NURS 8002 Assignment Locating and Critically Analyzing Primary Research Articles

NURS 8002 Assignment Locating and Critically Analyzing Primary Research Articles

Sample Answer for NURS 8002 Assignment Locating and Critically Analyzing Primary Research Articles Included After Question

Major Assignment Membership In Professional Organizations 

What steps do you take to locate primary and peer-reviewed research articles when performing a literature search?

What resources are available to you to engage in a meaningful and successful literature search?

As you have explored throughout this course, Walden University provides vast resources for student support to ensure success in their academic program of study. When it comes to research and using Library resources, several support mechanisms are available to you as well.

Taking the first step to think about a research topic or area of interest and filtering that topic using a series of keywords and operations will be a fundamental component for performing a literature search in Walden Library’s databases. While the ultimate goal is to produce a set or results that match your search criteria, you must keep in mind that that the quality of the research articles obtained will likely vary. Thus, you must critically examine and analyze the aims of the research produced and how it aligns, confirms, or negates your topic or area of research. As you develop proficiency in this area, you will discover that you can extract content themes and frameworks to enhance future research and the need to identify additional research support.

For this Assignment, consult the Walden Library webinars and resources provided. These resources serve as a general good first step for performing literature searches and engaging with the databases of research available to you. Think about a research topic or area of interest to focus on for this Assignment. Then, search the Walden Library to locate and retrieve peer-reviewed research articles that pertain to your topic or area of interest.

RESOURCES

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

TO PREPARE:

  • Review the Walden Library webinars presented in the media Learning Resources for this week.
  • Then, search the Walden Library and locate three peer-reviewed primary research articles that pertain to your practice area and are of particular interest to you.

THE ASSIGNMENT: (6 PARAGRAPHS)

Write a 6-paragraph APA-formatted paper in which you do the following:

  • Write a 1-pararaph introduction of how you conducted your literature search and the databases consulted in your search in relation to your practice area or area of interest. Be specific and provide examples.
  • Write a 1-paragraph summary of each of the articles you have selected (a total of 3 paragraphs).
  • Write 1 paragraph that synthesizesthe three articles using a scholarly voice.
  • Write a final paragraph in which you discuss the differences between summarizing and synthesizing research. Be specific and provide examples.

Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates/general#s-lg-box-20293632). All papers submitted must use this formatting.

BY DAY 7 OF WEEK 9

Submit your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 9.

SUBMISSION INFORMATION

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

  1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as M4Assgn+last name+first initial.
  2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
  3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NURS 8002 Assignment Locating and Critically Analyzing Primary Research Articles

Title: NURS 8002 Assignment Locating and Critically Analyzing Primary Research Articles

The clinical practice environment entails taking care of many patients with various clinical conditions; therefore, various issues or problems usually arise that need improvement or a complete change. Some of these problems can better be handled through research efforts by DNP and PhD-prepared nurses. One of the problems occurring in a clinical environment and is suitable for research is catheter-associated urinary tract infections. These are infections that come as a result of the insertion, maintenance, and or care of urinary catheters (Tenke et al., 2017).  Catheter-associated urinary tract infections are very common in clinical settings due to the fact that the rate of use of indwelling urinary catheters is high. For instance, a recent study showed that 24% of patients in US hospitals use indwelling urinary catheters. Besides, the figures elsewhere are not any better since patients 26% and 18% of patients in Australia and the UK hospitals use the indwelling catheters. 

Catheter-associated urinary tract infections warrant attention due to the negative effects or impact it has on patients, health care facilities and the healthcare system. One of the effects is that the condition causes longer hospital stays for the admitted patients, a situation which can expose the patients to other hospital-acquired infections (Cao et al., 2018). Besides, the treatment becomes more difficult due to enhanced antimicrobial resistance. The other reason why the condition deserves attention from the nursing perspective is that it can be reduced through appropriate nursing interventions. While there are various innovative interventions such as cleaning of the meatal region before inserting the catheters using appropriate agents such as saline or Chlorhexidine (Fasugba et al., 2019), ensuring that the indwelling catheters are promptly removed from the patient when not needed, among other things, the condition still persists and common in healthcare settings (Mota & Oliveira, 2019).  

 

Outline 

 Nursing professional bodies are vital for the growth of a nurse as a scholar-practitioner. With membership in such professional organizations, a nurse gets access to many benefits such as current updates regarding the condition, advocacy opportunities, educational endeavours, and scholarships, among others (Bindon, 2017). I am therefore planning to join a nursing professional organization. Having been a member of the National Student Nurse Association, which is meant for nursing students, I plan to join a professional nursing body once done with my program. One of the professional nursing organizations I intend to join is the National League for Nursing. This organization has the potential of supporting the development of my scholarly project as well as my education.  

One way this organization will support my future projects is through nursing research grants. Nursing research can be expensive; however, the opportunity of getting nursing research grants offered by the National League for nursing can make an individual achieve dreams of being an accomplished researcher. Among my major aims as a nurse is to be an accomplished nurse professional, a feat that is not possible without professional development support. The National League for Nursing offers professional development to its members; therefore, I believe that by joining this organization, I will be able to accomplish my nursing professional goals. 

 

References 

 Bindon, S. L. (2017). Professional development strategies to enhance nurses’ knowledge and maintain safe practice. AORN journal, 106(2), 99-110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aorn.2017.06.002 

Cao, Y., Gong, Z., Shan, J., & Gao, Y. (2018). Comparison of the preventive effect of urethral cleaning versus disinfection for catheter-associated urinary tract infections in adults: A network meta-analysis. International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 76, 102-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2018.09.008 

Fasugba, O., Cheng, A. C., Gregory, V., Graves, N., Koerner, J., Collignon, P., … & Mitchell,B. G. (2019). Chlorhexidine for meatal cleaning in reducing catheter-associatedurinary tract infections: a multicentre stepped-wedge randomised controlled trial. TheLancet Infectious Diseases, 19(6), 611-619. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30736-9. 

Mota, É. C., & Oliveira, A. C. (2019). Catheter-associated urinary tract infection: why do not we control this adverse event? Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, 53. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1980-220×2018007503452 

Tenke, P., Mezei, T., Bőde, I., & Köves, B. (2017). Catheter-associated urinary tract infections. European urology supplements, 16(4), 138-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eursup.2016.10.001 

A Sample Answer 2 For the Assignment: NURS 8002 Assignment Locating and Critically Analyzing Primary Research Articles

Title: NURS 8002 Assignment Locating and Critically Analyzing Primary Research Articles

Students pursuing advanced nursing education require and should develop research skills so that they can locate and critically analyze articles to attain evidence for implementation in their practice settings. Through this approach, they attain not just success in nursing research but also advance in their careers as well-informed practitioners who leverage evidence-based practice (EBP) interventions to offer patient-centered care and reduce hospital readmission (Charosaei et al., 2021). The Walden University library offers resources and databases for advanced nursing students to conduct research and locate scholarly articles. Imperatively, through these databases which include PubMed Central, Medline, and CINAHL as well as BMC Central, one can locate articles on the topic of interest using keywords or terms. The purpose of this paper is to locate and analyze three articles from online resources provided by the identified databases or journals, summarize, and synthesize them from a scholarly perspective. In its final part, the paper explores the differences between summarizing and synthesizing research articles.

Article 1

The first article is by Bokhour et al. (2018) and focuses on strategies that healthcare organizations can implement to offer patient-centered care. According to the authors, a core part of implementing patient-centered care (PCC) is transforming the organization’s culture of care. Using the Department of Veterans Affairs, the authors conducted qualitative semi-structured interviews with employees to identify various factors that help entities to offer patient-centered care like effective leadership, patient and family engagement, engaging the staff, and focusing on innovation among other aspects. In their conclusion, the authors are categorical that an effective organizational culture is key to offering patient-centered care.

Article 2

The article by Hower et al. (2019) explores the organizational determinants from decision makers’ point-of-view on implementing patient-centered care. Using a qualitative approach across different health and social care organizations (HSCOs), the authors found that various aspects were important and determined the level of patient-centered care (PCC) that each facility can offer. Among these include effective communication among staff, addressing staff welfare to motivate them, and overcoming resource constraints, especially financial and human resource issues. The authors conclude by imploring HSCOs to tailor their interventions based on their situations to meet these needs.

Article 3

The third article by Rammohan et al. (2023) discusses the implementation of care transition teams to reduce hospital readmission and enhance patient outcomes. Using a two-phase study approach to investigate readmission rates and associated risk factors in a community hospital for about five years, and a care transition team after discharge and patient support to evaluate the social determinants of health (SDOHs). As such, the authors emphasize the critical role that care transition teams play in lowering the rates of hospital readmissions rates and mitigating the financial strain on healthcare organizations. The researchers assert that hospitals through care transition teams can lower the overall readmission rates by identifying and addressing individual risk factors that include evaluation of social determinants of health (SDOHs).

Synthesis of the Articles

The three articles emphasize the need for healthcare organizations to develop and implement effective strategies aimed at providing patient-centered care that can reduce hospital readmissions. According to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) (2020), patient-tailored interventions lead to increased participation of patients in their care plans and management of their condition. Tailoring these interventions ensures that patients get quality care based on care transition teams to reduce possible readmissions. Through these articles, one can identify the relationship between patient-centered care and reduced rates of readmissions, especially within the first thirty days after discharge. The articles are categorical that providing patient-centered care leads to improved care quality and reduces the possibility of readmissions.

Differences Between Summary and Synthesis of Articles

Article summary and synthesis are different based on the goals and focus. At the core of the article’s summary is detailing the topic of the study, methods, and approaches used, the results of the research, and the conclusion. The summary also outlines the main themes of the article. Conversely, synthesizing an article means identifying and critically analyzing the themes and areas of study covered by the authors. Article synthesis entails giving a more in-depth interpretation of the sources and their relevance to the practice issue being researched.

Conclusion

Locating and critically analyzing research articles is a core part of nurturing advanced nursing students’ research skills and attributes. Through this approach, nursing students enhance their ability to attain research evidence and implement it in practice settings to solve patient issues. The implication is that critical analysis entails synthesizing the articles to determine the common themes and their connection to the research goals and interests of the research.

 

References

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) (2020). Rethinking the Role of Primary

Care in Reducing Hospital Readmissions. https://www.ahrq.gov/news/blog/ahrqviews/rethinking-role-of-primary-care.html

Bokhour, B. G., Fix, G. M., Mueller, N. M., Barker, A. M., Lavela, S. L., Hill, J. N., … & Lukas,

  1. V. (2018). How can healthcare organizations implement patient-centered care? Examining a large-scale cultural transformation. BMC health services research, 18(1), 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-2949-5

Charosaei, F., Rostami, S., Esmaeili, M., Molavynejad, S., & Vanaki, Z. (2021). Effective

strategies for implementing patient-centered care in cardiac care unit: An opportunity for change. Journal of education and health promotion, 10. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-019-05428-2

Hower, K. I., Vennedey, V., Hillen, H. A., Kuntz, L., Stock, S., Pfaff, H., & Ansmann, L. (2019).

Implementation of patient-centered care: which organizational determinants matter from the decision maker’s perspective? Results from a qualitative interview study across various health and social care organizations. BMJ open, 9(4), e027591. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027591

Rammohan R, Joy M, Magam S, et al. (May 15, 2023) The Path to Sustainable Healthcare:

Implementing Care Transition Teams to Mitigate Hospital Readmissions and Improve Patient Outcomes. Cureus, 15(5): e39022. DOI:10.7759/cureus.39022

 

What steps do you take to locate primary and peer-reviewed research articles when performing a literature search?

What resources are available to you to engage in a meaningful and successful literature search?

Photo Credit: [erhui1979]/[Digital Vision Vectors]/Getty Images

As you have explored throughout this course, Walden University provides vast resources for student support to ensure success in their academic program of study. When it comes to research and using Library resources, several support mechanisms are available to you as well.

Taking the first step to think about a research topic or area of interest and filtering that topic using a series of keywords and operations will be a fundamental component for performing a literature search in Walden Library’s databases. While the ultimate goal is to produce a set or results that match your search criteria, you must keep in mind that that the quality of the research articles obtained will likely vary. Thus, you must critically examine and analyze the aims of the research produced and how it aligns, confirms, or negates your topic or area of research. As you develop proficiency in this area, you will discover that you can extract content themes and frameworks to enhance future research and the need to identify additional research support.

NURS 8002 Assignment Locating and Critically Analyzing Primary Research Articles
NURS 8002 Assignment Locating and Critically Analyzing Primary Research Articles

For this Assignment, consult the Walden Library webinars and resources provided. These resources serve as a general good first step for performing literature searches and engaging with the databases of research available to you. Think about a research topic or area of interest to focus on for this Assignment. Then, search the Walden Library to locate and retrieve peer-reviewed research articles that pertain to your topic or area of interest.

To prepare:

  • Review the Walden Library webinars presented in the media Learning Resources for this week.
  • Then, search the Walden Library and locate three peer-reviewed primary research articles that pertain to your practice area and are of particular interest to you.

The Assignment: (6 paragraphs)

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 8002 Assignment Locating and Critically Analyzing Primary Research Articles

 

Write a 6-paragraph APA-formatted paper in which you do the following:

  • Write a 1-pararaph introduction of how you conducted your literature search and the databases consulted in your search in relation to your practice area or area of interest. Be specific and provide examples.
  • Write a 1-paragraph summary of each of the articles you have selected (a total of 3 paragraphs).
  • Write 1 paragraph that synthesizes the three articles using a scholarly voice.
  • Write a final paragraph in which you discuss the differences between summarizing and synthesizing research. Be specific and provide examples.

Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates/general#s-lg-box-20293632). All papers submitted must use this formatting.

By Day 7 of Week 9

Submit your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 9.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

  • Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “M4Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
  • Click the Module 4 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
  • Click the Module 4 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
  • Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “M4Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
  • If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
  • Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.

NURS 8002 Assignment Locating and Critically Analyzing Primary Research Articles Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Module 4 Assignment Rubric

 

Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

Submit your Module 4 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

 

Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 9

To participate in this Assignment:

Module 4 Assignment

Lopes Write Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.

Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.

Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?

Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.

Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.

If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.

I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.

As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:

Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.

Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

Important information for writing discussion questions and participation

Welcome to class

Hello class and welcome to the class and I will be your instructor for this course. This is a -week course and requires a lot of time commitment, organization, and a high level of dedication. Please use the class syllabus to guide you through all the assignments required for the course. I have also attached the classroom policies to this announcement to know your expectations for this course. Please review this document carefully and ask me any questions if you do. You could email me at any time or send me a message via the “message” icon in halo if you need to contact me. I check my email regularly, so you should get a response within 24 hours. If you have not heard from me within 24 hours and need to contact me urgently, please send a follow up text to

I strongly encourage that you do not wait until the very last minute to complete your assignments. Your assignments in weeks 4 and 5 require early planning as you would need to present a teaching plan and interview a community health provider. I advise you look at the requirements for these assignments at the beginning of the course and plan accordingly. I have posted the YouTube link that explains all the class assignments in detail. It is required that you watch this 32-minute video as the assignments from week 3 through 5 require that you follow the instructions to the letter to succeed. Failure to complete these assignments according to instructions might lead to a zero. After watching the video, please schedule a one-on-one with me to discuss your topic for your project by the second week of class. Use this link to schedule a 15-minute session. Please, call me at the time of your appointment on my number. Please note that I will NOT call you.

Please, be advised I do NOT accept any assignments by email. If you are having technical issues with uploading an assignment, contact the technical department and inform me of the issue. If you have any issues that would prevent you from getting your assignments to me by the deadline, please inform me to request a possible extension. Note that working fulltime or overtime is no excuse for late assignments. There is a 5%-point deduction for every day your assignment is late. This only applies to approved extensions. Late assignments will not be accepted.

If you think you would be needing accommodations due to any reasons, please contact the appropriate department to request accommodations.

Plagiarism is highly prohibited. Please ensure you are citing your sources correctly using APA 7th edition. All assignments including discussion posts should be formatted in APA with the appropriate spacing, font, margin, and indents. Any papers not well formatted would be returned back to you, hence, I advise you review APA formatting style. I have attached a sample paper in APA format and will also post sample discussion responses in subsequent announcements.

Your initial discussion post should be a minimum of 200 words and response posts should be a minimum of 150 words. Be advised that I grade based on quality and not necessarily the number of words you post. A minimum of TWO references should be used for your initial post. For your response post, you do not need references as personal experiences would count as response posts. If you however cite anything from the literature for your response post, it is required that you cite your reference. You should include a minimum of THREE references for papers in this course. Please note that references should be no more than 5 years old except recommended as a resource for the class. Furthermore, for each discussion board question, you need ONE initial substantive response and TWO substantive responses to either your classmates or your instructor for a total of THREE responses. There are TWO discussion questions each week, hence, you need a total minimum of SIX discussion posts for each week. I usually post a discussion question each week. You could also respond to these as it would count towards your required SIX discussion posts for the week.

I understand this is a lot of information to cover in 5 weeks, however, the Bible says in Philippians 4:13 that we can do all things through Christ that strengthens us. Even in times like this, we are encouraged by God’s word that we have that ability in us to succeed with His strength. I pray that each and every one of you receives strength for this course and life generally as we navigate through this pandemic that is shaking our world today. Relax and enjoy the course!

Hi Class,

Please read through the following information on writing a Discussion question response and participation posts.

Contact me if you have any questions.

Important information on Writing a Discussion Question

  • Your response needs to be a minimum of 150 words (not including your list of references)
  • There needs to be at least TWO references with ONE being a peer reviewed professional journal article.
  • Include in-text citations in your response
  • Do not include quotes—instead summarize and paraphrase the information
  • Follow APA-7th edition
  • Points will be deducted if the above is not followed

Participation –replies to your classmates or instructor

  • A minimum of 6 responses per week, on at least 3 days of the week.
  • Each response needs at least ONE reference with citations—best if it is a peer reviewed journal article
  • Each response needs to be at least 75 words in length (does not include your list of references)
  • Responses need to be substantive by bringing information to the discussion or further enhance the discussion. Responses of “I agree” or “great post” does not count for the word count.
  • Follow APA 7th edition
  • Points will be deducted if the above is not followed
  • Remember to use and follow APA-7th edition for all weekly assignments, discussion questions, and participation points.
  • Here are some helpful links
  • Student paper example
  • Citing Sources
  • The Writing Center is a great resource
NURS_8002_Module4_Assignment_Rubric
NURS_8002_Module4_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts

Write a 1-paragraph introduction of how you conducted your literature search and the databases consulted in your search in relation to your practice area or area of interest. Be specific and provide examples.

20 to >17.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%
The response accurately and clearly introduces in detail how the literature search was conducted in relation to the practice area or area of interest selected, including a detailed description of the literature search process and the databases consulted. … The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the introduction and process described.

17 to >15.0 pts

Good 80%–89%
The response accurately introduces how the literature search was conducted in relation to the practice area or area of interest selected, including an accurate description of the literature search process and the databases consulted. … The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the introduction and process described.

15 to >13.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%
The response inaccurately or vaguely introduces how the literature search was conducted in relation to the practice area or area of interest selected, including an inaccurate or vague description of the literature search process and the databases consulted. … The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the introduction and process described.

13 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%
The response inaccurately and vaguely introduces how the literature search was conducted in relation to the practice area or area of interest selected, including an inaccurate and vague description of the literature search process and the databases consulted, or it is missing. … The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the introduction and process describes, or it is missing.
20 pts

Write a 1-paragraph summary of each of the articles you have selected (a total of 3 paragraphs).

20 to >17.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%
The response accurately and clearly summarizes in detail each of the articles selected.

17 to >15.0 pts

Good 80%–89%
The response accurately summarizes each of the articles selected.

15 to >13.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%
The response inaccurately or vaguely summarizes each of the articles selected. … OR … The response summarizes < 3 articles.

13 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%
The response inaccurately and vaguely summarizes each of the articles selected, or it is missing.
20 pts

Write 1 paragraph that synthesizes the 3 articles using a scholarly voice.

25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%
The response comprehensively and fully synthesizes the content from the 3 articles selected that accurately and clearly support in detail the practice area or area of interest selected.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good 80%–89%
The response synthesizes the content from the 3 articles selected that accurately supports the practice area or area of interest selected.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%
The response inaccurately or vaguely synthesizes content from the articles selected that may lend support to the practice area or area of interest selected.

17 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%
The response inaccurately and vaguely synthesizes content from the 3 articles selected that does not lend support to the practice area or area of interest selected, or it is missing.
25 pts

Write a final paragraph in which you discuss the differences between summarizing and synthesizing research. Be specific and provide examples.

20 to >17.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%
The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the differences between summarizing and synthesizing research. … The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the differences explained.

17 to >15.0 pts

Good 80%–89%
The response accurately explains the differences between summarizing and synthesizing research. … The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the differences explained.

15 to >13.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%
The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the differences between summarizing and synthesizing research. … The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the differences explained.

13 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%
The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the differences between summarizing and synthesizing research, or it is missing. … The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the differences explained, or it is missing.
20 pts

Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. … A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good 80%–89%
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. … Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

3 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. … No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.
5 pts

Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good 80%–89%
Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%
Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
5 pts

Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent 90%–100%
Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.5 pts

Good 80%–89%
Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

3.5 to >3.0 pts

Fair 70%–79%
Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

3 to >0 pts

Poor 0%–69%
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
5 pts
Total Points: 100