NURS 6512 Week 5 Discussion Discussion: Assessing the Ears, Nose, and Throat

Sample Answer for NURS 6512 Week 5 Discussion Discussion: Assessing the Ears, Nose, and Throat Included After Question

Nurses conducting assessments of the ears, nose, and throat must be able to identify the small differences between life-threatening conditions and benign ones. For instance, if a patient with a sore throat and a runny nose also has inflamed lymph nodes, the inflammation is probably due to the pathogen causing the sore throat rather than a case of throat cancer. With this knowledge and a sufficient patient health history, a nurse would not need to escalate the assessment to a biopsy or an MRI of the lymph nodes but would probably perform a simple strep test.

Most ear, nose, and throat conditions that arise in non-critical care settings are minor in nature. However, subtle symptoms can sometimes escalate into life-threatening conditions that require prompt assessment and treatment.

In this Case Study Assignment, you consider case studies of abnormal findings from patients in a clinical setting. You determine what history should be collected from the patients, what physical exams and diagnostic tests should be conducted, and formulate a differential diagnosis with several possible conditions.

RESOURCES

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

TO PREPARE

  • By Day 1 of this week, you will be assigned to a specific case study for this Case Study Assignment. Please see the “Course Announcements” section of the classroom for your assignment from your Instructor.
  • Also, your Case Study Assignment should be in the Episodic/Focused SOAP Note format rather than the traditional narrative style format. Refer to Chapter 2 of the Sullivan text and the Episodic/Focused SOAP Template in the Week 5 Learning Resources for guidance. Remember that all Episodic/Focused SOAP Notes have specific data included in every patient case.

With regard to the case study you were assigned:

  • Review this week’s Learning Resources and consider the insights they provide.
  • Consider what history would be necessary to collect from the patient.
  • Consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition. How would the results be used to make a diagnosis?
  • Identify at least five possible conditions that may be considered in a differential diagnosis for the patient.

THE ASSIGNMENT

Use the Episodic/Focused SOAP Template and create an episodic/focused note about the patient in the case study to which you were assigned using the episodic/focused note template provided in the Week 5 resources. Provide evidence from the literature to support diagnostic tests that would be appropriate for each case. List five different possible conditions for the patient’s differential diagnosis and justify why you selected each.

BY DAY 6 OF WEEK 5

Submit your Assignment.

SUBMISSION INFORMATION

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

  1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK5Assgn1+last name+first initial.
  2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
  3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NURS 6512 Week 5 Discussion Discussion: Assessing the Ears, Nose, and Throat

Title: NURS 6512 Week 5 Discussion Discussion: Assessing the Ears, Nose, and Throat

Patient Information:

CT, 32 years old

S.

CC (chief complaint) “I feel tired and my hair is falling off”

HPI: Chantal is a 32-year-old female who visited the facility with complaints of feeling tired and her hair falling out. She reports that she has gained 30 pounds of weight in the past year. Chantal also reports that her appetite has significantly decreased. She denied accompanying symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, and pain. She reports that engaging in active physical activities worsens the fatigue that she is experiencing.

Current Medications: Chantal denies any current use of medications

Allergies: Chantal reports seasonal allergies. She denies food or drug allergies.

PMHx: Chantal’s immunization record is up-to-date. Her last tetanus vaccination was 10/10/23. She has no history of hospitalization or chronic illnesses. She also denied any history of surgeries.

Soc Hx: Chantal is married with no children. She works as a teacher. She lives with her husband in a rented apartment. She does not smoke or abuse any drugs. She loves spending her leisure time with her husband and family. She wears a seat belt while driving. Their home has smoke detectors. She engages in regular exercises at least four times weekly.

Fam Hx: Chantal’s mother was diagnosed with cervical cancer a year ago and has been on treatment. Her father is an alcoholic and has hypertension and asthma. Her paternal grandfather died of heart disease. Her paternal grandmother died of major depression. Her maternal grandmother died of diabetes mellitus type 2.

ROS:

GENERAL:  Chantal was dressed appropriately for the occasion. She was alert and oriented to herself, time, and events. She reported fatigue and weight gain. She denied fever, pain, or chills.

HEENT:  Eyes: Chantal denies blurred vision, eye drainage, pain, or double vision. Ears, Nose, Throat:  Chantal denies ear pain, decreased hearing, ringing, or ear fullness. She denies sneezing, nasal drainage, or septum deviation. She denies a sore throat, difficulty swallowing, or postnasal drainage.

SKIN:  Chantal reports her hair falling out. She denies abnormal changes in her skin color, itching, or skin rashes. CARDIOVASCULAR: Chantal denies palpitation, peripheral edema, palpitations, or chest pain and discomfort.

RESPIRATORY:  Chantal denies wheezing, cough, dyspnea, cyanosis, or sputum. GASTROINTESTINAL:  Chantal reports decreased appetite. She denies nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, heartburn, abdominal pain, or bleeding.

GENITOURINARY:  Chantal reports that her last menstrual period was 24/12/2023. She denies urgency, frequency, or dysuria.

NEUROLOGICAL:  Chantal denies loss of balance, difficulty with movement, tingling sensations, syncope, dizziness, or paralysis. Her bowel and bladder movements are normal.

MUSCULOSKELETAL: Chantal denies fractures, joint pains, muscle pain, stiffness, and back pains.

HEMATOLOGIC:  Chantal denies easy bruising and a history of excessive bleeding and bleeding disorders

LYMPHATICS:  Chantal denies any enlarged notes or a history of splenectomy. PSYCHIATRIC:  Chantal has no history of any mental health disorders

ENDOCRINOLOGIC:  Chantal reports weight gain, feeling cold, fatigue, and disturbance in her sleeping pattern. She denies polydipsia or polydipsia.

ALLERGIES:  Chantal reports a history of her hair falling out.

O.

Physical exam:

Vital signs: T 37.3, RR 20, BP 102/62, P 70, and SPO2 96%, Weight 276 lbs Height 5’5

Skin: Scarce hair distribution, dry and cold skin to touch

 

Diagnostic results: A complete blood count and thyroid function tests were ordered. This was to rule out infections and abnormal thyroid hormones as the cause of Chantal’s problems.

A.

Differential Diagnoses

Hypothyroidism: Hypothyroidism is Chantal’s primary diagnosis. Hypothyroidism is a thyroid disorder that develops from low thyroid hormone levels. Hypothyroidism develops due to central or secondary causes. Central hypothyroidism arises from inadequate stimulation of the thyroid gland by the central nervous system while secondary hypothyroidism develops due to other causes such as thyroid surgery. Patients suffering from hypothyroidism experience symptoms such as cold intolerance, skin changes, puffiness, decreased sweating, gastrointestinal disturbances, hair loss, voice changes, fatigue, sleep disturbances, and weight gain. They also experience galactorrhea and menstrual cycle abnormalities (Patil et al., 2023; Wilson et al., 2021). Chantal has symptoms seen in hypothyroidism, hence, her primary diagnosis.

Major depression: Major depression is the secondary diagnosis that should be considered for Chantal. Major depression is a mental health disorder characterized by a severely depressed mood on most days, throughout the day. Patients also report additional symptoms such as fatigue, feelings of worthlessness and guilt, and changes in appetite, sleep patterns, and weight. Patients are also easily distracted, and experience difficulties concentrating and making decisions, suicidal thoughts, plans, and attempts (Bode et al., 2021). Chantal has some symptoms of major depression such as weight and appetite changes and sleep disturbances. However, she does not have a depressed mood, hence; major depression is the secondary diagnosis.

Sleep apnea: Sleep apnea is the other differential diagnosis that should be considered for Chantal. Sleep apnea is a sleep disorder characterized by problems with sleeping patterns. The affected patients experience repeated episodes of interrupted sleep due to the stopping of the breathing process. Patients experience symptoms such as snoring loudly, feeling tired after a night’s sleep, gasping for air during sleep, morning headaches, and irritability (Gottlieb & Punjabi, 2020; Malhotra et al., 2021). Chantal has sleep disturbance problems, which do not qualify her for sleep apnea, hence, it being a secondary diagnosis.

Chronic fatigue syndrome: Chronic fatigue syndrome is the other differential that should be considered for Chantal. Chronic fatigue syndrome is a condition associated with symptoms such as profound tiredness despite bed rest. The symptoms worsen when patients engage in any activity that requires intensive mental or physical activity. Additional symptoms associated with the syndrome include light sensitivity, headaches; tender lymph nodes, insomnia, and difficulties with concentration (Deumer et al., 2021; Sandler & Lloyd, 2020). Despite Chantal reporting fatigue, she does not suffer from chronic fatigue syndrome because of the presence of other symptoms such as weight gain and cold intolerance.

Addison’s disease: Addison’s disease is the other differential diagnosis that should be considered for Chantal. Addison’s disease develops from insufficient production of steroid hormones by the adrenal gland. Patients experience symptoms that include skin hyperpigmentation, low blood pressure, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, constipation, and abdominal pain, weight loss. Patients might also experience fever, convulsions, severe gastrointestinal disturbances, and hypoglycemia during adrenal crises (Husebye et al., 2021; Saverino & Falorni, 2020). Addison’s disease is Chantal’s least likely diagnosis because of weight gain, cold intolerance, and lack of skin hyperpigmentation.

This section is not required for the assignments in this course (NURS 6512) but will be required for future courses.

 

References

Bode, H., Ivens, B., Bschor, T., Schwarzer, G., Henssler, J., & Baethge, C. (2021). Association of Hypothyroidism and Clinical Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry, 78(12), 1375–1383. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.2506

Deumer, U.-S., Varesi, A., Floris, V., Savioli, G., Mantovani, E., López-Carrasco, P., Rosati, G. M., Prasad, S., & Ricevuti, G. (2021). Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS): An Overview. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 10(20), Article 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10204786

Gottlieb, D. J., & Punjabi, N. M. (2020). Diagnosis and Management of Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Review. JAMA, 323(14), 1389–1400. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.3514

Husebye, E. S., Pearce, S. H., Krone, N. P., & Kämpe, O. (2021). Adrenal insufficiency. The Lancet, 397(10274), 613–629. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00136-7

Malhotra, A., Ayappa, I., Ayas, N., Collop, N., Kirsch, D., Mcardle, N., Mehra, R., Pack, A. I., Punjabi, N., White, D. P., Gottlieb, D. J., & for SRS Task Force. (2021). Metrics of sleep apnea severity: Beyond the apnea-hypopnea index. Sleep, 44(7), zsab030. https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsab030

Patil, N., Rehman, A., & Jialal, I. (2023). Hypothyroidism. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK519536/

Sandler, C. X., & Lloyd, A. R. (2020). Chronic fatigue syndrome: Progress and possibilities. Medical Journal of Australia, 212(9), 428–433. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.50553

Saverino, S., & Falorni, A. (2020). Autoimmune Addison’s disease. Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 34(1), 101379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beem.2020.101379

Wilson, S. A., Stem, L. A., & Bruehlman, R. D. (2021). Hypothyroidism: Diagnosis and Treatment. American Family Physician, 103(10), 605–613.

NURS 6512 Week 5 discussion Discussion Assessing the Ears, Nose, and Throat
NURS 6512 Week 5 discussion Discussion Assessing the Ears, Nose, and Throat

By Day 3

Post an episodic/focused note about the patient in the case
study to which you were assigned using the episodic/focused note template
provided in week 5 resources. Provide evidence from the literature to support
diagnostic tests that would be appropriate for each case. List five different
possible conditions for the patient’s differential diagnosis and justify why you
selected each.

Note: For this Discussion, you are required to complete your
initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’
postings. Begin by clicking on the “Post to Discussion Question” link
and then select “Create Thread” to complete your initial post.
Remember, once you click on Submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts,
and you cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before
clicking on Submit!

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NURS 6512 Week 5 discussion Discussion: Assessing the Ears, Nose, and Throat

Grading Rubric Guidelines

Performance Category 10 9 8 4 0
Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.

  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions
  • Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion
  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation.
  • The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable
  • No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
Performance Category  10 9 8 4 0
Application of Course Knowledge –

Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources;
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.
  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources.
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content
  • Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson.
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson
  • Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post.
  • Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored
  • No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Performance Category  5 4 3 2 0
Interactive Dialogue

Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days.

(5 points possible per graded thread)

  • Exceeds minimum post requirements
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days.
  • Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer
  • Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days
  • Replies to a question posed by a peer

Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.

  • Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days.
  • The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline
  • Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty
  • Has only one post for the week
  • Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments
  • Does not post to the thread
  • No connections are made to the topic
  Minus 1 Point Minus 2 Point Minus 3 Point Minus 4 Point Minus 5 Point
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted.

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

  • 2-3 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.
  • 4-5 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is somewhat focused.
  • 6-7 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.
  • 8-10 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.
  • Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style does not facilitate communication.
  • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
0 points lost       -5 points lost
Total Participation Requirements

per discussion thread

The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day. The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days
Early Participation Requirement

per discussion thread

The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week. The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.