NURS 6512 Week 3 Discussion: Assessment Tools and Diagnostic Tests in Adults and Children

NURS 6512 Week 3 Discussion: Assessment Tools and Diagnostic Tests in Adults and Children

Sample Answer for NURS 6512 Week 3 Discussion: Assessment Tools and Diagnostic Tests in Adults and Children Included After Question

When seeking to identify a patient’s health condition, advanced practice nurses can use a diverse selection of diagnostic tests and assessment tools; however, different factors affect the validity and reliability of the results produced by these tests or tools. Nurses must be aware of these factors in order to select the most appropriate test or tool and to accurately interpret the results.

Not only do these diagnostic tests affect adults, body measurements can provide a general picture of whether a child is receiving adequate nutrition or is at risk for health issues. These data, however, are just one aspect to be considered. Lifestyle, family history, and culture—among other factors—are also relevant. That said, gathering and communicating this information can be a delicate process.

Photo Credit: Getty Images/Hero Images

For this Assignment, you will consider the validity and reliability of different assessment tools and diagnostic tests. You will explore issues such as sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. You will also consider examples of children with various weight issues. You will explore how you could effectively gather information and encourage parents and caregivers to be proactive about their children’s health and weight.

To Prepare

  • Review this week’s Learning Resources and consider factors that impact the validity and reliability of various assessment tools and diagnostic tests. You also will review examples of pediatric patients and their families as it relates to BMI.
  • By Day 1 of this week, you will be assigned to one of the following Assignment options by your Instructor: Adult Assessment Tools or Diagnostic Tests (option 1), or Child Health Case (Option 2). Note: Please see the “Course Announcements” section of the classroom for your assignments from your Instructor.
  • Search the Walden Library and credible sources for resources explaining the tool or test you were assigned. What is its purpose, how is it conducted, and what information does it gather?
  • Also, as you search the Walden library and credible sources, consider what the literature discusses regarding the validity, reliability, sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, ethical dilemmas, and controversies related to the test or tool.
  • If you are assigned Assignment Option 2 (Child), consider what health issues and risks may be relevant to the child in the health example.
    • Based on the risks you identified, consider what further information you would need to gain a full understanding of the child’s health. Think about how you could gather this information in a sensitive fashion.
    • Consider how you could encourage parents or caregivers to be proactive toward the child’s health.

The Assignment

Assignment (3–4 pages, not including title and reference pages):

Assignment Option 1: Adult Assessment Tools or Diagnostic Tests:
Include the following:

  • A description of how the assessment tool or diagnostic test you were assigned is used in healthcare.
    • What is its purpose?
    • How is it conducted?
    • What information does it gather?
  • Based on your research, evaluate the test or the tool’s validity and reliability, and explain any issues with sensitivity, reliability, and predictive values. Include references in appropriate APA formatting.

Assignment Option 2: Child Health Case:

Include the following:

  • An explanation of the health issues and risks that are relevant to the child you were assigned.
  • Describe additional information you would need in order to further assess his or her weight-related health.
  • Identify and describe any risks and consider what further information you would need to gain a full understanding of the child’s health. Think about how you could gather this information in a sensitive fashion.
  • Taking into account the parents’ and caregivers’ potential sensitivities, list at least three specific questions you would ask about the child to gather more information.
  • Provide at least two strategies you could employ to encourage the parents or caregivers to be proactive about their child’s health and weight.

By Day 6 of Week 3

Submit your Assignment.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

  • Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK3Assgn1+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
  • Click the Week 3 Assignment 1 Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
  • Click the Week 3 Assignment 1 link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
  • Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK3Assgn1+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
  • If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
  • Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.

Grading Criteria

NURS 6512 Week 3 Discussion Assessment Tools and Diagnostic Tests in Adults and Children
NURS 6512 Week 3 Discussion Assessment Tools and Diagnostic Tests in Adults and Children

In this Discussion, you will consider the validity and
reliability of different assessment tools and diagnostic tests. You will
explore issues such as sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative
predictive values. You will also consider examples of children with various
weight issues. You will explore how you could effectively gather information
and encourage parents and caregivers to be proactive about their children’s
health and weight.

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NURS 6512 Week 3 Discussion: Assessment Tools and Diagnostic Tests in Adults and Children

Title: NURS 6512 Week 3 Discussion: Assessment Tools and Diagnostic Tests in Adults and Children

The rising prevalence of obesity in children has become a major concern in healthcare. According to statistics, the prevalence of obesity in children 2-5 years is 12.7% and 20.7% in children aged between 6 and 11 years (CDC, 2022). Obesity puts children at risk of poor health outcomes in childhood and adulthood. According to Sanyaolu et al. (2019), children who are obese are likely to remain that way even in adulthood, putting them at risk of developing chronic conditions including stroke, type 2 diabetes, heart disease, and cancer, among other top ten leading causes of death in America. Hence, monitoring a child’s weight is essential in preventing potential obesity. In most cases, obesity is due to lifestyle and living conditions. In the chosen case study, an overweight five-year-old child has parents who are overweight and working all the time, which reveals a great deal of information regarding the child’s socioeconomic circumstances and risk factors for poor health outcomes. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the boy’s case and identify the risk factors he is exposed to owing to his surroundings and family lifestyle.

Health Issues and Risks

The child is overweight, which is of great concern because it puts the child at risk of obesity. Obesity is a risk factor for multiple conditions that impact a child’s functioning, growth and development, and overall well-being. Children with overweight and obesity issues are likely to develop sleep disorders, type 2 diabetes, asthma, heart disease, high blood pressure, gallstones, liver problems and early puberty. In addition, being overweight or obese can also lead to low social competence in children. The likelihood of overweight or obese children being bullied is 63% greater than other children (Sanyaolu et al., 2019). Bullying has sociopsychological effects on children, including isolation, low self-esteem, poor body image, depression, suicide, and anxiety. In the case study, the child is only five years old, and experiences of bullying and its sociopsychological implications can negatively impact his growth and development.

Additionally, the boy’s weight indicates that he is not eating healthy foods and snacks physical activity. Indulging in high sugar content and processed foods more than healthy choices leads to being overweight. Since the parents are working almost all the time, they do not have time to prepare proper meals; hence rely on first food and soft drinks for meals. A lack of healthy meal options means that the boy does not get enough nutritional nutrients that he needs at his stage for proper growth and development (Dains et al., 2019). This puts him at risk of deficiencies and poor health outcomes because of low immunity that cannot sufficiently fight off pathogens causing diseases. For example, he can be susceptible to infections. Moreover, both parents are overweight, which points to the possibility of the overweight being a genetic issue. Nevertheless, whether genetic or not, being overweight puts the patient at risk of obesity and other health issues.

Additional Information

The child’s background suggests that he comes from a low socioeconomic background. Therefore, additional information would be focused on evaluating the child’s social determinants of health and other issues that impact weight. For example, information about the child’s eating habits and availability of basic needs, including healthy meal choices. This information will help to know what the child’s nutrition is like and whether it is the cause of his overweight. Additionally, information on the child’s physical activity will also be an essential part of the assessment (Srinath et al., 2019). For example, asking the child if they enjoy playing out with friends or if he spends most of his time in the house watching television and playing video games. If the child is living a sedentary lifestyle without engaging in physical play, it can contribute to their overweight. The living conditions also can impact the child’s health; for example, if they live in a place with a playing field or have no space for playing, it discourages physical activity while encouraging a sedentary lifestyle (Smith et al. 2020).

Health Risks

The child’s well-being and health are at stake because of being overweight. The first health risk is obesity. I would collect information by measuring the child’s weight and height and then calculating the BMI. Secondly, the child is at risk of developing one or more chronic conditions such as diabetes or heart problems. I would assess this information by asking about the child’s health, including recent hospitalizations, if any. The child may also be at risk of psychosocial development because being overweight affects interaction with peers. Hence, it does not give the child opportunity for proper psychosocial development. Further information would be collected by asking the parents about the child’s social life, interaction with other children, and emotional displays that might point to a problem (Ball et al., 2019).

The physical growth and development of the child are also a concern. For example, according to the development theories, at age five, a child is physically active and should demonstrate better coordination and balance. The boy’s low socioeconomic status is a risk factor for poor health outcomes; for example, unsafe and congested living conditions can lead to injury and infections (Ball et al., 2019). Further information would be gathered by asking about the child’s socioeconomic background. While doing the assessment and health interview, it is essential to observe confidentiality, privacy, and respect for the patient’s culture.

Specific Questions

Does your child have any health issues?

What kinds of meals do you prepare at home?

Do you earn enough to support the family’s needs, particularly the essential needs?

Where do you live?

How many people live in your household?

Does your child like to play and interact with other children?

Strategies for Promoting Healthy Weights

I will use the Health Promotion Model (HPM) to educate the parents and caregivers on the dangers of being overweight and the benefits of maintaining a healthy weight (Narzisi & Simons, 2021). Secondly, I would educate the parents on proper nutrition and suggest foods they can include in their child’s diet, such as plenty of fruits and vegetables, more grains, and less fast-food and processed foods. The parents will also be encouraged to limit snacks and substitute unhealthy snacks with healthy choices such as nuts. Another strategy is to educate the parents on the importance of physical education. If the parents adopt physical activity in their lifestyle, it will influence the child also to become more physically active and lose weight.

Conclusion

Statistics show that childhood obesity is rising, putting more children at risk of poor health outcomes. The child in this case study is a five-year-old boy who is overweight. Both parents are also overweight, and he spends time with his grandmother, as the parents are busy working. The child is at risk of developing obesity, which would make him susceptible to chronic conditions including diabetes, heart disease, kidney problems, and cancer. The boy presumably lives in a low-socioeconomic neighbourhood, further exposing him to negative health outcomes. To mitigate potential negative health risks, the parents must adjust the boy’s diet to incorporate foods with more nutritional value and avoid processed foods and soft drinks. Additionally, the family need lifestyle adjustment to adopt physical activity to help them maintain healthy weights.

 

References

Ball, J. W., Dains, J. E., Flynn, J. A., Solomon, B. S., & Stewart, R. W. (2019). Seidel’s guide to physical examination: An interprofessional approach (9th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby.

CDC. (2022, May 17). Childhood Obesity Facts: Prevalence of Childhood Obesity in the United States. Retrieved from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data/childhood.html#:~:text=Prevalence%20of%20Childhood%20Obesity%20in%20the%20United%20States&text=The%20prevalence%20of%20obesity%20was,to%2019%2Dyear%2Dolds.

Dains, J. E., Baumann, L. C., & Scheibel, P. (2019). Advanced health assessment and clinical diagnosis in primary care (6th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby.

Narzisi, K., & Simons, J. (2021). Interventions that prevent or reduce obesity in children from birth to five years of age: A systematic review. Journal of Child Health Care, 25(2), 320–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367493520917863.

Sanyaolu, A., Okorie, C., Qi, X., Locke, J., & Rehman, S. (2019). Childhood and Adolescent Obesity in the United States: A Public Health Concern. Global Pediatric Health, https://doi.org/10.1177/2333794X19891305.

Smith, J. D., Fu, E., & Kobayashi, M. A. (2020). Prevention and Management of Childhood Obesity and Its Psychological and Health Comorbidities. Annual review of clinical psychology, 16, 351–378. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-100219-060201.

Srinath, S., Jacob, P., Sharma, E., & Gautam, A. (2019). Clinical Practice Guidelines for Assessment of Children and Adolescents. Indian journal of psychiatry, 61(Suppl 2), 158–175. https://doi.org/10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_580_18.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NURS 6512 Week 3 Discussion: Assessment Tools and Diagnostic Tests in Adults and Children

A Sample Answer 2 For the Assignment: NURS 6512 Week 3 Discussion: Assessment Tools and Diagnostic Tests in Adults and Children

Title: NURS 6512 Week 3 Discussion: Assessment Tools and Diagnostic Tests in Adults and Children

Introduction

Colorectal cancer, often known as colon cancer, is the third most common cancer in men and women. Fortunately, it is detectable and preventable with early screening approaches that may begin as early as age 45. To identify abnormalities in the colon, colonoscopy is the recommended form of colon cancer screening, a sort of imaging examination. The procedure is carried out by introducing a camera-equipped flexible tube into the anus and rectum. Cologuard, a less invasive and more convenient alternative to colonoscopy, has gained popularity. Cologuard’s usage has increased in popularity due to the COVID-19 epidemic, owing to its ease of administration. While the Cologuard screening has some advantages, it also has some disadvantages. A significant worry is its inaccuracy, making it not a substitute for a colonoscopy. This paper will cover the goal of the Cologuard test, how it is administered, the data obtained, and the test’s validity and reliability, among others.

Description of how Cologuard is used in Healthcare

            Cologuard is a rectal and colon cancer screening test. Each day, the colon loses cells from its lining. These cells move through the colon with the excrement. Specific genes in cancer cells may have undergone mutations. Cologuard is capable of detecting the changed DNA. The presence of abnormal cells or blood in faces may suggest the presence of cancer or precancerous tumors. Cologuard is designed to identify DNA markers associated with colorectal neoplasia and detect occult hemoglobin in human faces. A positive result might suggest the presence of colorectal cancer (CRC) or advanced adenoma and should be followed up with a diagnostic colonoscopy (Ned et al., 2011). Cologuard may be used by those with 45 years and above also having an average risk of getting colorectal cancer. Cologuard is not a substitute for colonoscopy monitoring or diagnostic colonoscopy in high-risk people. Colon cancer may be detected with Cologuard since the colon’s lining releases cells daily. These cells eventually end up in the feaces. The feaces may also include abnormal cells from a malignant tumor or precancerous polyp and blood from any ruptured blood vessels. Polyps are benign growths on the surface of the colon that have the potential to develop into cancer.

Cologuard’s instructions are straightforward, and the screening process is completed in a matter of minutes. The test should be completed within five days after obtaining the kit. After obtaining the kit, begin by removing all materials except those required for the sample. The sample of the stool should not exceed the size of the liquid bottle contained in the package. Attempting to avoid getting pee on the sample is critical. This may be accomplished by emptying the bladder first and avoiding contaminating the faces sample with toilet paper or other things. The sample should be obtained when a person knows he or she can return the sample within a day of collection (Ned et al., 2011). After that, the huge sample container is inserted into the toilet bracket using the included instructions. A fecal sample must be taken using the large sample container when one is on the toilet. It is important to remove a sample container from the toilet mount after collecting it, then set it on a flat surface. Place the scraped sample in a small test tube. Before labeling and sealing the tiny and big sample containers, apply the preservative to the larger container. Before delivering the sample to the lab, be sure to follow the included packing instructions to the letter. Cologuard is a stool test that detects DNA and hemoglobin (blood) produced by these aberrant cells.

Validity and Reliability Cologuard Test

Cologuard is a test intended to identify cancer, not prevent it (JAMA , 2014). Cologuard detects just 42% of big polyps, while a colonoscopy detects 95% of large polyps. When polyps are discovered during a colonoscopy, they are simultaneously removed. If polyps are found using Cologuard, they must be removed by colonoscopy. Cologuard cannot identify the majority of big precancerous polyps. This may give patients the erroneous impression that they avoid colon cancer by getting the Cologuard test. In a nutshell, there is no genuine substitute for a colonoscopy. Due to its astounding success rate in diagnosing colorectal cancer early on, the illness has become one of the most preventable types of cancer (Imperiale et al., 2014). While alternative tests, such as Cologuard, are available and may have some advantages, such as little preparation and invasiveness, the findings are less trustworthy. Individuals with abnormal results will still need a colonoscopy for confirmation.

Cologuard testing has several downsides, most notably accuracy, particularly when compared to a colonoscopy. Cologuard has an overall sensitivity of 95.2 percent for colon cancer (Exact Sciences, 2022). Additional studies revealed a sensitivity of 57.2 percent for all advanced precancerous lesions and 83.3 percent for high-grade dysplasia. Colonoscopy detects precancerous lesions and polyps more accurately than stool sample testing, according to Li (2018). Physicians prefer to send patients for colonoscopies rather than a stool test since false positives are more common. The major purpose of screening tests is to rule out illnesses like cancer; therefore, sensitivity is a critical consideration. Imperiale et al. (2014) argue that with an 87 percent overall specificity, the DNA test’s sensitivity for advanced precancerous lesions was half that of colorectal cancer.

 

 References

Exact Sciences, (2022). Exact Sciences presents data showing improved accuracy of second-generation Cologuard® test and progress toward an even better colorectal cancer screening solution for patients. https://www.exactsciences.com/newsroom/exact-sciences-presents-data-showing-improved-accuracy-of-second-generation-cologuard-test

Imperiale, T. F., Ransohoff, D. F., Itzkowitz, S. H., Levin, T. R., Lavin, P., Lidgard, G. P., Ahlquist, D. A., & Berger, B. M. (2014). Multitarget stool DNA testing for colorectal-cancer screening. New England Journal of Medicine, 370(14), 1287–1297.

Li, D. (2018). Recent advances in colorectal cancer screening. Chronic Diseases and Translational Medicine, 4(03), 139–147.

Ned, R. M., Melillo, S., & Marrone, M. (2011). Fecal DNA testing for colorectal cancer screening: The ColoSureTM test. PLoS Currents, 3.

A Stool DNA Test (Cologuard) for Colorectal Cancer Screening. (2014). JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 312(23), 2566. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.15746

 Grading Rubric Guidelines

Performance Category 10 9 8 4 0
Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.

  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions
  • Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion
  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation.
  • The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable
  • No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
Performance Category  10 9 8 4 0
Application of Course Knowledge –

Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources;
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.
  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources.
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content
  • Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson.
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson
  • Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post.
  • Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored
  • No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Performance Category  5 4 3 2 0
Interactive Dialogue

Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days.

(5 points possible per graded thread)

  • Exceeds minimum post requirements
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days.
  • Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer
  • Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days
  • Replies to a question posed by a peer

Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.

  • Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days.
  • The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline
  • Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty
  • Has only one post for the week
  • Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments
  • Does not post to the thread
  • No connections are made to the topic
  Minus 1 Point Minus 2 Point Minus 3 Point Minus 4 Point Minus 5 Point
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted.

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

  • 2-3 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.
  • 4-5 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is somewhat focused.
  • 6-7 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.
  • 8-10 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.
  • Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style does not facilitate communication.
  • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
0 points lost       -5 points lost
Total Participation Requirements

per discussion thread

The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day. The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days
Early Participation Requirement

per discussion thread

The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week. The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.