NURS 8114 Discussion Translation Models and Frameworks

Sample Answer for NURS 8114 Discussion Translation Models and Frameworks Included After Question

Collaboration offers the advantage of other experiences and viewpoints to confirm or challenge your own. Discussions can do the same and for some topics, getting early feedback is especially valuable. This Discussion is one such example. As you dig into the science of translation and select a framework or model for your proposed EBP QI project, you can look to your class colleagues for a check on your choice and your reasoning.

Photo Credit: steheap / Adobe Stock

To prepare:

  • Review the Week 5 Learning Resources. Pay particular attention to the featured frameworks/models, below, in the White,Dudley-Brown, and Terhaar text.
  • Identify the translation science framework or model that is most relevant to your practice problem from among the following three models and consider your reasoning:
    • Roger’s Diffusion of Innovations (pp. 36–39);
    • Knowledge-to-Action (pp. 42–45);
    • Theory of Reasoned Action (pp. 66–67).
  • Assess your understanding of “translation science” and how you would explain it in the context of evidence-based practice and quality improvement.

With these thoughts in mind …

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 8114 Discussion Translation Models and Frameworks

NURS 8114 Discussion Translation Models and Frameworks
NURS 8114 Discussion Translation Models and Frameworks

By Day 3 of Week 5

Post an explanation of the translation science framework or model that you selected and explain why it is most relevant to your practice problem. Be specific and provide examples.

Read a selection of your colleagues’ posts.

By Day 6 of Week 5

Respond to at least two colleagues on 2 different days, with preference to colleagues who selected different translation science frameworks or models from the one you chose. Recommend another framework/model they might consider and/or clarify their explanation of translation science. Cite sources to support your posts.

Note: For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the “Post to Discussion Question” link and then select “Create Thread” to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and you cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Submit!

Submission and Grading Information

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 5 Discussion Rubric

 

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NURS 8114 Discussion Translation Models and Frameworks

Title:  NURS 8114 Discussion Translation Models and Frameworks

The Knowledge-to-Action (KTA) paradigm presented in Chapter 2 of “Translation of Evidence into Nursing and Healthcare” is the reasoning behind the proposed Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) Quality Improvement (QI) intervention. Knowledge development and the action cycle are prerequisites for this paradigm. This comprehensive technique is especially suited to healthcare translation research. Starting with integrating and consolidating information from various sources is the KTA framework (White et al. 2019). This fits in with the original idea of data-based Practice Quality Improvement (EBP QI), whose initial stages are to gather relevant data related to a practice problem (White et al. 2019). It focuses on tailoring information to the individual recipient and adapting evidence to healthcare realities.

The second step focuses on the action cycle, designed to select, adapt, apply, supervise and assess interventions. However, this dynamic strategy suits the nature of quality improvement, which is based on refinement and needs to be adjusted over time (White et al., 2019). The continuing evaluation emphasized in the KTA framework also meshes well with the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle, which is widely used in QI efforts (White et al. 2019). Besides such procedural aspects, there are also human elements. When Activating the KTA framework (White et al., 2019). This finding is particularly relevant to the practice problems associated with clinical practice changes brought about by those providing healthcare and organizational culture. All these difficult questions are part of the KTA paradigm and give us a comprehensive system for change, which raises the chances of long-term effectiveness. Evidence on how to treat pain effectively is compiled under the framework, considering patient demographics, available resources and staff capabilities (White et al. 2019). Further, it also helps structure and compliance while fitting the surgical unit’s specific features.

The Knowledge-to-Action framework is vital to the Evidence-Based Practice Quality Improvement challenge. This is the method of synthesizing knowledge and the cycle of dynamic action in treating quality improvement, which complements its cyclical character. The focus on adapting knowledge to the situation and respect for human and organizational variables positions it as a sound choice. With the KTA gateway, it’s much more likely that evidence-based procedures will be followed and patient outcomes improved (White et al. 2019). Knowledge translation and implementation science undergird the KTA framework, which guides EBP QI. The dynamic action cycle and knowledge synthesis create a force to transform health care (White et al. 2019). The framework was selected manually and theoretically to deal with the challenges of the QI project.

This selection is because the KTA framework is more flexible and emphasizes follow-up assessment. These will help take the project from the planning to the implementation phase and improve patient results in time. This becomes a practical document that will form the project. As it progresses, the KTA framework should facilitate the improvement of interventions to suit changing requirements for healthcare (White et al. 2019). Continuous evaluation of the framework measures the effects of interventions, supporting evidence-based decision-making through every phase. The KTA framework will guide the project in both theory and practice (White et al., 2019). Such agility and reliance on ongoing self-idents the project’s ability to transition from planning to implementation, giving them a better chance at a successful surgical outcome. Applying the KTA framework demonstrates dedication to data-driven healthcare provision and patient treatment.

 

References

Walden University Academic Skills Center. (n.d.). How do I create a strong PowerPoint presentation?Links to an external site. https://academicanswers.waldenu.edu/faq/72804

Walden University Academic Skills Center. (n.d.). MS PowerPoint resources: Getting startedLinks to an external site.. https://academicanswers.waldenu.edu/faq/330533

White, K. M., Dudley-Brown, S., & Terhaar, M. F. (Eds.). (2019). Translation of evidence into nursing and healthcare (3rd ed.). Springer.

A Sample Answer 2 For the Assignment: NURS 8114 Discussion Translation Models and Frameworks

Title:  NURS 8114 Discussion Translation Models and Frameworks

The KTA framework is an effective instrument for enacting changes in healthcare settings because it is adaptable and prioritizes follow-up assessment. In the first step of the KTA framework, known as Knowledge Creation, an issue is identified, the body of current literature is reviewed, and new knowledge is created to solve the issue. After then, the new and old knowledge are merged or synthesized. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses may be used in this. The knowledge that has been synthesized is subsequently transformed into practical tools or products. These could be manuals, tools for making decisions, or instructional materials.

The KTA framework’s second phase, the Action Cycle, is subsequently introduced. It entails locating, going over, and choosing the knowledge that will be put into practice. After then, the chosen knowledge is modified to match the regional setting. This can entail tailoring the information to the unique requirements of the patient group. Additionally, possible obstacles to using the knowledge are found and removed. These could include a lack of funds, ignorance, or unwillingness to adapt. Next, actions are taken to encourage applying the knowledge. These could be reminders, criticism, or instructional sessions. In order to evaluate the impact of the knowledge, its application is then observed. Surveys, interviews, or audits may be used in this. The results of the application of knowledge are then assessed. Evaluating patient, process, or financial outcomes may be part of this.

Ultimately, tactics are implemented to maintain the application of the information. This can entail continuing education, modifications to policies, or institutionalization of the information.

By taking these actions, a project can move from the planning stage to the implementation stage with the support of the KTA framework, ultimately leading to better patient outcomes.

 

References

Melnyk BM, Newhouse R. Evidence-based Practice Versus Evidence-informed Practice: A Debate That Could Stall Forward Momentum in Improving Healthcare Quality, Safety, Patient Outcomes, and Costs. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing. 2014. Nov 13;11(6):347–9.

White, K. M., Dudley-Brown, S., & Terhaar, M. F. (Eds.). (2019). Translation of evidence into nursing and healthcare (3rd ed.). Springer.

A Sample Answer 3 For the Assignment: NURS 8114 Discussion Translation Models and Frameworks

Title:  NURS 8114 Discussion Translation Models and Frameworks

I like your topic of mental health stigmatization. It is a prevailing situation in the minor ethnicity, and I would like to add some ideas.

Stigma reduction essentially relates to the elimination of prejudice and discrimination against people with mental health and substance use disorders (Corrigan & Nieweglowski, 2019). When a disorder is stigmatized, people with that disorder are also stigmatized. There is a misconception that these disorders only happen to people with some moral failure of some kind. On the other hand, any disorder can happen to anyone. Vital risk factors associated with these disorders are poverty, experiencing violence, or being a member of a marginalized group.

According to the CDC, 1 in 7 Americans report experiencing  Substance Use Disorder (SUD), and 1 in 5 Americans experience a mental health disorder each year. Co-occurring mental health and substance use disorders are common. These disorders are not rare, but neither is recovery. With proper support, all mental health disorders can be managed, and anyone with SUD can recover (Marcussen et al., 2019).

Promoting recovery should include addressing these underlying social determinants of health and promoting culturally responsive and trauma-informed treatment. Stigma reduction is an essential part of this (Grinker, 2021).

As rightly identified, transitional theory can be applied to realign the public understanding of the treatment and desensitize them from the usual stigmatization syndrome. Applying the knowledge and Action theory to this purpose will also be worth applying.

The knowledge-to-action (KTA) theory is a process model that helps select implementation strategies for a process. One of the things that makes the KTA unique is that it begins with research evidence and the need to synthesize and translate it (White et al., 2019). KTA can be used to present scientific findings that dissociate mental health issues from some groups of people. The stigmatization of mental health issues is more profound among racial/ethnic minorities (Ibrahim et al., 2019). These groups often experience other social adversities, such as poverty and discrimination within policies and institutions (Ibrahim et al., 2019). The five components, Cs of the KTA stand for capture, curate, connect, collaborate, and create (White et al., 2019). All together, the components provide a pathway to help end the stigmatization and struggles with mental health challenges (White et al., 2019).

References

CDC (2023). Substance Use Disorder. Retrieved from: Substance Use Disorders (SUDs) | Feature Topics | Drug Overdose (cdc.gov)Links to an external site.. ( Assessed on December 25, 2023).

CDC (2023). Mental Health. Retrieved from: SLinks to an external site.Mental Health | DASH | CDCLinks to an external site.. ( Assessed on December 26, 2023).

Corrigan, P. W., & Nieweglowski, K. (2019). How does familiarity impact the stigma of mental illness?. Clinical Psychology Review, 70, 40-50.

Ibrahim, N., Amit, N., Shahar, S., Wee, L. H., Ismail, R., Khairuddin, R., … & Safien, A. M. (2019). Do depression literacy, mental illness beliefs and stigma influence mental health help-seeking attitude? A cross-sectional study of secondary school and university students from B40 households in Malaysia. BMC public health, 19, 1-8.

Grinker, R. R. (2021). Nobody’s Normal: How Culture Created the Stigma of Mental Illness. WW Norton & Company.

Marcussen, K., Gallagher, M., & Ritter, C. (2019). Mental illness as a stigmatized identity. Society and Mental Health, 9(2), 211-227.

White, K. M., Dudley-Brown, S., & Terhaar, M. F. (Eds.). (2019). Translation of evidence into nursing and healthcare (3rd ed.). Springer.

 

Lopes Write Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.

Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.

Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?

Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.

Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.

If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.

I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.

As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:

Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.

Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

Important information for writing discussion questions and participation

Welcome to class

Hello class and welcome to the class and I will be your instructor for this course. This is a -week course and requires a lot of time commitment, organization, and a high level of dedication. Please use the class syllabus to guide you through all the assignments required for the course. I have also attached the classroom policies to this announcement to know your expectations for this course. Please review this document carefully and ask me any questions if you do. You could email me at any time or send me a message via the “message” icon in halo if you need to contact me. I check my email regularly, so you should get a response within 24 hours. If you have not heard from me within 24 hours and need to contact me urgently, please send a follow up text to

I strongly encourage that you do not wait until the very last minute to complete your assignments. Your assignments in weeks 4 and 5 require early planning as you would need to present a teaching plan and interview a community health provider. I advise you look at the requirements for these assignments at the beginning of the course and plan accordingly. I have posted the YouTube link that explains all the class assignments in detail. It is required that you watch this 32-minute video as the assignments from week 3 through 5 require that you follow the instructions to the letter to succeed. Failure to complete these assignments according to instructions might lead to a zero. After watching the video, please schedule a one-on-one with me to discuss your topic for your project by the second week of class. Use this link to schedule a 15-minute session. Please, call me at the time of your appointment on my number. Please note that I will NOT call you.

Please, be advised I do NOT accept any assignments by email. If you are having technical issues with uploading an assignment, contact the technical department and inform me of the issue. If you have any issues that would prevent you from getting your assignments to me by the deadline, please inform me to request a possible extension. Note that working fulltime or overtime is no excuse for late assignments. There is a 5%-point deduction for every day your assignment is late. This only applies to approved extensions. Late assignments will not be accepted.

If you think you would be needing accommodations due to any reasons, please contact the appropriate department to request accommodations.

Plagiarism is highly prohibited. Please ensure you are citing your sources correctly using APA 7th edition. All assignments including discussion posts should be formatted in APA with the appropriate spacing, font, margin, and indents. Any papers not well formatted would be returned back to you, hence, I advise you review APA formatting style. I have attached a sample paper in APA format and will also post sample discussion responses in subsequent announcements.

Your initial discussion post should be a minimum of 200 words and response posts should be a minimum of 150 words. Be advised that I grade based on quality and not necessarily the number of words you post. A minimum of TWO references should be used for your initial post. For your response post, you do not need references as personal experiences would count as response posts. If you however cite anything from the literature for your response post, it is required that you cite your reference. You should include a minimum of THREE references for papers in this course. Please note that references should be no more than 5 years old except recommended as a resource for the class. Furthermore, for each discussion board question, you need ONE initial substantive response and TWO substantive responses to either your classmates or your instructor for a total of THREE responses. There are TWO discussion questions each week, hence, you need a total minimum of SIX discussion posts for each week. I usually post a discussion question each week. You could also respond to these as it would count towards your required SIX discussion posts for the week.

I understand this is a lot of information to cover in 5 weeks, however, the Bible says in Philippians 4:13 that we can do all things through Christ that strengthens us. Even in times like this, we are encouraged by God’s word that we have that ability in us to succeed with His strength. I pray that each and every one of you receives strength for this course and life generally as we navigate through this pandemic that is shaking our world today. Relax and enjoy the course!

Hi Class,

Please read through the following information on writing a Discussion question response and participation posts.

Contact me if you have any questions.

Important information on Writing a Discussion Question

  • Your response needs to be a minimum of 150 words (not including your list of references)
  • There needs to be at least TWO references with ONE being a peer reviewed professional journal article.
  • Include in-text citations in your response
  • Do not include quotes—instead summarize and paraphrase the information
  • Follow APA-7th edition
  • Points will be deducted if the above is not followed

Participation –replies to your classmates or instructor

  • A minimum of 6 responses per week, on at least 3 days of the week.
  • Each response needs at least ONE reference with citations—best if it is a peer reviewed journal article
  • Each response needs to be at least 75 words in length (does not include your list of references)
  • Responses need to be substantive by bringing information to the discussion or further enhance the discussion. Responses of “I agree” or “great post” does not count for the word count.
  • Follow APA 7th edition
  • Points will be deducted if the above is not followed
  • Remember to use and follow APA-7th edition for all weekly assignments, discussion questions, and participation points.
  • Here are some helpful links
  • Student paper example
  • Citing Sources
  • The Writing Center is a great resource