NURS 6512 Assignment 1 Lab Assignment Ethical Concerns IN

NURS 6512 Assignment 1 Lab Assignment Ethical Concerns IN

Sample Answer for NURS 6512 Assignment 1 Lab Assignment Ethical Concerns IN Included After Question

Dr. Tara Harris reviews the overall expectations for Module 4. Consider how you will manage your time as you review your media and Learning Resources for your Case Study Lab Assignment and your Final exam (3m).

Assignment 1: Lab Assignment: Ethical Concerns

As an advanced practice nurse, you will run into situations where a patient’s wishes about his or her health conflict with evidence, your own experience, or a family’s wishes. This may create an ethical dilemma. What do you do when these situations occur?

In this Lab Assignment, you will explore evidence-based practice guidelines and ethical considerations for specific scenarios.

To Prepare

Review the scenarios provided by your instructor for this week’s Assignment. Please see the “Course Announcements” section of the classroom for your scenarios.

  • Based on the scenarios provided:
    • Select one scenario, and reflect on the material presented throughout this course.
    • What necessary information would need to be obtained about the patient through health assessments and diagnostic tests?
    • Consider how you would respond as an advanced practice nurse. Review evidence-based practice guidelines and ethical considerations applicable to the scenarios you selected.

The Lab Assignment

Write a detailed one-page narrative (not a formal paper) explaining the health assessment information required for a diagnosis of your selected patient (include the scenario number). Explain how you would respond to the scenario as an advanced practice nurse using evidence-based practice guidelines and applying ethical considerations. Justify your response using at least three different references from current evidence-based literature.

By Day 6 of Week 11

Submit your Assignment.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

  • Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK11Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
  • Click the Week 11 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
  • Click the Week 11 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
  • Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK11Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
  • If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
  • Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NURS 6512 Assignment 1 Lab Assignment Ethical Concerns IN

Title: NURS 6512 Assignment 1 Lab Assignment Ethical Concerns IN

Ethics inform the care that nurses provide in their practice. The aim is to ensure safety and quality in addressing the patients’ care needs. Therefore, this paper explores the ethical concerns involved in caring for a 47-year-old man with ulcerative colitis who has no insurance. The patient has been admitted to the emergency room with extreme abdominal pain. He has not taken his medications for last few months and does not have any medical or prescription insurance.  

Necessary Information 

The additional information that should be obtained from the patient include symptom onset, duration, severity, precipitating, and relieving factors. Information on patient’s lifestyle such as alcohol use should also be obtained, as it can precipitate the disease. Physical assessment should identify if the patient is dehydrated or not, with diagnostic investigations such as complete blood count requested since the patient is at a risk of developing anemia.  

Nursing Actions 

Nurses and other healthcare providers act as advocates of their patients. They ensure the protection of their right to access high-quality, safe, and efficient care (Daly & Jackson, 2020; Molterer et al., 2020). Based on this, I would ensure the patient receives the care he needs despite lacking any medical or prescription insurance. Patients should not be discriminated in the care process based on factors such as ethnicity, race, or socioeconomic background.  

Nurses should also demonstrate ethics in their practice. This includes ensuring the protection of principles such as informed consent, justice, beneficence, and non-maleficence. Therefore, an appropriate intervention in the case study would be protecting patient’s  right to justice by providing the care that he needs. In addition, the nurse should alleviate any pain and suffering the patient has, hence, the principles of beneficence and non-maleficence (Mathibe-Neke, 2020; Moreau & Rudge, 2018).  

Besides providing care the nurse should also collaborate with the social worker and link the patient with the existing insurance plans such as those in the Affordable Care Act plan. Such insurances will help the patient access the care he needs whenever he needs for ulcerative colitis. The nurse should also empower the patient about the effective management of his condition. This includes educating him about the causes, precipitating factors, and prevention (Butts & Rich, 2022; Grace & Uveges, 2022). The health education will help him take responsibility for his health. therefore, the consideration of the above interventions will promote ethics in the patient care process.  

In summary, additional information and investigations should be performed on the client. Ethical principles should guide nursing actions. Patient empowerment should be considered. The aim should be relapse prevention for the patient’s optimum health and wellbeing.  

 

References

Butts, J. B., & Rich, K. L. (2022). Nursing Ethics: Across the Curriculum and Into Practice. Jones & Bartlett Learning. 

Daly, J., & Jackson, D. (2020). Contexts of Nursing: An Introduction. Elsevier Health Sciences. 

Grace, P. J., & Uveges, M. K. (2022). Nursing Ethics and Professional Responsibility in Advanced Practice. Jones & Bartlett Learning. 

Mathibe-Neke, J. M. (2020). Ethical practice in the nursing profession: A normative analysis. South African Journal of Bioethics and Law, 13(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJBL.2020.v13i1.00690 

Molterer, K., Hoyer, P., & Steyaert, C. (2020). A Practical Ethics of Care: Tinkering with Different ‘Goods’ in Residential Nursing Homes. Journal of Business Ethics, 165(1), 95–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-04099-z 

Moreau, J. T., & Rudge, T. (2018). How “care values” as discursive practices effect the ethics of a care-setting. Journal of Organizational Ethnography, 8(3), 298–311. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOE-04-2018-0024 

 

 

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 6512 Assignment 1 Lab Assignment Ethical Concerns IN

NURS 6512 Assignment 1 Lab Assignment Ethical Concerns IN
NURS 6512 Assignment 1 Lab Assignment Ethical Concerns IN

 

A Sample Answer 2 For the Assignment: NURS 6512 Assignment 1 Lab Assignment Ethical Concerns IN

Title: NURS 6512 Assignment 1 Lab Assignment Ethical Concerns IN

Immunization is an important component of health promotion for all children in the US. All the states require that children should be fully vaccinated before they begin their education. However, 47 states consider exemptions due to religious or philosophical reasons. Vaccinations are important in preventing unnecessary hospitalizations as well as mortalities. Therefore, it would be important for nurse practitioner to seek additional information from the parents about their reasons for opposing vaccination for their son. Often, parents decline vaccinations for their children due to the influence of factors such as religious beliefs and practice. The nurse practitioners should obtain information related to the religious affiliation of the family, beliefs and practice and their influence on the uptake on immunization services (Giubilini, 2021). The information on the religious beliefs, values and practices of the family will provide the nurse practitioner with the insights into the factors contributing to the decisions that the parents are making.

The nurse practitioner should also determine the knowledge and attitude of the family towards immunization. Information such as the knowledge of the parents about the benefits and risks of immunization should be obtained. The nurse practitioner should also obtained information about the fears and misconceptions that the family might have towards immunization. Low level of knowledge or misconceptions may affect the utilization of immunization services by the family (Berry et al., 2017). As a result, the nurse practitioner should educate the family about the benefits of immunization alongside the anticipated side effects. The nurse practitioner may utilize educational resources such as videos and photographs of the consequences of failing to immunize their child to increase the level of understanding of the patients (Mossey et al., 2020). Health education will help the family to make informed decisions about whether their son should be immunized or not.

References

Berry, N. J., Henry, A., Danchin, M., Trevena, L. J., Willaby, H. W., & Leask, J. (2017). When parents won’t vaccinate their children: A qualitative investigation of australian primary care providers’ experiences. BMC Pediatrics, 17(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-017-0783-2

Giubilini, A. (2021). Vaccination ethics. British Medical Bulletin, 137(1), 4–12. https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldaa036

Mossey, S., Hosman, S., Montgomery, P., & McCauley, K. (2020). Parents’ experiences and nurses’ perceptions of decision-making about childhood immunization. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 52(4), 255–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0844562119847343

Assignment_Rubric

  Excellent Good Fair Poor
Write a detailed 1-page narrative (not a formal paper) addressing the following:

·  Explain the health assessment information required for a diagnosis of your selected patient (include the scenario number).

 Points Range: 30 (30%) – 35 (35%)

The response clearly, accurately, and thoroughly explains detailed health assessment information required to diagnose the selected patient, with correct scenario number included.

 Points Range: 24 (24%) – 29 (29%)

The response accurately explains health assessment information required to diagnose the selected patient, with correct scenario number included.

 Points Range: 18 (18%) – 23 (23%)

The response vaguely explains health assessment information required to diagnose the selected patient, with scenario number, correct or inaccurate, included.

 Points Range: 0 (0%) – 17 (17%)

The response lacks and/or inaccurately explains assessment information required to diagnose the selected patient, with scenario number inaccurate or missing.
·   Explain how you would respond to the scenario as an advanced practice nurse using evidence-based practice guidelines and applying ethical considerations. Justify your response using at least three different references from current evidence-based literature. Points Range: 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)

The response clearly, accurately, and thoroughly explains detailed evidence-based practice guidelines and ethical considerations applied by an advanced practice nurse in responding to the scenario, with clear, accurate, and thorough justification using three or more different references from current evidence-based literature.

 Points Range: 39 (39%) – 44 (44%)

The response accurately explains evidence-based practice guidelines and ethical considerations applied by an advanced practice nurse in responding to the scenario, with accurate justification using at least three different references from current evidence-based literature.

 Points Range: 33 (33%) – 38 (38%)

The response vaguely explains evidence-based practice guidelines and ethical considerations applied by an advanced practice nurse in responding to the scenario, with vague and/or inaccurate justification using two to three different references from current evidence-based literature.

 Points Range: 0 (0%) – 32 (32%)

The response inaccurately explains or lacks evidence-based practice guidelines and ethical considerations applied by an advanced practice nurse in responding to the scenario, with inaccurate or missing justification using two or fewer references from current evidence-based literature.
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria. 		Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.

 Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.

 Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.

 Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.
Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation 		Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

 Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

 Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

 Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

 Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

 Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

 Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
Total Points: 100

Name: NURS_6512_Week_11_Assignment_Rubric

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 6512 Assignment 1 Lab Assignment Ethical Concerns IN

NURS 6512 Assignment 1 Lab Assignment Ethical Concerns IN Grading Rubric

Performance Category 100% or highest level of performance

100%

16 points

 Very good or high level of performance

88%

14 points

 Acceptable level of performance

81%

13 points

 Inadequate demonstration of expectations

68%

11 points

 Deficient level of performance

56%

9 points

 

 Failing level

of performance

55% or less

0 points
 Total Points Possible= 50           16 Points    14 Points 13 Points        11 Points           9 Points          0 Points
Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics.

 Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
 Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
 Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
  

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
  

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
 Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information
 16 Points  14 Points  13 Points 11 Points 9 Points  0 Points
Application of Course Knowledge

Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

 Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
 Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
 Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
 Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from and scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
 Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
 Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information and scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
   10 Points 9 Points  6 Points  0 Points
Interactive Dialogue

Initial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count)

The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count)

Responses are substantive and relate to the topic.

 Demonstrated all of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
 Demonstrated 3 of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
 Demonstrated 2 of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
 Demonstrated 1 or less of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
  8 Points 7 Points  6 Points         5 Points          4 Points  0 Points
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error.

 The following was present:

  • 0-3 errors in APA format

AND

  • Responses have 0-3 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND

  • Writing style is generally clear, focused on topic,and facilitates communication.
 The following was present:

  • 4-6 errors in APA format.

AND/OR

  • Responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is somewhat focused on topic.
 The following was present:

  • 7-9 errors in APA format.

AND/OR

  • Responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is slightly focused on topic making discussion difficult to understand.
  

The following was present:

  • 10- 12 errors in APA format

AND/OR

  • Responses have 8-9 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.
  

The following was present:

  • 13 – 15 errors in APA format

AND/OR

  • Responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.

AND/OR

  • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor.
 The following was present:

  • 16 to greater errors in APA format.

AND/OR

  • Responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors.

AND/OR

  • Writing style does not facilitate communication
  0 Points Deducted 5 Points Lost
Participation

Requirements

Demonstrated the following:

  • Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days
 Failed to demonstrate the following:

  • Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days
  0 Points Lost 5 Points Lost
Due Date Requirements Demonstrated all of the following:

  • The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.

A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.

Demonstrates one or less of the following.

  • The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.

A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.

Check Out Also:  NURS 6512 Assignment 1 Lab Assignment Differential Diagnosis for Skin Conditions IN