NURS 6051 Week 9 Discussion Developing a Culture of Evidence-Based Practice

Sample Answer for NURS 6051 Week 9 Discussion Developing a Culture of Evidence-Based Practice Included After Question

As your EBP skills grow, you may be called upon to share your expertise with others. While EBP practice is often conducted with unique outcomes in mind, EBP practitioners who share their results can both add to the general body of knowledge and serve as an advocate for the application of EBP.

In this Discussion, you will explore strategies for disseminating EBP within your organization, community, or industry. 

To Prepare:

Review the Resources and reflect on the various strategies presented throughout the course that may be helpful in disseminating effective and widely cited EBP.

This may include: unit-level or organizational-level presentations, poster presentations, and podium presentations at organizational, local, regional, state, and national levels, as well as publication in peer-reviewed journals.

Reflect on which type of dissemination strategy you might use to communicate EBP.

By Day 3 of Week 9

Post at least two dissemination strategies you would be most inclined to use and explain why. Explain which dissemination strategies you would be least inclined to use and explain why. Identify at least two barriers you might encounter when using the dissemination strategies you are most inclined to use. Be specific and provide examples. Explain how you might overcome the barriers you identified.

By Day 6 of Week 9

Respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days by offering additional ideas to overcome the barriers to strategies suggested by your colleagues and/or by offering additional ideas to facilitate dissemination.

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NURS 6051 Week 9 Discussion Developing a Culture of Evidence-Based Practice

Title: NURS 6051 Week 9 Discussion Developing a Culture of Evidence-Based Practice

Additional strategies to overcome the barriers and facilitate the dissemination of your nurse-led initiative at both the unit and nursing practice levels, you can consider promoting the poster fair’s benefits and collaborating with IT.

Promoting the benefits of participating in the nursing research poster fair is essential to encourage nursing staff’s active engagement. By highlighting the opportunity for professional development, you can stress that involvement in the fair offers a platform for staff to enhance their skills, gain exposure to innovative practices, and broaden their knowledge base, ultimately improving their career prospects (Mulkey, 2021). Emphasizing the fair as a forum for knowledge sharing underscores its potential to foster a culture of collaboration and learning, enabling staff to exchange insights and best practices with their peers. In collaboration with your nurse administrator, showcasing the fair’s potential to enhance unit performance and the organization as a whole is crucial. By conveying these advantages, you can motivate nursing staff to actively participate and gain support from key stakeholders, further facilitating the dissemination of your nurse-led initiative.

Secondly, collaborating with the IT department is crucial for overcoming the challenges related to electronic medical records. Begin by proactively engaging with the IT team to gain a comprehensive understanding of their current constraints, priorities, and the intricacies of the existing systems. By establishing this open line of communication, you can work together to prioritize your nurse-led initiative’s specific needs, demonstrating a commitment to mutual success (Kruse & Beane, 2018). In the face of a backlog, consider seeking interim solutions that leverage readily available technology within the Microsoft Teams platform. This cooperative approach not only accelerates the implementation process but also fosters a sense of shared responsibility, ultimately increasing the likelihood of success for your initiative while respecting IT’s operational requirements and constraints (Kruse & Beane, 2018).

By implementing these additional strategies, you can enhance the success of your nurse-led initiative, improve collaboration, and ensure that your ideas have a broader impact both within your unit and across the organization (Ashcraft et al., 2020). Over time, as your education and experience progress, you’ll be better equipped to participate in larger-scale policy changes and projects.

References

Ashcraft, L. E., Quinn, D. A., & Brownson, R. C. (2020). Strategies for effective dissemination of research to United States Policymakers: A systematic review. Implementation Science, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-020-01046-3

Kruse, C. S., & Beane, A. (2018). Health Information Technology continues to show positive effect on medical outcomes: Systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.8793

Mulkey, M. A. (2021). Engaging bedside nurse in research and Quality Improvement. Journal for Nurses in Professional Development, 37(3), 138–142. https://doi.org/10.1097/nnd.0000000000000732

A Sample Answer 2 For the Assignment: NURS 6051 Week 9 Discussion Developing a Culture of Evidence-Based Practice

Title: NURS 6051 Week 9 Discussion Developing a Culture of Evidence-Based Practice

The distribution tactics you choose, such as unit-level and nursing practice-level dissemination, are admirable choices that demonstrate great awareness of the subtleties inside your business. By focusing on the unit level, you may address individual difficulties and create trust among stakeholders, both of which are critical for effective implementation (Gallagher-Ford et al., 2011). Using your experience inside the unit provides a practical awareness of the unit’s particular patient needs, allowing you to articulate the initiative’s advantages to the multidisciplinary team successfully. Overcoming stakeholder buy-in and technology support hurdles through collaborative partnerships and the exploration of alternative technical solutions demonstrates adaptability and ingenuity in the face of adversity.

Your choice to have a nursing research poster fair inside the company is a great way to spread the word about your effort and encourage future creativity among nursing staff (Melnyk et al., 2011). Your comprehension of the practical limits, such as acquiring permission and handling workforce shortages, displays your forethought. Your recommended tactics for collaborating with the nurse manager and ensuring enough patient care coverage indicate your proactive approach to effectively resolving possible problems. Your careful approach to a department or hospital-wide policy changes demonstrates a judicious appreciation of the complexities inherent in such projects, demonstrating self-awareness and a commitment to continual learning and improvement. Your eagerness to learn from the present project and apply what you have learned to future projects demonstrates your commitment to professional growth and the advancement of healthcare practices within your business.

References

Gallagher-Ford, L., Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B. M., & Stillwell, S. B. (2011). Evidence-based practice, step by step: implementing an evidence-based practice change. AJN The American Journal of Nursing, 111(3), 54-60.

Melnyk, B. M., Fineout-Overholt, E., Gallagher-Ford, L., & Stillwell, S. B. (2011). Evidence-based practice, step by step: sustaining evidence-based practice through organizational policies and an innovative model. AJN The American Journal of Nursing, 111(9), 57-60.

Discussion_Rubric

[Control]

		Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor
Main Posting		45 (45%) - 50 (50%) Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.   Supported by at least three current, credible sources.   Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.	40 (40%) - 44 (44%) Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.   At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.   Supported by at least three credible sources.   Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.	35 (35%) - 39 (39%) Responds to some of the discussion question(s).   One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.   Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.   Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.   Post is cited with two credible sources.   Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.   Contains some APA formatting errors.	0 (0%) - 34 (34%) Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.   Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.   Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.   Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.   Contains only one or no credible sources.   Not written clearly or concisely.   Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.   Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.
Main Post: Timeliness		10 (10%) - 10 (10%) Posts main post by day 3.	0 (0%) - 0 (0%)	0 (0%) - 0 (0%)	0 (0%) - 0 (0%) Does not post by day 3.
First Response		17 (17%) - 18 (18%) Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.   Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.   Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.   Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.   Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.   Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.   Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.	15 (15%) - 16 (16%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.   Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.   Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.   Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.   Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.	13 (13%) - 14 (14%) Response is on topic and may have some depth.   Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.   Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.   Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.	0 (0%) - 12 (12%) Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.   Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.   Responses to faculty questions are missing.   No credible sources are cited.
Second Response		16 (16%) - 17 (17%) Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.   Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.   Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.   Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.   Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.   Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.   Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.	14 (14%) - 15 (15%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.   Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.   Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.   Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.   Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.	12 (12%) - 13 (13%) Response is on topic and may have some depth.   Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.   Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.   Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.	0 (0%) - 11 (11%) Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.   Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.   Responses to faculty questions are missing.   No credible sources are cited.
Participation		5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.	0 (0%) - 0 (0%)	0 (0%) - 0 (0%)	0 (0%) - 0 (0%) Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.
	Total Points: 100

Name: NURS_6052_Module05_Week09_Discussion_Rubric