NURS 6052 Week 9 Assignment: Recommending an EBP Change

Sample Answer for NURS 6052 Week 9 Assignment: Recommending an EBP Change Included After Question

The collection of evidence is an activity that occurs with an endgame in mind. For example, law enforcement professionals collect evidence to support a decision to charge those accused of criminal activity. Similarly, evidence-based healthcare practitioners collect evidence to support decisions in pursuit of specific healthcare outcomes.

In this Assignment, you will identify an issue or opportunity for change within your healthcare organization and propose an idea for a change in practice supported by an EBP approach.

To Prepare:

Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you critically appraised in Module 4.

Reflect on your current healthcare organization and think about potential opportunities for evidence-based change.

The Assignment: (Evidence-Based Project)

Part 5: Recommending an Evidence-Based Practice Change

Create an 8- to 9-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following:

Briefly describe your healthcare organization, including its culture and readiness for change. (You may opt to keep various elements of this anonymous, such as your company name.)

Describe the current problem or opportunity for change. Include in this description the circumstances surrounding the need for change, the scope of the issue, the stakeholders involved, and the risks associated with change implementation in general.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 6052 Week 9 Assignment: Recommending an EBP Change

Propose an evidence-based idea for a change in practice using an EBP approach to decision making. Note that you may find further research needs to be conducted if sufficient evidence is not discovered.

Describe your plan for knowledge transfer of this change, including knowledge creation, dissemination, and organizational adoption and implementation.

Describe the measurable outcomes you hope to achieve with the implementation of this evidence-based change.

Be sure to provide APA citations of the supporting evidence-based peer reviewed articles you selected to support your thinking.

Add a lessons learned section that includes the following:

A summary of the critical appraisal of the peer-reviewed articles you previously submitted

An explanation about what you learned from completing the evaluation table (1 slide)

An explanation about what you learned from completing the levels of evidence table (1 slide)

An explanation about what you learned from completing the outcomes synthesis table (1 slide)

A Sample Answer For the Assignment:  NURS 6052 Week 9 Assignment: Recommending an EBP Change

Title: NURS 6052 Week 9 Assignment: Recommending an EBP Change

Health care organizations should constantly evaluate their performance and intervene appropriately as situations necessitate. One of the highly recommended interventions is evidence-based practice change. Organizations adopt positive change based on current, relevant, and high-level evidence to solve clinical problems through such changes. The purpose of this presentation is to recommend an evidence-based practice change for addressing workplace incivility. It starts with an overview of the organization before describing the problem, the idea for change, and the plan for knowledge transfer. Other vital sections include an analysis of the measurable outcomes and lessons learned.

The success of an evidence-based change project depends on the organizational policies, attitude towards change, and culture, among other factors. The organization is primarily a general health care facility dealing with inpatient and outpatient services. It is highly centralized, with each department dealing with specific functions. Regarding culture, the organization is primarily an adhocracy. Lepore et al. (2018) defined an adhocracy as a culture where the management supports individual initiatives instead of prescribed rules. Readiness for change can be determined by assessing the organization’s approach to change. It is right to deduce that the organization is highly ready for change since it embraces change. Previous change-driven projects have been a massive success, and the management commits resources to support innovation.

The current problem is workplace incivility. According to Shi et al. (2018), workplace incivility includes rude and discourteous behavior towards colleagues. An uncivil workplace is detrimental to patient care and nurses’ productivity since it hampers workplace relationships and nurses’ wellbeing. It is a leading cause of discomfort and nurse turnover (Shi et al., 2018). Workplace incivility is among the issues that nurse leadership cannot ignore in health care settings. It adversely affects the nursing staff, patients due to low-quality care and the organization due to reduced performance. Stakeholders involved in change-facilitation and/or affected by the problem include the management as change promoters, patients, the nursing staff, nurse leaders, and human resources experts (for awareness programs). The most significant risks include a change in the workplace culture and resistance.

The evidence-based practice (EBP) approach recommends solving a clinical problem by integrating scientific evidence into clinical practice. As already mentioned, the problem of interest is workplace incivility. After generating evidence, it is crucial to appraise it to get the most relevant evidence for a clinical problem. Policy interventions and incivility awareness emerged as the most practical interventions for addressing workplace incivility. Such interventions include zero-tolerance policies, a culture of reporting, and education programs on workplace incivility. Cognitive rehearsal can also be integrated into the intervention programs to ensure that nurses are adequately prepared to identify and cope with workplace incivility. The objective is to reduce workplace incivility in the facility within six months.

EBP change projects would not be fruitful if the proposed changes are not implemented and knowledge shared. An effective way of knowledge creation is to continue searching and appraising evidence to ensure that changes are based on scientific evidence. Consultative forums and nursing education programs would also be effective in sharing knowledge and generating new ideas. The best way to adopt and implement changes is to share the EBP results with the management to facilitate appropriate practice changes. Dissemination is vital for ensuring that the EBP results reach a wider nursing audience. A policy brief and posting the results on the organization’s education would ensure that information reaches all the organization’s members. Other strategies can be chosen later to share knowledge externally.

The primary objective of the EBP change project is to reduce workplace incivility. It will lead to better health outcomes, achieved through EBP and shared decision-making (Hoffman et al., 2014). As a result, a combination of incivility awareness programs and policy interventions will promote a more civil workplace in six months. Shi et al. (2018) found workplace incivility a leading cause of anxiety and burnout. The proposed changes will address this problem and others stemming from workplace incivility, like reduced esteem and negative perception of the nursing profession. Reducing workplace incivility is also expected to improve the nurses’ wellbeing and confidence. Doing so will reduce medication errors and improve patient satisfaction since patients will be served better.

Research appraisal is a rigorous process which involves systematically evaluating research evidence to determine its relevance and value (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2018). After the appraisal, four articles were found relevant to workplace incivility prevention. Shi et al. (2018) recommended the importance of informed and resilient nurses to cope with workplace incivility. Armstrong (2018) recommended the need for improving nurses’ ability to recognize and manage workplace incivility, justifying awareness programs. also advised health care managers to improve nurses’ skills. The last article emphasized the need for awareness. According to Kile et al. (2019), awareness programs should be intensified in health care settings to reduce workplace incivility.

The evaluation analyzes articles about workplace incivility from multiple dimensions. It is tedious to analyze articles from multiple dimensions including research methodology, sample size, design, and outcomes. Also, research evidence should be sourced from credible sources with high-level evidence. Systematic reviews are highly reliable since they comprehensively select, analyze, and appraise evidence from multiple data sources. Also, reading the entire article can be time-consuming when searching for evidence. Therefore, it is crucial to rely on the abstract as the guide. Other vital observations include the importance of searching via keywords and in-depth understanding of research databases and the type of articles found in each.

It is crucial to conclude the presentation by summarizing the key findings. One of the major findings is that EBP change promotes positive change in health care by proposing evidence-based interventions for addressing clinical problems. Workplace incivility can be addressed using the same approach where research is sourced from current and relevant evidence. Suitable interventions for addressing workplace incivility include policy changes to promote a new workplace culture and increased awareness on workplace incivility to enable nurses identify and cope with the problem. It is also crucial to share EBP results with other health care providers and the larger nursing profession hence the need for dissemination.

Grading Rubric

Performance Category	100% or highest level of performance 100% 16 points	Very good or high level of performance 88% 14 points	Acceptable level of performance 81% 13 points	Inadequate demonstration of expectations 68% 11 points	Deficient level of performance 56% 9 points	Failing level of performance 55% or less 0 points
Total Points Possible= 50	16 Points	14 Points	13 Points	11 Points	9 Points	0 Points
Scholarliness Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics.	Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.	Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.	Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements: Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements: Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements: Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information
	16 Points	14 Points	13 Points	11 Points	9 Points	0 Points
Application of Course Knowledge Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations	Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.	Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.	Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements: Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from and scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements: Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements Applies principles, knowledge and information and scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
	10 Points	9 Points			6 Points	0 Points
Interactive Dialogue Initial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count) The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count) Responses are substantive and relate to the topic.	Demonstrated all of the following: Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words. The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each. Responses are substantive Responses are related to the topic of discussion.	Demonstrated 3 of the following: Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words. The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each. Responses are substantive Responses are related to the topic of discussion.			Demonstrated 2 of the following: Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words. The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each. Responses are substantive Responses are related to the topic of discussion.	Demonstrated 1 or less of the following: Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words. The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each. Responses are substantive Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
	8 Points	7 Points	6 Points	5 Points	4 Points	0 Points
Grammar, Syntax, APA Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing. The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error.	The following was present: 0-3 errors in APA format AND Responses have 0-3 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors AND Writing style is generally clear, focused on topic,and facilitates communication.	The following was present: 4-6 errors in APA format. AND/OR Responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors AND/OR Writing style is somewhat focused on topic.	The following was present: 7-9 errors in APA format. AND/OR Responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors AND/OR Writing style is slightly focused on topic making discussion difficult to understand.	The following was present: 10- 12 errors in APA format AND/OR Responses have 8-9 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors AND/OR Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.	The following was present: 13 – 15 errors in APA format AND/OR Responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors AND/OR Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand. AND/OR The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor.	The following was present: 16 to greater errors in APA format. AND/OR Responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. AND/OR Writing style does not facilitate communication
	0 Points Deducted					5 Points Lost
Participation Requirements	Demonstrated the following: Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days					Failed to demonstrate the following: Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days
	0 Points Lost					5 Points Lost
Due Date Requirements	Demonstrated all of the following: The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT. A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.					Demonstrates one or less of the following. The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT. A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.