NURS 6053 CHANGE IMPLEMENTATION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN

NURS 6053 CHANGE IMPLEMENTATION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN

NURS 6053 CHANGE IMPLEMENTATION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 6053 CHANGE IMPLEMENTATION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN

CHANGE IMPLEMENTATION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN

It is one of the most cliché of clichés, but it nevertheless rings true: The only constant is change. As a nursing professional, you are no doubt aware that success in the healthcare field requires the ability to adapt to change, as the pace of change in healthcare may be without rival.

As a professional, you will be called upon to share expertise, inform, educate, and advocate. Your efforts in these areas can help lead others through change. In this Assignment, you will propose a change within your organization and present a comprehensive plan to implement the change you propose.

To Prepare:

  • Review the Resources and identify one change that you believe is called for in your organization/workplace.
    • This may be a change necessary to effectively address one or more of the issues you addressed in the Workplace Environment Assessment you submitted in Module 4. It may also be a change in response to something not addressed in your previous efforts. It may be beneficial to discuss your ideas with your organizational leadership and/or colleagues to help identify and vet these ideas.
  • Reflect on how you might implement this change and how you might communicate this change to organizational leadership.

The Assignment (5-6-minute narrated PowerPoint presentation):

Change Implementation and Management Plan

Create a 5- or 6-slide narrated PowerPoint that presents a comprehensive plan to implement changes you propose.

Your narrated presentation should be 5–6 minutes in length.

Your Change Implementation and Management Plan should include the following:

  • An executive summary of the issues that are currently affecting your organization/workplace (This can include the work you completed in your Workplace Environment Assessment previously submitted, if relevant.)
  • A description of the change being proposed
  • Justifications for the change, including why addressing it will have a positive impact on your organization/workplace
  • Details about the type and scope of the proposed change
  • Identification of the stakeholders impacted by the change
  • Identification of a change management team (by title/role)
  • A plan for communicating the change you propose
  • A description of risk mitigation plans you would recommend to address the risks anticipated by the change you propose

Alternate Submission Method

You may also use Kaltura Personal Capture to record your narrated PowerPoint. This option will require you to create your PowerPoint slides first. Then, follow the Personal Capture instructions outlined on the Kaltura Media Uploader guide found in the left menu of your classroom. This guide will walk you through downloading the tool and help you become familiar with the features of Personal Capture. When you are ready to begin recording, you may turn off the webcam option so that only “Screen” and “Audio” are enabled. Start your recording and then open your PowerPoint to slide show view. Once the recording is complete, follow the instructions found on the “Posting Your Video in the Classroom Guide” found on the Kaltura Media Uploader page for instructions on how to submit your video. For this option, in addition to submitting your video, you must also upload your PowerPoint file which must include your speaker notes.

By Day 2 of Week 11

Submit your narrated Change Implementation and Management Plan.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

  • Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK11Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
  • Click the Week 11 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
  • Click the Week 11 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
  • Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK11Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
  • If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
  • Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.

Rubric Detail

 

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

Name: NURS_6053_Module05_Week11_Assignment_Rubric

  Excellent Good Fair Poor
Create a 5- or 6-slide PowerPoint that presents a comprehensive plan to implement changes you propose. Your Change Implementation and Management Plan should include the following:

· An executive summary of the issues that are currently affecting your organization/workplace (this can include the work you completed in your Workplace Environment Assessment).

· A description of the changes being proposed.

· Justifications for the changes, including why addressing them will have a positive impact on your organization/workplace.

 36 (36%) – 40 (40%)

The narrated presentation accurately and completely presents a comprehensive plan to implement proposed changes.

The narrated presentation accurately and thoroughly describes the issues currently affecting the organization in an executive summary.

The narrated presentation accurately and clearly describes the proposed changes.

The narrated presentation accurately and clearly provides justifications for the changes, including why addressing them will have a positive impact on the organization.

 32 (32%) – 35 (35%)

The narrated presentation adequately presents a comprehensive plan to implement proposed changes.

The narrated presentation adequately describes the issues currently affecting the organization in an executive summary.

The narrated presentation adequately describes the proposed changes.

The narrated presentation adequately provides justifications for the changes, including why addressing them will have a positive impact on the organization.

 28 (28%) – 31 (31%)

The narrated presentation vaguely, inaccurately, or incompletely presents a plan to implement proposed changes.

The narrated presentation inaccurately or vaguely describes the issues currently affecting the organization in an executive summary.

The narrated presentation inaccurately or vaguely describes the proposed changes.

The narrated presentation inaccurately or vaguely provides justifications for the changes, including why addressing them will have a positive impact on the organization.

 0 (0%) – 27 (27%)

The narrated presentation vaguely, inaccurately, and incompletely presents a plan to implement proposed changes.

The narrated presentation inaccurately and vaguely describes the issues currently affecting the organization in an executive summary or executive summary is missing.

The narrated presentation inaccurately and vaguely describes the proposed changes or proposed changes are missing.

The narrated presentation inaccurately and vaguely provides justifications for the changes, including why addressing them will have a positive impact on the organization or justifications are missing.
· Details about the type and scope of the proposed changes.

· Identification of the stakeholders impacted by the changes.

· Identification of a change management team (by title/role).

· A plan for communicating the changes you propose.

· A description of risk mitigation plans you would recommend to address the risks anticipated by the changes you propose.

 27 (27%) – 30 (30%)

The narrated presentation accurately and thoroughly details the type and scope of the proposed changes.

The narrated presentation accurately and clearly identifies the stakeholders impacted by the changes.

The narrated presentation accurately and completely identifies a change management team by title/ role.

The narrated presentation accurately and thoroughly proposes a detailed plan for communicating the changes proposed.

The narrated presentation accurately and thoroughly describes recommended risk mitigation plans that address the risks anticipated by the changes proposed.

 24 (24%) – 26 (26%)

The narrated presentation adequately details the type and scope of the proposed changes.

The narrated presentation adequately identifies the stakeholders impacted by the changes.

The narrated presentation adequately identifies a change management team by title/ role.

The narrated presentation adequately proposes a detailed plan for communicating the changes proposed.

The narrated presentation adequately describes recommended risk mitigation plans that address the risks anticipated by the changes proposed.

 21 (21%) – 23 (23%)

The narrated presentation vaguely or inaccurately details the type and scope of the proposed changes.

The narrated presentation vaguely or inaccurately identifies the stakeholders impacted by the changes.

The narrated presentation vaguely or inaccurately identifies a change management team by title/ role.

The narrated presentation vaguely or inaccurately proposes a detailed plan for communicating the changes proposed.

The narrated presentation vaguely or inaccurately describes recommended risk mitigation plans that address the risks anticipated by the changes proposed.

 0 (0%) – 20 (20%)

The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately details the type and scope of the proposed changes or proposed changes are missing.

The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately identifies the stakeholders impacted by the changes or stakeholders are missing.

The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately identifies a change management team by title/ role or change management team is missing.

The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately proposes a detailed plan for communicating the changes proposed or communication plan is missing.

The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately describes recommended risk mitigation plans that address the risks anticipated by the changes proposed or recommendations are missing.
Resource Synthesis 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Using proper in-text citations, the response fully integrates at least 2 outside resources and 2 or 3 course-specific resources.

PowerPoint presentation includes references slide.

 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Using proper in-text citations, the response fully integrates at least 2 outside resources and 1 course-specific resource.

PowerPoint presentation includes references slide.

 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Using proper in-text citations, the response minimally integrates outside and course-specific resources.

PowerPoint presentation includes references slide.

 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

The response does not integrate outside and course-specific resources or no in-text citations are used.

References slide is incomplete or missing.
Presentation Narration 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)

Narration is present.

 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Narration is missing.
PowerPoint Presentation:

The presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.

 9 (9%) – 10 (10%)

The presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.

 8 (8%) – 8 (8%)

Eighty percent of the presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.

 7 (7%) – 7 (7%)

Sixty to seventy nine percent of the presentation follows these guidelines: presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.

 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

Less than sixty percent of the presentation follows these guidelines: presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.
Written Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards:

Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.

 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
Total Points: 100

Name: NURS_6053_Module05_Week11_Assignment_Rubric

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 6053 CHANGE IMPLEMENTATION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN

NURS 6053 CHANGE IMPLEMENTATION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN
NURS 6053 CHANGE IMPLEMENTATION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN

Grading Rubric

Performance Category 100% or highest level of performance

100%

16 points

 Very good or high level of performance

88%

14 points

 Acceptable level of performance

81%

13 points

 Inadequate demonstration of expectations

68%

11 points

 Deficient level of performance

56%

9 points

 

 Failing level

of performance

55% or less

0 points
 Total Points Possible= 50           16 Points    14 Points 13 Points        11 Points           9 Points          0 Points
Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics.

 Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
 Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
 Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
  

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
  

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
 Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information
 16 Points  14 Points  13 Points 11 Points 9 Points  0 Points
Application of Course Knowledge

Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

 Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
 Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
 Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
 Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from and scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
 Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
 Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information and scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
   10 Points 9 Points  6 Points  0 Points
Interactive Dialogue

Initial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count)

The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count)

Responses are substantive and relate to the topic.

 Demonstrated all of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
 Demonstrated 3 of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
 Demonstrated 2 of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
 Demonstrated 1 or less of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
  8 Points 7 Points  6 Points         5 Points          4 Points  0 Points
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error.

 The following was present:

  • 0-3 errors in APA format

AND

  • Responses have 0-3 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND

  • Writing style is generally clear, focused on topic,and facilitates communication.
 The following was present:

  • 4-6 errors in APA format.

AND/OR

  • Responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is somewhat focused on topic.
 The following was present:

  • 7-9 errors in APA format.

AND/OR

  • Responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is slightly focused on topic making discussion difficult to understand.
  

The following was present:

  • 10- 12 errors in APA format

AND/OR

  • Responses have 8-9 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.
  

The following was present:

  • 13 – 15 errors in APA format

AND/OR

  • Responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.

AND/OR

  • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor.
 The following was present:

  • 16 to greater errors in APA format.

AND/OR

  • Responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors.

AND/OR

  • Writing style does not facilitate communication
  0 Points Deducted 5 Points Lost
Participation

Requirements

Demonstrated the following:

  • Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days
 Failed to demonstrate the following:

  • Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days
  0 Points Lost 5 Points Lost
Due Date Requirements Demonstrated all of the following:

  • The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.

A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.

Demonstrates one or less of the following.

  • The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.

A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.

Also Read: NURS 6053 ANALYSIS OF A PERTINENT HEALTHCARE ISSUE