Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

NURS 6053 Assignment: Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue Walden

NURS 6053 Assignment: Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue Walden

There are numerous national health stressors or problems that affect and impact health organizations throughout the United States. They all require attention, even if some are more pressing than others. The medical challenge chosen in this instance is the development of health-care practitioners’ expertise, which is one of the most significant existing stressors. These are the nurses who work in this capacity for a health-care organization. Upskilling is a method of retraining representatives so they can easily acquire new skills and continue practicing in their field (Pringle, 2017). Recent advancements (particularly mechanical) within and around health care have necessitated the updating of laborers’ skill sets, for example, nurses. The PwC Health Research Institute identified upskilling as a significant health-care issue in 2019. Today, unless updated, entire health-care workforces are threatened by technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI) attrition. This includes nurses who have not previously provided health care services.

The impact of upskilling as a health-care issue on my health-care association is enormous. This is because developing health-care innovations has become more necessary in diagnostics, therapeutics, and nursing care. As a result, nurses are finding themselves short of the skills necessary to provide excellent patient care. It requires the association to set aside funds for retraining and updating the skills of its nurses in order for them to adapt to emerging technological changes (Gaskell, 2018). For the organization, it is an unavoidable asset-intensive endeavor. For instance, in my association, policymakers simply needed to set aside funds for training nurses and other health-care staff on how to use the recently introduced EHR. Upskilling is successful in the health-care sector, where EHRs are now required. Artificial intelligence-assisted telehealth intercessions are expected to be a sign of health-care upskilling.

Two Articles’ Summary

Michaelis, et al. (2019) state that the health‐economic outcomes of allergic disease are noteworthy, with both direct health-care costs and backhanded costs (lost school and work time, decreased profitability and over‐the‐counter meds). There is additionally a well-recognized impedance of personal satisfaction, with less substantial expenses including uneasiness, trouble, inconvenience, incapacity, and, periodically, death. To assist with moderating these impacts, there is a need to upskill the expert workforce at all levels, and to furnish those prepared with the aptitudes to become future health are proficient mentors. Upskilling the workforce from the grass‐roots of undergrad concentrate in Medical, Nursing and Allied Health Professionals (AHP) through the total of training to senior specialist levels could have a significant valuable effect on the patient and their families, lead to a decrease in crisis utilization of clinical assistance, and help increment monetary profitability. As of now, the errand of upskilling the workforce falls to the global and national associations focused on giving direct instructive effort projects, symposia, and lectureships in an allergy to experts (Michaelis, et al., 2019). Upskilling the workforce from the grass‐roots of undergrad concentrate through the aggregate of preparing to expert level could majorly affect the patient and their families, the clinical help, general health, and the economy. NURS 6053 Assignment: Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue Walden

            Adamski, Gibson, Leech, & Truby (2018) state that an absence of nourishment training and education, time limitations during arrangements, and patients who approach an ever-developing group of sustenance and health data using the Internet and social media, together may clarify why specialists tend not to remember nourishment guidance for their care plans. For health experts, keeping up money in information about advancements in the numerous orders of sustenance science is testing; anticipating that specialists should have anything else than basic nourishment information is ridiculous, yet they should grapple numerous inquiries that their patients pose and inside exceptionally limited time (Adamski, Gibson, Leech, & Truby, 2018). Upskilling is an unquestionable requirement to stay aware of health-care advances. In different associations in the health-care area, a similar circumstance predicts. They are acceptance a comparable practice of retraining to upskill nurses, doctors, and other health laborers so they can familiarise with the continuing technological variations and maintain offering quality and safe patient care.

NURS 6053 Assignment Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue Walden

NURS 6053 Assignment Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue Walden

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NURS 6053 Assignment: Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue Walden

Strategies used to address the impact of issues

            Since the truth of upskilling in the health-care organization is inevitable, it is basic to create methodologies that target tending

to the organizational effect of this issue. Three methodologies are particularly useful. To start with, the organization needs to acquaint new advances step by step by taking into consideration adjustment and training. Expanding the training of the clinical workforce in the best way to utilize new and existing technology is being created and improved the world over. The training of laborers needs to be aware of these quick technological progressions (Chaghari, Ebadi, Ameryoun, & Safari, 2017). The workforce must be taught to utilize technology that controls care, enables patients, and utilizations shared information to improve the arrangement of proficient and powerful health-care. Second, upskilling should be made an arrangement activity that highlights the association’s objectives. An upskilling activity can occur at the degree of an organization, an industry, or a network. The last upskilling should be suitably intended for like some other price if it is to prosper. By no means should upskilling be considered as a bit of hindsight (Chaghari, Ebadi, Ameryoun, & Safari, 2017). These strategies had a positive impact on my organization as they are structured to offer the organization a competitive edge. However, accounting on the adverse side means that it will consume assets that should be set sideways by the organization. NURS 6053 Assignment: Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue Walden

NURS 6053 Assignment: Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue Walden

References NURS 6053 Assignment: Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue Walden

Adamski, M., Gibson, S., Leech, M., & Truby, H. (2018). Are doctors nutritionists? What is the role of doctors in providing nutrition advice? Nutrition Bulletin, 43(2), 147-152.

Chaghari, M., Ebadi, A., Ameryoun, A., & Safari, M. (2017). Empowering Education: A New Model for In-service Training of Nursing Staff. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism, 26–32.

Gaskell, A. (2018). Preparing The Healthcare Workforce To Deliver A Digital Future. Retrieved from Forbes: https://www.forbes.com/sites/adigaskell/2018/11/09/preparing-the-healthcare-workforce-to-deliver-the-digital-future/#6820cdf86d34

Michaelis, L. J., Skypala, I. J., Gardner, J., Sheikh, A., Fox, A. T., & Holloway, J. A. (2019). Upskilling health-care professionals to manage the clinical allergy. Clinical & Experimental Allergy.

Pringle, S. A. (2017). The Challenges of Upskilling Health Care Assistants in Community Nursing. Br J Community Nurs, 284-288.

Assignment: Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue

The Quadruple Aim provides broad categories of goals to pursue to maintain and improve healthcare. Within each goal are many issues that, if addressed successfully, may have a positive impact on outcomes. For example, healthcare leaders are being tasked to shift from an emphasis on disease management often provided in an acute care setting to health promotion and disease prevention delivered in primary care settings. Efforts in this area can have significant positive impacts by reducing the need for primary healthcare and by reducing the stress on the healthcare system.

Changes in the industry only serve to stress what has always been true; namely, that the healthcare field has always faced significant challenges, and that goals to improve healthcare will always involve multiple stakeholders. This should not seem surprising given the circumstances. Indeed, when a growing population needs care, there are factors involved such as the demands of providing that care and the rising costs associated with healthcare. Generally, it is not surprising that the field of healthcare is an industry facing multifaceted issues that evolve over time.

In this module’s Discussion, you reviewed some healthcare issues/stressors and selected one for further review. For this Assignment, you will consider in more detail the healthcare issue/stressor you selected. You will also review research that addresses the issue/stressor and write a white paper to your organization’s leadership that addresses the issue/stressor you selected.

To Prepare:

  • Review the national healthcare issues/stressors presented in the Resources and reflect on the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected for study.
  • Reflect on the feedback you received from your colleagues on your Discussion post for the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected.
  • Identify and review two additional scholarly resources (not included in the Resources for this module) that focus on change strategies implemented by healthcare organizations to address your selected national healthcare issue/stressor.

The Assignment (3-4 Pages):

Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue

Develop a 3- to 4-page paper, written to your organization’s leadership team, addressing your selected national healthcare issue/stressor and how it is impacting your work setting. Be sure to address the following:

  • Describe the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected and its impact on your organization. Use organizational data to quantify the impact (if necessary, seek assistance from leadership or appropriate stakeholders in your organization).
  • Provide a brief summary of the two articles you reviewed from outside resources on the national healthcare issue/stressor. Explain how the healthcare issue/stressor is being addressed in other organizations.
  • Summarize the strategies used to address the organizational impact of national healthcare issues/stressors presented in the scholarly resources you selected. Explain how they may impact your organization both positively and negatively. Be specific and provide examples.

Looking Ahead

The paper you develop in Module 1 will be revisited and revised in Module 2. Review the Assignment instructions for Module 2 to prepare for your revised paper.

By Day 7 of Week 2

Submit your paper.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

  • Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK2Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
  • Click the Week 2 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
  • Click the Week 2 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
  • Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK2Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
  • If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
  • Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
  • Due to the nature of this assignment, your instructor may require more than 7 days to provide you with quality feedback.

NURS_6053_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric

Excellent Good Fair Poor
Develop a 3- to 4-page paper, written to your organization’s leadership team, addressing the selected national healthcare issue/stressor and how it is impacting your work setting. Be sure to address the following:

·   Describe the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected and its impact on your organization. Use organizational data to quantify the impact (if necessary, seek assistance from leadership or appropriate stakeholders in your organization).

Points Range: 23 (23%) – 25 (25%)

The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the national healthcare issue/stressor selected and its impact on an organization.

The response includes accurate, clear, and detailed data to quantify the impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor selected.

Points Range: 20 (20%) – 22 (22%)

The response describes the national healthcare issue/stressor selected and its impact on an organization.

The response includes accurate data to quantify the impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor selected.

Points Range: 18 (18%) – 19 (19%)

The response describes the national healthcare issue/stressor selected and its impact on an organization that is vague or inaccurate.

The response includes vague or inaccurate data to quantify the impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor selected.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 17 (17%)

The response describes the national healthcare issue/stressor selected and its impact on an organization that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.

The response includes vague and inaccurate data to quantify the impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor selected, or is missing.

·   Provide a brief summary of the two articles you reviewed from outside resources, on the national healthcare issue/stressor and explain how the healthcare issue/stressor is being addressed in other organizations.
Points Range: 27 (27%) – 30 (30%)

A complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of two outside resources reviewed on the national healthcare issue/stressor selected is provided. The response fully integrates at least 2 outside resources and 2 or 3 course-specific resources that fully support the summary provided.

The response accurately and thoroughly explains in detail how the healthcare issue/stressor is being addressed in other organizations.

Points Range: 24 (24%) – 26 (26%)

An accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource reviewed on the national healthcare issue/stressor selected is provided. The response integrates at least 1 outside resource and 2 or 3 course-specific resources that may support the summary provided.

The response explains how the healthcare issue/stressor is being addressed in other organizations.

Points Range: 21 (21%) – 23 (23%)

A vague or inaccurate summary of outside resources reviewed on the national healthcare issue/stressor selected is provided. The response minimally integrates resources that may support the summary provided.

The response explains how the healthcare issue/stressor is being addressed in other organizations that is vague or inaccurate.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 20 (20%)

A vague and inaccurate summary of no outside resources reviewed on the national healthcare issue/stressor selected is provided, or is missing.

The response fails to integrate any resources to support the summary provided.

·   Summarize the strategies used to address the organizational impact of national healthcare issues/stressors presented in the scholarly resources you selected and explain how they may impact your organization both positively and negatively. Be specific and provide examples.
Points Range: 27 (27%) – 30 (30%)

A complete, detailed, and accurate summary of the strategies used to address the organizational impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor is provided.

The response accurately and thoroughly explains in detail how the strategies may impact an organization both positively and negatively, with specific and accurate examples.

Points Range: 24 (24%) – 26 (26%)

An accurate summary of the strategies used to address the organizational impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor is provided.

The response explains how the strategies may impact an organization both positively and negatively. May include some specific examples.

Points Range: 21 (21%) – 23 (23%)

A vague or inaccurate summary of the strategies used to address the organizational impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor is provided.

The response explains how the strategies may impact an organization both positively and negatively that is vague or inaccurate. May include some vague or inaccurate examples.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 20 (20%)

A vague and inaccurate summary of the strategies used to address the organizational impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor is provided, or is missing.

The response explains how the strategies may impact an organization both positively and negatively that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. Does not include any examples.

Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:

Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.

Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.

Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.

No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.

Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:

Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA format with no errors.
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.
Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
Total Points: 100
Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.