Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the blocksy domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/intelligentwr/nursingassignmentcrackers/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114

Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the blocksy domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/intelligentwr/nursingassignmentcrackers/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114

Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the wordpress-seo domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/intelligentwr/nursingassignmentcrackers/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114
NURS 6512 Assignment 1 Case Study Assignment Assessing Neurological Symptoms IN - Nursing Assignment Crackers NURS 6512 Assignment 1 Case Study Assignment Assessing Neurological Symptoms IN - Nursing Assignment Crackers

NURS 6512 Assignment 1 Case Study Assignment Assessing Neurological Symptoms IN

NURS 6512 Assignment 1 Case Study Assignment Assessing Neurological Symptoms IN

Sample Answer for NURS 6512 Assignment 1 Case Study Assignment Assessing Neurological Symptoms IN Included After Question

Imagine not being able to form new memories. This is the reality patients with anterograde amnesia face. Although this form of amnesia is rare, it can result from severe brain trauma. Anterograde amnesia demonstrates just how impactful brain disorders can be to a patient’s quality of living. Accurately assessing neurological symptoms is a complex process that involves the analysis of many factors.

In this Case Study Assignment, you will consider case studies that describe abnormal findings in patients seen in a clinical setting.

To Prepare

  • By Day 1 of this week, you will be assigned to a specific case study for this Case Study Assignment. Please see the “Course Announcements” section of the classroom for your assignment from your Instructor.
  • Also, your Case Study Assignment should be in the Episodic/Focused SOAP Note format rather than the traditional narrative style format. Refer to Chapter 2 of the Sullivan text and the Episodic/Focused SOAP Template in the Week 5 Learning Resources for guidance. Remember that all Episodic/Focused SOAP notes have specific data included in every patient case.

With regard to the case study you were assigned:

  • Review this week’s Learning Resources, and consider the insights they provide about the case study.
  • Consider what history would be necessary to collect from the patient in the case study you were assigned.
  • Consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition. How would the results be used to make a diagnosis?
  • Identify at least five possible conditions that may be considered in a differential diagnosis for the patient.

The Case Study Assignment

Use the Episodic/Focused SOAP Template and create an episodic/focused note about the patient in the case study to which you were assigned using the episodic/focused note template provided in the Week 5 resources. Provide evidence from the literature to support diagnostic tests that would be appropriate for each case. List five different possible conditions for the patient’s differential diagnosis, and justify why you selected each.

By Day 6 of Week 9

Submit your Assignment.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

  • Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK9Assgn1+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
  • Click the Week 9 Assignment 1 Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
  • Click the Week 9 Assignment 1 link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
  • Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK9Assgn1+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
  • If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
  • Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.

Grading Criteria

 

  • Chapter 7, “Mental Status”This chapter revolves around the mental status evaluation of an individual’s overall cognitive state. The chapter includes a list of mental abnormalities and their symptoms.
NURS 6512 Assignment 1 Case Study Assignment Assessing Neurological Symptoms IN
NURS 6512 Assignment 1 Case Study Assignment Assessing Neurological Symptoms IN
  • Chapter 23, “Neurologic System”The authors of this chapter explore the anatomy and physiology of the neurologic system. The authors also describe neurological examinations and potential findings.

Dains, J. E., Baumann, L. C., & Scheibel, P. (2019). Advanced health assessment and clinical diagnosis in primary care (6th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby.

 

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 6512 Assignment 1 Case Study Assignment Assessing Neurological Symptoms IN

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NURS 6512 Assignment 1 Case Study Assignment Assessing Neurological Symptoms IN

Title: NURS 6512 Assignment 1 Case Study Assignment Assessing Neurological Symptoms IN

Patient Information:

Initials: H.F.                Age: 47 Years             Sex: Female                Race: Caucasian

S.

CC (chief complaint): “I am experiencing pain in my right wrist”

HPI: H.F., a 47-year-old Caucasian female with obesity, sought medical attention at the clinic due to her primary concern of experiencing pain in her right wrist, accompanied by sensations of numbness and tingling in the index, middle finger, and thumb. The patient has provided an account of experiencing these symptoms approximately fourteen days prior. Nevertheless, she expresses apprehension regarding the discomfort, as it causes her to inadvertently release her hairstyling implements.

Location: Right wrist

Onset: two weeks ago

Character: Numbness and pain in her right wrist

Associated signs and symptoms: Thumb, middle, and index finger tingling

Timing: the whole day

Exacerbating/ relieving factors: Worse while doing tasks with the wrist joint. When the wrist is stationary, the discomfort is reduced.

Severity: 6/10

Current Medications:

  • Ibuprofen at a dosage of 400mg taken orally as needed,
  • Hydrochlorothiazide at a dosage of 25mg taken orally every morning
  • Amlodipine at a dosage of 10mg taken orally once daily.

Allergies: Allergic to sulfur. No environmental or food allergies.

PMHx: The patient exhibits obesity and has a documented history of hypertension.

  • Immunization status: The patient has received all necessary vaccinations, including Tdap in October 2020, the Influenza Vaccine during the current season, and completed the COVID-19 Vaccines with Boosters in 2021.
  • Surgeries: without any prior surgical history
  • Hospitalization: There is no record of any hospitalizations.

Soc Hx: The patient is a hairdresser who works five blocks from her house in a neighborhood spa. She claims to have a history of sometimes consuming alcohol while smoking cigarettes. She does not, however, admit to using marijuana or any other illegal substance. She presently lives as a family with her husband and three kids. During her free time, she enjoys singing and reading. She exercises by taking the dog for a 30-minute walk every evening. She affirms that she eats a healthy diet and sleeps well for around 8 hours each night.

Fam Hx: The patient has two siblings, the younger of whom has just received an asthma diagnosis while the other is well. Both of her parents are still living; the mother has a history of T2DM and HTN, while the father has a history of HTN and esophagostomy. She is unaware of the medical history of her grandparents.

ROS:

GENERAL: denies any symptoms of heat or cold sensitivity, reduced appetite, sluggishness, chills, fever, or recent weight changes.

HEENT: Head: denies experiencing seizures, headaches, or dizziness. Eye: denies any discomfort, discharge, vision disturbances, photophobia, or blurriness. Ear: denies discharge, tinnitus, discomfort, or hearing loss. Nose: denies having sneeze fits, sinus pain, a runny nose, or nose bleeding. Throat: denies pain, swallowing issues, or voice hoarseness.

SKIN: denies rash or itching.

CARDIOVASCULAR: denies having orthopnea, arrhythmias, elevated blood pressure, or palpitations.

RESPIRATORY: denies having a cough, producing phlegm, having breathing problems, or breathing quickly.

GASTROINTESTINAL: denies experiencing vomiting, heartburn, heartburn pain, discomfort, or abdominal distention.

GENITOURINARY: denies having hematuria, vaginal discharge, incontinence, dysuria, oliguria, frequent urination, or burning pain.

NEUROLOGICAL: denies experiencing ataxia, a headache, paralysis, syncope, or abnormalities in bowel or bladder control. reports tingling and numbness in the middle, index, and thumb fingers.

MUSCULOSKELETAL: a right wrist ache is reported. denies muscular pain, joint stiffness, or joint swelling. demonstrates the complete range of motion in other joints.

HEMATOLOGIC: denies bleeding issues, easy bruising, or anemia.

LYMPHATICS: denies splenectomy or lymphadenopathy.

PSYCHIATRIC: denies experiencing hallucinations or other psychological symptoms such as anxiety, sadness, or thoughts of homicide or suicide.

ENDOCRINOLOGIC: denies a tendency to sweat excessively, polyuria, polydipsia, or sensitivity to heat and cold.

ALLERGIES: Sulfur allergy is reported.

O.

Physical exam: Vital signs: BP- 138/86 mmHg, PR-86, RR-19, Temp- 98.9, SpO2-98% on room air, Ht- 5’9”, Wt- 210 lbs., BMI-31.01

GENERAL: a female who is obese and adequately attired. Clear speaking, the patient is focused and aware X4. The patient responds to inquiries adequately and is not visibly distressed.

HEENT: Head: normal-sized, trauma-free, and without scars. Eye: Sclera and conjunctiva are clear. No significant redness, discharge, or tearing. Ear: Typical pinna with an unobstructed tympanic membrane. It is normal for the external auditory canal. Nose: nasal mucous membrane that is wet. No sinuses or discomfort to the touch. Throat: pink, wet mucous membrane in the mouth. The tonsils and posterior pharynx are not erythematous, and the uvula is in the middle.

MUSCULOSKELETAL: Gait and musculoskeletal development are normal. displays a healthy body posture without any joint or bone swelling or abnormalities. Right thumb abduction shows weakness, with a 3/5 poor strength. Positive Hoffmann-Tinel and Phalen indicators. All the muscles of the other limb are strong and their tendon reflexes are normal.

NEUROLOGICAL: Aware and well-grounded in time, location, and people. quite helpful throughout the assessment. All of the cranial nerves are mostly unharmed. demonstrates typical reactions. The right hand’s middle finger, thumb, and index finger all feel numb and tingly.

Diagnostic results: The complete blood count (CBC) reveals a white blood cell count (WBC) of 8.9. Additionally, a comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP) including differentials is performed.  The glucose level is measured at 125, while the HgbA1c level is recorded as 4.5%, indicating the need to exclude any potential presence or occurrence. Neuropathy associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The concentration of C-reactive protein in the sample is 4.2 mg/L (Attal & Didier Bouhassira, 2023).

Diagnostic Tests:

  • An X-ray examination of the right wrist was conducted to assess the presence of arthritic changes (Genova et al., 2020).
  • Test for bone density to rule out osteoporosis.
  • nerve conduction analysis.
  • Manual: Tinel sign and Durkans Test (Zhang et al., 2020).

A.

Differential Diagnoses:

  1. Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS): This condition is characterized by symptoms such as tingling and numbness in the fingers, which occur due to compression of the median nerve within the carpal tunnel (Malakootian et al., 2022). This condition is commonly regarded as an occupational disease characterized by repetitive wrist and finger extension and flexion. However, certain cases of CTS may have an unknown cause, and the risk of developing CTS can be influenced by various factors, including genetic and acquired factors. A nerve conduction study is a precise diagnostic tool used to identify both normal and abnormal values of nerve function. Diagnostic laboratory results can also be utilized for the identification of increased levels of inflammatory markers. The patient exhibits multiple risk factors for developing this disease, including occupational factors and obesity.
  2. Peripheral neuropathy: This condition is linked to hand numbness. The patient’s gender, familial history, and weight contribute to their increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) (Selvarajah et al., 2019). Peripheral neuropathy is a frequently observed symptom associated with T2DM, characterized by a gradual onset. A two-point discrimination test was conducted, revealing decreased sensitivity in the patient’s right arm. The patient reports no decrease in sensation in the lower extremities. If the patient experiences altered symptoms and exhibits new-onset neuropathy in the lower extremities, I will contemplate reevaluating the A1C levels and potentially diagnose diabetic peripheral neuropathy based on diagnostic assessments. Diabetic individuals exhibit significant declines in hand and finger dexterity relative to their healthy counterparts.
  3. Wartenberg’s syndrome: This condition presents as paresthesia or pain occurring along the radial aspect of the forearm, with symptoms radiating toward the thumb and middle fingers. The pain arises due to the compression of the superficial radial nerve. Potential external factors may include the presence of a wristwatch or objects exerting pressure on the nerve (Kuschner & Berihun, 2021). The technique of palpation in the vicinity of the radial nerve region is employed to detect potential masses located both superficially and deeply. The utilization of the Tinel’s sign aids in the confirmation of this particular diagnosis.
  4. Lupus: This is an autoimmune disease characterized by immune system dysfunction, resulting in inflammation, a high body temperature, joint pain, malaise, and rash. DNA methylation is a specific and reliable biomarker for the diagnosis of lupus, exhibiting cell-type specificity (Fanouriakis et al., 2020). DNA methylation is more prominent in patients with active disease compared to those in remission. The lupus band test (LBT) is a direct immunofluorescent approach conducted through skin biopsy. It is particularly valuable in cases where clinical and laboratory data are inconclusive for diagnosing lupus.
  5. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM): The patient is at a heightened risk of developing T2DM. In the event of a gradual increase in the patient’s HbA1c, it is recommended to implement a prediabetes protocol involving lifestyle modifications such as dietary changes, exercise, and regular monitoring of HbA1c levels. Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DNP) is characterized by progressive metabolic and inflammatory alterations that result in impaired daily functioning and reduced independence (Wu et al., 2021). Fasting lipid levels should be included in laboratory tests to assess cholesterol levels and provide education on cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL, and HDL levels.

 

 

References

Attal, N., & Didier Bouhassira. (2023). Neuropathic Pain. https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780197616345.001.0001

Fanouriakis, A., Tziolos, N., Bertsias, G., & Boumpas, D. T. (2020). Update Οn the Diagnosis and Management of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases80(1), annrheumdis-2020-218272. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-218272

Genova, A., Dix, O., Saefan, A., Thakur, M., & Hassan, A. (2020). Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Review of Literature. Cureus12(3). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7333

Kuschner, S. H., & Berihun, H. (2021). Robert Wartenberg Syndrome and Sign: A Review Article. The Open Orthopaedics Journal15(1), 13–16. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874325002115010013

Malakootian, M., Soveizi, M., Gholipour, A., & Oveisee, M. (2022). Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Genetics of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Review. Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10571-022-01297-2

Selvarajah, D., Kar, D., Khunti, K., Davies, M. J., Scott, A. R., Walker, J., & Tesfaye, S. (2019). Diabetic peripheral neuropathy: advances in diagnosis and strategies for screening and early intervention. The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology7(12), 938–948. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-8587(19)30081-6

Wu, B., Niu, Z., & Hu, F. (2021). Study on Risk Factors of Peripheral Neuropathy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Establishment of Prediction Model. Diabetes & Metabolism Journal45(4), 526–538. https://doi.org/10.4093/dmj.2020.0100

Zhang, D., Chruscielski, C., Blazar, P., & Earp, B. (2020). Accuracy of Provocative Tests for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online2(3), 121–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsg.2020.03.002

A Sample Answer 2 For the Assignment: NURS 6512 Assignment 1 Case Study Assignment Assessing Neurological Symptoms IN

Title: NURS 6512 Assignment 1 Case Study Assignment Assessing Neurological Symptoms IN

Patient Information:

A.Y, 20 year-old African American male

S.

CC “I have been experiencing intermittent headaches that diffuse all over the head with greatest intensity and pressure above the eyes.”

HPI: The patient came with complaints of intermittent headaches for the last one week. The headaches diffuse all over the head with greatest intensity and pressure above the eyes and spreads through the nose, cheekbones, and jaw. The client reports that analgesics such as acetaminophen provide him with relieve that is not long lasting. The associated symptoms include nausea and photophobia. The severity of pain as reported by the patient was 8/10.

Current Medications: The patient has been using acetaminophen 1 gm TDS for the last four days.

Allergies: The client denied any food, drug, or environmental allergy.

PMHx: The client’s immunization history is up to date.

Soc Hx: The client is a college student undertaking a degree in information technology. He does not smoke or take alcohol. He engages in active physical activity, as he is a member of the university basketball team. His social support comprises of his family members and friends.

Fam Hx: The client denied any chronic illnesses in the family.

ROS:

GENERAL:  The patient appeared well-groomed for the occasion without any signs of malaise or weight loss. He denied fever and chills.

HEENT:  Eyes: The client denied visual loss, blurred vision, double vision or yellow sclerae. He reported photophobia during the episodes of intermittent headaches.

Ears, Nose, Throat:  He denied hearing loss, sneezing, congestion, runny nose or sore throat.

SKIN:  He denied rash, scars, or itching.

CARDIOVASCULAR:  He denied chest pain, chest pressure, chest discomfort, palpitations or edema.

RESPIRATORY:  He denied shortness of breath, difficulty in breathing, cough or sputum.

GASTROINTESTINAL:  Denies anorexia, vomiting or diarrhea. He also denied abdominal pain or blood. He reported nausea during episodes of intermittent headaches.

GENITOURINARY:  He denied burning on urination, increased urinary frequency, or changes in smell and color of urine.

NEUROLOGICAL:  The patient reports intermittent headaches, denies syncope, dizziness, paralysis, numbness, and tingling of the extremities. He also denied changes in bladder and bwel control.

MUSCULOSKELETAL:  The patient denied muscle, back pain, joint pain or stiffness.

HEMATOLOGIC:  He denied anemia, bleeding or bruising.

LYMPHATICS:  He denied enlarged nodes with absence of a history of splenectomy.

PSYCHIATRIC:  He denied history of depression or anxiety.

ENDOCRINOLOGIC:  He denied history of sweating, cold or heat intolerance. He also denied polyuria or polydipsia.

ALLERGIES:  He denied history of asthma, hives, eczema or rhinitis.

O.

Physical exam:

General: The patient appears well groomed, with lack of evidence of weight loss and fatigue

Vitals: Temp 36.7, BP 122/76 P-80, RR 20, SPO2 96,

Head: normocephalic, with no lesions, evidence of trauma, with symmetric facial features. The maxillary and frontal sinuses are tender on palpation.

Ears: The ears are symmetric with absence of ear drainage, loss of balance, and grey tympanic membranes

Eyes: the eyes are symmetric, without jaundice and bleeding. Normal visual acuity

Nose: Absence of nasal flaring, discharge, and septum deviation

Throat: Absence of tonsillitis

Neck: symmetric trachea noted with absence of neck rigidity, swelling, and gross abnormalities of the thyroid

Cardiovascular: presence of S1 and S2, with absence of peripheral edema and advantageous sounds

Gastrointestinal: Absence of abdominal swelling, scars, with normal bowel movements.

Respiratory: Lung sounds clear with absence of advantageous sounds

Neurological: Client is oriented to self, place, time, and events. Pupil reactive to light and equal in size with equal grip in both hands and symmetrical facial features. The self-reported headache is rated at 8/10. There is the presence of intermittent headache, photophobia, and nausea.

Diagnostic results: One of the recommended diagnostic investigations that should be performed for the client is nasal scrapping. Nasal scraping should be performed to obtain a sample for test for esinophils. Radiological investigations are also recommended in case of severe symptoms. The investigations include a head CT scan to detect any abnormalities such as tissue involvement, inflammation of the meninges, and tumors. A MRI may also be done to determine the presence of any abnormality in the brain tissue and soft tissue pathology. Bacterial sinusitis may also be diagnosed by performing sinus aspiration (Iskandar & Triayudi, 2020).

A.

Differential Diagnoses

Sinusitis: The first differential diagnosis for the client in this case study is sinusitis. Sinusitis is a condition characterized by the inflammation of the nasal cavities. The symptoms often last for a period of less than a month. Patients with sinusitis experience symptoms that include frontal headaches with feelings of fullness. Patients also experience other accompanying symptoms that include nausea, vomiting, photophobia, and nasal drainage. The physical assessment findings may reveal tenderness of the sinuses (Iskandar & Triayudi, 2020). The patient in the case study has symptoms that align with this diagnosis, hence, it being the primary diagnosis.

Migraine headache: migraine headache is the secondary diagnosis for the patient in this case study. Patients with migraine headache experience severe, throbbing headache. The accompanying symptoms include photophobia, phonophobia, nausea, and vomiting (Ha & Gonzalez, 2019). This is however a least diagnosis because of the patient experiencing feelings of fullness and involvement of the sinuses.

Allergic rhinitis: The other possible diagnosis for the client is allergic rhinitis. Patients with allergic rhinitis experience symptoms that include headaches, nasal drainage, coughing, sneezing, and pressure on the cheeks and nose (Scadding et al., 2017). Allergic rhinitis is however the least likely diagnosis due to the absence of a history of allergic reaction by the client.

Facial pain syndrome: Facial pain syndrome is the other potential diagnosis for the client in the case study. Facial pain syndrome is attributed to pain affecting the trigeminal nerve. The symptoms associated with it include pain on touching the face, speaking, chewing or brushing teeth (Benoliel & Gaul, 2017). Facial pain syndrome is however the least likely diagnosis due to the absence of pain upon stimulation of the facial muscles.

Acute bacterial pharyngitis: Acute bacterial pharyngitis is the last potential diagnosis for the client. Acute bacterial pharyngitis is attributed to step bacterial infection. Patients experience symptoms that include difficulty in swallowing, headache, chills, and malaise. The patient however does not experience difficulty in swallowing, fever, and chills, hence, acute bacterial pharyngitis not being the primary differential (Harberger & Graber, 2021).

This section is not required for the assignments in this course (NURS 6512) but will be required for future courses.

 

References

Benoliel, R., & Gaul, C. (2017). Persistent idiopathic facial pain. Cephalalgia, 37(7), 680–691. https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102417706349

Ha, H., & Gonzalez, A. (2019). Migraine Headache Prophylaxis. American Family Physician, 99(1), 17–24.

Harberger, S., & Graber, M. (2021). Bacterial Pharyngitis. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK559007/

Iskandar, A., & Triayudi, A. (2020). Early Diagnosis of Sinusitis Using Expert System Methods: Early Diagnosis of Sinusitis Using Expert System Methods. Jurnal Mantik, 4(2), 1231–1236. https://doi.org/10.35335/mantik.Vol4.2020.927.pp1231-1236

Scadding, G. K., Kariyawasam, H. H., Scadding, G., Mirakian, R., Buckley, R. J., Dixon, T., Durham, S. R., Farooque, S., Jones, N., Leech, S., Nasser, S. M., Powell, R., Roberts, G., Rotiroti, G., Simpson, A., Smith, H., & Clark, A. T. (2017). BSACI guideline for the diagnosis and management of allergic and non-allergic rhinitis (Revised Edition 2017; First edition 2007). Clinical & Experimental Allergy, 47(7), 856–889. https://doi.org/10.1111/cea.12953

Content

Name: NURS_6512_Week_9_Assignment1_Rubric

  Excellent Good Fair Poor
Using the Episodic/Focused SOAP Template:
· Create documentation or an episodic/focused note in SOAP format about the patient in the case study to which you were assigned.
·  Provide evidence from the literature to support diagnostic tests that would be appropriate for your case.
Points Range: 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)

The response clearly, accurately, and thoroughly follows the SOAP format to document the patient in the assigned case study. The response thoroughly and accurately provides detailed evidence from the literature to support diagnostic tests that would be appropriate for the patient in the assigned case study.

Points Range: 39 (39%) – 44 (44%)

The response accurately follows the SOAP format to document the patient in the assigned case study. The response accurately provides detailed evidence from the literature to support diagnostic tests that would be appropriate for the patient in the assigned case study.

Points Range: 33 (33%) – 38 (38%)

The response follows the SOAP format to document the patient in the assigned case study, with some vagueness and inaccuracy. The response provides evidence from the literature to support diagnostic tests that would be appropriate for the patient in the assigned case study, with some vagueness or inaccuracy in the evidence selected.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 32 (32%)

The response incompletely and inaccurately follows the SOAP format to document the patient in the assigned case study. The response provides incomplete, inaccurate, and/or missing evidence from the literature to support diagnostic tests that would be appropriate for the patient in the assigned case study.

·   List five different possible conditions for the patient’s differential diagnosis, and justify why you selected each. Points Range: 30 (30%) – 35 (35%)

The response lists five distinctly different and detailed possible conditions for a differential diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study and provides a thorough, accurate, and detailed justification for each of the five conditions selected.

Points Range: 24 (24%) – 29 (29%)

The response lists four to five different possible conditions for a differential diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study and provides an accurate justification for each of the five conditions selected.

Points Range: 18 (18%) – 23 (23%)

The response lists three to four possible conditions for a differential diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study, with some vagueness and/or some inaccuracy in the conditions and/or justification for each.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 17 (17%)

The response lists three or fewer, or is missing, possible conditions for a differential diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study, with inaccurate or missing justification for each condition selected.

Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.

Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.

Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.

Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

Total Points: 100

Name: NURS_6512_Week_9_Assignment1_Rubric

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 6512 Assignment 1 Case Study Assignment Assessing Neurological Symptoms IN

NURS 6512 Assignment 1 Case Study Assignment Assessing Neurological Symptoms IN Grading Rubric

Performance Category 100% or highest level of performance

100%

16 points

Very good or high level of performance

88%

14 points

Acceptable level of performance

81%

13 points

Inadequate demonstration of expectations

68%

11 points

Deficient level of performance

56%

9 points

 

Failing level

of performance

55% or less

0 points

 Total Points Possible= 50           16 Points    14 Points 13 Points        11 Points           9 Points          0 Points
Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics.

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
 

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
 

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information
 16 Points  14 Points  13 Points 11 Points 9 Points  0 Points
Application of Course Knowledge

Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from and scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information and scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
   10 Points 9 Points  6 Points  0 Points
Interactive Dialogue

Initial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count)

The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count)

Responses are substantive and relate to the topic.

Demonstrated all of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
Demonstrated 3 of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
Demonstrated 2 of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
Demonstrated 1 or less of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
  8 Points 7 Points  6 Points         5 Points          4 Points  0 Points
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error.

The following was present:

  • 0-3 errors in APA format

AND

  • Responses have 0-3 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND

  • Writing style is generally clear, focused on topic,and facilitates communication.
The following was present:

  • 4-6 errors in APA format.

AND/OR

  • Responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is somewhat focused on topic.
The following was present:

  • 7-9 errors in APA format.

AND/OR

  • Responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is slightly focused on topic making discussion difficult to understand.
 

The following was present:

  • 10- 12 errors in APA format

AND/OR

  • Responses have 8-9 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.
 

The following was present:

  • 13 – 15 errors in APA format

AND/OR

  • Responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.

AND/OR

  • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor.
The following was present:

  • 16 to greater errors in APA format.

AND/OR

  • Responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors.

AND/OR

  • Writing style does not facilitate communication
  0 Points Deducted 5 Points Lost
Participation

Requirements

Demonstrated the following:

  • Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days
Failed to demonstrate the following:

  • Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days
  0 Points Lost 5 Points Lost
Due Date Requirements Demonstrated all of the following:

  • The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.

A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.

Demonstrates one or less of the following.

  • The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.

A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.

Check Out Also: NURS 6501 Module 7 Week 10: Assignment Case Study Analysis IN-Concepts of Women’s and Men’s Health, Infections, and Hematologic Disorders