Sample Answer for NURS 8002 Blog: Learning Online Walden Included After Question
Blog: Learning Online
Have you ever read an online blog? If so, what was the aim of the blog? What did you like or did not like about the blog?
In this course, you will engage in a series of Blog Assignments with your colleagues. Blogs help to facilitate a meaningful and somewhat informal classroom environment that fosters dialogue, interaction, and the dissemination of ideas in a functional platform (Kuo et al., 2017). Blogs also serve as way to promote a community and collaborate learning approach through the sharing of ideas. Although they may function like a Discussion Board, the aim is to be more open-ended in nature and somewhat informal in sharing your perspectives and thoughts on a given prompt or idea.
Photo Credit: artisteer / iStock / Getty Images Plus / Getty Images
For this first Blog Assignment, reflect on your experiences, either academically or professionally, in which you have employed a given strategy to allow for success that may transfer successfully toward learning online. Think about how this strategy may help to inform your overall approach toward completing an online doctorate degree.
Reference: Kuo, Y.-C., Belland, B. R., & Kuo, Y.-T. (2017). Learning through blogging: Students’ perspectives in collaborative blog-enhanced learning communities. Educational Technology & Society, 20(2), 37–50.
To prepare:
- Review the strategies and tips in the documents linked in this week’s Learning Resources, such as Plagiarism Prevention Resource Kit and Scholarly Voice: Overview, and those presented in “Writing at the Graduate Level.”
- Review the Walden University Catalog, Field Experience: College of Nursing, and Programs: DNP Doctoral Project resources to review your program of study and requirements for the completion of the DNP.
- Reflect on strategies you might use to ensure success in your program of study and for completion of your DNP degree requirements. For example, consider time management, organization, prioritization, and any other strategies that might be of considerable use in an academic or professional capacity.
By Day 3 of Week 1
Post a brief description of at least one strategy you have used in the past (academically or professionally) that was advantageous in empowering you in terms of one or more of the following skill sets: planning, time management, studying, and effective technology use. Then identify a strategy that you have not yet tried and explain how this strategy may be beneficial, given your strengths and any potential areas of improvement. Be specific and provide examples.
Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses.
By Day 6 of Week 1
Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses and respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days by suggesting at least one additional strategy to your colleague not yet selected and explain how and/or why you think it will contribute to their success as an online doctoral student.
Submission and Grading Information
Grading Criteria
To access your rubric:
Week 1 Blog Rubric
Post by Day 3 of Week 1 and Respond by Day 6 of Week 1
To Participate in this Blog:
Week 1 Blog
What’s Coming Up in Weeks 2–3?
Photo Credit: [BrianAJackson]/[iStock / Getty Images Plus]/Getty Images
Next week, you will examine how your academic and professional goals align to Walden University’s vision, mission, and social change outcomes. You also analyze plans for incorporating social change into your program of study and for professional practice.
Next Week
Week 1: Strategies for Successful Online Learning
What does it mean to be successful as an online student? What skills, knowledge, or experiences might you possess to ensure your success in your academic program? What does it mean to be a Walden University student?
It may come as no surprise that pursuing doctoral education is a significant milestone in any student’s academic journey. Whether you have completed an online degree or participated in some coursework online, the online learning environment may present unique challenges for ensuring your success and accountability in meeting and exceeding degree requirements. Throughout your academic journey, you will be presented with support resources, strategies, and opportunities to refine your previous skills and knowledge that can be applied for your academic success in your degree program.
This week, you will examine support resources and strategies for ensuring your success as an online student at Walden University. You will also review your DNP program requirements, including field experience and DNP doctoral project components to help you prepare in planning for future coursework and goal setting.
Learning Objectives
Students will:
- Evaluate strategies for self-empowerment in academic and professional settings
- Analyze strategies to address strengths and areas of improvement in academic and professional settings
Learning Resources
Required Readings (click to expand/reduce)
Walden University. (n.d.). Doctor of nursing practice.
https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/catalog/doctor-nursing-practice
Document: DNP Project Process Guide (Word document)
Required Media (click to expand/reduce)
Review the following media resources available from the Walden Library:
Module 1: The Foundations of Successful Doctoral Study
Welcome to the first module of Foundations and Essentials for the Doctor of Nursing Practice. The work you complete in this course provides a strong foundation for graduate study at Walden University. Following successful completion of your program, you will be prepared to address the challenges and opportunities to develop and contribute to the science that will lead nursing practice for the future.
How will your role as a scholar-practitioner impact the field of nursing practice? As you engage in the assessments for this course, reflect on how you will be developing your skills as a doctoral student and scholar-practitioner.
What’s Happening This Module?
This course is composed of 5 separate modules covering 11 weeks of content. Each module consists of an overarching topic, and each week within the module includes specific subtopics for learning. As you work through each module, you will have an opportunity to draw upon the knowledge you gain in the assessments and components of learning throughout each of the modules.
Module 1: The Foundations of Successful Doctoral Study is a 3-week module—Weeks 1–3 of the course—in which you will analyze strategies to be successful in the online learning environment and for doctoral study at Walden University. In your Blog for Week 1, you will explore and determine strategies for self-empowerment in academic and professional settings. In Weeks 2–3, you will reflect on your academic and professional goals in relation to Walden University’s vision, mission, and social change outcomes. In your Assignment, you will analyze how your academic and professional goals align to the American Association of Colleges of Nursing’s (AACN’s) The Essentials of Doctoral Education for Advanced Nursing Practice (DNP Essentials). You will also consider plans for incorporating social change into your program of study and professional practice.
| What do I have to do? | When do I have to do it? |
| Review your Learning Resources. | Days 1–7, Weeks 1, 2, and 3 |
| Blog: Learning Online | Post by Day 3 of Week 1 and respond to your colleagues by Day 6 of Week 1. |
| Assignment: AACN Competencies and the Walden Mission, Vision, and Outcomes | Submit your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 3. |
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NURS 8002 Blog: Learning Online Walden
Title: NURS 8002 Blog: Learning Online Walden
the success in the academic require elaborate planning and consideration of other factors. The planning processes involves organization of resources, setting schedules, and setting deadlines for the assignments that have to be performed in the course of learning. Planning would ensure that all the aspects of the project are achieved and that the guidelines have been met (Zangerle, 2021). Planning processes often lead to successful outcomes in the learning process. In most cases, students who plan adequately often realize success in their respective courses. Looking at the syllabus and dates is part of the planning process. The whole procedure involve writing down the objectives and what must be achieved during the course. The above strategies helps in visualizing the flow of the semester (Walden University, n.d). They ensure that all the assignments are done and delivered within the deadlines. Leaners or students who prepare adequately have little chances of failing their classes.
References
Zangerle, C. M. (2021). Two tactics for time management and stress reduction. Nursing
Management, 52(4), 6–8. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1097/01.NUMA.0000737784.64810.4b
Walden University (n.d). Using evidence: Synthesis. Writing Center. https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/evidence/synthesis
A Sample Answer 2 For the Assignment: NURS 8002 Blog: Learning Online Walden
Title: NURS 8002 Blog: Learning Online Walden
I applaud people who work the third shift because it is the most challenging shift. It took me about three days to recover from a third shift whenever I picked up a third shift for the money. I understand you had to do what works for you and your family, especially when kids are involved. On the bright side, it worked out well. A strategy that could work is time management. Time management refers to a set of behaviors for the optimal organization and division of time. Time management leads to a better use of time, increased productivity, and increases the likelihood of achieving predetermined goals. (Vizeshfar et al., 2022). I am still learning this strategy, but proper planning and time management can be beneficial in attaining one’s set goals.
Study groups are an excellent strategy. I have only been part of a study group once in nursing school. The study group was very beneficial but only lasted a few weeks. A study group can help motivate fellow students who are struggling, help students think creatively, refine their understanding of study resources, and encourage group members to continue to work towards their goals.
Reference
Vizeshfar, F., Rakhshan, M., Shirazi, F., & Dokoohaki, R. (2022). The effect of time management education on critical care nurses’ prioritization: a randomized clinical trial. Acute and critical care, 37(2), 202–208. https://doi.org/10.4266/acc.2021.01123Links to an external site..
A Sample Answer 3 For the Assignment: NURS 8002 Blog: Learning Online Walden
Title: NURS 8002 Blog: Learning Online Walden
Main question post. An effective academic strategy I have used from the past to the present involves planning ahead. Planning ahead is very beneficial to me as it allows me to prioritize and organize important aspects of my educational, work, and personal life, making it possible to adequately complete my day-to-day tasks in a timely and productive manner. Planning ahead ensures I will achieve important goals related to my personal life, work life, and school assignments. Planning ahead helps reduce stress by eliminating the anxiety of approaching deadlines. Planning ahead can allow the creation of technological documents that can be stored for future use (Park et al., 2017, pp. 1620–1630). Planning ahead gives me the peace of mind that I have effectively accomplished my goals, creating an excellent work-life balance.
An academic strategy I have yet to try in the past that may benefit me is note-taking. Taking notes can enhance my academic strengths and decrease my weaknesses by allowing me to improve my time management skills and prioritize and organize important aspects of my educational, work, and personal life, making those tasks more manageable and achievable. Note-taking is also advantageous in helping comprehend information that may have been misinterpreted (Bellinger & DeCaro, 2019, pp. 2807–2819). Note-taking can help me keep records of data, allowing me to upload and save that information at a later time. Taking notes will also enable me to remember written information and enhance my academic strengths, which include memorizing information once I have written it. In conclusion, incorporating note-taking with my present educational strategy planning ahead will help me successfully advance my doctoral education here at Walden University.
References
Bellinger, D. B., & DeCaro, M. S. (2019). Note-taking format and difficulty impact learning from instructor-provided lecture notes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(12), 2807–2819. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819879434Links to an external site.
Park, J., Lu, F.-C., & Hedgcock, W. M. (2017). Relative effects of forward and backward planning on goal pursuit. Psychological Science, 28(11), 1620–1630. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617715510Links to an external site.
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Name: NURS_8002_Week1_Blog_Rubric
| Excellent
90%–100% |
Good
80%–89% |
Fair
70%–79% |
Poor
0%–69% |
|||
| Main Posting:
Response to the Blog prompt is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. |
18 (30%) – 20 (33.33%)
Thoroughly responds to the Blog prompt(s). Is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and/or current practice experiences. No less than 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. |
16 (26.67%) – 17 (28.33%)
Responds to most of the Blog prompt(s). Is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and/or current practice experiences. 50% of the post has exceptional depth and breadth. |
14 (23.33%) – 15 (25%)
Responds to some of the Blog prompt(s). One to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. |
0 (0%) – 13 (21.67%)
Does not respond to the Blog prompt(s). Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. |
||
| Main Posting:
Writing |
5 (8.33%) – 5 (8.33%)
Written clearly and concisely. Contains no grammatical or spelling errors. Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
4 (6.67%) – 4 (6.67%)
Written concisely. May contain one to two grammatical or spelling errors. Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
3 (5%) – 3 (5%)
Written somewhat concisely. May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Contains some APA formatting errors. |
0 (0%) – 2 (3.33%)
Not written clearly or concisely. Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
||
| Main Posting:
Timely and full participation |
5 (8.33%) – 5 (8.33%)
Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation. Posts main Blog post by due date. |
4 (6.67%) – 4 (6.67%)
Posts main Discussion by due date. Meets requirements for full participation. |
3 (5%) – 3 (5%)
Posts main Blog post by due date. |
0 (0%) – 2 (3.33%)
Does not meet requirements for full participation. Does not post main Blog post by due date. |
||
| First Response:
Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective. |
5 (8.33%) – 5 (8.33%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Responds to questions posed by faculty. |
4 (6.67%) – 4 (6.67%)
Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting. |
3 (5%) – 3 (5%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth. |
0 (0%) – 2 (3.33%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. |
||
| First Response: Writing |
5 (8.33%) – 5 (8.33%)
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Response fully answers faculty questions, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
4 (6.67%) – 4 (6.67%)
Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues. Response mostly answers faculty questions, if posed. Provides opinions and ideas. Response is written in standard, edited English. |
3 (5%) – 3 (5%)
Response posed in the Blog may lack effective professional communication. Response somewhat answers faculty questions, if posed. |
0 (0%) – 2 (3.33%)
Responses posted in the Blog lack effective communication. Response to faculty questions is missing. |
||
| First Response: Timely and full participation |
5 (8.33%) – 5 (8.33%)
Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation. Posts by due date. |
4 (6.67%) – 4 (6.67%)
Meets requirements for full participation. Posts by due date. |
3 (5%) – 3 (5%)
Posts by due date. |
0 (0%) – 2 (3.33%)
Does not meet requirements for full participation. Does not post by due date. |
||
| Second Response: Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective. |
5 (8.33%) – 5 (8.33%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Responds to questions posed by faculty. |
4 (6.67%) – 4 (6.67%)
Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting. |
3 (5%) – 3 (5%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth. |
0 (0%) – 2 (3.33%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. |
||
| Second Response: Writing |
5 (8.33%) – 5 (8.33%)
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Response fully answers faculty questions, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
4 (6.67%) – 4 (6.67%)
Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues. Response mostly answers faculty questions, if posed. Provides opinions and ideas. Response is written in standard, edited English. |
3 (5%) – 3 (5%)
Response posed in the Blog may lack effective professional communication. Response somewhat answers faculty questions, if posed. |
0 (0%) – 2 (3.33%)
Responses posted in the Blog lack effective communication. Response to faculty questions is missing. |
||
| Second Response: Timely and full participation |
5 (8.33%) – 5 (8.33%)
Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation. Posts by due date. |
4 (6.67%) – 4 (6.67%)
Meets requirements for full participation. Posts by due date. |
3 (5%) – 3 (5%)
Posts by due date. |
0 (0%) – 2 (3.33%)
Does not meet requirements for full participation. Does not post by due date. |
||
| Total Points: 60 | ||||||
Name: NURS_8002_Week1_Blog_Rubric
Grading Rubric Guidelines
| Performance Category | 10 | 9 | 8 | 4 | 0 |
| Scholarliness
Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Performance Category | 10 | 9 | 8 | 4 | 0 |
| Application of Course Knowledge –
Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations |
|
|
|
|
|
| Performance Category | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 |
| Interactive Dialogue
Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days. (5 points possible per graded thread) |
|
Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week. |
|
|
|
| Minus 1 Point | Minus 2 Point | Minus 3 Point | Minus 4 Point | Minus 5 Point | |
| Grammar, Syntax, APA
Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted. Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing. The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition |
|
|
|
|
|
| 0 points lost | -5 points lost | ||||
| Total Participation Requirements
per discussion thread |
The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day. | The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days | |||
| Early Participation Requirement
per discussion thread |
The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week. | The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT. |