NURS 6512 Discussion Building a Health History PEER POSTS1

NURS 6512 Discussion Building a Health History PEER POSTS1

Sample Answer for NURS 6512 Discussion Building a Health History PEER POSTS1 Included After Question

Effective communication is vital to constructing an accurate and detailed patient history. A patient’s health or illness is influenced by many factors, including age, gender, ethnicity, and environmental setting. As an advanced practice nurse, you must be aware of these factors and tailor your communication techniques accordingly. Doing so will not only help you establish rapport with your patients, but it will also enable you to more effectively gather the information needed to assess your patients’ health risks.

For this Discussion, you will take on the role of a clinician who is building a health history for a particular new patient assigned by your Instructor.

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

To prepare:

With the information presented in Chapter 2 of Ball et al. in mind, consider the following:

  • By Day 1 of this week, you will be assigned a new patient profile by your Instructor for this Discussion. Note: Please see the “Course Announcements” section of the classroom for your new patient profile assignment.
  • How would your communication and interview techniques for building a health history differ with each patient?
  • How might you target your questions for building a health history based on the patient’s social determinants of health?
  • What risk assessment instruments would be appropriate to use with each patient, or what questions would you ask each patient to assess his or her health risks?
  • Identify any potential health-related risks based upon the patient’s age, gender, ethnicity, or environmental setting that should be taken into consideration.
  • Select one of the risk assessment instruments presented in Chapter 2 or Chapter 5 of the Seidel’s Guide to Physical Examination text, or another tool with which you are familiar, related to your selected patient.
  • Develop at least five targeted questions you would ask your selected patient to assess his or her health risks and begin building a health history.

By Day 3 of Week 1

Post a summary of the interview and a description of the communication techniques you would use with your assigned patient. Explain why you would use these techniques. Identify the risk assessment instrument you selected, and justify why it would be applicable to the selected patient. Provide at least five targeted questions you would ask the patient.

Note: For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the Reply button to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Post Reply, you cannot delete or edit your own posts and you cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Post Reply!   

Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses.

By Day 6 of Week 1

Respond to at least two of your colleagues on 2 different days who selected a different patient than you, using one or more of the following approaches:

  • Share additional interview and communication techniques that could be effective with your colleague’s selected patient.
  • Suggest additional health-related risks that might be considered.
  • Validate an idea with your own experience and additional research

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NURS 6512 Discussion Building a Health History PEER POSTS1

Title: NURS 6512 Discussion Building a Health History PEER POSTS1

Being able to obtain a comprehensive health history for a patient is important in developing a treatment plan for them.  The purpose of this discussion post is to discuss interview techniques I would use for an 85-year-old white female living alone with declining health.  I will talk about the risk assessment instrument I would use and why.  Lastly, I will list five targeted questions I would ask to assess her health to start building a health history.

The first meeting with any patient is so important to build a good relationship and partnership from the start (Ball et al., 2019).  With this patient being 85 and living alone there will be a lot to consider when interviewing her.  I will need to establish is she is mentally with it, if she has hearing problems, and how much she understands about her health.  Older adults often assume certain problems are just normal parts of aging and not anything to be considered (Ball et al., 2019).  Often, older adults can also experience agism (Garrison-Diehn et al., 2022).  Even in health care settings older adults experience feelings of incompetence and being a burden (Garrison-Diehn et al., 2022).  It will be important to make sure she feels comfortable speaking to me knowing there is no bias or judgement.

The risk assessment I would do for this patient is the functional assessment.  This is an older lady who lives alone.  It will be essential to figure out how well she is able to function on her own.  One of the biggest risks for older patients is falling.  Falling is associated with adverse outcomes that can lead to a patient not being able to live at home anymore along with increased mortality (Snehal et al., 2020).  The functional assessment would give information regarding how well she can move around the house, is she is able to keep a clean environment, how meals are prepared, how she goes to the bathroom, and keeps good hygiene (Ball et al, 2019).  All these issues are going to contribute to her overall health.  It is important to gather this information to determine what assistance, if any, she will need.

After introducing myself and establishing how the patient would like to be addressed, I would start by simply asking “What brings you in today?”  This is a way to find out what her chief complaint is for coming in.  My second question would be “When did this start?”  This brings the patient back to the beginning and prompts them to tell the whole story regarding why they came in.  My third question would be “What medications do you take on a regular basis and what are they for?”  In my experience patients may or may not even know what they are taking, let alone why they are taking them.  It can also lead to her discussing if she is compliant with her medications.  To follow that, my fourth question would be “What medical problems do you have?”  Before going through a formal review of systems, this can give a clue to what she considers to be important in her history.   My last question would be “How well do you feel you are able to take care of yourself at home?”  This is an open-ended question to gain some insight on the functional assessment.  If the patient’s initial chief complaint is not urgent it is okay to give the patient some time while understanding the time constraints of you as the provider (Ball et al., 2019).

Establishing a relationship with patients and getting a thorough health history can be a daunting task for providers.  It is key to tailor interviewing skills to meet patient specific needs.  Modifying interview skills to the individual will eliminate communication barriers between the provider and patient (Bass et al., 2019).  Creating a strong relationship with the patient will allow the nurse practitioner to obtain the most comprehensive health history and provide the best possible care to clients.

References:

Ball, J. W., Dains, J. E., Flynn, J. A., Solomon, B. S., & Stewart, R. W. (2019). Seidel’s guide to physical examination: An interprofessional approach (9th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby.

Garrison-Diehn, C., Rummel, C., Au, Y. H., & Scherer, K. (2022). Attitudes toward older adults and aging: A foundational geropsychology knowledge competency. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 29(1), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.1037/cps0000043

Snehal, K., Rashmi, G., & Aarti, N. (2020). Risk factors for fear of falling in older adults in India. Journal of Public Health, 28(2), 123-129. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-019-01061-9

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 6512 Discussion Building a Health History PEER POSTS1

A Sample Answer 2 For the Assignment: NURS 6512 Discussion Building a Health History PEER POSTS1

Title: NURS 6512 Discussion Building a Health History PEER POSTS1

I enjoyed reading your post about communication with an 85 year old patient. It is important to build a report with the patient so they feel comfortable speaking with you. When evaluating the patient to find out if they are mentally intact it is important to not lead them to answers. Even though the patient has a decline in her health she may be mentally still intact. Open ended questions are important because it allows the patient to express themselves. This may help you find out if they are understanding the question or are they trying to hide any deficits.  Using closed ended questions can also help you identify how their memory is. Providing questions with random words to remember will help you assess this piece of brain functionality when it comes to remembering things. It is important to know where the patient is at with memory and cognitively because this can raise some red flags when it comes to safety in their home. When I worked in home care as a care coordinator I had done many evaluations of elderly people in my community to see if they are safe to be at home or are they needing a different level of care. I was able to help family members realize safety concerns for the patient by being able to do these assessments.

One question that ended up coming up a lot was will the patient remember they are cooking something or are they at risk of starting a fire. During one of my evaluations I ended up finding that the patient was not safe to cook in the home. I ended up having to unplug the stove and the other cooking devices with the help of the family members until they were able to get the patient placed with a higher level of care. It would also be important to do a fall assessment on this patient to see if there are risks for falls and if the patient did have a fall would their be away they could alert someone if they got injured. Walking around and doing a survey of the home was part of these assessments. I also observed the patient while they went about doing their normal routine without correcting them because I would want to see what they would do if I was not there. If it became too much of a risk than I would stop and make note of findings while making sure the patient is safe. When asking the patient questions, I will not dominate the conversation. I will actively listen by providing non-verbal cues to the patient that shows that I am listening to the patient when they are speaking while not leading the patient to answers during the evaluation of their safety in their home.

NURS 6512 Discussion Building a Health History PEER POSTS1
NURS 6512 Discussion Building a Health History PEER POSTS1

References:

Ball, J., Dains, J. E., Flynn, J. A., Solomon, B. S., & Stewart, R. W. (2019). Seidel’s Guide to Physical Examination: An interprofessional approach (9th ed.). Elsevier.

Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. (n.d.). Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Mayo Clinic. Retrieved June 4, 2022, from

A Sample Answer 3 For the Assignment: NURS 6512 Discussion Building a Health History PEER POSTS1

Title: NURS 6512 Discussion Building a Health History PEER POSTS1

Introduction

My assignment is based on working with an 85-year-old white female living alone with no family in declining health. While working on this task, I assume the patient is my mother, and I interrogate him with empathy, knowing that she is an elderly person who is likely to be more isolated and lonelier than individuals living with their loved ones. Here, I need to create an interviewing strategy to employ in assessing this patient’s medical condition, taking into account his advanced age that his health is declining.

Communication is a difficult endeavor that requires empathy and courtesy, especially when dealing with senior individuals. It’s critical to observe, listen, and gather information when pertinent information is offered when speaking with these kinds of patients. To preserve a constant pace with the patient, the medical practitioner not only should go slowly and be very patient (Ball et al., 2019). Furthermore, by observing, the healthcare professional can connect to and be brought into the environment of the elderly. It is critical to comprehend the participant’s reality and the circumstances that may impact their responses. It’s critical for health care professionals to establish a good connection with patients in the interview session to create a favorable interaction.

The nurse tells the patient to introduce themselves to create familiarity and as the patient settles in the interview. Showing sincerity is vital while getting to know the social circle’s nature and the living condition of the patient. The questions could be personal, but they are meant to know the situation of the healthcare provider.

Target Health Question

The impact of social determinants on patient health is an important issue to consider when assessing a patient’s health.  Food availability, social support, social position, and low-income levels, are all closely linked to premature death and higher incidents of sickness, based on empirical evidence. Inquiring into social determinants of health and how they affect the patient’s health can be a touchy subject (Ryan, 2019). As a result, I’d organize my queries in a way that respects the older patient while also demonstrating empathy and sincerity for their plight. Moreover, because such individuals may have difficulties communicating their conditions and ideas, I would be using effective listening skills.

Risk Assessment

The arranging of the patient’s health record through the Subjective Objective Assessment (SOAP) and Plan Problem Oriented Medical Record (POMR) would be appropriate tools for the assessment of this patient. The POMR tool is an effective instrument as it provides for a thorough recording and assessment of medical information about a patient (Pdhi.com, 2022). Furthermore, it enables the collection of data from all care team members in order to ascertain the diagnosis and develop an empirical medication regimen. POMRs often include the patient’s condition, complaints, test findings, and a care plan that enables the medical practitioner to address each issue individually, write patient records, and a review of discharge with instructions for follow-up (Feldman et al., 2021).

Health-Related Risk

Since the patient is elderly and has a declining health status, there are certain risks that are mainly linked to social health determinants. Old age put the patient at risk of falling (Abdi et al., 2019). As such, the health care provider should investigate if she has already incurred any injuries from falling.

Five Target Questions

On the first encounter, it is vital to first build a connection and therapeutic relationship with the patient to make them comfortable to open up. This way, there would be mutual understanding, which is essential in knowing the needs of the patients. Some of the questions, I would ask include;

  1. Do you experience any pains?
  2. What do you think could be the reasons for your symptoms?
  3. Are you under any medication?
  4. What do you think of your quality of life?
  5. Have any medications triggered any allergies in you?

References

Abdi, S., Spann, A., Borilovic, J., de Witte, L., & Hawley, M. (2019). Understanding the care and support needs of older people: a scoping review and categorisation using the WHO international classification of functioning, disability and health framework (ICF). BMC Geriatrics19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1189-9

 

Ball, J. W., Dains, J. E., Flynn, J. A., Solomon, B. S., & Stewart, R. W. (2019). Seidel’s guide to physical examination: An interprofessional approach (9th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby

Feldman, R., Chiu, M., Lawson, A., & Sadavoy, J. (2021). Evaluating Caregiver Risk: The Dementia Caregiver Interview Guide. Psych3(4), 552-561. https://doi.org/10.3390/psych3040036

Pdhi.com. (2022). What is a Health Risk Assessment? | ConXus Platform. Pdhi.com. Retrieved 2 June 2022, from https://www.pdhi.com/ncqa/what-is-a-health-risk-assessment/.

Ryan, L. (2019). Clinical Applications of a Smart Physical Examination System for the Health Management in Elderly. Case Medical Research. https://doi.org/10.31525/ct1-nct03858660

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 6512 Discussion Building a Health History PEER POSTS1

A Sample Answer 4 For the Assignment: NURS 6512 Discussion Building a Health History PEER POSTS1

Title: NURS 6512 Discussion Building a Health History PEER POSTS1

Your case was quite an interesting one to research. Omenka, Watson, and Hendrie (2020) conducted a scoping review of African immigrants’ health disparities. Scoping studies are a type of research to identify available evidence or gaps on a subject of interest (Munn et al., n.d.). With that said, Omenka, Watson, and Hendrie (2020) found little research has been specifically conducted on African immigrants; instead, the researchers found African immigrants were being grouped in research studies conducted on African Americans. On that note, I find it important to differentiate the health and spiritual beliefs of both cultures so that, as clinicians, we can provide culturally competent care.

I agree with your statement on creating a safe zone for the patient before conducting sexual history assessment; this will build trust and the patient will be willing to openly share personal health history. According to Omenka, Watson, and Hendrie (2020), African immigrants view HIV as a spiritual problem and are more likely to seek medical attention when a disease is in its advanced stages. Hence, the importance of early intervention is important.

Additional interview questions that may be of value in this situation may be to ask, “can you tell me how you view illness?” and Ball et al. (2019) suggests asking, “what do I need to know as your clinician to provide care for you?” Likewise, Ball et al. (2019) suggest not pressing an issue when communicating with patients. Great post.

Ball, J. W., Dains, J. E., Flynn, J. A., Solomon, B. S., & Stewart, R. W. (2019). Seidel’s guide to physical examination: An interprofessional approach (9th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby.

Munn, Z., Peters, M. D. J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (n.d.). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x

Omenka, O. I., Watson, D. P., & Hendrie, H. C. (2020). Understanding the healthcare experiences and needs of African immigrants in the United States: a scoping review. BMC Public Health, 20(1), 27. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1186/s12889-019-8127-9

Grading Rubric Guidelines

Performance Category 10 9 8 4 0
Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.

  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions
  • Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion
  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation.
  • The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable
  • No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
Performance Category  10 9 8 4 0
Application of Course Knowledge –

Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources;
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.
  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources.
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content
  • Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson.
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson
  • Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post.
  • Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored
  • No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Performance Category  5 4 3 2 0
Interactive Dialogue

Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days.

(5 points possible per graded thread)

  • Exceeds minimum post requirements
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days.
  • Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer
  • Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days
  • Replies to a question posed by a peer

Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.

  • Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days.
  • The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline
  • Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty
  • Has only one post for the week
  • Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments
  • Does not post to the thread
  • No connections are made to the topic
  Minus 1 Point Minus 2 Point Minus 3 Point Minus 4 Point Minus 5 Point
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted.

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

  • 2-3 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.
  • 4-5 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is somewhat focused.
  • 6-7 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.
  • 8-10 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.
  • Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style does not facilitate communication.
  • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
0 points lost       -5 points lost
Total Participation Requirements

per discussion thread

The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day. The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days
Early Participation Requirement

per discussion thread

The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week. The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.

Also Read:  NURS 6512 Discussion Assessing Musculoskeletal Pain PEER POSTS