Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

NURS 6053 Discussion 2 Your Leadership Profile

NURS 6053 Discussion 2 Your Leadership Profile

 

Week 5: Initial Discussion Post

After completing the StrengthsFinder assessment instrument, the report revealed that my top 5 themes are Includer, Relator, Positivity, Achiever and Focus. As in Includer, the results showed that I do my best work in the evening or after midnight. I find this to be very true because I am often up late getting things done. That is when I find the most peacefulness. It also says that I usually find qualities to appreciate in most people that I meet. I also believe that this is true because I believe that people come into your life for a reason, season or lifetime and I feel that a positive each person that we meet we can take a positive trait from each of them.

The Relator characteristic reports that I enjoy close relationships with others and find deep satisfaction in working hard with friends to achieve a goal. I tend to have friendships where we hold one accountable, which ultimately drives us to achieve the goals that we set out for ourselves.

As a person of Positivity, I am very generous with praise, quick to smile and always lookout for the positive in all situations. I do take every situation and look at the bright side of it. I am on of celebration and believe that everything should be celebrated. It also states that “somehow you can’t quite escape your conviction that it is good to be alive.” I am firm believer of that, because with everything that we have been through with the Coronavirus situation, we still stand as front-line care givers and are still striving to do well in school and I am ever so grateful for that.

As the Achiever, this helps explain my drive. I do believe that we all should strive to reach our greatest potential. With this quality, I do believe that something should be marked off the list each day and each day begins at zero. I do feel that if nothing gets done, then I have failed for the day. I have to stop being so critical and relax and live a little more without pressuring myself so much. In the end, I do believe that each day should begin with a set of goals or a list of things/tasks to do. NURS 6053 Discussion 2 Your Leadership Profile

The final strength is Focus. This strength aligns with the strength of Achiever as Focus always has to have a goal in wanting to know “where am I headed”.  This is true because I believe that you should always plan. With this plan, it allows me to prioritize and stay on target. I am the one who keeps everyone on tasks. My Focus reminds everyone that if something isn’t helping you achieve your goals, then it must be eliminated.

In conclusion, I feel that these results relate to my leadership traits by of way of setting goals. I do praise my team all of time. When nurses are given praise, it inspires us to continue to do well. I approach each situation with positivity and I allow the team to provide suggestions on how we can make our unit better. I include their thoughts, feelings and consideration for making changes.

References

Rath, T., (2017). Strenghtsfinder from Gallup. Discover your Clifton Strengths.

Clifton, D. (2017). The Clifton Strength Assessment. Retrieved from:

https://www.gallup.com/cliftonstrengths/en/strengthsfinder.aspx

RE: Discussion – Week 5 (Second Response)

 T,

I like how you applied the concept of achiever to your daily practice. Its a common saying that as long as we learn one new thing a day, the day was not wasted. Waking up everyone morning with a goal, or idea, or list of things that need to get done and completing those

NURS 6053 Discussion 2 Your Leadership Profile

NURS 6053 Discussion 2 Your Leadership Profile

tasks makes the day feel even better, that it was not just wasted. Some days there are going to be more things to complete, while other days it might seem that the list of tasks to do is never ending; I think as nurses we have a tendency of placing tasks found on other people’s list on ours, to either help them or do it ourselves. It is important to remember that some days to keep the list of things to complete to a minimum, give ourselves a day off, just to relax and take a mental break. Like you said, some people feel incomplete at the end of the day because they did not get everything on their list done, I’ve learned to not beat myself up to much, so what I don’t get done in one day, I put that at the top of my list for the next day.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NURS 6053 Discussion 2 Your Leadership Profile

I think positivity goes a long way in the nursing community, I don’t think you can be a negative person and work in nursing. We deal with patients facing all kind of negative injuries and illnesses, we have to be positive for them, try and keep them positive about their prognosis, about their road to recovery. Such studies highlight how a negative relationship with patients can have harmful consequences for nurses and physicians, in terms of stress, burnout, and health complaint (Converso, Loera, Viotti, Martini, 2015). My leader once said that along with being the patients biggest advocate, we are also the patients biggest cheerleader, we are positive for them, we are excited for the small things, the small steps in their road to recovery; we make them see why the small things make the biggest impact.

Converso, D., Loera, B., Viotti, S., & Martini, M. (2015). Do positive relations with patients play a protective role for healthcare employees? Effects of patients’ gratitude and support on nurses’ burnout. Frontiers in psychology, 6, 470.

DBQ Response #1

Response #1. Hi T..,

Great Post. I agree that the relator is characteristic because it is essential to establish a working relationship with others in nursing. According to Latief et al. (2019), nurses need to find happiness in each other because it leads to job satisfaction. Moreover, I recognize that being an achiever in practice is vital because it defines the potential that drives us because it includes setting goals anew every day. Besides, I accept that the focus strength describes where you are headed daily by providing a plan. Additionally, I agree that the forte allows you to make priorities and keep you on your tasks. NURS 6053 Discussion 2 Your Leadership Profile

Also, I recognize that being an includer is crucial not only in learning but also in practice as it allows one to work in the utmost peacefulness and appreciate the qualities of other people. Akbar and Locsin (2017) inputs that human nature craves appreciation, showing the belief in the capacity of other nurses’ potential to promote their healing and wholeness.  Positivity is essential in nursing because believing everything will be better gives people hope. Conclusively, I concur with your assertion that the results relate to leadership traits because they result in admirable nursing practice changes.

References

Akbar, A. M. A. & Locsin, R. C. (2017). Nursing Engagement: The Process of Nursing Grounded in the Theory of Human Potential Fulfillment in Nursing (HuPoFNE). Songklanagarind Journal of Nursing, 37(Supplement), 15-24.

Chambers, C., & Ryder, E. (2018). Supporting compassionate healthcare practice: Understanding the role of resilience, positivity, and wellbeing. Routledge.

Devine, C. A., & Chin, E. D. (2018). Integrity in nursing students: A concept analysis. Nurse Education Today, 60(2), 133-138.

Latief, A., Refeai, S., Mohammed, E., Emam, E., & Ghazawy, E. (2019). Workplace Friendship among Minia University Hospitals’ Nurses. Egyptian Journal of Occupational Medicine, 43(3), 441-452.

Name:  Discussion Rubric

  Excellent

90–100

Good

80–89

Fair

70–79

Poor

0–69

Main Posting:

Response to the Discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

40 (40%) – 44 (44%)

Thoroughly responds to the Discussion question(s).

Is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

No less than 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.

Supported by at least three current credible sources.

35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

Responds to most of the Discussion question(s).

Is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

50% of the post has exceptional depth and breadth.

Supported by at least three credible references.

31 (31%) – 34 (34%)

Responds to some of the Discussion question(s).

One to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.

Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

Cited with fewer than two credible references.

0 (0%) – 30 (30%)

Does not respond to the Discussion question(s).

Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.

Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

Contains only one or no credible references.

Main Posting:

Writing

6 (6%) – 6 (6%)

Written clearly and concisely.

Contains no grammatical or spelling errors.

Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Written concisely.

May contain one to two grammatical or spelling errors.

Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Written somewhat concisely.

May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

Contains some APA formatting errors.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Not written clearly or concisely.

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Main Posting:

Timely and full participation

9 (9%) – 10 (10%)

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.

Posts main Discussion by due date.

8 (8%) – 8 (8%)

Meets requirements for full participation.

Posts main Discussion by due date.

7 (7%) – 7 (7%)

Posts main Discussion by due date.

0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

Does not meet requirements for full participation.

Does not post main Discussion by due date.

First Response:

Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.

9 (9%) – 9 (9%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

Responds to questions posed by faculty.

The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

8 (8%) – 8 (8%)

Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.

7 (7%) – 7 (7%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

First Response:

Writing

6 (6%) – 6 (6%)

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues.

Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed.

Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources.

Response is written in standard, edited English.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Response posed in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication.

Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

Few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective communication.

Response to faculty questions are missing.

No credible sources are cited.

First Response:

Timely and full participation

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.

Posts by due date.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Meets requirements for full participation.

Posts by due date.

3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Posts by due date.

0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Does not meet requirements for full participation.

Does not post by due date.

Second Response:
Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.
9 (9%) – 9 (9%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

Responds to questions posed by faculty.

The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

8 (8%) – 8 (8%)

Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.

7 (7%) – 7 (7%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

Second Response:
Writing
6 (6%) – 6 (6%)

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues.

Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed.

Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources.

Response is written in standard, edited English.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Response posed in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication.

Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

Few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective communication.

Response to faculty questions are missing.

No credible sources are cited.

Second Response:
Timely and full participation
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.

Posts by due date.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Meets requirements for full participation.

Posts by due date.

3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Posts by due date.

0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Does not meet requirements for full participation.

Does not post by due date.

Total Points: 100

Name:  Discussion Rubric

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.