NURS 8002 The Doctoral Project and Project Management -

Sample Answer for NURS 8002 The Doctoral Project and Project Management Included After Question

Project management is the practice and underlying framework of initiating, planning, executing, controlling, and closing project work to achieve specific goals and meet specific success criteria within a given time frame. One of the primary challenges of project management is the need to achieve all the project goals within the given constraints.

The successful completion of your DNP program of study requires the completion of both a practicum/field experience and a Doctoral Project. Thus, the framework and practice of project management will be useful in ensuring that you can successfully complete the aims of these two major milestones of your degree program.

In this first course, you will not be required to select your official topic of interest for your Doctoral Project; however, it is highly encouraged that you begin thinking about the direction you might want to go in for the purposes of conducting an initial literature search on your topic of interest. Think about what practice area you might want to pursue upon completion of the DNP degree. What process or set of procedures in your current nursing practice require improvement or investigation? What type of quality improvement initiative are you interested in conducting to improve quality patient care and healthcare delivery?

NURS 8002 The Doctoral Project and Project Management

What’s Happening This Module?

Module 4: The Doctoral Project and Project Management is a 2-week module—Weeks 8–9 of the course—in which you will conduct a literature search of peer-reviewed research and synthesize the research related to either your practice area or an area of particular interest for the practice of nursing. As you engage with the resources for this module, keep in mind that locating, critically analyzing, and synthesizing the peer-reviewed research will be an important skill to develop as you will engage in these processes to complete your Doctoral Project but also in advanced nursing practice. Consider the stepwise approach toward conducting a literature review in the Walden Library and how you will engage in a critical analysis and synthesis of your peer-reviewed research findings as you complete your Module Assignment.

What do I have to do?	When do I have to do it?
Review your Learning Resources	Days 1–7, Weeks 8 and 9
Assignment: Locating and Critically Analyzing Primary Research Articles	Submit your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 9.

Go to the Week’s Content

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 8002 The Doctoral Project and Project Management

NURS 8002 The Doctoral Project and Project Management Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

Name: NURS_8002_Module4_Assignment_Rubric

· Grid View

· List View

	Excellent 90%–100%	Good 80%–89%	Fair 70%–79%	Poor 0%–69%
Write a 1-paragraph introduction of how you conducted your literature search and the databases consulted in your search in relation to your practice area or area of interest. Be specific and provide examples.	18 (18%) – 20 (20%) The response accurately and clearly introduces in detail how the literature search was conducted in relation to the practice area or area of interest selected, including a detailed description of the literature search process and the databases consulted. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the introduction and process described.	16 (16%) – 17 (17%) The response accurately introduces how the literature search was conducted in relation to the practice area or area of interest selected, including an accurate description of the literature search process and the databases consulted. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the introduction and process described.	14 (14%) – 15 (15%) The response inaccurately or vaguely introduces how the literature search was conducted in relation to the practice area or area of interest selected, including an inaccurate or vague description of the literature search process and the databases consulted. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the introduction and process described.	0 (0%) – 13 (13%) The response inaccurately and vaguely introduces how the literature search was conducted in relation to the practice area or area of interest selected, including an inaccurate and vague description of the literature search process and the databases consulted, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the introduction and process describes, or it is missing.
Write a 1-paragraph summary of each of the articles you have selected (a total of 3 paragraphs).	18 (18%) – 20 (20%) The response accurately and clearly summarizes in detail each of the articles selected.	16 (16%) – 17 (17%) The response accurately summarizes each of the articles selected.	14 (14%) – 15 (15%) The response inaccurately or vaguely summarizes each of the articles selected. OR The response summarizes < 3 articles.	0 (0%) – 13 (13%) The response inaccurately and vaguely summarizes each of the articles selected, or it is missing.
Write 1 paragraph that synthesizes the 3 articles using a scholarly voice.	23 (23%) – 25 (25%) The response comprehensively and fully synthesizes the content from the 3 articles selected that accurately and clearly support in detail the practice area or area of interest selected.	20 (20%) – 22 (22%) The response synthesizes the content from the 3 articles selected that accurately supports the practice area or area of interest selected.	18 (18%) – 19 (19%) The response inaccurately or vaguely synthesizes content from the articles selected that may lend support to the practice area or area of interest selected.	0 (0%) – 17 (17%) The response inaccurately and vaguely synthesizes content from the 3 articles selected that does not lend support to the practice area or area of interest selected, or it is missing.
Write a final paragraph in which you discuss the differences between summarizing and synthesizing research. Be specific and provide examples.	18 (18%) – 20 (20%) The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the differences between summarizing and synthesizing research. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the differences explained.	16 (16%) – 17 (17%) The response accurately explains the differences between summarizing and synthesizing research. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the differences explained.	14 (14%) – 15 (15%) The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the differences between summarizing and synthesizing research. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the differences explained.	0 (0%) – 13 (13%) The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the differences between summarizing and synthesizing research, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the differences explained, or it is missing.
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.	5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.	4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.	3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.	0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.
Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation	5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.	4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.	3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.	0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.	5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors.	4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.	3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.	0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
Total Points: 100

Excellent

90%–100%

Good

80%–89%

Fair

70%–79%

Poor

0%–69%

Write a 1-paragraph introduction of how you conducted your literature search and the databases consulted in your search in relation to your practice area or area of interest. Be specific and provide examples.

18 (18%) – 20 (20%)

The response accurately and clearly introduces in detail how the literature search was conducted in relation to the practice area or area of interest selected, including a detailed description of the literature search process and the databases consulted.

The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the introduction and process described.

16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

The response accurately introduces how the literature search was conducted in relation to the practice area or area of interest selected, including an accurate description of the literature search process and the databases consulted.

The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the introduction and process described.

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

The response inaccurately or vaguely introduces how the literature search was conducted in relation to the practice area or area of interest selected, including an inaccurate or vague description of the literature search process and the databases consulted.

The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the introduction and process described.

0 (0%) – 13 (13%)

The response inaccurately and vaguely introduces how the literature search was conducted in relation to the practice area or area of interest selected, including an inaccurate and vague description of the literature search process and the databases consulted, or it is missing.

The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the introduction and process describes, or it is missing.

Write a 1-paragraph summary of each of the articles you have selected (a total of 3 paragraphs).

18 (18%) – 20 (20%)

The response accurately and clearly summarizes in detail each of the articles selected.

16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

The response accurately summarizes each of the articles selected.

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

The response inaccurately or vaguely summarizes each of the articles selected.

The response summarizes < 3 articles.

0 (0%) – 13 (13%)

The response inaccurately and vaguely summarizes each of the articles selected, or it is missing.

Write 1 paragraph that synthesizes the 3 articles using a scholarly voice.

23 (23%) – 25 (25%)

The response comprehensively and fully synthesizes the content from the 3 articles selected that accurately and clearly support in detail the practice area or area of interest selected.

20 (20%) – 22 (22%)

The response synthesizes the content from the 3 articles selected that accurately supports the practice area or area of interest selected.

18 (18%) – 19 (19%)

The response inaccurately or vaguely synthesizes content from the articles selected that may lend support to the practice area or area of interest selected.

0 (0%) – 17 (17%)

The response inaccurately and vaguely synthesizes content from the 3 articles selected that does not lend support to the practice area or area of interest selected, or it is missing.

Write a final paragraph in which you discuss the differences between summarizing and synthesizing research. Be specific and provide examples.

18 (18%) – 20 (20%)

The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the differences between summarizing and synthesizing research.

The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the differences explained.

16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

The response accurately explains the differences between summarizing and synthesizing research.

The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the differences explained.

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the differences between summarizing and synthesizing research.

The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the differences explained.

0 (0%) – 13 (13%)

The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the differences between summarizing and synthesizing research, or it is missing.

The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the differences explained, or it is missing.

Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.

No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.

Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

Total Points: 100