NURS 6052 Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template Essay

Sample Answer for NURS 6052 Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template Essay Included After Question

Realtors rely on detailed property appraisals—conducted using appraisal tools—to assign market values to houses and other properties. These values are then presented to buyers and sellers to set prices and initiate offers. 

Research appraisal is not that different. The critical appraisal process utilizes formal appraisal tools to assess the results of research to determine value to the context at hand. Evidence-based practitioners often present these findings to make the case for specific courses of action. 

In this Assignment, you will use an appraisal tool to conduct a critical appraisal of published research. You will then present the results of your efforts. 

NURS 6052 Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template Essay
NURS 6052 Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template Essay

To Prepare: 

  • Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you selected in Module 2 and the four systematic reviews (or other filtered high- level evidence) you selected in Module 3. 
  • Reflect on the four peer-reviewed articles you selected in Module 2 and analyzed in Module 3. 
  • Review and download the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template provided in the Resources. 

The Assignment (Evidence-Based Project) 

Part 3A: Critical Appraisal of Research 

Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected by completing the Evaluation Table within the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template. Choose a total of four peer- reviewed articles that you selected related to your clinical topic of interest in Module 2 and Module 3. 

Note: You can choose any combination of articles from Modules 2 and 3 for your Critical Appraisal. For example, you may choose two unfiltered research articles from Module 2 and two filtered research articles (systematic reviews) from Module 3 or one article from Module 2 and three articles from Module 3. You can choose any combination of articles from the prior Module Assignments as long as both modules and types of studies are represented. 

Part 3B: Critical Appraisal of Research 

Based on your appraisal, in a 1-2-page critical appraisal, suggest a best practice that emerges from the research you reviewed. Briefly explain the best practice, justifying your proposal with APA citations of the research. 

By Day 7 of Week 7 

Submit Part 3A and 3B of your Evidence-Based Project. 

Submission and Grading Information 

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following: 

  • Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK7Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name. 
  • Click the Week 7 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment. 
  • Click the Week 7 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area. 
  • Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK7Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open. 
  • If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database. 
  • Click on the Submit button to complete your submission. 

Grading Criteria 

 

To access your rubric: 

Week 7 Assignment Rubric 

 

Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity 

 

To check your Assignment Draft for Authenticity 

Submit your Week 7 Assignment Draft and review the originality report 

 

Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 7 

 

To participate in this Assignment: 

Week 7 Assignment 

 

Next Module 

 

To go to the next module: 

Module 5 

Module 4: Critical Appraisal, Evaluation/Summary, and Synthesis of Evidence (Weeks 6-7) 

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Critical Appraisal [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author. 

Due By  Assignment 
Week 6, Days 1-4  Read the Learning Resources.
Begin to compose Part A of your Assignment.. 
Week 6, Days 5-7   Continue to compose Part B of your Assignment.
Begin to compose Part B of your Assignment. 
Week 7, Days 1-6  Continue to compose Part A and B of your Assignment. 
Week 7, Day 7  Deadline to submit Part A and B of your Assignment. 

Learning Objectives 

Students will: 

  • Evaluate peer-reviewed articles using critical appraisal tools 
  • Analyze best practices based on critical appraisal of evidence-based research 

 

Learning Resources 

Note: To access this module’s required library resources, please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the Course Materials section of your Syllabus. 

Required Readings 

Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2018). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer. 

  • Chapter 5, “Critically Appraising Quantitative Evidence for Clinical Decision Making” (pp. 124–188) 
  • Chapter 6, “Critically Appraising Qualitative Evidence for Clinical Decision Making” (pp. 189–218) 

Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B. M., Stillwell, S. B., & Williamson, K. M. (2010a). Evidence-based practice step by step: Critical appraisal of the evidence: Part I. American Journal of Nursing, 110(7), 47–52. doi:10.1097/01.NAJ.0000383935.22721.9c 

Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases. 

Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B. M., Stillwell, S. B., & Williamson, K. M. (2010b). Evidence-based practice, step by step: Critical appraisal of the evidence: Part II: Digging deeper—examining the “keeper” studies. American Journal of Nursing, 110(9), 41–48. doi:10.1097/01.NAJ.0000388264.49427.f9 

Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases. 

Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B. M., Stillwell, S. B., & Williamson, K. M. (2010c). Evidence-based practice, step by step: Critical appraisal of the evidence: Part III: The process of synthesis: Seeing similarities and differences across the body of evidence. American Journal of Nursing, 110(11), 43–51. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000390523.99066.b5 

Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases. 

Williamson, K. M. (2009). Evidence-based practice: Critical appraisal of qualitative evidence. Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association, 15(3), 202–207. doi:10.1177/1078390309338733 

Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases. 

 

Document: Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template (Word document) 

 

Required Media 

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Appraising the Research [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author. 

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Interpreting Statistics [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author. 

 

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Review of research: Hierarchy of evidence pyramid [Mutlimedia file]. Baltimore, MD: Author. 

 

Schulich Library McGill. (2017, June 6). Types of reviews [Video file]. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/5Rv9z7Mp4kg 

Rubric Detail  

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.  

Content 

NURS 6052 Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template Essay Rubric 

  Excellent   Good   Fair   Poor  
Part 3A: Critical Appraisal of Research Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected and analyzed by completing the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template. Be sure to include: · An Evaluation Table   Points Range: 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)  

The critical appraisal accurately and clearly provides a detailed evaluation table. The responses provide a detailed, specific, and accurate evaluation of each of the peer-reviewed articles selected. 

Points Range: 40 (40%) – 44 (44%)  

The critical appraisal accurately provides an evaluation table. The responses provide an accurate evaluation of each of the peer-reviewed articles selected with some specificity. 

Points Range: 35 (35%) – 39 (39%)  

The critical appraisal provides an evaluation table that is inaccurate or vague. The responses provide an inaccurate or vague evaluation of each of the peer-reviewed articles selected. 

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 34 (34%)  

The critical appraisal provides an evaluation table that is inaccurate and vague or is missing. 

Part 3B: Evidence-Based Best Practices Based on your appraisal, suggest a best practice that emerges from the research you reviewed. Briefly explain the best practice, justifying your proposal with APA citations of the research.   Points Range: 32 (32%) – 35 (35%)  

The responses accurately and clearly suggest a detailed best practice that is fully aligned to the research reviewed.

The responses accurately and clearly explain in detail the best practice, with sufficient justification of why this represents a best practice in the field. The responses provide a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of two outside resources reviewed on the best practice explained. The response fully integrates at least two outside resources and two or three course-specific resources that fully support the responses provided.

Accurate, complete, and full APA citations are provided for the research reviewed. 

Points Range: 28 (28%) – 31 (31%)  

The responses accurately suggest a best practice that is adequately aligned to the research reviewed.

The responses accurately explain the best practice, with adequately justification of why this represents a best practice in the field. The responses provide an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource reviewed on the best practice explained. The response integrates at least one outside resource and two or three course-specific resources that may support the responses provided.

Accurate and complete APA citations are provided for the research reviewed. 

Points Range: 25 (25%) – 27 (27%)  

The responses inaccurately or vaguely suggest a best practice that may be aligned to the research reviewed.

The responses inaccurately or vaguely explain the best practice, with inaccurate or vague justification for why this represents a best practice in the field. The responses provide a vague or inaccurate synthesis of outside resources reviewed on the best practice explained. The response minimally integrates resources that may support the responses provided.

Inaccurate and incomplete APA citations are provided for the research reviewed. 

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 24 (24%)  

The responses inaccurately and vaguely suggest a best practice that may be aligned to the research reviewed or are missing.

The responses inaccurately and vaguely explain the best practice, with inaccurate and vague justification for why this represents a best practice in the field, or are missing. A vague and inaccurate synthesis of no outside resources reviewed on the best practice explained is provided or is missing. The response fails to integrate any resources to support the responses provided.

Inaccurate and incomplete APA citations are provided for the research reviewed or is missing. 

Written Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization:

Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.  

Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)  

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria. 

Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)  

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated yet is brief and not descriptive. 

Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)  

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60–79% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic. 

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)  

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time.

No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. 

Written Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards:

Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.  

Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)  

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. 

Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)  

Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 

Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)  

Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. 

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)  

Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. 

Written Expression and Formatting—The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.   Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)  

Uses correct APA format with no errors. 

Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)  

Contains a few (one or two) APA format errors. 

Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)  

Contains several (three or four) APA format errors. 

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)  

Contains many (five or more) APA format errors. 

Total Points: 100  

Name: NURS_6052_Module04_Week07_Assignment_Rubric 

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NURS 6052 Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template Essay

Title: NURS 6052 Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template Essay

 

Evidence-Based Project, Part 4A: Critical 

Introduction 

A critical appraisal assists in reducing the research burden by enabling a researcher to identify and focus more on relevant articles to their research question. The research can either provide support or disapprove the claims made by the researcher through the utilization of quality, and evidence-based practice interventions. The selected topic for the research study is use of resilience training to redice the problem of nurse burnout among nurses in different care settings. Nurse burnout remains a critical problem that impacts the quality of care and patient outcomes in different care setting. Resilience training allows nurses to develop and use evidence-based interventions to reduce burnout and enhance their overall performance and improve the quality of care.  

Evidence-based practice (EBP) incorporates best practices from studies and patient care information with clinician experience and patient preferences leading to the delivery of highest quality of care, and improving patient outcomes. The use of EBP requires care providers to formulate a clinical question of interest. In this case, the PICOT question is: Among nurses with burnout (P), does resilience training (I) compared to no intervention (C) reduce burnout(O) in six months (T)? The purpose of this assignment is to appraises critically peer-reviewed article for evidence to support resilience training among nurses with burnout to reduce its prevalence. 

 

 

 

Full APA formatted  Article #1  Article #2  Article #3  Article #4 
citation of selected article  Wang, Q. Q., Lv, W. J., Qian, R. L., & Zhang, Y. H. (2019). Job burnout and quality of working life among Chinese nurses: A cross‐sectional study. Journal of Nursing Management, 27(8), 1835-1844. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12884  Yu, F., Raphael, D., Mackay, L., Smith, M., & King, A. (2019). Personal and work-related factors associated with nurse resilience: A systematic review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 93, 129-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.02.014  Brook, J., Aitken, L. M., MacLaren, J. A., & Salmon, D. (2021). An intervention to decrease burnout and increase retention of early career nurses: A mixed methods study of acceptability and feasibility. BMC Nursing, 20(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-020-00524-9  Deldar, K., Froutan, R., Dalvand, S., Gheshlagh, R. G., & Mazloum, S. R. (2018). The Relationship between Resiliency and Burnout in Iranian Nurses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Open access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences, 6(11), 2250–2256. https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2018.428