Sample Answer for NURS 8114 Discussion Search-Based Questions Walden Included After Question
The Discussion this week invites you to check in with colleagues and your Instructor on your experience as you begin your Module 4 Assignment to conduct a literature search in the Walden Library. This Discussion is a particularly good example of how colleagues can support one another in tandem as common work gets underway.
Photo Credit: steheap / Adobe Stock
Note what you are discovering about search strategies that could be of benefit to colleagues, and prepare to consider their recommendations as well. Be sure that you begin your search of scholarly literature in the Walden Library promptly this week, to be prepared to post by Day 3. References and citations are not required for this Discussion.
To prepare:
- Review the Week 8 Learning Resources, with particular attention to the Walden Library resources to support your literaturesearch.
- Evaluate your process as you access the resource materials and your literature search gets underway. Keep in mind the importance of selecting current literature, i.e., published in the previous 5 years. Consider what is working for you in identifying search topics related to your critical question and in finding relevant current articles, and what questions you have for colleagues and your Instructor.
- Also draw on your Week 7 Discussion experience in identifying scholarly articles related to your critical question and comments from colleagues to act on as you begin your literature search. Be proactive in stating your questions and needs and clarifying your search process, to maximize the value of this Discussion and your Assignment in this module.
- In addition to your Discussion post, you may also contact the Instructor directly by email with specific questions or needs related to your literature search. Follow the guidelines in the Course Syllabus for contacting the Instructor.
With these thoughts in mind …
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 8114 Discussion Search-Based Questions Walden
By Day 3 of Week 8
Post a summary of your experience in beginning your literature search and assess your initial progress. Explain what is working for you in terms of a plan or search strategy for finding relevant, current literature, including Walden Library support resources you would recommend. Explain issues of concern and specific questions regarding the search process. References and citations are not required.
Read a selection of your colleagues’ posts.
By Day 6 of Week 8
Respond to at least two colleagues on 2 different days with suggestions of how to help and/or confirmation of similar issues/questions. No references are required.
Note: For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the “Post to Discussion Question” link and then select “Create Thread” to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and you cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Submit!
Submission and Grading Information
Grading Criteria
To access your rubric:
Week 8 Discussion Rubric
Post by Day 3 of Week 8 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 8
To Participate in this Discussion:
Week 8 Discussion
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NURS 8114 Discussion Search-Based Questions Walden
Title: NURS 8114 Discussion Search-Based Questions Walden
Evaluation of Literature Research
As cited in Discussion seven, I conducted a literature search formulated from the PICO model mentioned in Dang et al. (2021). The critical question is: For adult patients diagnosed with a severe mental illness (SMI) encountered by social determinants of health, does inter-professional collaboration improve accessibility to outpatient treatments and better health outcomes? I utilized Walden’s Library via the academic portal to begin my research process. After analyzing the critical question, I found that Walden’s library via the academic portal is one of the most helpful tools made available for researching peer-reviewed articles. I began my literature review search through the nursing database using CINAHL (CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature) and MEDLINE combined search, which allowed me to gain access to thousands of peer-reviewed articles. CINAHL and MEDLINE are familiar search engines used in previous classes and my MSN degree program. I also utilized credible information obtained directly from the World Health Organization website and the most current publication, dated 2023. I am spending more time researching, reading, comparing, and discarding irrelevant articles that are not of high critical appraisal.
Search Strategies and Finding Relevant, Current Research
One article I researched under the CINAHL search tool was too broad, generating 25,167 findings for access to mental health. I added the word services; less than half of the articles specific to these keywords generated 10,301 articles. Narrowing the literature review to information supporting the critical claim was done by selecting health services under the subject heading and then selecting mental health services which generated 4,214 resources. After narrowing my search compared to utilizing CINAHL & MEDLINE Combined, 1754 articles were generated. The number of articles generated was not all relevant to my critical question.
Most of the time, I narrowed my search to peer-reviewed articles and rarely used book citations other than those offered in the course study. After narrowing my search for these peer-reviewed articles, I allocated 213 articles relevant to my practice question. Searching for the best articles relevant to my practice issue became daunting and disorganized. I also had to use the Boolean navigation to filter and apply more keywords relevant to my practice question. I had to create a system that would allow me to keep my literature review findings by categorizing them as the highest to lowest levels of evidence. I found 9 research articles ranging from level I to level V, of which four various ranges were used for discussion seven. Utilizing a more narrow search relevant to keywords worked best for me.
I purposefully synthesized a level V research article so that I could understand and compare the difference to highly rigorous literature relevant to my practice question. I also narrowed the expansion of the search engine for literature publications dated within the last five years, which allowed me to provide current knowledge. I became a little frustrated attempting to condense the amount of literature findings. However, three search fields are automatically populated, and I needed to narrow the research more by clicking on the plus sign located to the right of the last populated fields. After I figured out this simple task, allocating more relevant literature was easier, resulting in five populated fields. According to the readings of Dang et al. (2021), they suggested that the highest levels of research would provide the best critical appraisal when presenting the evidence-based practice (EBP) quality initiative (QI) research project.
Specifications of the Search Process, Concerns, and Question(s)
Overall, I have had positive experiences except for two articles not being accessible due to a broken link. When working within time constraints, my concern is the turnaround time that it takes for a librarian to answer questions or assist students in locating similar articles. Ask the Librarian is a great resource, but it requires me to work ahead of schedule to be able to use this service. Walden’s general search library database did not work best in my literature review search. One search engine requires the individual to enter the exact name of the titles of articles, books, and other pieces of work. However, there was an article that I wavered on the level of rigorous evidence being too low. I should have written the author’s name or subject header down, and that specific search engine would have saved time in allocating the article.
The other concern with using a general search and not using the filter options will exclude EBP case studies and some systematic reviews that would have been effective information to support my critical practice question. Utilizing the general research navigation and not keeping a proper ledger at the beginning of my articles and citations exhausted productive time that could have been used for other literature review findings. It was challenging trying to categorize the levels of the research articles when compared to Appendix H of the Synthesis Process and Recommendation Tool. Question: My question is not about researching literature but trying to find additional resources or methods that will assist me with categorizing the literature review level of evidence. I may be overlooking a more specific way to approach Appendix H when it comes to categorizing the levels of evidence.
References not needed
Dang, D., Dearholt, S. L., Bissett, K., Ascenzi, J., & Walen, M. (Eds.). (2021). Johns Hopkins nursing evidence-based practice: Model and guidelines (4th ed.). Sigma Theta Tau International.
A Sample Answer 2 For the Assignment: NURS 8114 Discussion Search-Based Questions Walden
Title: NURS 8114 Discussion Search-Based Questions Walden
This research on inter-professional collaboration’s impact on adult patients with severe mental illness (SMI) and social determinants of health is commendable since it has utilized various resources to gather relevant literature. Secondly, using the PICO model and focusing on peer-reviewed articles from credible sources such as the World Health Organization and recent publications are essential steps in conducting a thorough literature review. Similarly, it is impressive how it has used specific search terms and filters to narrow down your results since by refining the searches using CINAHL and MEDLINE, the research can reduce the number of irrelevant articles and access a more focused set of resources. This is because it is essential to have a systematic approach to managing the literature review findings, and the effort in categorizing them based on evidence levels is commendable since organizing the articles from the highest to lowest levels of evidence helps you present a more cohesive and evidence-based argument.
However, regarding the concern about librarian assistance turnaround time, planning and using resources like “Ask the Librarian” is indeed beneficial, especially when there are time constraints. In addition, consider reaching out to peers or faculty members for suggestions on relevant articles or efficient search strategies. Additionally, to assist in categorizing the level of evidence more effectively, there is a consideration of exploring different critical appraisal tools or hierarchies specific to the research area. Some universities and organizations have customized frameworks that might align better with your study’s focus. Moreover, attending workshops or webinars on literature review and evidence synthesis can enhance your skills in evaluating and categorizing research articles.
Regarding the issue of using a general search and potentially missing out on valuable EBP case studies and systematic reviews, there should be a consideration of utilizing advanced search filters and specialized databases that focus on evidence-based practice. Tools like the Synthesis Process and Recommendation Tool’s Appendix H can be challenging at first, but attending workshops or consulting with research advisors can provide valuable insights into effectively using them.
A Sample Answer 3 For the Assignment: NURS 8114 Discussion Search-Based Questions Walden
Title: NURS 8114 Discussion Search-Based Questions Walden
Evaluation of Literature Research
Using the PICO framework, my literature search began with defining the critical question: “What are the underlying factors contributing to medication noncompliance in the psychiatric community, and how can healthcare systems effectively address these factors to improve medication adherence and treatment outcomes?” This question provided a clear focus for the research and guided the selection of appropriate keywords.
Walden Library, accessed through the academic portal, proved valuable in initiating the search process. Utilizing the library’s database, CINAHL and MEDLINE were selected for their extensive collection of peer-reviewed articles related to mental health and medication adherence in the psychiatric community.
Effective Strategies:
To ensure relevance and currency of the literature, I applied several successful search strategies. First, I used a combination of keywords such as “psychiatric medication adherence,” “factors influencing noncompliance,” “healthcare system interventions,” and “treatment outcomes.” This strategy allowed for a comprehensive exploration of the topic while targeting specific aspects of interest. However, 4,866 articles that were not relevant to my research were generated.
My search was then narrowed to include only articles published within the last five years to ensure access to current knowledge on medication adherence in psychiatric settings. This approach proved beneficial and narrowed my search to 1322 articles.
Utilizing the Boolean navigation tool was particularly useful for refining the search results. By employing Boolean operators (AND, OR, NOT) and applying them to relevant keywords, I found 269 articles that were directly related to my research question.
Recommended Walden Library Support Resources:
Throughout the search process, I utilized several Walden Library support resources for my literature review. The “Ask a Librarian” service, while requiring time management, provided invaluable assistance when encountering difficulties or requiring guidance in locating specific articles. The librarians’ expertise was helpful in identifying relevant peer-reviewed literature, particularly when clarifying complex search queries.
Issues of Concern and Specific Questions:
An issue of concern relates to the turnaround time for librarian support. While the “Ask a Librarian” service is beneficial, it requires planning ahead to ensure timely assistance.
Additionally, navigating the Walden Library’s general search database proved less effective in finding relevant literature compared to specialized databases like CINAHL and MEDLINE. As a result, I intend to concentrate on using CINAHL and MEDLINE search engines to access the most pertinent information.
Lopes Write Policy
For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.
Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.
Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?
Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.
Late Policy
The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.
Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.
If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.
I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.
As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.
Communication
Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:
Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.
Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.
Important information for writing discussion questions and participation
Welcome to class
Hello class and welcome to the class and I will be your instructor for this course. This is a -week course and requires a lot of time commitment, organization, and a high level of dedication. Please use the class syllabus to guide you through all the assignments required for the course. I have also attached the classroom policies to this announcement to know your expectations for this course. Please review this document carefully and ask me any questions if you do. You could email me at any time or send me a message via the “message” icon in halo if you need to contact me. I check my email regularly, so you should get a response within 24 hours. If you have not heard from me within 24 hours and need to contact me urgently, please send a follow up text to
I strongly encourage that you do not wait until the very last minute to complete your assignments. Your assignments in weeks 4 and 5 require early planning as you would need to present a teaching plan and interview a community health provider. I advise you look at the requirements for these assignments at the beginning of the course and plan accordingly. I have posted the YouTube link that explains all the class assignments in detail. It is required that you watch this 32-minute video as the assignments from week 3 through 5 require that you follow the instructions to the letter to succeed. Failure to complete these assignments according to instructions might lead to a zero. After watching the video, please schedule a one-on-one with me to discuss your topic for your project by the second week of class. Use this link to schedule a 15-minute session. Please, call me at the time of your appointment on my number. Please note that I will NOT call you.
Please, be advised I do NOT accept any assignments by email. If you are having technical issues with uploading an assignment, contact the technical department and inform me of the issue. If you have any issues that would prevent you from getting your assignments to me by the deadline, please inform me to request a possible extension. Note that working fulltime or overtime is no excuse for late assignments. There is a 5%-point deduction for every day your assignment is late. This only applies to approved extensions. Late assignments will not be accepted.
If you think you would be needing accommodations due to any reasons, please contact the appropriate department to request accommodations.
Plagiarism is highly prohibited. Please ensure you are citing your sources correctly using APA 7th edition. All assignments including discussion posts should be formatted in APA with the appropriate spacing, font, margin, and indents. Any papers not well formatted would be returned back to you, hence, I advise you review APA formatting style. I have attached a sample paper in APA format and will also post sample discussion responses in subsequent announcements.
Your initial discussion post should be a minimum of 200 words and response posts should be a minimum of 150 words. Be advised that I grade based on quality and not necessarily the number of words you post. A minimum of TWO references should be used for your initial post. For your response post, you do not need references as personal experiences would count as response posts. If you however cite anything from the literature for your response post, it is required that you cite your reference. You should include a minimum of THREE references for papers in this course. Please note that references should be no more than 5 years old except recommended as a resource for the class. Furthermore, for each discussion board question, you need ONE initial substantive response and TWO substantive responses to either your classmates or your instructor for a total of THREE responses. There are TWO discussion questions each week, hence, you need a total minimum of SIX discussion posts for each week. I usually post a discussion question each week. You could also respond to these as it would count towards your required SIX discussion posts for the week.
I understand this is a lot of information to cover in 5 weeks, however, the Bible says in Philippians 4:13 that we can do all things through Christ that strengthens us. Even in times like this, we are encouraged by God’s word that we have that ability in us to succeed with His strength. I pray that each and every one of you receives strength for this course and life generally as we navigate through this pandemic that is shaking our world today. Relax and enjoy the course!
Hi Class,
Please read through the following information on writing a Discussion question response and participation posts.
Contact me if you have any questions.
Important information on Writing a Discussion Question
- Your response needs to be a minimum of 150 words (not including your list of references)
- There needs to be at least TWO references with ONE being a peer reviewed professional journal article.
- Include in-text citations in your response
- Do not include quotes—instead summarize and paraphrase the information
- Follow APA-7th edition
- Points will be deducted if the above is not followed
Participation –replies to your classmates or instructor
- A minimum of 6 responses per week, on at least 3 days of the week.
- Each response needs at least ONE reference with citations—best if it is a peer reviewed journal article
- Each response needs to be at least 75 words in length (does not include your list of references)
- Responses need to be substantive by bringing information to the discussion or further enhance the discussion. Responses of “I agree” or “great post” does not count for the word count.
- Follow APA 7th edition
- Points will be deducted if the above is not followed
- Remember to use and follow APA-7th edition for all weekly assignments, discussion questions, and participation points.
- Here are some helpful links
- Student paper example
- Citing Sources
- The Writing Center is a great resource