NURS 8114 Assignment The Science of Translation -

Sample Answer for NURS 8114 Assignment The Science of Translation Included After Question

Just as translation is required to understand varying languages or customs or any number of differences that define the world, translation of evidence is a requirement in the world of quality improvement. With this module you will begin digging into your primary text, Translation of Evidence into Nursing and Healthcare. That title precisely conveys the intent of this module, and looking ahead, important aspects of your work as a DNP. Leading change for quality improvement necessitates understanding the science of translation and how to make leaps in practice, step by step.

In this 3-week module you will explore the foundations and beginning stages of initiating practice changes within a health care setting. Week 4 examines Evidence-Based Practice, Quality Improvement, and Implementation Science: Interrelationships. Weeks 5 and 6, Introduction to the Science of Translation, I and II, respectively, provide models and frameworks for implementing evidence-based quality improvement. Throughout the module, you will begin a “practice run” for a practice change as the focus of your signature DNP Project in this doctoral program. Imagine a translator who enables communication and connection and how you can do the same as an advocate of evidence-based practice quality improvement.

NURS 8114 Assignment The Science of Translation

What’s Happening in This Module?

Preview your module activities and schedule.

What do I have to do?	When do I have to do it?
Review your Learning Resources	Days 1–7, Weeks 4, 5, and 6
Week 4 Blog: Observation of Evidence-Based Practice	Post by Day 3 of Week 4, and respond to your colleagues by Day 6 of Week 4.
Module 3 Assignment: Exploring EBP Quality Improvement	You are encouraged to begin your Assignment in Week 4; submit by Day 7 of Week 6.
Week 5 Discussion: Translation Models and Frameworks	Post by Day 3 of Week 5, and respond to your colleagues by Day 6 of Week 5.

Go to the Week’s Content

What’s Coming Up in Module 3!

Photo Credit: [BrianAJackson]/[iStock / Getty Images Plus]/Getty Images

In the next module, you will examine the interrelationships of evidence-based practice, quality improvement, and implementation

science, all of which will play vital roles in planning and executing your DNP Project in your program of study. Get ready for an important module in this course with a dynamic module Assignment.

Looking Ahead: Week 4 Blog

Week 4 contains the only blog in this course. A blog offers a more informal approach to engaging with your colleagues. Note you are still required to post your blog by Day 3 and respond to at least two colleagues by Day 6. Review the Week 4 Blog guidelines to prepare.

Week 4 Video: Evidence-Based Practice With Dr. Kathleen White

The Learning Resources in Week 4 feature a video interview with Dr. Kathleen White, lead author of your Translation course text. She provides an example of evidence-based practice and steps in implementing quality improvement, including building consensus among stakeholders for a practice change. Plan to view this video at least once as you begin the module.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 8114 Assignment The Science of Translation

Next Module

To go to the next module:

Module 3

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NURS 8114 Assignment The Science of Translation

Title: NURS 8114 Assignment The Science of Translation

NURS 8114 Assignment The Science of Translation Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

Name: NURS_8114_Week_4_Blog

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor
Main Posting: Response to the Blog prompt is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.	5 (8.33%) – 5 (8.33%) Thoroughly responds to the Blog prompt(s). Is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and/or current practice experiences. No less than 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.	4 (6.67%) – 4 (6.67%) Responds to most of the Blog prompt(s). Is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and/or current practice experiences. 50% of the post has exceptional depth and breadth.	3 (5%) – 3 (5%) Responds to some of the Blog prompt(s). One to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.	0 (0%) – 2 (3.33%) Does not respond to the Blog prompt(s). Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Main Posting: Writing	5 (8.33%) – 5 (8.33%) Written clearly and concisely. Contains no grammatical or spelling errors. Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.	4 (6.67%) – 4 (6.67%) Written concisely. May contain one to two grammatical or spelling errors. Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.	3 (5%) – 3 (5%) Written somewhat concisely. May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Contains some APA formatting errors.	0 (0%) – 2 (3.33%) Not written clearly or concisely. Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.
Main Posting: Timely and full participation	9 (15%) – 10 (16.67%) Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation. Posts main Blog post by due date.	8 (13.33%) – 8 (13.33%) Posts main Discussion by due date. Meets requirements for full participation.	7 (11.67%) – 7 (11.67%) Posts main Blog post by due date.	0 (0%) – 6 (10%) Does not meet requirements for full participation. Does not post main Blog post by due date.
First Response: Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective.	9 (15%) – 9 (15%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Responds to questions posed by faculty.	8 (13.33%) – 8 (13.33%) Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.	7 (11.67%) – 7 (11.67%) Response is on topic and may have some depth.	0 (0%) – 6 (10%) Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
First Response: Writing	6 (10%) – 6 (10%) Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Response fully answers faculty questions, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.	5 (8.33%) – 5 (8.33%) Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues. Response mostly answers faculty questions, if posed. Provides opinions and ideas. Response is written in standard, edited English.	4 (6.67%) – 4 (6.67%) Response posed in the Blog may lack effective professional communication. Response somewhat answers faculty questions, if posed.	0 (0%) – 3 (5%) Responses posted in the Blog lack effective communication. Response to faculty questions is missing
First Response: Timely and full participation	5 (8.33%) – 5 (8.33%) Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation. Posts by due date.	4 (6.67%) – 4 (6.67%) Meets requirements for full participation. Posts by due date.	3 (5%) – 3 (5%) Posts by due date.	0 (0%) – 2 (3.33%) Does not meet requirements for full participation. Does not post by due date.
Second Response: Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective.	9 (15%) – 9 (15%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Responds to questions posed by faculty.	8 (13.33%) – 8 (13.33%) Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.	7 (11.67%) – 7 (11.67%) Response is on topic and may have some depth.	0 (0%) – 6 (10%) Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Second Response: Writing	6 (10%) – 6 (10%) Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Response fully answers faculty questions, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.	5 (8.33%) – 5 (8.33%) Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues. Response mostly answers faculty questions, if posed. Provides opinions and ideas. Response is written in standard, edited English.	4 (6.67%) – 4 (6.67%) Response posed in the Blog may lack effective professional communication. Response somewhat answers faculty questions, if posed.	0 (0%) – 3 (5%) Responses posted in the Blog lack effective communication. Response to faculty questions is missing.
Second Response: Timely and full participation	5 (8.33%) – 5 (8.33%) Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation. Posts by due date.	4 (6.67%) – 4 (6.67%) Meets requirements for full participation. Posts by due date.	3 (5%) – 3 (5%) Posts by due date.	0 (0%) – 2 (3.33%) Does not meet requirements for full participation. Does not post by due date.
Total Points: 60

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Main Posting:

Response to the Blog prompt is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

5 (8.33%) – 5 (8.33%)

Thoroughly responds to the Blog prompt(s).

Is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and/or current practice experiences.

No less than 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.

4 (6.67%) – 4 (6.67%)

Responds to most of the Blog prompt(s).

Is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and/or current practice experiences.

50% of the post has exceptional depth and breadth.

3 (5%) – 3 (5%)

Responds to some of the Blog prompt(s).

One to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.

Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

0 (0%) – 2 (3.33%)

Does not respond to the Blog prompt(s).

Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.

Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

Main Posting:

Writing

5 (8.33%) – 5 (8.33%)

Written clearly and concisely.

Contains no grammatical or spelling errors.

Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

4 (6.67%) – 4 (6.67%)

Written concisely.

May contain one to two grammatical or spelling errors.

Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

3 (5%) – 3 (5%)

Written somewhat concisely.

May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

Contains some APA formatting errors.

0 (0%) – 2 (3.33%)

Not written clearly or concisely.

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Main Posting:

Timely and full participation

9 (15%) – 10 (16.67%)

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.

Posts main Blog post by due date.

8 (13.33%) – 8 (13.33%)

Posts main Discussion by due date.

Meets requirements for full participation.

7 (11.67%) – 7 (11.67%)

Posts main Blog post by due date.

0 (0%) – 6 (10%)

Does not meet requirements for full participation.

Does not post main Blog post by due date.

First Response:

Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective.

9 (15%) – 9 (15%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

Responds to questions posed by faculty.

8 (13.33%) – 8 (13.33%)

Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.

7 (11.67%) – 7 (11.67%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

0 (0%) – 6 (10%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

First Response:
Writing

6 (10%) – 6 (10%)

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Response fully answers faculty questions, if posed.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

5 (8.33%) – 5 (8.33%)

Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues.

Response mostly answers faculty questions, if posed.

Provides opinions and ideas.

Response is written in standard, edited English.

4 (6.67%) – 4 (6.67%)

Response posed in the Blog may lack effective professional communication.

Response somewhat answers faculty questions, if posed.

0 (0%) – 3 (5%)

Responses posted in the Blog lack effective communication.

Response to faculty questions is missing

First Response:
Timely and full participation

5 (8.33%) – 5 (8.33%)

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.

Posts by due date.

4 (6.67%) – 4 (6.67%)

Meets requirements for full participation.

Posts by due date.

3 (5%) – 3 (5%)

Posts by due date.

0 (0%) – 2 (3.33%)

Does not meet requirements for full participation.

Does not post by due date.

Second Response:
Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective.

9 (15%) – 9 (15%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

Responds to questions posed by faculty.

8 (13.33%) – 8 (13.33%)

Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.

7 (11.67%) – 7 (11.67%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

0 (0%) – 6 (10%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

Second Response:
Writing

6 (10%) – 6 (10%)

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Response fully answers faculty questions, if posed.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

5 (8.33%) – 5 (8.33%)

Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues.

Response mostly answers faculty questions, if posed.

Provides opinions and ideas.

Response is written in standard, edited English.

4 (6.67%) – 4 (6.67%)

Response posed in the Blog may lack effective professional communication.

Response somewhat answers faculty questions, if posed.

0 (0%) – 3 (5%)

Responses posted in the Blog lack effective communication.

Response to faculty questions is missing.

Second Response:
Timely and full participation

5 (8.33%) – 5 (8.33%)

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.

Posts by due date.

4 (6.67%) – 4 (6.67%)

Meets requirements for full participation.

Posts by due date.

3 (5%) – 3 (5%)

Posts by due date.

0 (0%) – 2 (3.33%)

Does not meet requirements for full participation.

Does not post by due date.

Total Points: 60