Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

NURS 8114 Week 6 Introduction to the Science of Translation II Essay

NURS 8114 Week 6 Introduction to the Science of Translation II Essay

“Change” as a word is somewhat abstract. The same could be said of the phrase “science of translation.”
But as you likely know from your nursing experience, change is not abstract for those working to make it
happen or those implementing—or adjusting to—a new protocol or procedure.
A significant part of your work in this module involves focusing on stakeholders in an EBP QI project. As
you have identified practice sites, you have identified staff members within each setting who would
have a say in the approval and a hand in the success of a quality improvement initiative. It is vital to
keep those professionals in your sights and to speak with language that will have meaning for them.
Consider in a health care setting where “quality improvement” is not formalized through an office or
department and how differences in approach and nuance may be required.
As you complete your module Assignment this week, pay particular attention to the presentation you
are preparing and how you are applying the science of translation to ensure your EBP QI aims and
outcomes are fully understood.
Learning Objectives
Students will:
 Compare health care settings for quality improvement projects
 Justify practice problems for quality improvement
 Analyze site and stakeholder requirements for quality improvement projects in nursing practice
 Compare stakeholder requirements for quality improvement projects across nursing practice
 Evaluate translation science frameworks and models for application to practice problems
 Apply implementation science frameworks/models for evidence-based practice quality
improvement projects

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 8114 Week 6 Introduction to the Science of Translation II Essay

Learning Resources

Required Readings (click to expand/reduce)

White, K. M., Dudley-Brown, S., & Terhaar, M. F. (Eds.). (2019). Translation of evidence into nursing and
healthcare (3rd ed.). Springer.
 Chapter 4, “Translation of Evidence to Improve Clinical Outcomes” (pp. 77–102)

Boehm, L. M., Stolldorf, D. P., & Jeffery, A. D. (2020). Implementation science training and resources for
nurses and nurse scientists. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 52(1), 47–54.

(Review from Weeks 4 and 5)

Dunagan, P. B. (2017). The quality improvement attitude survey: Development and      preliminary
psychometric characteristics. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 26(23–24), 5113–5120.

(Review from Weeks 4 and 5)

Hammersla, M., Belcher, A., Ruccio, L. R., Martin, J., & Bingham, D. (2021). Practice and quality
improvement leaders survey of expectations of DNP graduates’ quality improvement expertise. Nurse
Educator [Epub ahead of print]. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000001009

(Review from Weeks 4 and 5)

Jones-Schenk, J., & Bleich, M. R. (2019). Implementation science as a leadership and doctor of nursing
practice competency. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 50(11), 491–492.

(Review from Weeks 4 and 5)

Powell, B. J., Waltz, T. J., Chinman, M. J., Damschroder, L. J., Smith, J. L., Matthieu, M. M., Proctor, E. K.,
& Kirchner, J. E. (2015). A refined compilation of implementation strategies: Results from the Expert
Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project. Implementation Science, 10:21.

(Review from Weeks 4 and 5)

Rew, L., Cauvin, S., Cengiz, A., Pretorius, K., & Johnson, K. (2020). Application of project management
tools and techniques to support nursing intervention research. Nursing Outlook, 68(4), 396–405.

(Review from Weeks 4 and 5)

Shea, C. M., Jacobs, S. R., Esserman, D. A., Bruce, K., & Weiner, B. J. (2014).                Organizational
readiness for implementing change: A psychometric assessment of a new measure. Implementation
Science, 9(7), 1–15.

(Review from Weeks 4 and 5)

Document: Handout: Preparing for an EBP QI Presentation to Stakeholders at a Practice Site (Word
(Review from Weeks 4 and 5.)

Required Media (click to expand/reduce)

Walden University. (2021). DNP glossary [Interactive media]. Walden University
Blackboard. https://class.waldenu.edu

Module 3 Assignment: Exploring EBP Quality Improvement
Continue working on your Module 3 Assignment to complete this week. Keep in mind that the key
requirements are to identify a hypothetical practice problem as the focus of an evidence-based quality
improvement project; a hypothetical health care setting for the project based on investigating actual
sites; stakeholders for project approval and implementation within health care settings; and a

presentation outlining the basic steps of a specific framework/model for translating research and
evidence to improved practice.
Although “hypothetical” is the watchword for this Assignment, the substantial effort you have invested
and the information and insights obtained can pay real dividends as you begin your DNP project in

Photo Credit: [Steve Hix/Fuse]/[None]/Getty Images
The Assignment
Part 1: Key Project Elements
Complete your paper of 6–8 pages, plus cover page and references page, explaining your investigation
of three hypothetical practice sites for an EBP QI project.
Part 2: Implementation Science Presentation
Complete your PowerPoint presentation of 3–5 slides, plus cover and reference slides, to inform
hypothetical stakeholders.
Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction,
summary, and references. The Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an
example of those required elements (available
at https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates/general#s-lg-box-20293632). All
papers submitted must use this formatting.
By Day 7 of Week 6
Submit Parts 1 and 2 of your Assignment (Word document and PowerPoint document).
Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:
 Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “M3Assgn+last name+first
initial.(extension)” as the name.
 Click the Module 3 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
 Click the Module 3 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria
from this area.
 Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document
you saved as “M3Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
 If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my
paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
 Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:
Module 3 Assignment Rubric

Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:
Submit your Module 3 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 6

To participate in this Assignment:
Module 3 Assignment

What’s Coming Up in Module 4!

Photo Credit: [BrianAJackson]/[iStock / Getty Images Plus]/Getty Images
In the next module, you will take a deep dive into the components of evidence-based practice, with
attention to analyzing and synthesizing evidence to support a nursing practice. You will begin Week 7
with exploring how to identify the critical question in a practice issue that will produce the relevant
evidence you seek.
Module 4 Assignment: Literature Review
A literature review will be part of the Module 4 Assignment, which you will begin in Week 8. You will
find both required and optional Learning Resources in the Walden Library to help facilitate your search
and evaluation of scholarly sources. Reflect on your experiences and success to date with scholarly
searches in the library and look for additional guidance, as needed.

Next Module

To go to the next module:
Module 4

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.