NURS 6052 DISCUSSION PATIENT PREFERENCES AND DECISION MAKING

Sample Answer for NURS 6052 DISCUSSION PATIENT PREFERENCES AND DECISION MAKING Included After Question

Changes in culture and technology have resulted in patient populations that are often well informed and educated, even before consulting or considering a healthcare need delivered by a health professional. Fueled by this, health professionals are increasingly involving patients in treatment decisions. However, this often comes with challenges, as illnesses and treatments can become complex. 

What has your experience been with patient involvement in treatment or healthcare decisions? 

In this Discussion, you will share your experiences and consider the impact of patient involvement (or lack of involvement). You will also consider the use of a patient decision aid to inform best practices for patient care and healthcare decision making. 

NURS 6052 DISCUSSION PATIENT PREFERENCES AND DECISION MAKING
NURS 6052 DISCUSSION PATIENT PREFERENCES AND DECISION MAKING

RESOURCES 

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.  

WEEKLY RESOURCES 

To Prepare: 

  • Review the Resources and reflect on a time when you experienced a patient being brought into (or not being brought into) a decision regarding their treatment plan. 
  • Review the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute’s Decision Aids Inventory at https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/. 
  • Choose “For Specific Conditions,” then Browse an alphabetical listing of decision aids by health topic. 
  • NOTE: To ensure compliance with HIPAA rules, please DO NOT use the patient’s real name or any information that might identify the patient or organization/practice. 

BY DAY 3 OF WEEK 11 

Post a brief description of the situation you experienced and explain how incorporating or not incorporating patient preferences and values impacted the outcome of their treatment plan. Be specific and provide examples. Then, explain how including patient preferences and values might impact the trajectory of the situation and how these were reflected in the treatment plan. Finally, explain the value of the patient decision aid you selected and how it might contribute to effective decision making, both in general and in the experience you described. Describe how you might use this decision aid inventory in your professional practice or personal life. 

BY DAY 6 OF WEEK 11 

Respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days and offer alternative views on the impact of patient preferences on treatment plans or outcomes, or the potential impact of patient decision aids on situations like the one shared.  

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NURS 6052 DISCUSSION PATIENT PREFERENCES AND DECISION MAKING

Title: NURS 6052 DISCUSSION PATIENT PREFERENCES AND DECISION MAKING

 Patient engagement is an essential part of healthcare and a crucial component of safe and high-quality patient-centered care (World Health Organization, 2016). As nurses, we have to engage our patients in the decision-making processes. It allows us to make better-informed decisions about their care options. To facilitate patient engagement in their care, we have to understand their personal preferences and values. Patient preferences can be spiritual or religious values, cultural and social values, personal priorities, beliefs about health, and thoughts about what is important for their quality of life (Ginex, 2018). Since the patient population is diverse and everyone is different, it is significant for us to always assess our patients’ preferences and values before providing healthcare services. 

My Experience 

 I am currently working part-time in the aesthetic field and incorporating patients’ preferences and values are the key to successful results. Patient satisfaction with the result tends to be low when patients’ preferences and values are not considered during the procedures. When I first started to work in this field, I performed the procedures as I got trained. For instance, we have a non-invasive radiofrequency (RF) therapy called Thermage. When I got training on the Thermage procedure, the trainer only covered the patient’s face. After the training, I did several Thermage procedures, and I only covered the face. However, one of the patients said that she also did it on the neck in the previous Thermage procedure. I already used all the shots from the Thermage tip at the time she talked about it. As a result, I had to open up another Thermage tip and use some shots on her neck. From this experience, I learned that it is crucial to communicate with patients throughout the procedures. 

 After I learned about the importance of incorporating patients’ preferences and values, I always communicate with the patients all the time. For example, if the patient asks, I let patients put the numbing cream on for a longer period of time or use ice to ease the pain. For injection procedures, such as fillers and Sculptra, I always ask if they have specific concerns about their faces and bodies before starting the procedures. After assessing what they want, I help fix those concerns. Most patients are satisfied with the result when their preferences and values are incorporated into the procedures.  

Decision Aid Inventory 

 Patient decision aids are tools that assist health practitioners to involve patients in decision-making by providing patients necessary information about the care options and possible outcomes, clarifying personal preferences and values, and making clear decisions that need to be made (The Ottawa Hospital, n.d.). For example, I selected “A COVID-19 decision aid: How do I choose when to interact with people or take part in activities outside my home during the pandemic?” among the patient decision aids. It consists of a series of questions that are based on one’s interest and level of risk. Answering those questions step-by-step helps clarify the reasons for interacting or not interacting with other people or taking or doing or not doing activities outside. There are many patient decision aids that can be useful in my practice. I can provide patients with these patient decision aids so they can effectively make their decisions.  

References 

Ginex, P. (2018, March 22). Integrate evidence with clinical expertise and patient preferences and values. https://voice.ons.org/news-and-views/integrate-evidence-with-clinical-expertise-and-patient-preferences-and-values 

The Ottawa Hospital. (n.d.). Patient decision aids. https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/index.html 

World Health Organization. (2016). Patient engagement. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/252269/9789241511629-eng.pdf 

A Sample Answer 2 For the Assignment: NURS 6052 DISCUSSION PATIENT PREFERENCES AND DECISION MAKING

Title: NURS 6052 DISCUSSION PATIENT PREFERENCES AND DECISION MAKING

As a nurse that works in critical care, I have seen nurses that become patients, or family with a relative that is a nurse or health care worker. I had the pleasure of working with a patient that her husband was a paramedic. That patient came to the ER after experiencing large amounts of urine, dizziness, and feeling off. The patient has been receiving large amounts of steroids due to inflammation to her back. According to her husband which was a paramedic, she has been taking prednisone 80mg daily for the last 3 weeks. Which is a high dose for a young woman. upon checking her blood sugar, it was measured at 880. Immediately we speak to them about starting insulin drip and fluids to bring her blood sugar down slowly. Her husband refused, and stated if we give her insulin she will be always dependent on insulin. The patient agrees with her husband due to his background.  

The patient preference impaction on treatment 

As the patient is a certified nurse aid, and her husband is a paramedic they have been refusing insulin to lower her blood sugar and only allowed fluids, multiple doctors and nurses attempted to educate the patinet and her husband and gave the patient 3 hours of fluids to attempt to bring her sugar down, but it failed. her sugar only dropped few points and she became acidotic.  In that emergency situation, insulin drip was started and blood sugar started to come down.  

Patient decision may impact positively and negatively on their plan of care, proper education and research is needed before weighing in heavily on your plan of care. 

References 

  1. Fineout-Overholt, L. E. Long, & L. Gallagher-Ford. (2018). Making the case for evidence-based practice and cultivating a spirit of inquiry. In Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt (Eds.), Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice (4th ed., pp. 7–32). Wolters Kluwer.

The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. (2019). Patient decision aids. https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/ 

A Sample Answer 3 For the Assignment: NURS 6052 DISCUSSION PATIENT PREFERENCES AND DECISION MAKING

Title: NURS 6052 DISCUSSION PATIENT PREFERENCES AND DECISION MAKING

Introduction

This paper will provide examples of how incorporating or not incorporating patient preferences and values impact their outcomes. Then, we will explain how including patient preferences and values influence their health situation and are reflected in their plan of care. Finally, we will discuss decision aid support and its impact on patient decision-making and use in professional practice.

The situation related to patient preference and value impacts outcomes in the plan of care.

The National Kidney Foundation (2020) state that, in the United States, 37 million adults are estimated to have chronic kidney disease, and approximately 90 percent don’t know they have it. Risk factors associated with CKD are diabeteshigh blood pressureheart diseaseobesity, and family history. According to Hoffman et al. (2014), evidence-based medicine should begin and end with the patient. For example, when a patient transitions from chronic kidney disease (CKD) to end-stage renal disease (ESRD), the patient is faced with several treatment options that are critical to their survival. These treatments are necessary for the rest of their lives, so patients need to choose the most suitable treatment for them. According to Green et al. (2018) many patients are unprepared for kidney failure treatments—even when they have been under nephrology specialty care for years. Nephrologists are often unable to predict the timing of kidney failure. Sometimes patients with advanced kidney disease experience rapid decline in kidney function, which leaves little time for a nephrologist to help patients prepare in advance (p. 2).

With electronic health records (EHR) and analysis, algorithms predict CKD patient characteristics and laboratory measures. The nephrologist can recognize patient needs or prognosis of kidney transition based on age, gender, eGFR, urine albumin, creatine ration, calcium, phosphorus, albumin, and bicarbonate focus, providing patients with the knowledge, skills, and support in shared decision making (p. 5). Kon et. (2016) note three elements of a shared decision-making (SDM) approach include information exchange, deliberation, and making a treatment decision addressing the patient preference, values, and goals of care (p. 1334). The impact in outcomes is that patients and families who are educated, informed, and supported throughout their diagnosis can better participate in SDM, accommodating their medical needs and preferences, leading to more satisfying outcomes and relationships.

Patient preferences and values

Evidence-based practice requires a patient-centered approach when it comes to decision-making. The Institute of Healthcare Improvement (IHI, 2013) describes “patient-centered” as placing an international focus on patients’ cultural traditions, values, personal preferences, family issues, social circumstances, and lifestyle. This approach leads to better patient engagement and outcomes (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2019, p.227). The evaluation of factors related to home and family life can make or break a successful care plan; for example, a young family of four with two children under the age of four recently found out that the husband/father needed to start dialysis therapy. This family has already been dealing with financial hardship, unstable marital concerns, and the responsibility of raising two small children.

The husband reports a lack of support once starting treatment from his wife, who feels burdened and unappreciated. He is afraid of losing her and his children and feels burdened with guilt and worry. The family needs a transdisciplinary care plan that focuses on the patient’s best options for treatment (given his current circumstances), including transplant and home therapies. This care plan would include counseling support to help save their marriage and adjust to this new chronic health diagnosis, care management to help provide support, financial guidance and options, and dietician to ensure the patient has the knowledge needed to optimize his therapy. William Osle’s quote, “It is much more important to know what sort of a patient has a disease than what sort of disease a patient has (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2019, p. 229) embodies the reason why patient preferences and values determine clinical decisions and outcomes.

Decision-Aid Support and Impact on Decision-Making

Decision aids are a valuable tool in helping patients make the right decisions based on their values and needs. The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (2019) provides an A-Z inventory of decision aids. For example, when searching the term, “Kidney”: multiple decision aid tools populate to relating to chronic kidney disease, end of life issues, and kidney failure to include dialysis choice, dialysis; doing the right choice, My life, My dialysis choice, advanced care planning: should I stop kidney dialysis, Kidney Failure: Should I start dialysis? This tool provides patients with treatment options, pathways, and outcomes. Clinicians use it to support patient preference and guide patient and provider decision-making (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2019, p. 228). In the example of the kidney patient who has multiple barriers to achieving optimal care, this information would have provided him with the options needed before starting dialysis. It would give a platform of shared decision between himself, his wife, and his provider. Clinicians should use decision aids in their daily practice with patients newly diagnosed or with patients who are not managing their diagnosis well. These aids will support active engagement by the patient and lead to both an improved patient and provider experience and outcomes.

References

Green, J. A., Ephraim, P. L., Hill-Briggs, F. F., Browne, T., Strigo, T. S., Hauer, C. L., Stametz,

  1. A., Darer, J. D., Patel, U. D., Lang-Lindsey, K., Bankes, B. L., Bolden, S. A., Danielson, P., Ruff, S., Schmidt, L., Swoboda, A., Woods, P., Vinson, B., Littlewood, D., Jackson, G., … Boulware, L. E. (2018). Putting patients at the center of kidney care transitions: PREPARE NOW, a cluster randomized controlled trial. Contemporary clinical trials73, 98–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2018.09.004

Hoffmann, T.C., Montori, V.M., & Del Mar, C. (2014) The connection between evidence-based

medicine and shared decision making. Journal of the American Medical Association, 312 (13), 1295-1296. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.10186

Kon, A.A., Davidson, J.E., Morrison, W., Danis, M., & White, D.B. (2016). Shared decision-

making in intensive care units: Executive summary of the American College of Critical Care Medicine and American Thoracic Society policy statement. Critical Care Medicine, 44(1), 188-201. Doi:10.1097/NND.0000000000000483

National Kidney Foundation. (2020) NKF statement on the ESRD treatment choices model

(ETC) and policies to improve kidney patient choice: Kidney disease facts. https://www.kidney.org/news/nkf-statement-esrd-treatment-choices-model-etc-and-policies-to-improve-kidney-patient-choice

The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. (2019). Patient decision aids. Retrieved from

https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/

Rubric 

NURS_6052_Module06_Week11_Discussion_Rubric 
Criteria  Ratings  Pts 
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMain Posting 
50 to >44.0 pts 

Excellent 

Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. … Supported by at least three current, credible sources. … Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. 

44 to >39.0 pts 

Good 

Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. … At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. … Supported by at least three credible sources. … Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. 

39 to >34.0 pts 

Fair 

Responds to some of the discussion question(s). … One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. … Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. … Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. … Post is cited with two credible sources. … Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. … Contains some APA formatting errors. 

34 to >0 pts 

Poor 

Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately. … Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. … Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. … Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. … Contains only one or no credible sources. … Not written clearly or concisely. … Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. … Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. 

 

50 pts 
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMain Post: Timeliness 
10 to >0.0 pts 

Excellent 

Posts main post by day 3. 

0 pts 

Poor 

Does not post by day 3. 

 

10 pts 
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFirst Response 
18 to >16.0 pts 

Excellent 

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. … Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. … Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. … Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. … Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. … Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. … Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. 

16 to >14.0 pts 

Good 

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. … Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. … Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. … Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. … Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. 

14 to >12.0 pts 

Fair 

Response is on topic and may have some depth. … Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. … Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. … Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. 

12 to >0 pts 

Poor 

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. … Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. … Responses to faculty questions are missing. … No credible sources are cited. 

 

18 pts 
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSecond Response 
17 to >15.0 pts 

Excellent 

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. … Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. … Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. … Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. … Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. … Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. … Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. 

15 to >13.0 pts 

Good 

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. … Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. … Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. … Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. … Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. 

13 to >11.0 pts 

Fair 

Response is on topic and may have some depth. … Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. … Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. … Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. 

11 to >0 pts 

Poor 

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. … Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. … Responses to faculty questions are missing. … No credible sources are cited. 

 

17 pts