Boost your Grades with us today!
Sample Answer for NURS 6052 Matrix Worksheet Template Included After Question
Is there a difference between “common practice” and “best practice”?
When you first went to work for your current organization, experienced colleagues may have shared with you details about processes and procedures. Perhaps you even attended an orientation session to brief you on these matters. As a “rookie,” you likely kept the nature of your questions to those with answers that would best help you perform your new role.
Over time and with experience, perhaps you recognized aspects of these processes and procedures that you wanted to question further. This is the realm of clinical inquiry.
Clinical inquiry is the practice of asking questions about clinical practice. To continuously improve patient care, all nurses should consistently use clinical inquiry to question why they are doing something the way they are doing it. Do they know why it is done this way, or is it just because we have always done it this way? Is it a common practice or a best practice?
In this Assignment, you will identify clinical areas of interest and inquiry and practice searching for research in support of maintaining or changing these practices. You will also analyze this research to compare research methodologies employed.
- Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry. Keep in mind that the clinical issue you identify for your research will stay the same for the entire course.
- Based on the clinical issue of interest and using keywords related to the clinical issue of interest, search at least four different databases in the Walden Library to identify at least four relevant peer-reviewed articles related to your clinical issue of interest. You should not be using systematic reviews for this assignment, select original research articles.
- Review the results of your peer-reviewed research and reflect on the process of using an unfiltered database to search for peer-reviewed research.
- Reflect on the types of research methodologies contained in the four relevant peer-reviewed articles you selected.
Part 1: Identifying Research Methodologies
After reading each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, use the Matrix Worksheet template to analyze the methodologies applied in each of the four peer-reviewed articles. Your analysis should include the following:
- The full citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format.
- A brief (1-paragraph) statement explaining why you chose this peer-reviewed article and/or how it relates to your clinical issue of interest, including a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest.
- A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the aims of the research of each peer-reviewed article.
- A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the research methodology used. Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed-methods approach. Be specific.
- A brief (1- to 2-paragraph) description of the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles you selected.
By Day 7 of Week 3
Submit your Evidence-Based Project.
Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:
- Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK3Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
- Click the Week 3 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
- Click the Week 3 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
- Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK3Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
- If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
- Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
- Due to the nature of this assignment, your instructor may require more than 5 days to provide you with quality feedback.
Use this document to complete Part 2 of the Module 2 Assessment, Evidence-Based Project, Part 1: An Introduction to Clinical Inquiry and Part 2: Research Methodologies
|Full citation of selected article
|Fasanya, B. K., & Dada, E. A. (2016). Workplace violence and safety issues in long-term medical
care facilities: nurses’ perspectives. Safety and Health at Work, 7(2), 97-101.
|Terry, D., Lê, Q., Nguyen, U., & Hoang, H. (2015). Workplace health and safety issues among
community nurses: a study regarding the impact on providing care to rural consumers. BMJ
|Uğurlu, Z., Karahan, A., Ünlü, H., Abbasoğlu, A., Özhan Elbaş, N., Avcı Işık, S., & Tepe, A.
(2015). The effects of workload and working conditions on operating room nurses and
technicians. Workplace Health & Safety, 63(9), 399-407.
|Walton, A. L., & Rogers, B. (2017). Workplace hazards faced by nursing assistants in the United
States: a focused literature review. International Journal of Environmental Research and
Public Health, 14(5), 544.
|Why you chose this article and/or how it relates to the clinical issue of interest (include a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest)
The main reason I chose this article “Workplace Violence and Safety Issues in Long-Term Care Facilities: Nurses’ Perspectives” by Fasanya and Dada (2016) was because it identifies factors contributing to workplace violence (WPV) in medical facilities. This article also emphasizes that more states are implementing the “stand your ground laws to promote worker protection” (Fansanya & Dada, 2016) in the United States (U.S.). This national concern reviews the increased incidences of WPV compared to studies conducted in 2011 (p.100). The history viewed in this article reveals how WPV impacts the quality of patient care.
|The article by Terry, Nguyen, and Hoang (2015) was chosen because it identifies various types of workplace health and safety issues affecting rural community nurses. Throughout this research, Terry, Nguyen, and Hoang (2015) emphasize various safety issues experienced by nurses that impact their ability to provide quality healthcare. This research also identifies some of the challenges nurses face in their workplace environment. Challenges such as poor patient homes, navigating animals in the workplace, and client smoking are just a few workplace safeties concerns. This article directly relates to the topic of workplace health and safety (WHS).
|The study conducted by Uğurlu et al. (2015) was selected because it provides pertinent information related to workplace safety and health issues that negatively impact the quality of care. Uğurlu et al. (2015) establish that nurses and medical technicians were exposed to various risks that affect their practice. Further, they emphasized on the lack of sufficient precautions taken by hospitals not to protect employees, hence placing all in danger.
|The article by Walton and Rogers (2017) was chosen because it broadly identifies and explains some workplace risks that nurses are exposed to daily. Further, it also describes several hazardous conditions that providers encounter. These conditions include infectious, chemical, and physical and psychosocial hazards.
|Brief description of the aims of the research of each peer-reviewed article
|The research aims to investigate the effects of workplace violence leading to patient safety concerns in a long-term facility, and individually assess various perspectives of nurses and CNA’s employed in these facilities. The hypothesis of this study demonstrated the relationship between violence and nurses, which contributes to a hazardous environment while they are performing their responsibilities (p.101).
|The primary aim of the research was to investigate the various types of WHS issues rural community nurses face and the impact these issues have on providing care for rural clients (p.1). Moreover, this study addresses several factors that include identifying WHS concerns that community nurses encounter. Emphasizing the impact WHS issues on nursing practice and delivery of care (p.2), and to recognize strategies, nurses develop to overcome WHS concerns in their practice (p.2) also forms part of the study.
|The primary purpose of the research conducted by Uğurlu et al. (2015) was to investigate the impacts of workload and workplace conditions on workers in the healthcare setting. The paper identifies some of the risks encountered by workers, including occupational illnesses and injuries, which result from an increase in workload. In addition, this study suggests how nurses and technicians contribute to identifying potential risks and suggest solutions to resolving issues in improving work situation.
|The aim of this research was to investigate the hazards encountered by nursing assistants in the healthcare organization. It did this by focusing on the effects of patient care caused by these hazardous conditions.
|Brief description of the research methodology used Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed-methods approach. Be specific.
The methodology involved the use of a quantitative approach in the form of yes/no option questionnaires. The questionnaires were geared toward nurses and CNA perspectives. The sample size included 80 male and female registered nurses and CNA’s. All participants were from the Piedmont Triad region of North Central Carolina. The partakers were divided into four age categories. Age Group 1 (18-25 years), Age Group 2 (26-35 years), Age Group 3 (36-45 years), and Age Group 4 (46 years and above). The data collected from this self-developed questionnaire included interview responses from nurses and CNA’s that were employed in long-term care facilities for eight years. Each facility was visited three times a day for one week. Once all the questionnaires were collected, the data gathered were analyzed using the 2010 MS Excel version. The analysis included both descriptive statistics concerning perspectives on safety, and inferential statistics analysis on participants’ exposure to WPV (p.102).
|The qualitative research methodology that Terry, Nguyen, and Hoang (2015) used was a narrative inquiry underpinned by a phenomenological approach. The 15 community nurse participants selected were subjected to a face-to-face and phone narrative inquiry approach. The subjective data was collected using semi structured interviews (p.3). Further, thematic analysis was used to analyze the interview data (p.3).
|In their study, Uğurlu et al. (2015) used a quantitative descriptive approach in the form of two questionnaires. The first questionnaire was geared towards the effects of working conditions. The second questionnaire was focused on Individuals Workload Perception scale. The scale included 11 items measuring time required for work performance, work intensity and individual’s perception of assignment. Each scale was scored on a Likert-type scale (1 = completely agreed, 5 = completely agree). The score was directly proportional to participants’ perceptions of workload.
|The research method used for this study was a qualitative literature review. Researchers employed a focused search strategy to analyze and collect the necessary data. This methodology allowed the researchers to use review various sources.
|A brief description of the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles you selected.
The strength of this research methodology was in the use of descriptive analysis. The most significant part of the data was the situational analysis of violence in the healthcare industry. The analysis demonstrated the statistical relationship of violence towards nurses and CNA’s, and the correlation of management involvement (p. 98). The findings of this study showed patients were the common perpetrators of WPV followed by co-workers (p. 101). This study was verified by the findings of other studies such as Kamchuchat, et al. (2008) and Pai and Lee (2008).
|The strength of the qualitative research used is that the participants were given a voice to “speak out” about their personal experience with WHS (p.1): Allowing nurses the opportunity to share their challenges and strategies to prevent WHS (p.3). The narrative questionnaire was explicitly geared towards WHS as opposed to the general workforce needs thus giving a more accurate result regarding WHS (p.3). For validity, the major themes were presented to study participants and asked for responses to the major idea.
|The quantitative descriptive approach that was adopted for this study has several strengths. One of the most fundamental strengths of the methodology is its relative ease of analysis. Moreover, the data acquired by the methodology can be reliable, precise and consistent. This influences the reliability and validity of the study.
|The primary strength of a focused search strategy is that it allows the researchers to provide consistent observation and acquisition of data that relate to the clinical issue under investigation. This interferes with the credibility of the findings. This expressive study focused on descriptive conditions of their work setting. In addition to the quantitative method, the use of analytical observations study which is a qualitative approach allowed the researchers to test the hypothesis describing hazards in the workplace. The questionnaire data collected from participants were statistically analyzed.
Based on the review of this article, the findings of the study revealed management shown little to no concern about the safety of medical staff from their attitudes towards WPV reports (p.99).
|Based on the review of this article, it is evident that a narrative inquiry is an appropriate research method in order for community nurses to voice WHS within their community.
|The article analyzes two pertinent issues related to workplace safety. The authors analyzed the workplace workload and conditions associated with the phenomenon. The role of nurses in the identification of the issue has also been analyzed by the article, which makes it pertinent to the issue.
|The article addresses the issue of workplace safety in one of the most important settings of nurses. The adoption of several articles to examine the workplace issues that nurses are exposed to was particularly important. The number of articles analyzed gives the study its validity.