Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

NURS 6630 Assignment 2: Practicum Application
Assignment

Practicum Applications must be submitted in a timely manner to ensure that your Preceptor and
Practicum Site meet the requirements of the College of Nursing and Walden University. For this
Assignment, you will either submit your Practicum Application or you will submit a
revised/updated Practicum Plan that indicates when you plan to take the Practicum courses.
To Prepare for this Assignment:
 Review the Practicum Application Deadlines found on the College of Nursing Field
Experience website to determine when you need to submit your Practicum Application.
 Review the Practicum Application Tutorial for submitting applications in Meditrek.
Meditrek Credentials (Username and Password):
 Your credentials have been emailed to your Walden student email address. Search your
Walden student issued email to locate the email from support@meditrek.info. (Note: Do
not email Meditrek directly, please use the following methods if you are unable to locate
your Meditrek credentials.)
o If you are unable to find your email, you may request your credentials emailed to
you online by requesting a password reset online:
https://edu.meditrek.com/public/ForgotPassword.aspx
o If you are unable to reset your password online, call the Customer Care Team
Support at 800-925-3368 or live chat via your student portal.

The Assignment:
You must complete either Part 1 or Part 2 of this Assignment:
Part 1: Practicum Application
 Login into Meditrek and complete your Practicum Application. When the application is
complete, submit it and create a PDF of the confirmation email you received.
Part 2: Practicum Plan
 Using the affiliation agreement search within Meditrek and identify potential Practicum
Sites that are in your area to assist you in identifying potential Preceptors.
 Complete the Practicum Plan form found in Meditrek, submit it and create a PDF of the
confirmation email you received.
By Day 7 of Week 10
Submit either your Practicum Application or Practicum Plan submission confirmation email
PDF.
Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:
 Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK10Assgn2+last
name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
 Click the Week 10 Assignment 2 Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the
Assignment.
 Click the Week 10 Assignment 2 link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for
grading criteria from this area.
 Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the
document you saved as “WK10Assgn2+last name+first initial.(extension)” and
click Open.
 If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit
my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
 Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:
Week 10 Assignment 2 Rubric

Submit Your Assignment by Day 7

To submit your Assignment:
Week 10 Assignment 2

What’s Coming Up in Week 11?

Photo Credit: [BrianAJackson]/[iStock / Getty Images Plus]/Getty Images
Next week, you will synthesize and apply your knowledge and skills of assessing and
treating patients with various psychopharmacologic treatments as you prepare for your
Final Exam.

Next Week

To go to the next week:
Week 11

Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Content
Name: NURS_6630_Week10_Assignment1_Rubric
 Grid View
 List View

 

Excellent
Point range:
90–100

Good
Point range: 80–89

Fair
Point range: 70–79

Poor
Point range: 0–69

Introduction to the
case (1 page)
Briefly explain and
summarize the case
for this Assignment.
Be sure to include
the specific patient
factors that may
impact your
decision making
when prescribing
medication for this
patient.

Points Range: 9
(9%) – 10 (10%)
The response
accurately, clearly,
and fully
summarizes in
detail the case for
the Assignment.
The response
accurately and
clearly explains in
detail the specific
patient factors that
impact decision
making when
prescribing
medication for this

Points Range: 8
(8%) – 8 (8%)
The response
accurately
summarizes the
case for the
Assignment.
The response
accurately explains
the specific patient
factors that impact
decision making
with prescribing
medication for this
patient.

Points Range: 7
(7%) – 7 (7%)
The response
inaccurately or
vaguely
summarizes the
case for the
Assignment.
The response
inaccurately or
vaguely explains
the specific patient
factors that impact
decision making
with prescribing
medication for this
patient.

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 6 (6%)
The response
inaccurately and
vaguely
summarizes the
case for the
Assignment, or is
missing.
The response
inaccurately and
vaguely explains
the specific patient
factors that impact
decision making
with prescribing
medication for this

patient. patient.

Decision #1 (1–2
pages)
• Which decision
did you select?
• Why did you
select this decision?
Be specific and
support your
response with
clinically relevant
and patient-specific
resources, including
the primary
literature.
• Why did you not
select the other
two options
provided in the
exercise? Be
specific and
support your
response with
clinically relevant
and patient-specific
resources, including
the primary
literature.
• What were you
hoping to achieve
by making this
decision? Support
your response with
evidence and
references to the
Learning Resources
(including the
primary literature).
• Explain how
ethical
considerations may
impact your

Points Range: 18
(18%) – 20 (20%)
The response
accurately and
clearly explains in
detail the decision
selected.
The response
accurately and
clearly explains in
detail why the
decision was
selected, with
specific clinically
relevant resources
that fully support
the decision
selected.
The response
accurately and
clearly explains in
detail why the
other two
responses were not
selected, with
specific clinically
relevant resources
that fully support
the response.
The response
accurately and
clearly explains in
detail the outcome
the student was
hoping to achieve
with the selected
decision, with
specific clinically
relevant resources

Points Range: 16
(16%) – 17 (17%)
The response
accurately explains
the decision
selected.
The response
explains why the
decision was
selected, with
specific clinically
relevant resources
that support the
decision selected.
The response
accurately explains
why the other two
responses were not
selected, with
specific clinically
relevant resources
that support the
response.
The response
accurately explains
the outcome the
student was hoping
to achieve with the
selected decision,
with specific
clinically relevant
resources that
support the
response.
The response
accurately explains
how ethical
considerations

Points Range: 14
(14%) – 15 (15%)
The response
inaccurately or
vaguely explains
the decision
selected.
The response
inaccurately or
vaguely explains
why the decision
was selected, with
specific clinically
relevant resources
that inaccurately or
vaguely support the
decision selected.
The response
inaccurately or
vaguely explains
why the other two
responses were not
selected, with
specific clinically
relevant resources
that inaccurately or
vaguely support the
response.
The response
inaccurately or
vaguely explains
the outcome the
student was hoping
to achieve with the
selected decision,
with specific
clinically relevant
resources that
inaccurately or

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 13 (13%)
The response
inaccurately and
vaguely explains
the decision
selected.
The response
inaccurately and
vaguely explains
why the decision
was selected, with
specific clinically
relevant resources
that do not support
the decision
selected, or is
missing.
The response
inaccurately and
vaguely explains
why the other two
responses were not
selected, with
specific clinically
relevant resources
that do not support
the decision
selected, or is
missing.
The response
inaccurately and
vaguely explains
the outcome the
student was hoping
to achieve with the
selected decision,
with specific
clinically relevant

treatment plan and
communication
with patients. Be
specific and provide
examples.

that fully support
the response.
The response
accurately and
clearly explains in
detail how ethical
considerations
impact the
treatment plan and
communication
with patients.
Examples provided
fully support the
decisions and
responses
provided.

impact the
treatment plan and
communication
with patients.
Examples provided
support the
decisions and
responses
provided.

vaguely support the
response.
The response
inaccurately or
vaguely explains
how ethical
considerations
impact the
treatment plan and
communication
with patients.
Examples provided
may support the
decisions and
responses
provided.

resources that do
not support the
response, or is
missing.
The response
inaccurately and
vaguely explains
how ethical
considerations
impact the
treatment plan and
communication
with patients, or is
missing.
Examples provided
do not support the
decisions and
responses
provided, or is
missing.

Decision #2 (1–2
pages)
• Which decision
did you select?
• Why did you
select this decision?
Be specific and
support your
response with
clinically relevant
and patient-specific
resources, including
the primary
literature.
• Why did you not
select the other
two options
provided in the
exercise? Be
specific and

Points Range: 18
(18%) – 20 (20%)
The response
accurately and
clearly explains in
detail the decision
selected.
The response
accurately and
clearly explains in
detail why the
decision was
selected, with
specific clinically
relevant resources
that fully support
the decision
selected.

Points Range: 16
(16%) – 17 (17%)
The response
accurately explains
the decision
selected.
The response
explains why the
decision was
selected, with
specific clinically
relevant resources
that support the
decision selected.
The response
accurately explains
why the other two
responses were not

Points Range: 14
(14%) – 15 (15%)
The response
inaccurately or
vaguely explains
the decision
selected.
The response
inaccurately or
vaguely explains
why the decision
was selected, with
specific clinically
relevant resources
that inaccurately or
vaguely support the
decision selected.
The response

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 13 (13%)
The response
inaccurately and
vaguely explains in
detail the decision
selected.
The response
inaccurately and
vaguely explains
why the decision
was selected, with
specific clinically
relevant resources
that do not support
the decision
selected, or is
missing.

support your
response with
clinically relevant
and patient-specific
resources, including
the primary
literature.
• What were you
hoping to achieve
by making this
decision? Support
your response with
evidence and
references to the
Learning Resources
(including the
primary literature).
• Explain how
ethical
considerations may
impact your
treatment plan and
communication
with patients. Be
specific and provide
examples.

The response
accurately and
clearly explains in
detail why the
other two
responses were not
selected, with
specific clinically
relevant resources
that fully support
the response.
The response
accurately and
clearly explains in
detail the outcome
the student was
hoping to achieve
with the selected
decision, with
specific clinically
relevant resources
that fully support
the response.
The response
accurately and
clearly explains in
detail how ethical
considerations
impact the
treatment plan and
communication
with patients.
Examples provided
fully support the
decisions and
responses
provided.

selected, with
specific clinically
relevant resources
that support the
response.
The response
accurately explains
the outcome the
student was hoping
to achieve with the
selected decision,
with specific
clinically relevant
resources that
support the
response.
The response
accurately explains
how ethical
considerations
impact the
treatment plan and
communication
with patients.
Examples provided
support the
decisions and
responses
provided.

inaccurately or
vaguely explains
why the other two
responses were not
selected, with
specific clinically
relevant resources
that inaccurately or
vaguely support the
response.
The response
inaccurately or
vaguely explains
the outcome the
student was hoping
to achieve with the
selected decision,
with specific
clinically relevant
resources that
inaccurately or
vaguely support the
response.
The response
inaccurately or
vaguely explains
how ethical
considerations
impact the
treatment plan and
communication
with patients.
Examples provided
may support the
decisions and
responses
provided.

The response
inaccurately and
vaguely explains
why the other two
responses were not
selected, with
specific clinically
relevant resources
that do not support
the decision
selected, or is
missing.
The response
inaccurately and
vaguely explains
the outcome the
student was hoping
to achieve with the
selected decision,
with specific
clinically relevant
resources that do
not support the
response, or is
missing.
The response
inaccurately and
vaguely explains
how ethical
considerations
impact the
treatment plan and
communication
with patients, or is
missing.
Examples provided
do not support the
decisions and
responses
provided, or is
missing.

Decision #3 (1–2
pages)
• Which decision
did you select?
• Why did you
select this decision?
Be specific and
support your
response with
clinically relevant
and patient-specific
resources, including
the primary
literature.
• Why did you not
select the other
two options
provided in the
exercise? Be
specific and
support your
response with
clinically relevant
and patient-specific
resources, including
the primary
literature.
• What were you
hoping to achieve
by making this
decision? Support
your response with
evidence and
references to the
Learning Resources
(including the
primary literature).
• Explain how
ethical
considerations may
impact your
treatment plan and
communication

Points Range: 18
(18%) – 20 (20%)
The response
accurately and
clearly explains in
detail the decision
selected.
The response
accurately and
clearly explains in
detail why the
decision was
selected, with
specific clinically
relevant resources
that fully support
the decision
selected.
The response
accurately and
clearly explains in
detail why the
other two
responses were not
selected, with
specific clinically
relevant resources
that fully support
the response.
The response
accurately and
clearly explains in
detail the outcome
the student was
hoping to achieve
with the selected
decision, with
specific clinically
relevant resources
that fully support
the response.

Points Range: 16
(16%) – 17 (17%)
The response
accurately explains
the decision
selected.
The response
explains why the
decision was
selected, with
specific clinically
relevant resources
that support the
decision selected.
The response
accurately explains
why the other two
responses were not
selected, with
specific clinically
relevant resources
that support the
response.
The response
accurately explains
the outcome the
student was hoping
to achieve with the
selected decision,
with specific
clinically relevant
resources that
support the
response.
The response
accurately explains
how ethical
considerations
impact the
treatment plan and

Points Range: 14
(14%) – 15 (15%)
The response
inaccurately or
vaguely explains
the decision
selected.
The response
inaccurately or
vaguely explains
why the decision
was selected, with
specific clinically
relevant resources
that inaccurately or
vaguely support the
decision selected.
The response
inaccurately or
vaguely explains
why the other two
responses were not
selected, with
specific clinically
relevant resources
that inaccurately or
vaguely support the
response.
The response
inaccurately or
vaguely explains
the outcome the
student was hoping
to achieve with the
selected decision,
with specific
clinically relevant
resources that
inaccurately or
vaguely support the
response.

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 13 (13%)
The response
inaccurately and
vaguely explains in
detail the decision
selected.
The response
inaccurately and
vaguely explains
why the decision
was selected, with
specific clinically
relevant resources
that do not support
the decision
selected, or is
missing.
The response
inaccurately and
vaguely explains
why the other two
responses were not
selected, with
specific clinically
relevant resources
that do not support
the decision
selected, or is
missing.
The response
inaccurately and
vaguely explains
the outcome the
student was hoping
to achieve with the
selected decision,
with specific
clinically relevant
resources that do
not support the

with patients. Be
specific and provide
examples.

The response
accurately and
clearly explains in
detail how ethical
considerations
impact the
treatment plan and
communication
with patients.
Examples provided
fully support the
decisions and
responses
provided.

communication
with patients.
Examples provided
support the
decisions and
responses
provided.

The response
inaccurately or
vaguely explains
how ethical
considerations
impact the
treatment plan and
communication
with patients.
Examples provided
may support the
decisions and
responses
provided.

response, or is
missing.
The response
inaccurately and
vaguely explains
how ethical
considerations
impact the
treatment plan and
communication
with patients, or is
missing.
Examples provided
do not support the
decisions and
responses
provided, or is
missing.

Conclusion (1 page)
• Summarize your
recommendations
on the treatment
options you
selected for this
patient. Be sure to
justify your
recommendations
and support your
response with
clinically relevant
and patient-specific
resources, including
the primary
literature.

Points Range: 14
(14%) – 15 (15%)
The response
accurately and
clearly summarizes
in detail the
recommendations
on the treatment
options selected for
this patient.
The response
accurately and
clearly explains a
justification for the
recommendations
provided, including
clinically relevant
resources that fully
support the
recommendations
provided.

Points Range: 12
(12%) – 13 (13%)
The response
accurately
summarizes the
recommendations
on the treatment
options selected for
this patient.
The response
accurately explains
a justification for
the
recommendation
provided, including
clinically relevant
resources that
support the
recommendations
provided.

Points Range: 11
(11%) – 11 (11%)
The response
inaccurately or
vaguely
summarizes the
recommendations
on the treatment
options selected for
this patient.
The response
inaccurately or
vaguely explains a
justification for the
recommendations
provided, including
clinically relevant
resources that
inaccurately or
vaguely support the
recommendations

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 10 (10%)
The response
inaccurately and
vaguely
summarizes the
recommendations
on the treatment
options selected for
this patient, or is
missing.
The response
inaccurately and
vaguely explains a
justification for the
recommendations
provided, including
clinically relevant
resources that do
not support the
recommendations

provided. provided, or is
missing.

Written Expression
and Formatting –
Paragraph
Development and
Organization:
Paragraphs make
clear points that
support well-
developed ideas,
flow logically, and
demonstrate
continuity of ideas.
Sentences are
carefully
focused—neither
long and rambling
nor short and
lacking substance.
A clear and
comprehensive
purpose statement
and introduction
are provided that
delineate all
required criteria.

Points Range: 5
(5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and
sentences follow
writing standards
for flow, continuity,
and clarity.
A clear and
comprehensive
purpose statement,
introduction, and
conclusion are
provided that
delineate all
required criteria.

Points Range: 4
(4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and
sentences follow
writing standards
for flow, continuity,
and clarity 80% of
the time.
Purpose,
introduction, and
conclusion of the
assignment are
stated, yet they are
brief and not
descriptive.

Points Range: 3.5
(3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Paragraphs and
sentences follow
writing standards
for flow, continuity,
and clarity
60%–79% of the
time.
Purpose,
introduction, and
conclusion of the
assignment is vague
or off topic.

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and
sentences follow
writing standards
for flow, continuity,
and clarity < 60% of
the time.
No purpose
statement,
introduction, or
conclusion were
provided.

Written Expression
and Formatting –
English writing
standards:
Correct grammar,
mechanics, and
proper punctuation

Points Range: 5
(5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct
grammar, spelling,
and punctuation
with no errors.

Points Range: 4
(4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1 or
2) grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation errors.

Points Range: 3.5
(3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3
or 4) grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation errors.

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5)
grammar, spelling,
and punctuation
errors that interfere
with the reader’s
understanding.

Written Expression
and Formatting –
The paper follows
correct APA format
for title page,
headings, font,

Points Range: 5
(5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA
format with no
errors.

Points Range: 4
(4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1 or
2) APA format
errors.

Points Range: 3.5
(3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3
or 4) APA format
errors.

Points Range: 0
(0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5)
APA format errors.

spacing, margins,
indentations, page
numbers,
parenthetical/in-
text citations, and
reference list.
Total Points: 100
Name: NURS_6630_Week10_Assignment1_Rubric

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.