images

Next week, you will continue your exploration of qualitative research. You will complete your Article Critique Assignment submission. You will also analyze and interpret the use of qualitative research methods and evaluate results derived from conducting qualitative research.

Next Week

To go to the next week:

Week 10

 

3 months ago

Abisola Alade 

RE: Discussion – Week 9

COLLAPSE

Top of Form

Week 9 post

 

Topic: Quality of life with participants with musculoskeletal diseases and chronic pain

Research Question: How does chronic pain in musculoskeletal diseases affect the quality of life?

Qualitative research is an erudite approach applied to elaborate on life experiences, traditions, and ways of life in the eyes of the participants included in the study. Qualitative researchers gain insights without measuring concepts or analyzing statistical relationships as they improve our comprehension of a phenomenon from the viewpoint of the people experiencing it (Gray, Grove, & Sutherland, 2017). This research topic aims to discover chronic pain and the encounters of patients with musculoskeletal disorders and their interpretation of quality of life. The methodology best suited for this qualitative research study is the phenomenology method. This methodology for this type of method is to depict experiences from the client’s viewpoint and lived experience.

An ethical issue that can arise in conducting this study is protecting the identity and privacy of the participants involved in the study. With this as a posing issue, it is imperative voluntarily for the participants to sign a protocol of informed consensus on the agreement to the further evaluation and potential publication of the results of the study ( Savvakis & Kolokouras, 2019)

A noted strength of the phenomenology method is its foundational approach in listening and evaluating all modes of communication to attain a more thorough understanding of experiences. A weakness of the phenomenology method is the difficulty in adequately analyzing and interpreting the research results and findings.

Another qualitative method applied to this research topic is grounded theory research. Grounded theory research is an inductive research technique with this method’s name. The findings are grounded in the concrete world experienced by participants and grounded in the actual data (Gray, Grove, & Sutherland, 2017). In terms of this research study, the symbolic interaction and perception seen in grounded theory research regarding a patient’s experience with chronic pain from a musculoskeletal disorder and the quality of life can be explored.

NURS 8201 Week 9 Discussion Using Qualitative Research to Inform Evidence-Based Practice ANSWERS

NURS 8201 Week 9 Discussion Using Qualitative Research to Inform Evidence-Based Practice ANSWERS

 

References

 

Gray, J.R., Grove, S.K., & Sutherland, S. (2017). Burn’s and Grove’s the practice of nursing research: Appraisal, synthesis, and generation of evidence (8th ed.), St. Louis, MO: Saunders Elsevier

Savvakis, M. & Kolokouras, N. (2019). Quality of Life and Chronic Pain: Coping Practices and Experiences of Patients with Musculoskeletal Diseases. International Journal of Caring Sciences. 12(3). 1423-1429.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 8201 Week 9 Discussion Using Qualitative Research to Inform Evidence-Based Practice ANSWERS

Grading Rubric Guidelines

Performance Category 10 9 8 4 0
Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.

  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions
  • Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion
  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation.
  • The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable
  • No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
Performance Category  10 9 8 4 0
Application of Course Knowledge –

Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources;
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.
  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources.
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content
  • Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson.
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson
  • Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post.
  • Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored
  • No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Performance Category  5 4 3 2 0
Interactive Dialogue

Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days.

(5 points possible per graded thread)

  • Exceeds minimum post requirements
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days.
  • Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer
  • Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days
  • Replies to a question posed by a peer

Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.

  • Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days.
  • The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline
  • Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty
  • Has only one post for the week
  • Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments
  • Does not post to the thread
  • No connections are made to the topic
  Minus 1 Point Minus 2 Point Minus 3 Point Minus 4 Point Minus 5 Point
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted.

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

  • 2-3 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.
  • 4-5 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is somewhat focused.
  • 6-7 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.
  • 8-10 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.
  • Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style does not facilitate communication.
  • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
0 points lost       -5 points lost
Total Participation Requirements

per discussion thread

The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day. The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days
Early Participation Requirement

per discussion thread

The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week. The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.

Check Out Also: NURS 8201 Week 9 Assignment 1 CITI Program Training  

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.